A solid-state drive (SSD) (also known as a solid-state disk or electronic disk, though it contains no actual "disk" of any kind or motors to "drive" the disks) is a data storage device using integrated circuit assemblies as memory to store data persistently. SSD technology uses electronic interfaces compatible with traditional block input/output (I/O) hard disk drives, thus permitting simple replacement in common applications. Also, new I/O interfaces like SATA Express are created to keep up with speed advancements in SSD technology.
SSDs have no moving mechanical components. This distinguishes them from traditional electromechanical magnetic disks such as hard disk drives (HDDs) or floppy disks, which contain spinning disks and movable read/write heads. Compared with electromechanical disks, SSDs are typically more resistant to physical shock, run silently, have lower access time, and less latency. However, while the price of SSDs has continued to decline in 2012, SSDs are still about 7 to 8 times more expensive per unit of storage than HDDs.
As of 2010[update], most SSDs use NAND-based flash memory, which retains data without power. For applications requiring fast access, but not necessarily data persistence after power loss, SSDs may be constructed from random-access memory (RAM). Such devices may employ separate power sources, such as batteries, to maintain data after power loss.
Hybrid drives or solid state hybrid drives (SSHD) combine the features of SSDs and HDDs in the same unit, containing a large hard disk drive and an SSD cache to improve performance of frequently accessed data.
- 1 Development and history
- 2 Architecture and function
- 3 Configurations
- 4 Comparison with hard disk drives
- 5 Comparison with memory cards
- 6 Applications
- 7 Wear leveling
- 8 Data recovery and secure deletion
- 9 File systems suitable for SSDs
- 10 Standardization organizations
- 11 Commercialization
- 12 See also
- 13 References
- 14 Further reading
- 15 External links
Development and history
Early SSDs using RAM and similar technology
SSDs had origins in the 1950s with two similar technologies: magnetic core memory and card capacitor read-only store (CCROS). These auxiliary memory units (as contemporaries called them) emerged during the era of vacuum-tube computers. But with the introduction of cheaper drum storage units their use ceased.
Later, in the 1970s and 1980s, SSDs were implemented in semiconductor memory for early supercomputers of IBM, Amdahl and Cray; however, the prohibitively high price of the built-to-order SSDs made them quite seldom used. In the late 1970s, General Instruments produced an electrically alterable ROM (EAROM) which operated somewhat like the later NAND flash memory. Unfortunately, a ten-year life was not achievable and many companies abandoned the technology. In 1976 Dataram started selling a product called Bulk Core, which provided up to 2 MB of solid state storage compatible with Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and Data General (DG) computers. In 1978, Texas Memory Systems introduced a 16 kilobyte RAM solid-state drive to be used by oil companies for seismic data acquisition. The following year, StorageTek developed the first RAM solid-state drive.
The Sharp PC-5000, introduced in 1983, used 128-kilobyte solid-state storage cartridges containing bubble memory. In 1984 Tallgrass Technologies Corporation had a tape backup unit of 40 MB with a solid state 20 MB unit built in. The 20 MB unit could be used instead of a hard drive. In September 1986, Santa Clara Systems introduced BatRam, a 4 megabyte mass storage system expandable to 20 MB using 4 MB memory modules. The package included a rechargeable battery to preserve the memory chip contents when the array was not powered. 1987 saw the entry of EMC Corporation (EMC) into the SSD market, with drives introduced for the mini-computer market. However, by 1993 EMC had exited the SSD market.
Back in 1983, Psion MC 400 Mobile Computer included four slots for removable storage in form of flash-based solid-state disks, using the same type of flash-memory cards as used by the Psion Series 3. The flash modules did have the limitation of needing to be re-formatted entirely to reclaim space from deleted or modified files; old versions of files which were deleted or modified continued to take up space until the module was formatted.
In 1995, M-Systems introduced flash-based solid-state drives. They had the advantage of not requiring batteries to maintain the data in the memory (required by the prior volatile memory systems), but were not as fast as the DRAM-based solutions. Since then, SSDs have been used successfully as HDD replacements by the military and aerospace industries, as well as for other mission-critical applications. These applications require the exceptional mean time between failures (MTBF) rates that solid-state drives achieve, by virtue of their ability to withstand extreme shock, vibration and temperature ranges.
In 1999, BiTMICRO made a number of introductions and announcements about flash-based SSDs, including an 18 GB 3.5-inch SSD. In 2007, Fusion-io announced a PCIe-based SSD with 100,000 input/output operations per second (IOPS) of performance in a single card, with capacities up to 320 gigabytes. At Cebit 2009, OCZ Technology demonstrated a 1 terabyte (TB) flash SSD using a PCI Express ×8 interface. It achieved a maximum write speed of 654 megabytes per second (MB/s) and maximum read speed of 712 MB/s. In December 2009, Micron Technology announced an SSD using a 6 gigabits per second (Gbit/s) SATA interface.
Enterprise flash drives
Enterprise flash drives (EFDs) are designed for applications requiring high I/O performance (IOPS), reliability, energy efficiency and, more recently, consistent performance. In most cases, an EFD is an SSD with a higher set of specifications, compared with SSDs that would typically be used in notebook computers. The term was first used by EMC in January 2008, to help them identify SSD manufacturers who would provide products meeting these higher standards. There are no standards bodies who control the definition of EFDs, so any SSD manufacturer may claim to produce EFDs when they may not actually meet the requirements. Likewise, there may be other SSD manufacturers that meet the EFD requirements without being called EFDs.
In the fourth quarter of 2012, Intel introduced its SSD DC S3700 drive, which focused on achieving consistent performance, an area that had previously not received much attention but which Intel claimed was important for the enterprise market. In particular, Intel claims that at steady state the S3700 won't vary its IOPS by more than 10–15%, and that 99.9% of all 4kB random IOs are serviced in less than 500µs.
Architecture and function
The key components of an SSD are the controller and the memory to store the data. The primary memory component in an SSD had been DRAM volatile memory since they were first developed, but since 2009 it is more commonly NAND flash non-volatile memory. Other components play a less significant role in the operation of the SSD and vary among manufacturers.
Every SSD includes a controller that incorporates the electronics that bridge the NAND memory components to the host computer. The controller is an embedded processor that executes firmware-level code and is one of the most important factors of SSD performance. Some of the functions performed by the controller include:
- Error-correcting code (ECC)
- Wear leveling
- Bad block mapping
- Read scrubbing and read disturb management
- Read and write caching
- Garbage collection
The performance of an SSD can scale with the number of parallel NAND flash chips used in the device. A single NAND chip is relatively slow, due to the narrow (8/16 bit) asynchronous I/O interface, and additional high latency of basic I/O operations (typical for SLC NAND, ~25 μs to fetch a 4 KB page from the array to the I/O buffer on a read, ~250 μs to commit a 4 KB page from the IO buffer to the array on a write, ~2 ms to erase a 256 KB block). When multiple NAND devices operate in parallel inside an SSD, the bandwidth scales, and the high latencies can be hidden, as long as enough outstanding operations are pending and the load is evenly distributed between devices. Micron and Intel initially made faster SSDs by implementing data striping (similar to RAID 0) and interleaving in their architecture. This enabled the creation of ultra-fast SSDs with 250 MB/s effective read/write speeds with the SATA 3 Gbit/s interface in 2009. Two years later, SandForce continued to leverage this parallel flash connectivity, releasing consumer-grade SATA 6 Gbit/s SSD controllers which supported 500 MB/s read/write speeds. SandForce controllers compress the data prior to sending it to the flash memory. This process may result in less writing and higher logical throughput, depending on the compressibility of the data.
