User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 2

cattle vandal

Thanks. This guy put so many "Santa is a communist" phrases on this page, I couldn't revert it myself. My browser crashed and I had to press Ctrl-Alt-Del!

Down but not out, Savie Kumara 05:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Megadeath bassist, baseless(?) claim

Hello, Bongwarrior. Axeman put this back in. I left him a note requesting a verifiable source. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 12:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for spotting and removing vandalism on my talk page. Keep up the great work! --TeaDrinker 20:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by User:Hellfire17 on the Cold War article

Hello...I looked up User:Hellfire17, and found that this person is a previous vandal. Is this sufficient to block the user, since more vandalism was done on Cold War article? Hires an editor 15:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Not yet, but almost. I gave him a final warning, if he does it again he will be blocked. Thanks for the heads up, take care. --Bongwarrior 18:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

RFC/u

I'll do that, thanks. GreenJoe 01:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

For the revert of the vandalism on the silent film articles this morning. Lugnuts 09:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome, that user was making some odd deletion requests, I just followed the trail. Take care. --Bongwarrior 09:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

List of homerun hitters

Is it not relevant to add the astrik? Cheers! -- KBW1 06:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

No, because that is MLB's decision, not Wikipedia's. And because steroid use hasn't been proven for most of those players, it's a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy as well. --Bongwarrior 06:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. If and when it gets proven that the MLB releases some type of list of the players that use steroids, then we may include it in the article, correct? Cheers! -- KBW1 21:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Human feces

Having a picture of an arm doesn't greatly increase our understanding of what an arm looks like either. There is no reason to remove this relevant and informative picture. It is logical that the primary subject of the article is illustrated by a picture. That some don't like the picture is not a reason to remove it; Wikipedia is not censored and we are not going to remove images based on what some find disgusting. We're an encyclopedia. Regards, Melsaran (talk) 23:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

This discussion has gone around and around on the talk page, with no clear consensus to keep or remove. I decided to remove it because it's unnecessary. I'm sure it will be back again before long. --Bongwarrior 23:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey thank you, and question

I saw you defended me. Not defended what I said when I lost my temper, which was crude and obviously not worth defending, but just the fact that I did write that because I lost my temper, and not that I'm just some ill-intentioned vandal, just a good faith editor who got really upset over an ongoing debate which had been driving me insane.

What's funny is one person told me I have no place being on wikipedia at all and said I clearly am not intelligent or something to that effect, yet he keeps reverting to the version I had written before because he thought it was the best.

I'm going to cool down and try to be civil, I'm not saying what I did was okay, but I just wanted to thank you for understanding that sometimes people get mad and that there's a difference between things getting heated and actual vandalism. That makes it a lot easier for me to relax and feel more optimistic about contributing in positive ways.

I've got a question though. Do you know if I can access the report that was written about me, and what I can do to contest it?

Peace.Rglong 07:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm not sure of the specifics of the situation, but I thought it was unfair for you to be tagged as a vandal. The report I took exception to was issued at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism; that report was removed because one of the admins agreed that it wasn't a case of vandalism, and you don't need to do anything about that one. There is another report posted at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about your behavior, and that one is still open, although it's not drawing much attention. It might not be a bad idea to drop by there and give your side of the story, and maybe give an apology if you think you need to. Good luck, and take care. --Bongwarrior 07:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

your name

Dude, I love it.

Peace.

Bufftractor53 23:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I try. Take care. --Bongwarrior 23:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Question

thx for setting up my talk page. I have visited other people's user page and saw boxes with "this user has made 10000 edits" my question is just how u can count all thoes edits? thxDrydom 08:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey, all you need to do is go here. There are also other edit counters you can use at Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters. Keep up the good work. --Bongwarrior 08:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Original Barnstar
		For your aide in keeping irrelevant pop-culture references out of Benjamin Disraeli. Mackensen (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome

*Cremepuff222* has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

:-) *Cremepuff222* 00:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for spotting the idiocy on my talk page and reverting it. Appreciated. Best regards, Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 07:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Some light dinner conversation

Nobcheese is British slang for smegma. It's probably not crossed the atlantic. Secretlondon 06:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

No, my apologies, I hadn't heard of that before. It's a potentially useful word, so here's hoping it finds its way here fairly soon. Take care. --Bongwarrior 06:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe it's come to this...

