User talk:66.194.51.34

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 66.194.51.34, is registered to Broome Community College 901 Upper Front Street Binghamton, NY 13902 and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Latinus 19:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 16:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zack de la Rocha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 19:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

April 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Crust (geology) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. – Gurchzilla 15:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to System has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. res 2216 firestar 14:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to 2024 aluminium alloy. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wizard191 (talk) 19:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Honda Civic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Plymouth GTX, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 14:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Elizabeth A. Smart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 14:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Photography, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Daa89563 (talk) 18:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Elbow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – Zntrip 23:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Digital divide has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jusda fax 17:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salekhard. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salekhard was changed by 66.194.51.34 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-28T14:09:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Solem v. Helm, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Solem v. Helm was changed by 66.194.51.34 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-28T14:10:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Garden of Forking Paths, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Garden of Forking Paths was changed by 66.194.51.34 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-11-05T01:26:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cohesion (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cohesion (band) was changed by 66.194.51.34 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-11-30T17:06:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fashion Fair Mall. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jus da fax 17:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Broome Community College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alanraywiki (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page June 13 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 21:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mount McKinley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. — Spike Toronto 19:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eagle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eagle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alligator, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mokele (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Loretta Young. As has been discussed on this article, categories of religious practice need sourcing, it is not a matter of "your 2 cents". Please appreciate the extensive work that has been given by other editors. Span (talk) 17:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jewish principles of faith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Avoided (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pola Negri, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinkadelica ^♣ 22:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dorothy Morris has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://dorothymorris.webs.com/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Dorothy Dare has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Pinkadelica ^♣ 20:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Ruby Keeler. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pinkadelica ^♣ 20:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eleanor Powell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinkadelica ^♣ 21:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011[edit]

Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:EGRS for additional information. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh Rumage for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Pinkadelica ^♣ 19:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Laraine Day has been reverted.
Your edit here to Laraine Day was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2CrGfF0e4Y&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome![edit]

Cool, glad you like the pics! It's so worth doing - we are lucky that we can use high quality pics for golden age stars so we should upload them. You can do it too if you make an account - it's so easy. Just find a picture online that's obviously a publicity pic, save it, and then copy the text from the images I've uploaded. Glad to find a fellow classic hollywood fan --Lobo512 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poor source[edit]

Note that blogs and forum posts do not meet Wikipedia's reliable sources policy. Please do not continue to use this link to add EGRS info to articles.Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article John Garfield, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alcmaeonid (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Esther Williams. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Alcmaeonid (talk) 18:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rosalind Russell, you may be blocked from editing. Alcmaeonid (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued addition of WP:EGRS violating material to biography articles supported by falsified references. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Veil of Maya, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm DouglasCalvert. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Long-term memory because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DouglasCalvert (talk) 17:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. An edit that you recently made to Binghamton shootings seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm PackMecEng. An edit that you recently made to Esperanto seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PackMecEng (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Buzkashi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rusty Springs (talk) 13:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vestal High School— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 14:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Aranya. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Great Fire of Rome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Aranya (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.