Most SSD manufacturers use non-volatile NAND flash memory in the construction of their SSDs because of the lower cost compared with DRAM and the ability to retain the data without a constant power supply, ensuring data persistence through sudden power outages. Flash memory SSDs are slower than DRAM solutions, and some early designs were even slower than HDDs after continued use. This problem was resolved by controllers that came out in 2009 and later.
|SLC to MLC||NAND to NOR|
|10× more persistent||10× more persistent|
|3x faster Sequential Write
same Sequential Read
|4x faster Sequential Write
5x faster Sequential Read
|30% more expensive||30% cheaper|
|The following Technologies should combine the advantages of NAND and NOR: OneNAND (Samsung), mDOC (Sandisk) and ORNAND (Spansion).|
Flash memory-based solutions are typically packaged in standard disk drive form factors (1.8-, 2.5-, and 3.5-inch), or smaller unique and compact layouts because of the compact memory.
Lower priced drives usually use multi-level cell (MLC) flash memory, which is slower and less reliable than single-level cell (SLC) flash memory. This can be mitigated or even reversed by the internal design structure of the SSD, such as interleaving, changes to writing algorithms, and higher over-provisioning (more excess capacity) with which the wear-leveling algorithms can work.
SSDs based on volatile memory such as DRAM are characterized by ultrafast data access, generally less than 10 microseconds, and are used primarily to accelerate applications that would otherwise be held back by the latency of flash SSDs or traditional HDDs. DRAM-based SSDs usually incorporate either an internal battery or an external AC/DC adapter and backup storage systems to ensure data persistence while no power is being supplied to the drive from external sources. If power is lost, the battery provides power while all information is copied from random access memory (RAM) to back-up storage. When the power is restored, the information is copied back to the RAM from the back-up storage, and the SSD resumes normal operation (similar to the hibernate function used in modern operating systems). SSDs of this type are usually fitted with DRAM modules of the same type used in regular PCs and servers, which can be swapped out and replaced by larger modules. Such as i-RAM, HyperOs HyperDrive, DDRdrive X1, etc. Some manufacturers of DRAM SSDs solder the DRAM chips directly to the drive, and do not intend the chips to be swapped out—such as ZeusRAM, Aeon Drive, etc.
A remote, indirect memory-access disk (RIndMA Disk) uses a secondary computer with a fast network or (direct) Infiniband connection to act like a RAM-based SSD, but the new, faster, flash-memory based, SSDs already available in 2009 are making this option not as cost effective.
Some SSDs use both DRAM and flash memory. When the power goes down, the SSD copies all the data from its DRAM to flash. When the power comes back up, the SSD copies all the data from its flash to its DRAM.
Cache or buffer
A flash-based SSD typically uses a small amount of DRAM as a cache, similar to the cache in hard disk drives. A directory of block placement and wear leveling data is also kept in the cache while the drive is operating. Data is not permanently stored in the cache. One SSD controller manufacturer, SandForce, does not use an external DRAM cache on their designs, but still achieves very high performance. Eliminating the external DRAM enables a smaller footprint for the other flash memory components in order to build even smaller SSDs.
Battery or super capacitor
Another component in higher performing SSDs is a capacitor or some form of battery. These are necessary to maintain data integrity such that the data in the cache can be flushed to the drive when power is dropped; some may even hold power long enough to maintain data in the cache until power is resumed. In the case of MLC flash memory, a problem called lower page corruption can occur when MLC flash memory loses power while programming an upper page. The result is that data written previously and presumed safe can be corrupted if the memory is not supported by a super capacitor in the event of a sudden power loss. This problem does not exist with SLC flash memory. Most consumer-class SSDs do not have built-in batteries or capacitors; among the exceptions are the Crucial M500 series, the Intel 320 series and the more expensive Intel 710 series.
The host interface is not specifically a component of the SSD, but it is a key part of the drive. The interface is usually incorporated into the controller discussed above. The interface is generally one of the interfaces found in HDDs. They include:
- Serial attached SCSI - SAS (generally found on servers, >3.0 Gbit/s)
- Serial ATA - SATA (>1.5 Gbit/s)
- PCI Express - (>2.0 Gbit/s)
- Fibre Channel (almost exclusively found on servers, >200 Mbit/s)
- USB - (> 1.5 Mbit/s)
- Parallel ATA (IDE, >26.4 Mbit/s) interface (mostly replaced by SATA)
- (Parallel) SCSI (generally found on servers; mostly replaced by SAS; last SCSI-based SSD introduced in 2004, >40 Mbit/s)
The size and shape of any device is largely driven by the size and shape of the components used to make that device. Traditional HDDs and optical drives are designed around the rotating platter or optical disc along with the spindle motor inside. If an SSD is made up of various interconnected integrated circuits (ICs) and an interface connector, then its shape could be virtually anything imaginable because it is no longer limited to the shape of rotating media drives. Some solid state storage solutions come in a larger chassis that may even be a rack-mount form factor with numerous SSDs inside. They would all connect to a common bus inside the chassis and connect outside the box with a single connector.
For general computer use, the 2.5-inch form factor (typically found in laptops) is the most popular. For desktop computers with 3.5-inch hard disk slots, a simple adapter plate can be used to make such a disk fit. Other types of form factors are more common in enterprise applications. An SSD can also be completely integrated in the other circuitry of the device, as in the Apple MacBook Air (starting with the fall 2010 model).
Standard HDD form factors
The benefit of using a current HDD form factor would be to take advantage of the extensive infrastructure already in place to mount and connect the drives to the host system. These traditional form factors are known by the size of the rotating media, e.g., 5.25-inch, 3.5-inch, 2.5-inch, 1.8-inch, not by the dimensions of the drive casing.
Standard card form factors
For applications where space is at premium, like for ultrabooks or tablets, a few compact form factors were standardized for flash-based SSDs.
There is the mSATA form factor, using the PCI Express Mini Card physical layout. It remains electrically compatible with the PCI Express Mini Card interface specification, while requiring an additional connection to the SATA host controller through the same connector.
M.2, formerly known as the Next Generation Form Factor (NGFF), is a natural transition from the mSATA and the physical layout it used, to a more usable and more advanced form factor. While mSATA took advantage of an existing form-factor and connector, M.2 has been designed to maximize usage of the card space, while minimizing the footprint.
Box form factors
Many of the DRAM-based solutions use a box that is often designed to fit in a rack-mount system. The number of DRAM components required to get sufficient capacity to store the data along with the backup power supplies requires a larger space than traditional HDD form factors.
Bare-board form factors
Form factors which were more common to memory modules are now being used by SSDs to take advantage of their flexibility in laying out the components. Some of these include PCIe, mini PCIe, mini-DIMM, MO-297, and many more. The SATADIMM from Viking Technology uses an empty DDR3 DIMM slot on the motherboard to provide power to the SSD with a separate SATA connector to provide the data connection back to the computer. The result is an easy-to-install SSD with a capacity equal to drives that typically take a full 2.5-inch drive bay. At least one manufacturer, Innodisk, has produced a drive that sits directly on the SATA connector (SATADOM) on the motherboard without any need for a power cable. Some SSDs are based on the PCIe form factor and connect both the data interface and power through the PCIe connector to the host. These drives can use either direct PCIe flash controllers or a PCIe-to-SATA bridge device which then connects to SATA flash controllers.
Ball grid array form factors
In the early 2000s, a few companies introduced SSDs in Ball Grid Array (BGA) form factors, such as M-Systems' (now SanDisk) DiskOnChip and Silicon Storage Technology's NANDrive (now produced by Greenliant Systems), and Memoright's M1000 for use in embedded systems. The main benefits of BGA SSDs are their low power consumption, small chip package size to fit into compact subsystems, and that they can be soldered directly onto a system motherboard to reduce adverse effects from vibration and shock.
Comparison with hard disk drives
Making a comparison between SSDs and ordinary (spinning) HDDs is difficult. Traditional HDD benchmarks tend to focus on the performance characteristics that are poor with HDDs, such as rotational latency and seek time. As SSDs do not need to spin or seek to locate data, they may prove vastly superior to HDDs in such tests. However, SSDs have challenges with mixed reads and writes, and their performance may degrade over time. SSD testing must start from the (in use) full disk, as the new and empty (fresh out of the box) disk may have much better write performance than it would show after only weeks of use.