Bongwarrior, your talkpage here is getting vandalized about five times per half-hour, at the least. Maybe it's come to this: you'll just have to have an administrator speed delete the page. Then, when things cool down again, and some of the vandalizers have turned good, and the others who refused to change have been blocked from editing, and the encyclopedia is full of nothing but responsible editors, you can always restore or recreate your talkpage. Just a thought; don't really expect anyone to perform it. Sometimes I find only the sunsets can cheer downward people up. October 21st, 2007. —Preceding comment was added at 00:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're talking about. My talk page hardly ever gets vandalized, and even if it was as bad as you say, I don't think deleting it would be the best course of action. Thanks for the concern though. --Bongwarrior 03:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Gee, I thought it did. After I brought up that discussion on whether or not the site made a mistake on who removed that myspace spam from the South Park page, I added your talkpage (and of course, the associated userpage) to my watchlist, in wait of a reply. Once I add a page to my watchlist, I almost never take it off; therefore I've frequently seen in the summaries how someone vandalizes both your user and your talk page, and you or some kind user always revert it. I merely thought that if the page was deleted until all the vandalizers (or a good enough deal of them) have been stopped, then you wouldn't have to worry about that anymore. (Of course, you'd probably have to keep your userpage going, since people might find it harder to identify you amongst all the other users, otherwise.) Then again, a good splash of cold water and smearing wet hair with tea tree oil sometimes helps also. October 21st, 2007. —Preceding comment was added at 03:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 17:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Since there's all that vandalism happening to your user pages:

Wilhelmina Will has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hope that cheers you up! Wilhelmina Will 00:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism off my userpages. The Chronic 03:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Good work on 41, as well. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 06:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page.

Here's a RickK Anti-vandalism barnstar for reverting the vandalism on my page! -Goodshoped 19:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

But, I have a concern. That person's going to come back and vandalize my page some more under sockpupets with P and H-man, like P***H***man, or P***man, or something like that. Anyway, I appreciate it. Cheers!

please explain

Now I'm a fair man, I can see why wiki has its policies and am in complete support of them. I wouldn't go to a major article and mess it up under any circumstances, that would just be rude. But Centennial high school? An article which was practically empty to begin with. You see it fit to continuously go back there and waste time editing it, ruining a good joke which the students of centennial would've appreciated? Now that's destructive behaviour. No, this isn't spam just to be clear, so dont go making out that it is. I'm asking you, where do you find the time and why do you care, is this just an ego thing. im confused to say the least seeing as you are an "American dude". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.144.197.186 (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not trying to ruin anyone's fun, but Wikipedia is a fairly prominent website, and people come here looking for serious information, not jokes. It doesn't matter if it's a major article or a stub. I find Wikipedia to be a very useful resource, and I'd like to keep it that way. You may want to check out the website Uncyclopedia. I'm not all that familiar with it, but it seems like you can get away with whatever you want, as long as it's funny. Of course, if you want to stick around here and contribute a bit more seriously, that's even better. Take care. --Bongwarrior 06:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

THANK YOU

Very much for the Barnstar! That guy gave me quite a workout. Thanks again.. -Rjd0060 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Name change

BW,

Thanks for the heads up. I was unaware of the Wiki name policy. I will change my username from RogerStaubach to something else. PS - This is the only way I see to reply to you. There must be another way?

Thanks,

RS —Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerStaubach (talk • contribs) 07:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding, RS. Contacting me right here is usually the quickest way. If you'd rather email me, there's an "email this user" link on the left side of this page, but sometimes it takes a little while before I check it. Once again, welcome, and please try to keep Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy in mind. I see you made some more edits, and while I disagree with some, the rest look pretty good. Take care. --Bongwarrior 07:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Move protection

Do you want your user or talk page move (semi-)protected? (I would have thought the default for a User page would be move protected, but I suppose the could be reasons for moving a user page on a renamed accout.... — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for suggesting it, but I don't think that's necessary, unless it starts to become a trend. Thanks for looking out though, and take care. --Bongwarrior 20:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Bongwarrior RfA

Thanks for answering the question, I'm humbled by the fact that you've actually answered it. Mine hardly ever get responses. Good luck with the request, and hopefully you'll get the mop. Rudget _{Contributions} 21:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much, and thanks for the question. --Bongwarrior 21:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Milestone home runs

You may have an opinion on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Milestone home runs by Barry Bonds.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

