User talk:Andonic/Archive 19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks[edit]

For the quick reverts to my user talk page =) —Salmar (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cord Blood Banking[edit]

Hello Andonico,

I did not vandalize the Cord Blood Banking page at all, I deleted the duplication! Since you undid my corrections to the page, now there are 2 sections of "Issues of all cord blood banks".— Ryantcook (talk)

Thanks[edit]

Hello Andonico,

Thank you very much for your understanding and prompt corrective action. I am still a bit new to the wikipedia community, but I really do hope that I can contribute to it. But once again, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryantcook (talk • contribs) 01:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time Trax[edit]

Why should a mention of the "War of the Hemispheres" be unconstructive, while the "Just War" seems to be so important? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.85.90.195 (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar![edit]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your hard work reverting vandalism. :-)--Lights (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 7 11 February 2008 About the Signpost
Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad Foundation's FY2007 audit released 
Vatican claims out-of-context Wikipedia quote was used to attack Pope Best of WikiWorld: "W" 
News and notes: Working group, Wik-iPhone, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Basic dispute resolution Dispatches: Great saves at Featured article review 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nom troubles[edit]

Sorry if I caused any bad feeling by adding the co-nomination on Ohana's RFA whilst it's live, but seen as I offered.... :) Rudget. 16:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not enjoyed the weather[edit]

I <curse words removed for fear of troutslaps> hate snow. You'd think I'd move. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

The user that you and I were dealing with a few days ago uploaded an image. I don't think the licensing information is accurate, but I don't know how to add it for deletion either. Oore (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Oore (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Governor Palin[edit]

Thanks for the message on my talk page. Why do you feel the edit was unconstructive? I quoted a direct fact from a newspaper and described the edit accuratley in the edit summary.

PanzaM22 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC) Mike[reply]

Huggle[edit]

No problem, you're pretty quick on the rollback yourself. :P Keilana|Parlez ici 19:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

29 years?[edit]

Am I missing a joke here? Enigma (talk) 22:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for long blocks, but I was a little surprised by that. Usually I see short blocks or occasionally indefinite ones for accounts created exclusively for vandalism. Thanks for the reply. :) Enigma (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flyordie .com[edit]

Would you mind taking a look at this page, the author is continually removing the speedy tag from the page, but has just barely repaired it so that it is no longer an advertisement. Maybe A1 or nonsense material? Either way, it would be great if you could make it a red link. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 23:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duh! Guess i was not thinking straight...thanks for deleting...oh someone got to it before you. Thanks anyways! Tiptoety talk 23:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, you deleted it. The link you left on my talk was to the wrong article :p Tiptoety talk 23:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanz talk 04:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Best pic I've seen

Doczilla's RfA[edit]

No problem![edit]

No problem, you're quite welcome! Wildthing61476 (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me to stay away from Wikipedia[edit]

Thank you for reminding me to stay away from Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.103.45.114 (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inflation stuff[edit]

AndonicO, a few months ago I tried to encourage another user to help me develop inflation accounting. It hasn't worked out. User:Herbou AKA User:Nicolaas J Smith is now editing as a COI anon, I think. See User talk:87.103.45.114, where I left a message. Not sure what's happening here, but wanted to let you know. --Foggy Morning (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle[edit]

Thanks for your message. I had in fact sent off an email requesting Huggle before I put my name down for VandalProof, but have not yet received a reply. I will chase the developer again this week. I am encouraged that you believe it to be worthwhile. Kind regards--Calabraxthis (talk) 14:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind suggestion. I would welcome receiving a copy of Huggle to try out. My email address is Calabraxthis(at)googlemail(dot)(com) . Best regards--Calabraxthis (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks kindly for sending me the copy of Huggle. I have had the opportunity to road-test it this weekend, and despite the subtle nuances which I will need to learn, it is indeed excellent and is certainly the best piece of software around. Thanks again--Calabraxthis (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jokosher edit not vandalism![edit]

