User talk:10metreh

Nice work!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You've beat me to reverting vandalism three times so far this afternoon; keep up the good work! Sophus Bie (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! 10metreh (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Lady Gaga awards

Lady Gaga won 290 awards, it was confirmed by the Haus of Gaga, more specifically Stefani Germanotta (Lady Gaga) on her Born This Way Ball concert in January 2013 in the backstage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gagawarhol (talk • contribs) 18:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

That figure, even if you are telling the truth, is probably unreliable; also, this is March so it could be out of date. Please provide a reliable source for your figures. 10metreh (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Mobitel (Sri Lanka)

Please don't add back unsourced controversial claims, thanks Widefox; talk 00:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry; as I know absolutely nothing about the subject in question I had no idea whether the claims in that section were controversial. Since there was no edit summary, I reverted the deletion as unexplained removal of content. 10metreh (talk) 08:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I do take your point that edit summaries on section blanks help, but no edit summary isn't enough to revert (per se), especially controversial claims and anyhow...WP:RV "revert a good faith edit only after careful consideration" Widefox; talk 11:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I had just seen the same user remove a different section from the article. I was beaten to reverting that edit, but when he removed a different section with his next edit I probably thought he was (as vandals often do) randomly removing content from the article; thus I didn't regard the edits as "good faith". Now I realise that he may have accidentally removed the wrong section at first (a scenario which I had never imagined before). Sorry again. 10metreh (talk) 20:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

vandalism

it's not vandalism, it's removing an unnessecary waste of space. - 83.100.233.169 (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. Hadn't seen quite how long the list was. 10metreh (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

carbon capture and storage

	environment protection
	how does ccs technique work to control CO2 radiation Deepakkumarpooja.kumar3 (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Why exactly are you asking me this? 10metreh (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, TRIDINDIA, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 12:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I think i just ran into the tenth situation where i wanted to revert some vandalism, only to find out you already took care of it. Keep up the excellent work! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! 10metreh (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Block this IP

This IP is used for a public school. Block to refrain from student vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.26.44.100 (talk) 13:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I presume you are a member of staff. I am not an administrator so I can't block IPs myself, but I can request a block and will do so. 10metreh (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

MUESLI

its true it was originally made with lemon juice

Please could you find a reliable source for that information? 10metreh (talk) 11:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

http://www.lifestylefood.com.au/recipes/244/bircher-muesli 2 juice of lemon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.171.249.108 (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

OK, changed it; I thought it was wrong because the first time you made some other changes (what is a "chair spoon"?) 10metreh (talk) 11:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for your anti-vandalism work. Have a tea on me. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! *sips tea* 10metreh (talk) 12:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about my post on the Trumpet page

You sent me a message- sorry about the vandalism. I had some friends on my computer who thought it would be fun to change a whole load of Wikipedia article...Good thing I caught them or they could have done worse.

Thanks for you message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.244.115 (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Damn you...you beat me to reverting Gobongsamuraibongwarrior's vandalism edits so many times today. I have no choice, but I just have to give you wikilove. Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 16:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Damn you...you beat me to reverting Gobongsamuraibongwarrior's vandalism edits so many times today. I have no choice, but I just have to give you wikilove. Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 16:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for both beers! *sips* 10metreh (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Haha, actually it was an error, but never mind. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 05:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You fought hard against Freechemistrytextbook, and won. This Barnstar is to commemorate this battle. Cheers! Kevin12xd (contribs) 16:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! That was the second time today that someone has repeatedly removed themselves from AIV; the other (see above) was also removing speedy deletion templates from his pages so I've had a busy day. 10metreh (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Godzilla

The recent attempts to revert Godzilla are constructive, NOT vandalism. Someone recently dropped in a bunch of bloated, in-universe fancruft, removing citations in the process. Check the reverted versions of the page; it actually contains citations and is written in compliance with the rules on how to write wikipedia articles about fictional characters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.144.216 (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. So much "content" was removed that it looked like vandalism. Sorry about that. 10metreh (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Ball-lightning

i was simply relating what i and a fiend saw. Then i found a photo of a Ball Plasmoid by Jean-Louis Navadin on-line that looks just like the Balls i observed and went back to Wico to add EDIT Navadin in my post thingy. Being THE 1st TIME i EVER put something on Wico, i may have done something wrong. But why would you delete it? Do you enjoy making me type it out again? Don't worry, i won't. It's people like you with to much time on there hands that make it harder on the rest of us. Whatever — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.160.210.17 (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your own (informally written) comments on your own (possibly made-up) unreliably sourced experiences are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. 10metreh (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You battled Mrpointoview and won. A barnstar for you. Potnpan123 (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

You shouldn't replace PRODs

Hi. With this edit you replaced a PROD template that the article author had just removed. Per WP:Proposed deletion anyone, including the author, is allowed to remove a PROD, for any reason or none, and once removed it may not be replaced. The idea is that PROD is intended to save work at AfD by allowing uncontroversial deletions without discussion, but once deletion has been objected to it is no longer uncontroversial, and so an AfD is necessary. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

China Burma India Theater

Hi, I got your message that you said I had done nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia in this Article . But actually i never did any edits and i don't know how my IP got traced in this. Thanks for refining. 27.34.84.170 (talk) 08:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Paarijatham

Hi, just letting you know the above article has been prodded, not by me, as the prodder didn't inform youAtlantic306 (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Stop the harassment

WP:OWNTALK : "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. ... The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and unregistered users." 32.218.34.133 (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, should have checked your edit - it was perfectly legitimate, though it would have been a good idea to comment on Dcirovic's talk page before removing the warning as vandals often remove warnings. 10metreh (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 10metreh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Racism in france

May I ask why the label of "unbalanced" is still there on the page? I think it's unnecessary. BM Tornado (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm really sorry about the warning - I saw your edit which accidentally replaced the "unbalanced" notice with "O" and thought it could be vandalism. If I were you I would raise the issue of whether the article is unbalanced on the talk page. 10metreh (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, 10metreh. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I notice that you have the "administrator someday" userbox. Reviewing new pages is one of the best ways to develop experience needed to successfully wield the mop. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 09:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 10metreh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)