Talk:Holland 602 type submarine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which exactly was the "prototype" if any ?[edit]

The photo caption reads "The USS H-3 served as the prototype for the class" but the text reads "The prototypes for the class were the two submarines ordered in 1911 for the Chilean Navy. The 313/421 ton subs were built to the John Philip Holland design 19-E and design 19-B. The Chilean Navy, however, refused to accept delivery of the boats. They were then sold to the Royal Canadian Navy, becoming HMCS CC-1 and HMCS CC-2." which seems contradictory. ?? I think there is some confusion between the general Holland 602 type and the specific US H class. This article is about the general 602 type. Rcbutcher (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-written this bit; It makes more sense to see the Chilean/CC class boats as predecessors, rather than prototypes. Xyl 54 (talk) 16:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Danish Navy?[edit]

Looking at several sources, I can find no Danish submarines matching the names given in the text. Were these former British or Swedish ships, since they are listed with the HMS prefix associated with those two navies? Or were they, perhaps, ordered but never delivered? Or renamed in Danish service? Color me confused… — Bellhalla (talk) 18:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken these out; The RDN had no Holland boats at all, according to Jane's (Fighting ships of WWI) and Conway (Fighting ships 1922-46). They were added in March 2008 by an anonymous one-edit contributor, who may well be getting muddled with something else. Xyl 54 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Holland 602 type submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]