User talk:Blanicky

Thanks...[edit]

...for your contributions to the articles related to Czech music. Much appreciated :) Feel free to ask me if you need any help! --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:13, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! I would like to focus on Czech music history, composers, compositions and organizing of subject categories (already started).Jan Blanický 20:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree, the article Music of the Czech Republic is a chaotic mess, and the best option is in my opinion complete rewriting. I don't think anyone will object, however, you can notify the Czech WikiProject. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

You do not have to put "~~~~" in the edit summary box. It is required only when you write a reply on the talk page. Like the one in the end of this message: vvv^t 09:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing of your articles[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karel Ančerl Gold[edit]

Mr. Blanický, hello.
I have been working a little on your page. I am interested in Ančerl since he was a Torontonian, like me.
But this article really needs a reference from a Czech magazine saying how important this collection is, before there is trouble here.
Cheers, Varlaam (talk) 21:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

there are many sources on internet, where particular discs from the edition are reviewed, also in English. It is very difficult to rate all collection, because the content is enormous, surveying long period of the work and going from romantic era to end of modernism, resp. beginning of contemporary classical. I think the fact, that this Supraphon set was awarded in 2006 by Grand Prix du Disque de l'Académie de Charles Cros, the most prestigious prize, granted together for exceptional artistic and technical level of classical music recordings proved it a little bit. Only the last one (no.43), released later and content Czechoslovak composers from early communist era is in my opinion bad, but not from the side of the conductor :-) Many of albums were awarded also separately in previous editions on vinyls. Of course, i am aware it is not sufficient response, but i did not find any review of all collection. For me personally are some discs there absolute peak (Dvořák´s Requiem and 9th Symphony, Janáček´s Glagolitic Mass and Sinfonietta or Taras Bulba, Bartók´s Concerto for orchestra or Kabeláč´s Mystery of Time.

I am not the author of the page.

The page needs to have references to its value, for example, its awards.

Those references need to be added before a senior editor, who is not me, decides he wants to delete the entire page.

I personally have no time or interest in justifying the page. You are the author, not I. Correct?

Sincerely, Varlaam (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you updated Jiří Stivín.

Progressive rock sources used to talk about him 30 years ago.

I cannot help, but Stivín has nothing together with progressive rock, only maybe some instrumental participation somewhere. He was predominantly the pioneer of free-jazz in Czechia and also experimentator in jazz-classical fusion attempts or, if you want, progressive jazz. I really don´t know any album of him, that should be denominated as "rock", regardless "progressive" or not.

I made a shopping trip to Bratislava in 1983 looking for progressive albums. My information on Czech prog came from an article in Surface Noise magazine, as I recall.

We used to see Supraphon LPs here often in those days. And some Panton, but not as much.

Varlaam (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Pavel Stepanek a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pavel Štěpánek. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Operas by Czech composers[edit]

Category:Operas by Czech composers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Compositions by Czech composers[edit]

Category:Compositions by Czech composers, which you created, has been nominated for merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Saint Wenceslas Chorale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Czech

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:Sindinero#Czechia[edit]

Hello, Blanicky. You have new messages at Sindinero's talk page.
Message added 18:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Category:Jazz-rock fusion albums by Czech artists[edit]

Category:Jazz-rock fusion albums by Czech artists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

E (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tom, Snare and Czech

Jan from Holešov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Digraph, Slavic and Czech

Skrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Slavic

Your recent edits[edit]

When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bohuslav Balbín, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stylistics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josef Pekař, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wenceslas I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Czech Republic. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My edit is fully in accordance to the authorization of the Czech government from May 2, 2016. Do not revert it. http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/en/issues_and_press/factsheets/x2016_04_21_the_completion_of_translations_of_the.html

No it is not in accordance. Please read the papers first. Nothing like that has been appointed. Thanks. -jkb- (talk) 15:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More significantly, see the article's talkpage, where your editorial idea has failed ot acchieve WP:CONSENSUS (it's doesn't matter how strongly you feel it is "correct"). DMacks (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Blanicky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marek Štryncl[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marek Štryncl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 22:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Musica Florea[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Musica Florea, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 22:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:High Mass compositions[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:High Mass compositions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Czech post-punk groups[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Czech post-punk groups indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]