I'm pleased to inform you that, consensus having been achieved, you are now an administrator. Please read all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Best of luck — Dan | talk 23:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Incidentally, I agree that your name's a tad unprofessional. Evidently this is not a major concern to the community, so do as you see fit; I offer my input for whatever it may be worth. — Dan | talk 23:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, the username thing has been brought up a few times. I wouldn't be wild about a change, but I will give it due consideration and do what needs to be done. Take care. --Bongwarrior 23:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats on getting the mop! Incidentally, I think that your username is fine and that those who brought it up as a concern likely need a collective loosening of their underpants. :) GlassCobra 23:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, and same to you! Hopefully we won't screw up too bad at first :) --Bongwarrior 23:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Do please consider filing a request for renaming at Wikipedia:Changing usernames (somewhat funny that it is again us bureaucrats who you need to help rename you after having been promoted). I would recommend doing this sooner rather than later, since it's nice to be recognised for your work, and should you change your name at a later date, it may leave people somewhat confused. This is totally your choice, however. Good luck! :-) --Deskana (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Wilhelmina Will has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

My congrats for you, as well! I'm glad you were able to become an administrator! Now you can block the people who vandalize your page! Wilhelmina Will 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats again buddy! By the way... I love the username, and if people are offended by it, screw it. Jmlk17 10:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Tom Cat

Tom cat has been established, but User:Boo1210 insists on creating another article, Tom Cat, which has only one sentence. I changed it to redirecting Tom cat, but User:Boo1210 reverted to the one sentence revision. Please delete Tom Cat square and quickly.123.193.12.44 06:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've moved Tom cat to Tom Cat to take care of the capitalization, and redirected Tom cat to Tomcat. Hopefully this makes everyone happy. --Bongwarrior 07:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Roger,thanks123.193.12.44 07:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, dear. That's the problem with the title of administator. All the little people request for you to execute articles out of the wazoo! Wilhelmina Will 07:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Horrorscope.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Horrorscope.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Changed block

I hope you don't mind, but I've changed User:BottlecapWarrior's block to indefinite, since he has not a single non-vandalistic edit, and has had plenty of warnings. If he indicates a willingness to contribute, of course he can be unblocked, but since he's done some subtle vandalism in the past, it seemed just as well to make it indefinite. Let me know if you feel differently, of course. Chick Bowen 04:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Nope, that's fine. He hadn't been blocked before, so I decided to be lenient. Your way works just as well. Take care. --Bongwarrior 04:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Lock Box block

Hi, just a quick note, if you block any user for death threats or other similar behaviour, please remember to disable their ability to send e-mails, consider leaving Arbcom's e-mail address on the talk page and then protecting it. We generally will not let any user blocked for making serious threats to e-mail users and intimidate them or post further threats on their talk page, and as administrators will generally not deal with the unblock request, there's no need for any further communication between 'us' and 'them'. They can take it up with Arbcom through the e-mail address provided or forget about Wikipedia. If you've blocked someone in similar circumstances, it's often worthwhile contacting an Arbitrator or Arbitration Clerk and asking them to post something to their private mailing list, just so all the Arbcom are aware of the situation, and can oversight any especially problematic edits. I've reblocked with e-mail disabled, as a precaution. Nick 18:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Will do, thank you for letting me know. --Bongwarrior 23:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Your assistance is much appreciated in the continuing spam attacks launched by Wikzilla who goes under a lot of pseudonyms and sockpuppets including Wikzillaspeni$ and 71.247.232.60. FWIW Bzuk 10:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC).

Pee Wee Herman

Hi. I am trying to put together a checkuser request in relation to the "Pee Wee Herman" vandal, with a view to getting the underlying IPs blocked (I have range blocked some IPs used by the vandal(s) with limited success). I am putting together a list of sockpuppets and their edits here. As I see that you have been involved in dealing with this vandalism, I am letting you know and please feel free to contribute to the list. TigerShark (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Question

[1] - Okay that CSD cat. may not have been the best. Do you not agree with me that that article is a complete waste of time seeing as it can already be accomplished on the Nirvana band article? Scarian^Talk 22:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Not really. I've seen this type of article before, and it can be potentially useful, especially in bands that have had a lot of members. By the way, I have a question for you: how is this considered vandalism? --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Slip of the finger :-) - Okay after having a quick snoop around I agree with you. Sorry for any confusion caused and thankyou for taking the time to handle the speedy. Cheers, have a nice day! Scarian^Talk 08:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Right wing extremist