Most of the advantages of solid-state drives over traditional hard drives are due to their ability to access data completely electronically instead of electromechanically, resulting in superior transfer speeds and mechanical ruggedness. On the other hand, hard disk drives offer significantly higher capacity for their price.
While SSDs appear to be more reliable than HDDs, SSD failures are often catastrophic, with total data loss. As of 2013[update], most SSDs fail poorly on power faults. While HDDs can fail in this manner as well, they often give warning that they are failing, allowing much or all of their data to be recovered. Additionally, the robustness of an SSD varies greatly amongst models.
Not all solid-state drives perform equally. Single-level cell (SLC) SSDs have faster access times than multi-level cell (MLC) SSDs. DRAM-based solid-state storage is currently considered the fastest, with average response times of 10 microseconds instead of the average 100 microseconds of other SSDs. Enterprise flash devices (EFDs) are designed to handle the demands of Tier-1 application with performance and response times similar to less-expensive SSDs.
Traditional hard drives store their data in a linear, ordered manner. SSDs, however, constantly rearrange their data while keeping track of their locations for the purpose of wear leveling. As such, the flash memory controller and its firmware play a critical role in maintaining data integrity. One major cause of data loss in SSDs is firmware bugs, which rarely cause problems in HDDs.[dubious ]
The following table shows a detailed overview of the advantages and disadvantages of both technologies. Comparisons reflect typical characteristics, and may not hold for a specific device.
|Attribute or characteristic||Solid-state drive||Hard disk drive|
|Start-up time||Almost instantaneous; no mechanical components to prepare. May need a few milliseconds to come out of an automatic power-saving mode.||Disk spin-up may take several seconds. A system with many drives may need to stagger spin-up to limit peak power drawn, which is briefly high when an HDD is first started.|
|Random access time||Typically under 0.1 ms. As data can be retrieved directly from various locations of the flash memory, access time is usually not a big performance bottleneck.||Ranges from 2.9 (high end server drive) to 12 ms (laptop HDD) due to the need to move the heads and wait for the data to rotate under the read/write head.|
|Read latency time||Generally low because the data can be read directly from any location. In applications where hard disk seeks are the limiting factor, this results in faster boot and application launch times (see Amdahl's law).||Much higher than SSDs. Read time is different for every different seek, since the location of the data on the disk and the location of the read-head make a difference.|
|Data transfer rate||SSD technology can deliver rather consistent read/write speed, but when lots of individual smaller blocks are accessed, performance is reduced. In consumer products the maximum transfer rate typically ranges from about 100 MB/s to 600 MB/s, depending on the disk. Enterprise market offers devices with multi-gigabyte per second throughput.||Once the head is positioned, when reading or writing a continuous track, an enterprise HDD can transfer data at about 140 MB/s. In practice transfer speeds are many times lower due to constant seeking, as files are read from various locations or they are fragmented. Data transfer rate depends also upon rotational speed, which can range from 4,200 to 15,000 rpm and also upon the track (reading from the outer tracks is faster due higher absolute head velocity relative to the disk).|
|Read performance||Read performance does not change based on where data is stored on an SSD.
Unlike mechanical hard drives, current SSD technology suffers from a performance degradation phenomenon called write amplification, where the NAND cells show a measurable drop in performance, and will continue degrading throughout the life of the SSD. A technique called wear leveling is implemented to mitigate this effect, but due to the nature of the NAND chips, the drive will inevitably degrade at a noticeable rate.
|If data from different areas of the platter must be accessed, as with fragmented files, response times will be increased by the need to seek each fragment.|
|Fragmentation (filesystem specific)||There is limited benefit to reading data sequentially (beyond typical FS block sizes, say 4kB), making fragmentation negligible for SSDs. Defragmentation would cause wear by making additional writes of the NAND flash cells, which have a limited cycle life.||Files, particularly large ones, on HDDs usually become fragmented over time if frequently written; periodic defragmentation is required to maintain optimum performance.|
|Noise (acoustic)||SSDs have no moving parts and therefore are basically silent, although electric noise from the circuits may occur.||HDDs have moving parts (heads, actuator, and spindle motor) and make characteristic sounds of whirring and clicking; noise levels vary between models, but can be significant (while often much lower than the sound from the cooling fans). Laptop hard disks are relatively quiet.|
|Temperature control||SSDs do not usually require any special cooling and can tolerate higher temperatures than HDDs. High-end enterprise models delivered as add-on cards may be supplied fitted with heat sinks to dissipate heat generated.||According to Seagate, ambient temperatures above 95 °F (35 °C) can shorten the life of a hard disk, and reliability will be compromised at drive temperatures above 131 °F (55 °C). Fan cooling may be required if temperatures would otherwise exceed these values. In practice most hard drives are used without special arrangements for cooling.|
|Susceptibility to environmental factors||No moving parts, very resistant to shock and vibration.||Heads floating above rapidly rotating platters are susceptible to shock and vibration.|
|Installation and mounting||Not sensitive to orientation, vibration, or shock. Usually no exposed circuitry.||Circuitry may be exposed, and must not contact metal parts. Most recent models work well in all orientations. Should be mounted to protect against vibration and shock.|
|Susceptibility to magnetic fields ||Low impact on flash memory. But an electromagnetic pulse will damage any electrical system, especially integrated circuits.||Magnets or magnetic surges could in principle damage data, although the magnetic platters are usually well-shielded inside a metal case.|
|Weight and size||Solid state drives, essentially semiconductor memory devices mounted on a circuit board, are small and light in weight. However, for easy replacement, they often follow the same form factors as HDDs (3.5-inch, 2.5-inch or 1.8-inch). Such form factors typically weigh as much as their HDD counterparts, mostly due to the enclosure.||HDDs typically have the same form factor but may be heavier. This applies for 3.5-inch drives, which typically weigh around 700 grams.|
|Reliability and lifetime||SSDs have no moving parts to fail mechanically. Each block of a flash-based SSD can only be erased (and therefore written) a limited number of times before it fails. The controllers manage this limitation so that drives can last for many years under normal use. SSDs based on DRAM do not have a limited number of writes. However the failure of a controller can make a SSD unusable. Reliability varies significantly across different SSD manufacturers and models with return rates reaching 40% for specific drives. As of 2011[update] leading SSDs have lower return rates than mechanical drives. Many SSDs critically fail on power outages; a December 2013 survey of many SSDs found that only some of them are able to survive multiple power outages.||HDDs have moving parts, and are subject to potential mechanical failures from the resulting wear and tear. The storage medium itself (magnetic platter) does not essentially degrade from read and write operations.
According to a study performed by Carnegie Mellon University for both consumer and enterprise-grade HDDs, their average failure rate is 6 years, and life expectancy is 9–11 years. Leading SSDs have overtaken hard disks for reliability, however the risk of a sudden, catastrophic data loss can be lower for mechanical disks.
|Secure writing limitations||NAND flash memory cannot be overwritten, but has to be rewritten to previously erased blocks. If a software encryption program encrypts data already on the SSD, the overwritten data is still unsecured, unencrypted, and accessible (drive-based hardware encryption does not have this problem). Also data cannot be securely erased by overwriting the original file without special "Secure Erase" procedures built into the drive.||HDDs can overwrite data directly on the drive in any particular sector. However the drive's firmware may exchange damaged blocks with spare areas, so bits and pieces may still be present.|
|Cost per capacity||NAND flash SSDs have reached US$0.59 per GB.||HDDs cost about US$0.05 per GB for 3.5-inch and $0.10 per GB for 2.5-inch drives.|
|Storage capacity||In 2013, SSDs were available in sizes up to 2 TB, but less costly 128 to 512 GB drives were more common.||In 2013, HDDs of up to 6 TB were available.|
|Read/write performance symmetry||Less expensive SSDs typically have write speeds significantly lower than their read speeds. Higher performing SSDs have similar read and write speeds.||HDDs generally have slightly lower write speeds than their read speeds.|
|Free block availability and TRIM||SSD write performance is significantly impacted by the availability of free, programmable blocks. Previously written data blocks no longer in use can be reclaimed by TRIM; however, even with TRIM, fewer free blocks cause slower performance.||HDDs are not affected by free blocks and do not benefit from TRIM.|
|Power consumption||High performance flash-based SSDs generally require half to a third of the power of HDDs. High-performance DRAM SSDs generally require as much power as HDDs, and must be connected to power even when the rest of the system is shut down.||The lowest-power HDDs (1.8-inch size) can use as little as 0.35 watts. 2.5-inch drives typically use 2 to 5 watts. The highest-performance 3.5-inch drives can use up to about 20 watts.|
Comparison with memory cards
While both memory cards and most SSDs use flash memory, they serve very different markets and purposes. Each has a number of different attributes which are optimized and adjusted to best meet the needs of particular users. Some of these characteristics include power consumption, performance, size, and reliability.
