Talk:Eiffel Tower

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eiffel Tower article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 90 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Eiffel Tower was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 1, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

France: Paris Top‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 12 dates. [show]

March 31, 2004, March 31, 2005, March 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, March 31, 2008, March 31, 2010, March 31, 2012, March 31, 2013, March 31, 2015, March 31, 2017, March 31, 2019, and March 31, 2021

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

March 29 to April 4, 2015 (21st)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

“There was multiple protests...” Should read “There were...” 2001:5B0:2711:7498:E454:44EF:2494:9F37 (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Liu1126 (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steps

The official website has 1,665. 327 + 347 + (991) = 1,665.

It says 1,802 when opened. 360 + 380 + 1,062 = 1,802. Implies only one change: in 1983. https://www.toureiffel.paris/en/news/visit/take-stairs-and-discover-eiffel-tower-new-way

Many sites say it opened with 1,710.

No site (that I could find) reliably cites 1,792.

One with 1,792, has a typo (in a different spot: 564, should be 364). It says changes were made in 1900. https://www.wonders-of-the-world.net/Eiffel-Tower/Renovations-of-the-Eiffel-tower.php

No site (that I could find) could tell me when the third level stairs were closed to the public. But 1900 seems likely.

Note: there are 3 posts in Archives asking about Steps.

MBG02 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The last paragraph in the history, origin section should be removed, it has its place in specific articles, but not in the history section of the article about the Eiffel Tower. The article that this section sources uses the Eiffel Tower as a symbol, but its link with colonisation in Haiti is far-fetched. Aurci (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. I think the paragraph provides valuable context, and this is not a minor change to the article. As such, consensus needs to be developed here first before using the edit request template. PianoDan (talk) 17:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You and I know that that kind of opinion article from the New York Times is biased towards a certain view of things.. The context you are talking about is completely invented by the author to push a political narrative, that kind of opinion should not be in the history section of a Wikipedia page. It gives the impression that the Eiffel Tower was funded by Haiti which any historian would say is complete nonsense Aurci (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rust and current condition

I have one photograph of rust to contribute, and basing this on articles: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/04/eiffel-tower-riddled-with-rust-and-in-need-of-repair-leaked-reports-say tells the eiffel tower needs urgent repairs, citing a report of 884 faults. Unfortunately me, even being a member of the German wikipedia branch for more than 20 years with various (mostly small edits), cannot edit the article here. Matzee (talk) 13:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Building chronological question

Hello, since I have not entered it, I don't know the origin. There are, amongst others, two photos of the building fase. The building dates of the first platform and onto the second seem to be reversed. As I read it as it is, they started with the second stage 5 days before they completed the first platform. Bastiaan van der Kraan (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]