Quit deleting my accurate commentary in topics relating to nuclear power. See my user page for enlightmentt —Preceding unsigned comment added by No Nooks (talk • contribs) 04:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hugh Jackman's page

i did not edit the page at all, so why have you sent me a message advising me that an edit from me has been reversed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ForkScratcher (talk • contribs) 14:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

This is one of the edits I reverted. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Hookeman socks

Check this out [2]. You probably will want to block them all. Regards.--12 Noon 22:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for the heads up. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton

How did you know I changed her picture?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravencao (talk • contribs) 07:24, Nov 22, 2007

I have her article on my watchlist. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

AIV

I see you reviewed an AIV report on Pratson11. You mentioned that there is a level 2 warning and that the unproductive edits have stopped. That's good. My question is that a level 3 warning states that "You will be blocked...". One trouble is that only admin can block. So if a non-admin places the warning, it is an idle threat. Furthermore, a non-admin cannot guarantee what an admin will do. What's your opinion about rewording it. One possibility is that "Steps will be taken to suspend your editing privileges by blocking". That's a bit wordy. Thanks for reviewing it. Maybe the AIV report stopped it. Archtransit (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Non-admins are absolutely allowed and encouraged to use all levels in warning vandals. It's not an idle threat, because when someone continues to vandalize after receiving a full or mostly full set of warnings, an admin will almost always issue an appropriate block when it's brought to their attention. So feel free to use them all, that's what they were designed for. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor Bongwarrior :)

Bongwarrior, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD#Bongwarrior and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). -Goodshoped 23:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Nooooo. I can be verified by reliable sources, I swear. I was going to add them tomorrow, please don't delete me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

It's all in the debate. BONG! -Goodshoped 23:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't you worry, Bongwarrior! I'm behind you every step of the way! Here's something for consolation, in the meantime:

Wilhelmina Will (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Err...

Marlith ^T/C has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... {{subst:User:Krimpet/WikiJoint}}... huh?

Marlith ^T/C 03:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much

for protecting my userspace! --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of User:Etheltrust.....

Hi, to my understanding, userpages still fall under speedy criteria due to the fact that they are still classified as a main space, per here and here. Please correct me if i am wrong. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, it doesn't look like you are wrong at all, I'd never noticed that before. Still, I don't see what good can come out of deleting someone's userpage, unless it's defamatory, used for advertising, etc. I say live and let live, but if you want to re-tag it, I'll let someone else have a look at it. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, just wanted to make sure. Thank you, i have re-tagged it. Tiptoety (talk) 01:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Someone's been harassing me...

...there's this person that's been harassing me and trolling on my talkpage. StopTaoSpam (talk · contribs) has been harassing me since I reverted his removal of content, and he's been very uncivil to me and attacking me on his userpage, and he has been trolling on my talk page. I have the diff links if you want them, plus a warning that's still fresh on my talkpage. I would recommend you get rid of this message before he makes a big deal of this again on his userpage. -Goodshoped 02:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

-Goodshoped has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... {{subst:User:Krimpet/WikiJoint}}... huh?

-Goodshoped 02:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Heads up - we're at ANI!

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Deletion_of_User:Etheltrust. Sigh... Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 02:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Awesome! Thanks for the heads up. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Nigel Capel-Cure

Hi there. According to Wikiproject:Cricket guidelines, Nigel Capel-Cure meets standards for notability. Specifically, he "has appeared in at least one major (i.e., first-class or List A) match as a player".

I am intrigued however - of what relation was Alfred, subject of an article you created? Judging by an age difference of 82 years, I would assume Alfred was Nigel's grandfather, but I do not know. Would be interested to know if you are aware.

Thank you. Bobo. 18:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey Bobo, I think you have the wrong guy. I just removed the prod from the Nigel Capel-Cure article. I didn't create the other one. --Bongwarrior 19:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Save!

Thanks for the save on my userpage. I appreciate the assistance, amigo. Take care! Snowfire51 08:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from me, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo 03:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

One question (Pittsburgh Steelers revert)

Is "championed" a word? WAVY 10 Fan 13:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

It's definitely a word, but I'm not positive the usage is correct. "Championed" usually means "supported"; I'm not 100% sure if it can also mean "won a lot of championships" the way it's being used. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain

Gah. :O) I was just doing the revert to Angel of Sadness' version, when you beat me. I was just checking the IP edits to be sure... :O) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hah, you snooze you lose. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Griffith University