SSDs were originally designed for use in a computer system. The first units were intended to replace or augment hard disk drives, so the operating system recognized them as a hard drive. Originally, solid state drives were even shaped and mounted in the computer like hard drives. Later SSDs became smaller and more compact, eventually developing their own unique form factors. The SSD was designed to be installed permanently inside a computer.
In contrast, memory cards (such as Secure Digital (SD), CompactFlash (CF) and many others) were originally designed for digital cameras and later found their way into cell phones, gaming devices, GPS units, etc. Most memory cards are physically smaller than SSDs, and designed to be inserted and removed repeatedly. There are adapters which enable some memory cards to interface to a computer, allowing use as an SSD, but they are not intended to be the primary storage device in the computer. The typical CompactFlash card interface is three to four times slower than an SSD. As memory cards are not designed to tolerate the amount of reading and writing which occurs during typical computer use, their data may get damaged unless special procedures are taken to reduce the wear on the card to a minimum.
Until 2009, SSDs were mainly used in those aspects of mission critical applications where the speed of the storage system needed to be as fast as possible. Since flash memory has become a common component of SSDs, the falling prices and increased densities have made it more cost-effective for many other applications. Organizations that can benefit from faster access of system data include equity trading companies, telecommunication corporations, streaming media and video editing firms. The list of applications which could benefit from faster storage is vast.
Flash-based solid-state drives can be used to create network appliances from general-purpose personal computer hardware. A write protected flash drive containing the operating system and application software can substitute for larger, less reliable disk drives or CD-ROMs. Appliances built this way can provide an inexpensive alternative to expensive router and firewall hardware.
SSDs based on an SD card with a live SD operating system are easily write-locked. Combined with a cloud computing environment or other writable medium, to maintain persistence, an OS booted from a write-locked SD card is robust, rugged, reliable, and impervious to permanent corruption. If the running OS degrades, simply turning the machine off and then on returns it back to its initial uncorrupted state and thus is particularly solid. The SD card installed OS does not require removal of corrupted components since it was write-locked though any written media may need to be restored.
Hard drives caching
In 2011, Intel introduced a caching mechanism for their Z68 chipset (and mobile derivatives) called Smart Response Technology, which allows a SATA SSD to be used as a cache (configurable as write-through or write-back) for a conventional, magnetic hard disk drive. A similar technology is available on HighPoint's RocketHybrid PCIe card.
Solid-state hybrid drives (SSHDs) are based on the same principle, but integrate some amount of flash memory on board of a conventional drive instead of using a separate SSD. The flash layer in these drives can be accessed independently from the magnetic storage by the host using ATA-8 commands, allowing the operating system to manage it. For example Microsoft's ReadyDrive technology explicitly stores portions of the hibernation file in the cache of these drives when the system hibernates, making the subsequent resume faster.
Dual-drive hybrid systems are combining the usage of separate SSD and HDD devices installed in the same computer, with overall performance optimization managed by the computer user, or by the computer's operating system software. Examples of this type of system are bcache and dm-cache on Linux, and Apple’s Fusion Drive.
If a particular block was programmed and erased repeatedly without writing to any other blocks, that block would wear out before all the other blocks — thereby prematurely ending the life of the SSD. For this reason, SSD controllers use a technique called wear leveling to distribute writes as evenly as possible across all the flash blocks in the SSD.
In a perfect scenario, this would enable every block to be written to its maximum life so they all fail at the same time. Unfortunately, the process to evenly distribute writes requires data previously written and not changing (cold data) to be moved, so that data which are changing more frequently (hot data) can be written into those blocks. Each time data are relocated without being changed by the host system, this increases the write amplification and thus reduces the life of the flash memory. The key is to find an optimum algorithm which maximizes them both.
Data recovery and secure deletion
Solid state drives have set new challenges for data recovery companies, as the way of storing data is non-linear and much more complex than that of hard disk drives. The strategy the drive operates by internally can largely vary between manufacturers and, the TRIM command zeroes the whole range of a deleted file. Wear leveling also means that the physical address of the data and the address exposed to the operating system are different.
As for secure deletion of data, using the ATA Secure Erase command is recommended, as the drive itself knows the most effective method to truly reset its data. A program such as Parted Magic can be used for this purpose.
File systems suitable for SSDs
Typically the same file systems used on hard disk drives can also be used on solid state disks. It is usually expected for the file system to support the TRIM command which helps the SSD to recycle discarded data. There is no need for the file system to take care of wear leveling or other flash memory characteristics, as they are handled internally by the SSD. Some flash file systems using log-based designs (F2FS, JFFS2) help to reduce write amplification on SSDs, especially in situations where only very small amounts of data are changed, such as when updating file system metadata.
While not a file system feature, operating systems must also align partitions correctly to avoid excessive read-modify-write cycles. Other features designed for hard disk drives, most notably defragmentation, are disabled in SSD installations.
Listed below are some notable computer file systems that work well with solid-states drives.
The ext4, Btrfs, XFS, JFS and F2FS file systems include support for the discard (TRIM) function. As of November 2013, ext4 can be recommended as a safe choice. F2FS is a modern file system optimized for flash-based storage, and is a very good choice, but is still in experimental stage.
Kernel support for the TRIM operation was introduced in version 2.6.33 of the Linux kernel mainline, released on 24 February 2010. To make use of it, a filesystem must be mounted using the
discard parameter. Linux swap partitions are by default performing discard operations when the underlying drive supports TRIM, with the possibility to turn them off, or to select between one-time or continuous discard operations.
Recent versions of standard disk utilities are taking care of proper partitions alignment.
During installation, Linux distributions usually do not configure the installed system to use TRIM and thus the
/etc/fstab file requires manual modifications. This is because of the notion that the current Linux TRIM command implementation might not be optimal. It has been proven to cause a performance degradation instead of a performance increase under certain circumstances. As of January 2014[update], Linux sends individual TRIM commands, instead of vectorized lists of TRIM ranges as recommended by the TRIM specification. This problem has existed for years and it is not known when the Linux TRIM strategy will be reworked to fix the issue. Canonical plans the Ubuntu distribution to use scheduled fstrim background worker to perform TRIM instead.
For performance reasons, it is recommended to switch the I/O scheduler from the default CFQ (Completely Fair Queuing) to Noop or Deadline. CFQ was designed for traditional magnetic media and seek optimizations, thus many of those I/O scheduling efforts are wasted when used with SSDs. As part of their designs, SSDs are offering much bigger levels of parallelism for I/O operations, so it is preferable to leave scheduling decisions to their internal logic – especially for high-end SSDs.
A scalable block layer for high-performance SSD storage, developed primarily by Fusion-io engineers, was merged into the Linux kernel mainline in kernel version 3.13, released on 19 January 2014. This leverages the performance offered by SSDs and NVM Express, by allowing much higher I/O submission rates. With this new design of the Linux kernel block layer, internal queues are split into two levels (per-CPU and hardware-submission queues), thus removing bottlenecks and allowing much higher levels of I/O parallelization. With the release of Linux kernel version 3.13, only the virtioblk driver has been modified to actually use this new interface; other drivers will be ported in the following releases.
