Neutrality (international relations)
A neutral power in a particular war is a sovereign state which officially declares itself to be neutral towards the belligerents. A non-belligerent state does not need to be neutral. The rights and duties of a neutral power are defined in Sections 5 and 13 of the Hague Convention of 1907. A permanently neutral power is a sovereign state which is bound by international treaty to be neutral towards the belligerents of all future wars. An example of a permanently neutral power is Switzerland. The concept of neutrality in war is narrowly defined and puts specific constraints on the neutral party in return for the internationally recognised right to remain neutral.
Neutralism or a "neutralist policy" is a foreign policy position wherein a state intends to remain neutral in future wars. A sovereign state that reserves the right to become a belligerent if attacked by a party to the war is in a condition of armed neutrality.
Rights and responsibilities of a neutral power
A neutral power must intern belligerent troops who reach its territory, but not escaped prisoners of war. Belligerent armies may not recruit its citizens, but they may go abroad to enlist. Belligerent armies' personnel and material may not be transported across neutral territory, but the wounded may be. A neutral power may supply communication facilities to belligerents, but not war material, although it need not prevent export of such material.
Belligerent naval vessels may use neutral ports for a maximum of 24 hours, though neutrals may impose different restrictions. Exceptions are to make repairs — only the minimum necessary to put back to sea — or if an opposing belligerent's vessel is already in port, in which case it must have a 24-hour head start. A prize ship captured by a belligerent in the territorial waters of a neutral power must be surrendered by the belligerent to the neutral, which must intern its crew.
List of neutral states
Recognised as neutral
|country||neutrality period/beginning year||notes|
|Austria||1920-1938 (after World War I to occupation by Germany)
1955-1994 (from Declaration of Neutrality to EU membership)
|Maintains external independence and inviolability of borders (expressly modeled on the Swiss neutrality). Is a member of the European Union.|
|Costa Rica||1949||Neutral country after abolishing its military in 1949.|
|Finland||1935-1939 (to Winter War)
1956-1994 (from return of Porkkala rental area to EU membership)
|Is a member of the European Union.|
|Ireland||1937-1972 (to EEC/EU membership)||A traditional policy of military neutrality defined as non-membership of mutual defence alliances. Concessions in the Treaty of Nice via Seville Declarations on the Treaty of Nice and Treaty of Lisbon via Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland guarantee neutrality alongside EU membership.|
|Liechtenstein||1868||Neutral since its army was dissolved in 1868.|
|Malta||1980-2004 (to EU membership)||Policy of neutrality since 1980, guaranteed in a treaty with Italy concluded in 1983. Is a member of the European Union.|
|Panama||1989||The neutrality of the Panama Canal is enshrined by specific treaty.|
|San Marino||1862||Security guaranteed in treaty with Italy in 1862 and renewed again in 1931.|
|Sweden||1814-1918 (to Finnish Civil War: Swedish military expedition
on the Åland Islands)
1918-1994 (after Finnish Civil War to EU membership)
|Is a member of the European Union.|
|Switzerland||1815||Self-imposed, permanent, and armed, designed to ensure external security. Switzerland is the oldest neutral country in the world; it has not fought a foreign war since its neutrality was established by the Treaty of Paris in 1815. Although the European powers (Austria, France, the United Kingdom, Portugal, Prussia, Russia, Spain and Sweden) agreed at the Congress of Vienna in May 1815 that Switzerland should be neutral, final ratification was delayed until after Napoleon Bonaparte was defeated so that some coalition forces could invade France via Swiss territory (see the minor campaigns of 1815 and the Act on the Neutrality of Switzerland signed on 20 November 1815 by the Great Powers (Austria, Britain, France, Prussia and Russia)).|
|Turkmenistan||1995||Declared its permanent neutrality and had it formally recognised by the United Nations in 1995.|
|Ukraine||2010||Declared policy of state non-alignment in 2010.|