Check again. - 58.107.98.45 (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar: The Last Airbender[edit]

Am I in trouble about the Avatar thing?That episode was supposed to air last month(The Boiling Rock). I'm telling you to please keep my avatar episode edit. To check for sure, visit IMDb Avatar Page and Season 3, go down and you will see I am right. Thanks (or not), --Ditsy5154 (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Ditsy5154[reply]

You![edit]

You deleated my post about The Horrible 3. Please tell every user to stop deleating it. I am currently writing the script. I can only tell the main story outline, for fear that someone will steal my idea before my movie is made.--Ditsy5154 (talk) 21:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry[edit]

I'm really sorry about the vandalism. It won't happen again. I'll change the Halo: Combat Evolved article (that you haven't noticed yet) back. I'm new, and I'm stupid. Sorry. Won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J Kode (talk • contribs) 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why[edit]

Why not? It's a friggin movie!--Ditsy5154 (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ckydudelog[edit]

That user was part of a tag team of vandals all vandalising the same page at the same time (and this was indicated in the AIV report). Given that this shows the accounts were being blatantly unconstructive (they had 14 vandal edits within 15 minutes!) I didn't see the need to go through the full warning process. Hut 8.5 18:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

29 year block :o[edit]

I'll just bet that this user will be right back vandalizing on Feb. 19, 2037.  ;) NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, ummm, I'm going to discredit a lot of your blocks because in 29 years, these people will all be back, and the indefinites won't. Other admins 1, AndonicO 0!

I'm trying to think why I posted this and why this might be funny. Sorry, can't think of anything. Enigma msg! 03:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

You called my addition of the image on a certain page vandalism. But believe it or not, the man on the image is on the page. Ask Anastrophe, it is all just a misunderstanding! I added the image in good faith, I did it only under the wrong name in the caption the first time! Angela from the Blue (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazni[edit]

Thank you for the note. I just reverted the edits of User:Mirzlax who is sockpuppet #83 (!) of banned User:NisarKand. See also checkuser for more proofs. Unfortunately, admin User:Kingturtle is actively proxying for this banned user in various articles, including Kabul, Ahmad Shah Durrani, etc. Thank you anyway.

OhanaUnited's RFA[edit]

Barnstar[edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
I hereby award you this barnstar for reverting vandalism to my userpage. Thank you for watching out for us in the community. Your awesome. Happy Editing, Dustitalk to me 19:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can award a barnstar to that can I? lol....Also I have a question. Can I close my editor review? Happy Editing, Dustitalk to me 20:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thanks for being quick to undo the vandalism on my page Happy Editing, Dustitalk to me 17:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please check out the conversation on my page, and the response I left on the userpage. Just wanted to make you aware of the situation. Happy Editing, Dustitalk to me 18:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Educated Guest

204.234.17.51 Vandalism[edit]

I saw that you warned user 204.234.17.51 saying that it will be their last warning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/204.234.17.51

They're still continuing to vandalise articles.

The IP is the one that is used at my school and a few others in the area.

Just bringing it to your attention

Thanks Zeroxysm (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peking duck Blog article[edit]

Blogs are most definitely subject to speedy deletion under criterion A7. That doesn't mean that articles on them aren't allowed; it just means that if the article doesn't prove the blog is notable, it can be deleted on site. You were fine to delete the article. I was being gracious by tagging to hopefully make the OE realize why the article was about to get deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


"Terrorism" definition and air forces[edit]

Thanks for your message. I can't deal with citation(s) right no,w but I'll attend to this as soon as I can.

Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imp of the Perverse (talk • contribs) 02:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of block[edit]

AndonicO, could you please elaborate a bit on your block of BestSummers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? I see no activity from that user for the last two weeks, but today you put a block on the user. This does not seem to be in line with WP:BLOCK. Please help me to understand your reasoning. Thank you. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Email[edit]

I replied. You've got mail! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 17:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Talk:Rio de Janeiro[edit]

I responded on the talk page.   jj137 (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the talk page.   jj137 (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added a message on their talk page.   jj137 (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You might as well go ahead and block me, I received a final warning a few days ago.   jj137 (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... I don't see anything in the logs...   jj137 (talk) 01:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, probably not...   jj137 (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Like I really would have tried to get you desysopped! I would have laughed.   jj137 (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. That's probably what would happen if any vandal fighting admin got desysopped.   jj137 (talk) 01:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... I have 500 blocks in the past two months. </jealousy> :)   jj137 (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Me going to try harder at reverting vandalism.   jj137 (talk) 02:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On it.   jj137 (talk) 02:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

30k[edit]

Done. Muahaha. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, didn't think so. Anyways, thanks for the barnstars, it looks fine. Race to 40k? :P Keilana|Parlez ici 13:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I was planning on writing for the Tzatziki Squad for awhile. Perhaps a peer review would be in order? If you give the OK, I'll nominate the article on behalf of the entire squad. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I'll write what I can, I'm not that good a writer, as you can see from my 0 FAs. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP likes blocks[edit]

As you might've seen, he vandalized your page after final warning. Enigma msg! 04:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Buzz Aldrin on the Moon.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Buzz Aldrin on the Moon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Buzz Aldrin on the Moon.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Block[edit]

  • :-O - No! I only violated 3RR like twice... honest... Bah, anyway, does the Rouge cabal actually exist anymore?! You have no category :-( ScarianCall me Pat 09:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, who reported me to AIV?! - And I don't know if I'm hardcore if enough the rouge's just yet ;-) ScarianCall me Pat 12:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Children's names[edit]

I don't understand, your'e saying that one can buy Howard Sounes' book and learn their names, but one can't reveal their names on Wikipedia? Thank you. Educated Guest (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you kindly answer my question please? Thank you. Educated Guest (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounes' source[edit]

Daily Telegraph Magazine: Jakob Dylan, Oct 7, 2000. If he wanted to keep their names secret, he didn't make a very good job of it did he? Thanks, Educated Guest (talk) 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, well I can only take Sounes' word as well. There is also material taken from a JD interview with Rolling Stone Magazine. Cheers, Educated Guest (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Asia (band)[edit]

Thanks for your comments. I've replied at User talk:A. B.#Talk:Asia (band). --A. B. (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like our friend is back with more complaints and a new set of IPs. --A. B. (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rangeblocks ...[edit]

... are scary. I was always terrified of applying them in case I shut down the entire of France or something :) You get awfully used to it, though, and yours looks just perfect. Narrowest range possible, AO/ACB and of a short duration. Perfect! - Alison ❤ 04:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Inversion (Music)[edit]

Hello; Tried to sort out inconsistencies and unclarities in this section. If you look at the "given" "third inversion" text compared to the "given/original" you will see the original inconsistencies. I tried to clear some things up, having played keyboard for 50 years. There are things not yet as clear as one would like, but I do hope to have advanced the cause.Beofluff (talk) 05:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Category:Rouge admins[edit]

Hi Andonic,

I noticed that you still use the Category:Rouge admins on your userpage/usertalk page. Please consider removing it, as it has now been deleted as of this discussion. Have a nice day!

--The Helpful One (Review) 13:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hehehe[edit]

So I think my latest idea is the best yet, check out my user page--Pewwer42  Talk  06:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle[edit]

Hi. I've never tried anti-vandalism software before, but I'd like to give Huggle a try. How would I go about getting the latest version sent to me? Thanks, Enigma msg! 19:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment Block[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
O RLY? How come I can still edit then? ;) · AndonicO Hail! 21:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Adventist U[edit]

hi - noticed you put a block on this IP address: [1] recently. you might want to take some action again - they're up to no good at New York Philharmonic and elsewhere today. thanks J. Van Meter (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andonic/Archive_19&oldid=1163069273"