Mac OS X
Mac OS X versions since 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) support TRIM but only when used with an Apple-purchased SSD. There is also a technique to enable TRIM in earlier versions, though it is uncertain whether TRIM is utilized properly if enabled in versions before 10.6.8. TRIM is generally not automatically enabled for third-party drives, although it can be enabled by using third-party utilities such as Trim Enabler. The status of TRIM can be checked in the System Information application or in the system_profiler command-line tool.
Versions of Microsoft Windows prior to 7 do not take any special measures to support solid state drives. Partitions should be manually aligned before OS installation. Defragmentation negatively affects the life of the SSD and has no benefit. The TRIM command can be triggered using third-party tools to help maintain performance over time.
Starting from Windows 7, the standard NTFS file system provides TRIM support (other file systems do not support TRIM).
By default, Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 execute TRIM commands automatically if the device is detected to be a solid-state drive. To reverse this, in the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem the value DisableDeleteNotification can be set to 1 to prevent the mass storage driver from issuing the TRIM command. This can be useful in situations where data recovery is preferred over wear leveling (TRIM irreversibly resets all data that it manipulates).
Windows implements TRIM command for more than just file delete operations. The TRIM operation is fully integrated with partition- and volume-level commands like format and delete, with file system commands relating to truncate and compression, and with the System Restore (also known as Volume Snapshot) feature.
Windows 7, 8, and 8.1
Windows 7 has support for SSDs. Support in Windows 8 and 8.1 is similar. The operating system detects the presence of an SSD and optimizes operation accordingly. For SSD devices Windows disables defragmentation, Superfetch and ReadyBoost, the latter two being boot-time and application prefetching operations. It also includes support for the TRIM command to reduce garbage collection for data which the operating system has already determined is no longer valid. Without support for TRIM, the SSD would be unaware of this data being invalid and would unnecessarily continue to rewrite it during garbage collection causing further wear on the SSD.
Windows Vista generally expects hard disk drives rather than SSDs. Windows Vista includes ReadyBoost to exploit characteristics of USB-connected flash devices, but for SSDs it only improves the default partition alignment to prevent read-modify-write operations which reduce the speed of the SSD. This is because most SSDs are typically aligned on 4 kB sectors and most systems are based on 512 byte sectors with the default partition set up unaligned. The proper alignment really does not help the SSD's endurance over the life of the drive, however some Vista operations, if not disabled, can shorten the life of the SSD. Disk defragmentation should be disabled because the location of the file components on an SSD doesn't significantly impact its performance, but moving the files to make them contiguous using the Windows Defrag routine will cause unnecessary write wear on the limited number of P/E cycles on the SSD. The Superfetch feature will not materially improve the performance of the system and causes additional overhead in the system and SSD, although it does not cause wear. There is no official information to confirm whether Windows Vista sends TRIM commands to a solid state drive.
Solaris as of version 10 Update 6 (released in October 2008), and recent versions of OpenSolaris, Solaris Express Community Edition, Illumos, Linux with ZFS on Linux and FreeBSD all can use SSDs as a performance booster for ZFS. A low-latency SSD can be used for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL), where it is named the SLOG. This is used every time a synchronous write to the disk occurs. An SSD (not necessarily with a low-latency) may also be used for the level 2 Adaptive Replacement Cache (L2ARC), which is used to cache data for reading. When used either alone or in combination, large increases in performance are generally seen.
ZFS for FreeBSD introduced support for TRIM on September 23, 2012. The code builds a map of regions of data that were freed; on every write the code consults the map and eventually removes ranges that were freed before, but are now overwritten. There is a low-priority thread that TRIMs ranges when the time comes.
- Linux swap partitions are by default performing TRIM operations when the underlying block device supports TRIM, with the possibility to turn them off, or to select between one-time or continuous TRIM operations.
- If an operating system does not support using TRIM on discrete swap partitions, it might be possible to use swap files inside an ordinary file system instead.
- DragonFly BSD allows SSD-configured swap to also be used as file system cache. This can be used to boost performance on both desktop and server workloads. The bcache, dm-cache and Flashcache projects provide a similar concept for the Linux kernel.
The following are noted standardization organizations and bodies that work to create standards for solid-state drives (and other computer storage devices). The table below also includes organizations which promote the use of solid-state drives. This is not necessarily an exhaustive list.
|Organization or Committee||Subcommittee of:||Purpose|
|INCITS||N/A||Coordinates technical standards activity between ANSI in the USA and joint ISO/IEC committees worldwide|
|JEDEC||N/A||Develops open standards and publications for the microelectronics industry|
|JC-64.8||JEDEC||Focuses on solid-state drive standards and publications|
|NVMHCI||N/A||Provides standard software and hardware programming interfaces for nonvolatile memory subsystems|
|SATA-IO||N/A||Provides the industry with guidance and support for implementing the SATA specification|
|SFF Committee||N/A||Works on storage industry standards needing attention when not addressed by other standards committees|
|SNIA||N/A||Develops and promotes standards, technologies, and educational services in the management of information|
|SSSI||SNIA||Fosters the growth and success of solid state storage|
Solid-state drive technology has been marketed to the military and niche industrial markets since the mid-1990s..
Along with the emerging enterprise market, SSDs have been appearing in ultra-mobile PCs and a few lightweight laptop systems, adding significantly to the price of the laptop, depending on the capacity, form factor and transfer speeds. For low-end applications, a USB flash drive may be obtainable for anywhere from $10 to $100 or so, depending on capacity; alternatively, a CompactFlash card may be paired with a CF-to-IDE or CF-to-SATA converter at a similar cost. Either of these requires that write-cycle endurance issues be managed, either by refraining from storing frequently written files on the drive or by using a flash file system. Standard CompactFlash cards usually have write speeds of 7 to 15 MB/s while the more expensive upmarket cards claim speeds of up to 60 MB/s.
One of the first mainstream releases of SSD was the XO Laptop, built as part of the One Laptop Per Child project. Mass production of these computers, built for children in developing countries, began in December 2007. These machines use 1,024 MiB SLC NAND flash as primary storage which is considered more suitable for the harsher than normal conditions in which they are expected to be used. Dell began shipping ultra-portable laptops with SanDisk SSDs on April 26, 2007. Asus released the Eee PC subnotebook on October 16, 2007, with 2, 4 or 8 gigabytes of flash memory. On January 31, 2008, Apple released the MacBook Air, a thin laptop with an optional 64 GB SSD. The Apple Store cost was $999 more for this option, as compared with that of an 80 GB 4200 RPM hard disk drive. Another option, the Lenovo ThinkPad X300 with a 64 gigabyte SSD, was announced by Lenovo in February 2008. On August 26, 2008, Lenovo released ThinkPad X301 with 128 GB SSD option which adds approximately $200 US.
On January 14, 2008, EMC Corporation (EMC) became the first enterprise storage vendor to ship flash-based SSDs into its product portfolio when it announced it had selected STEC, Inc.'s Zeus-IOPS SSDs for its Symmetrix DMX systems.
In 2008 Sun released the Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage Systems (codenamed Amber Road), which use both solid state drives and conventional hard drives to take advantage of the speed offered by SSDs and the economy and capacity offered by conventional hard disks.
In November 2010, Fusion-io released its highest performing SSD drive named ioDrive Octal utilising PCI-Express x16 Gen 2.0 interface with storage space of 5.12 TB, read speed of 6.0 GB/s, write speed of 4.4 GB/s and a low latency of 30 microseconds. It has 1.19 M Read 512 byte IOPS and 1.18 M Write 512 byte IOPS.
In 2011, computers based on Intel's Ultrabook specifications became available. These specifications dictate that Ultrabooks use an SSD. These are consumer-level devices (unlike many previous flash offerings aimed at enterprise users), and represent the first widely available consumer computers using SSDs aside from the MacBook Air.
At CES 2012, OCZ Technology demonstrated the R4 CloudServ PCIe SSDs capable of reaching transfer speeds of 6.5 GB/s and 1.4 million IOPS. Also announced was the Z-Drive R5 which is available in capacities up to 12 TB capable of reaching transfer speeds of 7.2 GB/s and 2.52 million IOPS using the PCI Express x16 Gen 3.0.