|Vatican City||1929||The Lateran Treaty signed in 1929 with Italy imposed that "The Pope was pledged to perpetual neutrality in international relations and to abstention from mediation in a controversy unless specifically requested by all parties" thus making Vatican City neutral since then.|
Claim to be neutral
|country||claimed neutrality period/beginning year||notes|
|Cambodia||1955-1970 (to Vietnam War)
|Laos||1962-1964 (to Vietnam War)
1975 (after Vietnam War)
|The International Agreement on the Neutrality of Laos was signed in Geneva on July 23, 1962, by 14 nations, including the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. However throughout the Laotian Civil War, Laos was fighting the PAVN and Pathet Lao with the help of the USA among other anti-communist countries. Laos's neutrality can therefore be described as a "false neutrality".|
|Mexico||1939||With the exception of its participation on the side of the Allies in World War II. Opened its borders in the 20th century to political refugees fleeing the military dictatorships of South America and Spain. From 2000-2006, Mexico ignored the neutrality policy under foreign secretaries Jorge G. Castañeda and Luis Ernesto Derbez. Whether historical neutrality is to be kept is now internally debated. The Mexican formulation of neutrality is known as Estrada doctrine.|
|Moldova||1994||Article 11 of the 1994 Constitution proclaims "permanent neutrality".|
|Serbia||2007||The National Assembly of Serbia declared armed neutrality in 2007.|
|Belgium||1839-1914 (to World War I) & 1936-1940||Neutral stance since 1839, abolished through the Treaty of Versailles after WWI (and again after WWII), proclaimed neutrality in October 1936 and severed 1921 alliance with France, non-neutral alignment after 1945 confirmed by membership of NATO.|
|Denmark||1864-1940 (after Second Schleswig War to World War II)||A NATO member since 1949.|
|Estonia||1938-1939||Declared its neutrality 1938, but was thereafter forced to allow the troops of Soviet Union 1939 and occupied by it 1940 in accordance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Now a NATO member.|
|Hungary||1956 (attempted neutrality during the Hungarian Revolution)||Now a NATO member.|
|Latvia||1938-1939||Declared its neutrality 1938, but was thereafter forced to allow the troops of Soviet Union 1939 and occupied by it 1940 in accordance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Now a NATO member.|
|Lithuania||1939||Declared its neutrality 1939, but was thereafter forced to allow the troops of Soviet Union at autumn 1939 and occupied by it 1940 in accordance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Now a NATO member.|
|Luxembourg||1839-1914 (to World War I)
1920-1940 (after World War I to World War II)
|Neutral stance since 1839, abolished through its constitution in 1948, non-neutral alignment confirmed by membership of NATO.|
|Netherlands||1839-1940 (to World War II)||Self-imposed neutrality between 1839 and 1940 on the European continent. Now a NATO member.|
|Norway||1905-1940 (to World War II)||A NATO member since 1949.|
|Portugal||1932-1945 (neutral during World War II)||A NATO member since 1949.|
Points of debate
The neutrality of some countries now in the European Union (Austria, Finland, Ireland, Malta, Sweden) is under dispute, especially as the EU now operates a Common Foreign and Security Policy. This view was supported by the Finnish Prime Minister, Matti Vanhanen, on 5 July 2006, while speaking to the European Parliament as Council President;
"Mr Pflüger described Finland as neutral. I must correct him on that: Finland is a member of the EU. We were at one time a politically neutral country, during the time of the Iron Curtain. Now we are a member of the Union, part of this community of values, which has a common policy and, moreover, a common foreign policy."
Later, the 'solidarity clause' in the Lisbon Treaty was deemed sufficient to replace the Western European Union (WEU) military alliance's mutual defence clause (where an attack upon one state is deemed an attack on all, resulting in military support from other members). As a result the WEU was closed down with its mutual defence role having been absorbed by the European Union.
Irish neutrality is similarly debated; the state's "traditional policy of military neutrality" is not defined in law, and referendums on the Treaty of Nice and on the Treaty of Lisbon were lost in part because of fears these would undermine Irish neutrality.
