User talk:71.174.73.147

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strict constructionism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Strict constructionism was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.994634 on 2011-01-18T03:30:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matt Saracen, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matt Saracen was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861111 on 2011-02-10T22:04:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Interpreter of Maladies with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 12:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Binding energy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 14:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prince Omar bin Al Faisal, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to XMG Studio was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Casi se muere, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Casi se muere was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967979 on 2012-02-23T15:48:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Casi se muere with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wiki13 (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Douglas Bruce, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Douglas Bruce was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929989 on 2012-04-13T17:48:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louie Caporusso. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davewild (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Xavier Rescigno, you may be blocked from editing. Davewild (talk) 17:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ralph Vane, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ralph Vane was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910635 on 2012-04-13T18:02:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Davewild (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to It (1990 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: It (1990 film) was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956907 on 2012-05-25T19:39:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chip Davis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chip Davis was changed by 71.174.73.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892353 on 2012-05-25T19:47:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. 99.153.142.225 (talk) 19:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chip Davis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 19:56, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 20:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Elemented9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Fermat's Last Theorem, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Element9. TALK 00:04, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to B.A.P (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ottoman Empire— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asım Akin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 16:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Asım Akin with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Isaac Newton in popular culture— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Newton in popular culture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ben Jonson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 18:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Military of ancient Rome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.174.73.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I truly don’t know what happened here. Using a shared network, and it seems that I have been blocked due to someone else’s error. I really do not want to use Wikipedia inappropriately, I just want to add to it like a normal user.

Decline reason:

Please follow the instructions at the top of the page. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.174.73.147&oldid=1139886830"