Quality and performance
SSD technology has been developing rapidly. Most of the performance measurements used on disk drives with rotating media are also used on SSDs. Performance of flash-based SSDs is difficult to benchmark because of the wide range of possible conditions. In a test performed in 2010 by Xssist, using IOmeter, 4 kB random 70% read/30% write, queue depth 4, the IOPS delivered by the Intel X25-E 64 GB G1 started around 10,000 IOPs, and dropped sharply after 8 minutes to 4,000 IOPS, and continued to decrease gradually for the next 42 minutes. IOPS vary between 3,000 to 4,000 from around 50 minutes onwards for the rest of the 8+ hour test run.
Write amplification is the major reason for the change in performance of an SSD over time. Designers of enterprise-grade drives try to avoid this performance variation by increasing over provisioning, and by employing wear-leveling algorithms that move data only when the drives are not heavily utilized.
SSD shipments were 11 million units in 2009, 17.3 million units in 2011 for a total of $5 billion, 39 million units in 2012, and are expected to rise to 83 million units in 2013 to 201.4 million units in 2016 and to 227 million units in 2017.
Revenues for the SSD market (including low-cost PC solutions) worldwide totaled US$585 million in 2008, rising over 100% from US$259 million in 2007.
- "Texas Memory Systems: Solid State Disk Overview". Texas Memory System Resources. Texas Memory Systems. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- Whittaker, Zack. "Solid-state disk prices falling, still more costly than hard disks". Between the Lines. ZDNet. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- "What is solid state disk? - A Word Definition From the Webopedia Computer Dictionary". Webopedia. ITBusinessEdge. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- Janssen, Cory. "What is a Solid State Disk (SSD)? - Definition from Techopedia". Tecnopedia. Janalta Interactive Sites. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- "Solid State Storage 101: An introduction to Solid State Storage". SNIA. January 2009. Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- STEC."SSD Power Savings Render Significant Reduction to TCO." Retrieved October 25, 2010.
- Vamsee Kasavajhala (May 2011). "SSD vs HDD Price and Performance Study, a Dell technical white paper". Dell PowerVault Technical Marketing. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- Geoff Gasior (21 June 2012). "SSD prices in steady, substantial decline: A look at the cost of the current generation". The Tech Report.
- "WD shows off its first hybrid drive, the WD Black SSHD". Cnet. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
- Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos (2012-02-08). "Momentus XT 750 GB Review: A Second-Gen Hybrid Hard Drive". Retrieved 2013-11-07.
- Anand Lal Shimpi (2011-12-13). "Seagate 2nd Generation Momentus XT (750GB) Hybrid HDD Review". Retrieved 2013-11-07.
- Rent, Thomas M. (2010-03-20). "Origin of Solid State Drives". storagereview.com. Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- Weber, Helmut (September 1967). "Microprogramming the IBM System/36O Model 30". Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- "Auxiliary memory". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2012.
- "IBM User's Guide, Thirteenth Edition". Web.utk.edu. 1960-06-30. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "Charting the 30 Year Rise of the Solid State Disk Market". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2011-06-19.
- "Dataram Corp: 1977 Annual Report". Retrieved 2011-06-19.
- "SSD Market History - Charting the 30 Year Rise of the Solid State Disk Market". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2010-05-06.
- Moore, Fred. "Enterprise Storage Report for the 1990s". Storage Technology Corporation. Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- Ahl, David H. (January 1984). "The Sharp PC-5000; a desktop computer in a portable package". Creative Computing 10 (1). Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- Waurzyniak, Patrick (8 September 1986). Battery-Powered Mass Storage System Offered. InfoWorld Media Group, Inc. pp. 54–. ISSN 0199-6649. Retrieved 26 November 2012.
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "SSD Market History - Charting the 30 Year Rise of the Solid State Disk Market". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2010-05-06.
- EMC Corporation. "EMC Corporation". web.archive.org. Archived from the original on 2000-06-21. Retrieved 2011-07-11.
- Kind, Tobias (2009-11-13). "RAMDISK Benchmarks". University of California, Davis. Retrieved 2011-06-20.
- "Psion MC 400 Mobile Computer". retrocosm.net. 2012-03-29. Retrieved 2013-12-13.
- Odagiri, Hiroyuki; Goto, Akira; Sunami, Atsushi; Nelson, Richard R. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch Up: An International Comparative Study. Oxford University Press. pp. 224–227. ISBN 0-19-957475-8.
- Cash, Kelly. "Flash SSDs - Inferior Technology or Closet Superstar?". BiTMICRO. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
- Drossel, Gary (February 2007). "Solid-state drives meet military storage security requirements". Military Embedded Systems. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- "BiTMICRO 1999 News Releases". BiTMICRO. 1999. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- "Fusion-io announces ioDrive, placing the power of a SAN in the palm of your hand". Fusion-io. 2007-09-25. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- "OCZ's New Blazing Fast 1TB Z SSD Drive". Tom's Hardware. 2009-03-04. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- Jansen, Ng (2009-12-02). "Micron Announces World's First Native 6Gbps SATA Solid State Drive". DailyTech. Retrieved 2009-12-02.
- Mellor, Chris. "EMC has changed enterprise disk storage for ever:First into the enterprise flash breech". Techworld. Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- Burke, Barry A. (2009-02-18). "1.040: efd - what's in a name?". The Storage Anarchist. Retrieved 2010-06-12.
- Anand Lal Shimpi . (2012-11-09). "The Intel SSD DC S3700 (200GB) Review?". AnandTech.
- "What is a Solid State Disk?". Ramsan.com. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- "SSD Controller Detail". StorageReview.com. 2010-04-10. Retrieved 2010-04-10.
- Bechtolsheim, Andy (2008). "The Solid State Storage Revolution". SNIA.org. Retrieved 2010-11-07.
- Werner, Jeremy (2010-08-17). "A Look Under the Hood at Some Unique SSD Features". SandForce.com. Retrieved 2012-08-28.
- "The SSD Anthology: Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ". AnandTech.com. 2009-03-18.
- "Flash SSD with 250 MB/s writing speed". Micron.com. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- Shimpi, Anand Lal (2011-02-24). "OCZ Vertex 3 Preview: Faster and Cheaper than the Vertex 3 Pro". Anandtech.com. Retrieved 2011-06-30.
- Shimpi, Anand Lal (31 December 2009). "OCZ's Vertex 2 Pro Preview: The Fastest MLC SSD We've Ever Tested". AnandTech. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
- Lai, Eric (2008-11-07). "SSD laptop drives 'slower than hard disks'". Computerworld. Retrieved 2011-06-19.
- SLC and MLC SSD Festplatten. Retrieved 2013-04-10.
- Mearian, Lucas (2008-08-27). "Solid-state disk lackluster for laptops, PCs". Retrieved 2009-03-11.
- "Are MLC SSDs Ever Safe in Enterprise Apps?". Storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- Lucchesi, Ray (September 2008). "SSD flash drives enter the enterprise". Silverton Consulting. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
- Bagley, Jim (2009-07-01). "Over-provisioning: a winning strategy or a retreat?". StorageStrategies Now. p. 2. Retrieved 2010-06-19.
- Drossel, Gary (2009-09-14). "Methodologies for Calculating SSD Useable Life". Storage Developer Conference, 2009. Retrieved 2010-06-20.
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "RAM SSDs". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 14 August 2010.
- Allyn Malventano. "CES 2012: OCZ shows DDR based SATA 6Gb/sec aeonDrive". 2012.
- "RIndMA Disk". Hardwareforall.com. Retrieved 2010-08-13.
- Zsolt Kerekes. "Flash SSD vs RAM SSD Prices". 2007.
- "Why Are SSDs Still So Expensive?".
- Douglas Perry. "Buffalo Shows SSDs with MRAM Cache". 2012.
- Rick Burgess. "Everspin first to ship ST-MRAM, claims 500x faster than SSDs". 2012.