Austrian neutrality is special, as for many Austrian citizens neutrality is a main element of the Austrian state. So while in fact neutrality currently only exists on paper, politicians do not dare to adjust the constitution to reflect reality. Furthermore the topic is very complicated as strong political powers are against any ties to NATO while in fact NATO can be regarded as the major European defence institution.
Neutrality to forestall invasion
Other countries may be more active on the international stage, while emphasising an intention to remain neutral in case of war close to the country. By such a declaration of intentions, the country hopes that all belligerents will count on the country's territory as off limits for the enemy, and hence unnecessary to waste resources on. The neutrality of Republic of Moldova is an interesting case. According to Ion Marandici, Moldova has chosen neutrality in order to avoid Russian security schemes and Russian military presence on its territory. Even if the country is constitutionally neutral, some researchers argue that de facto this former Soviet republic never was neutral, because parts of the Russian 14th army are present at Bendery. The same author suggests that one solution in order to avoid unnecessary contradictions and deepen at the same time the relations with NATO would be "to interpret the concept of permanent neutrality in a flexible manner".
Many countries made such declarations during World War II. Most, however, became occupied, and in the end only the states of Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland (with Liechtenstein) remained neutral of the European countries closest to the war. Their fulfilment to the letter of the rules of neutrality have been questioned: Ireland supplied some important secret information to the Allies; for instance, the date of D-Day was decided on the basis of incoming Atlantic weather information secretly supplied to them by Ireland but kept from Germany. Also, German pilots who crash landed in Ireland were interned, whereas their Allied counterparts usually went "missing" close to the border. Sweden and Switzerland, as embedded within Nazi Germany and its occupied territory, similarly made some concessions to Nazi requests as well as to Allied requests. Sweden was also involved in intelligence operations with the Allies, including listening stations in Sweden and espionage in Germany, as well as secret military training of Norwegian and Danish soldiers in Sweden. Spain also pursued a policy of "non-alignment" and sent a volunteer combat division to aid the Nazi war effort. Portugal officially stayed neutral, but actively supported the Allies by providing overseas naval bases.
According to Edwin Reischauer, "To be neutral you must be ready to be highly militarized, like Switzerland or Sweden." However, other countries - like Costa Rica - have claimed that having no army would strengthen their neutrality and democratic stability.
- Non-Aligned Movement
- Category:Neutral states in World War II
- Irish neutrality
- International humanitarian law
- Second Hague Convention, Section 5
- Second Hague Convention, Section 13
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.1
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.10
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.11
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.13
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.4,5
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.6
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.2
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.14
- Hague Convention, §5 Art.8
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.6
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.7
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.12
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.14
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.16
- Hague Convention, §13 Art.3
- TREATY CONCERNING THE PERMANENT NEUTRALITY AND OPERATION OF THE PANAMA CANAL
- "A/RES/50/80; U.N. General Assembly". Retrieved 29 December 2009.
- "Ukraine Parliament Ok’s neutrality bill". Kyiv Post (Kiev, Ukraine). AP. 4 June 2010.
- La Jornada. "Adiós a la neutralidad - La Jornada". Jornada.unam.mx. Retrieved 2013-09-19.
- Enclosed by NATO, Serbia ponders next move AFP, 6 April 2009
- Presentation of the programme of the Finnish presidency (debate) 5 July 2006, European Parliament Strasbourg
- Statement of the Presidency of the Permanent Council of the WEU on behalf of the High Contracting Parties to the Modified Brussels Treaty – Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom, Western European Union 31 March 2010
- Marandici, Ion (2006). "Moldova's neutrality: what is at stake?" (MS Word). Lviv: IDIS-Viitorul and the Center for European Studies.
- Chapin, Emerson. "Edwin Reischauer, Diplomat and Scholar, Dies at 79," New York Times. September 2, 1990.
- Military of Costa Rica Military of Costa Rica