- Jim Handy. "Viking: Why Wait for Nonvolatile DRAM?". 2013.
- The SSD Guy (2013-03-30). "Seagate Upgrades Hybrids, Phases Out 7,200RPM HDDs". The SSD Guy. Retrieved 2014-01-20.
- "Hybrid Storage Drives"
- Demerjian, Charlie (2010-05-03). "SandForce SSDs break TPC-C records". SemiAccurate.com. Retrieved 2010-11-07.
- "Intel SSD, now off the sh..err, shamed list".
- "Crucial's M500 SSD reviewed".
- "More Power-Loss Data Protection with Intel® SSD 320 Series".
- "Intel® Solid-State Drive 710: Endurance. Performance. Protection.".
- "PATA SSD". Transcend. Archived from the original on 2011-01-29.
- "Netbook SSDs". Super Talent. Archived from the original on 2011-01-29.
- Kerekes, Zsolt (July 2010). "The (parallel) SCSI SSD market". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2011-06-20.
- Ruth, Gene (2010-01-27). "SSD: Dump the hard disk form factor". Burton Group. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "SSD Buyers Guide". storagesearch.com. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- "SATA M.2 Card". The Serial ATA International Organization. Retrieved 2013-09-14.
- Beard, Brian (2009). "SSD Moving into the Mainstream as PCs Go 100% Solid State". Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
- "Enterprise SATADIMM". Viking Technology. Retrieved 2010-11-07.
- "SATADOM". Innodisk. Retrieved 2011-07-07.
- Pop, Sebastian. "PCI Express SSD from Fusion-io ioXtreme Is Aimed at the Consumer Market". Softpedia. Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- Pariseau, Beth (16 March 2010). "LSI delivers Flash-based PCIe card with 6 Gbit/s SAS interface". Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "SSDs". StorageSearch.com. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
- "New From SST: SST85LD0128 NANDrive - Single Package Flash Based 128MB Solid State Hard Disk Drive with ATA / IDE Interface". Memec Newsletter. Dec 2006. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
- "SST announces small ATA solid-state storage devices". Computer Technology Review. 26 Oct 2006. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
- "M1000 Specifications". Memoright. Retrieved 2011-07-07.
- Chung, Yuping (19 Nov 2008). "Compact, shock- and error-tolerant SSDs offer auto infotainment storage options". EE Times. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
- "Benchmarking Enterprise SSDs" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "SSD vs HDD - Why Solid State Drive". SSD Guide. OCZ Technology. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- "Price Comparison SSDs" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- BeHardware reported lower retailer return rates for SSDs than HDDs between April and October 2010. Prieur, Marc (6 May 2011). "Components returns rates". BeHardware. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- A 2011 study by Intel on the use of 45,000 SSDs reported an annualized failure rate of 0.61% for SSDs, compared with 4.85% for HDDs. "Validating the Reliability of Intel® Solid-State Drives". Intel. July 2011. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- Prieur, Marc (16 November 2012). "Components returns rates (7)". BeHardware. Retrieved 25 August 2013.
- Harris, Robin (2013-03-01). "How SSD power faults scramble your data". ZDNet. CBS Interactive.
- Ku, Andrew (29 July 2011). "Tom's Hardware, Data center feedback". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- Schoeb, Leah (January 2013). "Should you believe vendors’ jaw-dropping solid-state performance specs?". Storage Magazine. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- Mearian, Lucas (3 August 2009). "Intel confirms data corruption bug in new SSDs, halts shipments". ComputerWorld. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- "More hard drive firmware bugs cause data loss". Defcon-5.com. 5 September 2009. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- Markoff, John (2008-12-11). "Computing Without a Whirring Drive". The New York Times. p. B9. "Using a standard Macintosh performance measurement utility called Xbench, the Intel solid-state drive increased the computer's overall performance by almost half. Disk performance increased fivefold."
- HP Solid State Drives (SSDs) for Workstations
- "Hard Drive Data Recovery Glossary". New York Data Recovery. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
- Radding, Alan. "Solid-state storage finds its niche". StorageSearch.com. Retrieved 2007-12-29. Registration required.
- Meyev, Aleksey (2008-04-23). "SSD, i-RAM and Traditional Hard Disk drives". X-bit labs.
- "The PC Guide: Spindle Speed".
- "Super Talent SSD: 16GB of Solid State Goodness". AnandTech. 2007-05-07. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- "Intel X25-M solid-state drive degrades significantly with heavy use". Retrieved 2012-10-21.
- "Intel High Performance Solid State Drive - Solid State Drive Frequently Asked Questions". Retrieved 2010-03-04.
- "Windows Defragmenter". microsoft.com. 2010-04-23.
- "How NTFS reserves space for its Master File Table (MFT)". Microsoft. 2008-10-16. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "How does a solid state drive work?". Hardware. KnownHost. 27 May 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- "Do SSDs heat up?". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/185191en/". Seagate. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "SSD vs HDD". SAMSUNG Semiconductor.
- "Memoright SSDs: The End of Hard drives?". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2008-08-05.
- "How Magnets Affect Your Computer". Retrieved 2011-03-04.
- Lucas Mearian (2008-08-27). "Solid-state disk lackluster for laptops, PCs". Retrieved 2008-09-12. "Corporate-grade SSD uses single-level cell (SLC) NAND memory and multiple channels to increase data throughput and wear-leveling software to ensure data is distributed evenly in the drive rather than wearing out one group of cells over another. And, while some consumer-grade SSD is just now beginning to incorporate the latter features (p. 1). It matters whether the SSD drive uses SLC or MLC memory. SLC generally endures up to 100,000 write cycles or writes per cell, while MLC can endure anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 writes before it begins to fail, [according to Fujitsu's vice president of business development Joel Hagberg] (p. 4)."
- Kerekes, Zsolt. "SSD Myths and Legends - "write endurance"". StorageSearch.com.
- "No SWAP Partition, Journaling Filesystems, …on an SSD?". Robert.penz.name. 2008-12-07. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
- "SSDs, Journaling, and noatime/relatime". 2009-03-01. Retrieved 2011-09-27.
- Tests by Tom's Hardware on the 60 GB Intel 520 SSD calculated a worst-case lifetime of just over five years for incompressible data, and a lifetime of 75 years for compressible data. Ku, Andrew (6 February 2012). "Intel SSD 520 Review: SandForce's Technology: Very Low Write Amplification". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- Analysis of SSD Reliability during power-outages, December 2013
- A study performed by Carnegie Mellon University on manufacturers' published MTBF 
- "SSDs are hot, but not without security risks". IDG Communications. 2010-08-01.
- "ACrucial M500 SSD now selling for 59 cents per gig". Techreport. 2013-04-11. Retrieved 2013-04-11.
- "HGST Ships 6TB Ultrastar® He6 Helium-filled Drives for High-density, Massive Scale-out Data Center Environments". HGST, Inc. 2013-11-04. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- AnandTech | The SSD Improv: Intel & Indilinx get TRIM, Kingston Brings Intel Down to $115. Anandtech
- "Long-term performance analysis of Intel Mainstream SSDs". PC Perspective. 2009-02-13.
- Schmid, Patrick (2007-11-07). "HyperDrive 4 Redefines Solid State Storage: HyperDrive 4 - The Fastest Hard Disk In The World?". Tom's Hardware.|-
- Prigge, Matt (2010-06-07). "An SSD crash course: What you need to know". InfoWorld. Retrieved 2010-08-29.
- "eWeek, Toshiba 1.8 drive announcement, January 2011".
- "The differences between an SSD and a memory card". sandisk.com. Retrieved 2011-06-16.
- "Intel Z68 Chipset & Smart Response Technology (SSD Caching) Review". AnandTech. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "SSD Caching (Without Z68): HighPoint's RocketHybrid 1220". Tom's Hardware. 2011-05-10. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- Mark E. Russinovich; David A. Solomon; Alex Ionescu (2009). Windows internals (5th ed.). Microsoft Press. pp. 772–774. ISBN 978-0-7356-2530-3.
- Petros Koutoupis (2013-11-25). "Advanced Hard Drive Caching Techniques". linuxjournal.com. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- Arnd Bergmann (2011-02-18). "Optimizing Linux with cheap flash drives". LWN.net. Retrieved 2013-10-03.
- Jonathan Corbet (2007-05-15). "LogFS". LWN.net. Retrieved 2013-10-03.
- "Parted Magic". Parted Magic. 2012-04-22. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "Linux kernel 2.6.33". kernelnewbies.org. 2010-02-24. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "swapon(8) - Linux manual page". man7.org. 2013-09-17. Retrieved 2013-12-12.
- "SSD Optimization". debian.org. 2013-11-22. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
- "mm/swapfile.c, line 2507". kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git - Linux kernel stable tree, version 3.12.5. kernel.org. Retrieved 2013-12-12.
- On current Linux systems, each partition is aligned to start at a 1 MiB mark, which covers all use cases, being divisible by 1 MiB / 512 KiB / 128 KiB / 4 KiB / 512 B.
- "Enabling and Testing SSD TRIM Support Under Linux". Techgage. 2011-05-06. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "openSUSE mailing list: SSD detection when creating first time fstab ?". Lists.opensuse.org. 2011-06-02. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "SSD discard (trim) support". openSUSE.
- Patrick Nagel: Impact of ext4′s discard option on my SSD
- "block/blk-lib.c, line 29". kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git - Linux kernel stable tree, version 3.12.7. kernel.org. Retrieved 2014-01-09.
- Phoronix: Ubuntu Aims To TRIM SSDs By Default
- "Linux I/O Scheduler Comparison On The Linux 3.4 Desktop". Phoronix. 2012-05-11. Retrieved 2013-10-03.
- "SSD benchmark of I/O schedulers". ubuntuforums.org. 2010. Retrieved 2013-10-03.
- "1.1 A scalable block layer for high-performance SSD storage". Linux 3.13. kernelnewbies.org. 2014-01-19. Retrieved 2014-01-25.
- Jonathan Corbet (2013-06-05). "The multiqueue block layer". LWN.net. Retrieved 2014-01-25.
- Matias Bjørling; Jens Axboe; David Nellans; Philippe Bonnet (2013). "Linux Block IO: Introducing Multi-queue SSD Access on Multi-core Systems" (PDF). kernel.dk. ACM. Retrieved 2014-01-25.
- "Mac OS X Lion has TRIM support for SSDs, HiDPI resolutions for improved pixel density?". Engadget. Retrieved 2011-06-12.
- "MacRumors Forum". MacRumors. Retrieved 2011-06-12.[unreliable source?]
- ATA Trim/Delete Notification Support in Windows 7
- MSDN Blogs: Support and Q&A for Solid-State Drives
- Flynn, David. "Windows 7 gets SSD-friendly". Retrieved 2009-01-29.
- "MSDN Blogs: Support and Q&A for Solid-State Drives". e7blog. Retrieved 2009-05-27.
- Yam, Marcus (May 5, 2009). "Windows 7 and Optimization for Solid State Drives". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- "Windows 7 and it's Support for Solid State Drives". Windows 7 Center. November 10, 2008. Retrieved 2011-06-18.
- Smith, Tony. "If your SSD sucks, blame Vista, says SSD vendor". Retrieved 2008-10-11.
- "Samsung, Microsoft in talks to speed up SSDs on Vista". Retrieved 2008-09-22.
- Sexton, Koka (29 June 2010). "SSD Storage Demands Proper Partition Alignment". www.wwpi.com. Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- Butler, Harry (27 Aug 2009). "SSD performance tweaks for Vista". bit-tech.net. Retrieved 9 August 2010.
- "ZFS L2ARC and SSD drives by Brendan Gregg". brendan_entry_test. Sun Microsystem blog. 2008-07-12. Retrieved 2009-11-12.
- "[base] Revision 240868". Svnweb.freebsd.org. Retrieved 2014-01-20.
- "features". DragonFlyBSD. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "[Phoronix] EnhanceIO, Bcache & DM-Cache Benchmarked". Phoronix.com. 2013-06-11. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
- Aughton, Simon (2007-04-25). "Dell Gets Flash With SSD Option for Laptops". IT PRO.
- Chen, Shu-Ching Jean (2007-06-07). "$199 Laptop Is No Child's Play". Forbes. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
- "Macbook Air Specifications". Apple Inc. Retrieved 2009-10-21.[verification needed]
- "Road Warriors Get Ready – Lenovo Delivers "No Compromises" Ultraportable ThinkPad X300 Notebook PC" (Press release). Lenovo. 2008-02-26.
- Joshua Topolsky (2008-08-15). "Lenovo slips out the new ThinkPad X301: new CPUs, 128GB SSD, still thin as hell". engadget.com. Retrieved 2013-12-09.
- "EMC With STEC for Enterprise Flash Drives". StorageNewsletter.com. 2008-01-14. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
- "Solaris ZFS Enables Hybrid Storage Pools: Shatters Economic and Performance Barriers". Sun Microsystems. Retrieved 2009-04-09.
- "Toshiba Ships First Laptop With a 512 GB SSD". Tom's Hardware. 2009-04-14.
- "Toshiba announces world's first 512GB SSD laptop". CNET News. 2009-04-14.
- "MacBook Air". Apple, Inc. 2010-10-20.[verification needed]
- "OCZ's RevoDrive X2: When A Fast PCIe SSD Isn't Fast Enough". Tom's Hardware. 2011-01-12.
- "ioDrive Octal". Fusion-io. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "OCZ R4 PCIe SSD Packs 16 SandForce SF-2200 Series Subunits". techPowerUp. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- Carl, Jack. "OCZ Launches New Z-Drive R4 and R5 PCIe SSD – CES 2012". Lenzfire. Retrieved 2012-05-06.
- "Samsung Introduces Industry’s First 1 Terabyte mSATA SSD". www.global.samsungtomorrow.com, Samsung. 2013-12-09.
- "Samsung announces world's first 1 TB mSATA SSD". Samsung, www.samsungtomorrow.com. 2013-12-09.
- "Intel X25-E 64GB G1, 4KB Random IOPS, iometer benchmark". March 27, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-01.
- "SSDs vs. hard drives". Network World.
- SSD Sales up 14% in 2009, January 20th, 2010, Brian Beeler, storagereview.com
- Solid State Drives to Score Big This Year with Huge Shipment Growth, April 2, 2012, Fang Zhang, iSupply
- SSDs sales rise, prices drop below $1 per GB in 2012, January 10, 2012, Pedro Hernandez, ecoinsite.com
- 39 Million SSDs Shipped WW in 2012, Up 129% From 2011 - IHS iSuppli, January 24th, 2013, storagenewsletter.com
- SSDs weather the PC storm, May 8, 2013, Nermin Hajdarbegovic, TG Daily, accesat la 9 mai 2013
- Samsung leads in 2008 SSD market with over 30% share, says Gartner, 10 June 2009, Josephine Lien, Taipei; Jessie Shen, DIGITIMES
- "Solid-state revolution: in-depth on how SSDs really work". Lee Hutchinson. Ars Technica. June 4, 2012.
- Mai Zheng, Joseph Tucek, Feng Qin, Mark Lillibridge, "Understanding the Robustness of SSDs under Power Fault", FAST'13
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Solid-state drives.|
- Background and general
- StorageReview.com SSD Guide
- A guide to understanding Solid State Drives
- SSDs versus laptop HDDs and upgrade experiences
- Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ
- Charting the 30 Year Rise of the Solid State Disk Market
- Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? - long term SSD reliability review
- SSD return rates review by manufacturer (2012), hardware.fr - French (English) a 2012 update of a 2010 report based on data from a leading French tech retailer
- Ted Tso - Aligning filesystems to an SSD's erase block size
- JEDEC Continues SSD Standardization Efforts
- Linux & NVM: File and Storage System Challenges (PDF)