We clearly have a problem here with one guy using many user names to make his POV Vandalism to his article and its talk page. I see you blocked one just before I was going to and now there is a new one. I'm off to bed now and hopefully the Griffith University folks, sharing my time zone roughly will do likewise. We may have to take this further tomorrow. Call on me to help if you need to. --Bduke (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing one of my more genius maneuvers [3]. Obviously MY Talk page is SOOO important that it needs to be listed with the templates. Opps.... One of these days I'll remember where those silly colons go. --ShakataGaNai (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all, I was just looking at the templates and I happened to notice it. Take care. --Bongwarrior 19:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Bobsaget101

Hello, may I know what's wrong with the name? --King Edmund of the Woods (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

It matches the name of a well-known living person, Bob Saget. --Bongwarrior (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Xyxyxyxyxy

Hi, You recently removed the username Xyxyxyxyxy from WP:UAA, and I was just wondering why you did so.

I thought that the username was a clear violation? Could you tell me where I went wrong?

Thanks, Blake01 14:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Blake, it just didn't seem long enough or random enough to me to justify a block. It's "xy" five times, not too confusing. It wouldn't have been fair to immediately block. Also, I apologize for not giving my reasoning in my edit summary when I removed it, I just sort of lumped a few together to save time. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

hickory high school

why did you edit that page exactly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brixtonq (talk • contribs) 09:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

No reason really, I just stumbled across it and wanted to clean it up a little. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

erroneous deletions

I assume you attended the school or are an administrator of some sort. I'm also sure you checked your facts. Maybe the Virginia Pilot would help you cite my additions, instead of deleting what you are apparently bias about. And since when does a professional baseball player the only good that has come out of that school? I am going to have to take the stance that he is about as important or "notable" as any of the rest of the student body who has graduated. As far as what is relevant or not on Wikipedia, I believe it is in the reader's best interest to be more informed on what may not be legal fact, than be deprived of true events and real people associated with the article. Nevertheless mr bongwikiwarrior, defender of all thats just, I would be more worried about the LACK of information on the Hickory High School page. Sorry to inform you, that school is not without it's controversial issues. Let them be heard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brixtonq (talk • contribs) 10:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

It's not my responsibility to cite your additions. We deal with facts here, not rumors and speculation. If you can find a reliable source that mentions that particular incident, it can stay. Otherwise, it has to go. As for the notable alumni I removed, most of them were "notable" for playing Counter Strike. Playing video games does not indicate notability. I have no particular interest in your school, and no affiliation. I'm just trying to keep the Wikipedia nice and tidy. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:UAA edit lolz

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention (diff; hist) . . (-420) . . Bongwarrior (Talk | contribs | block) Nice...number there!!! :P ~Eliz81^(C) 08:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, cool, I didn't even notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Sandox

Well done on deleting that edit on the sandbox by the I.P that added so many extra bytes when I tried to edit it my Firefox browser crashed, and when I tried to do it in IE7 that crashed as well ;) <font style="background:black"><font face="The Battle Continuez">[[User:Cf38|<font color="red">cf38</font>]]</font></font><font style="background:black"><font face="Simpsonfont"><small>^{[[User talk:Cf38|<font color="white">talk</font>]]}</small>< (talk) 09:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

User Asdfasdfasdf1232

Truthfully, the block was a 50-50 call. Because he was spamming the links, I gave him the benefit of being misguided. Blanking the pages could certainly have justified an indefinite block as vandalism-only, though. I certainly wouldn't have argued if another admin had blocked him that way. —C.Fred (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Userpage vandal revert

Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 09:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

User talk:122.104.187.123

Hi Bongwarrior, the above IP (which you blocked due to the racist remarks he/she was leaving) has continued doing so on the IP talk page. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention. Cheers, faithless (^speak) 06:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey FTW. I've semi-protected it for the duration of the block, that should take care of that. Thank you for letting me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure thing. :) faithless (^speak) 06:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Tag for an article deletion.

User: Jody Parmer had placed a request for the article "Ginger Jolie" from the help desk to be erased, i've placed a tag for the deletion but was removed, i've checked the logs and it indicated that you've erased the tag, is there something wrong with the users request, respond on my talk page. SKYNET X7000 (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Waterloo

Thanks for the help with the Vandal on Battle of Waterloo Tirronan (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism on my talk page

Thanks! --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Bongwarrior. Thank you for deleting the article Nick greb. It was a complete nonsense. Great job. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Are you a administrator? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newwikihelper (talk • contribs) 07:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, yes I am. Is there something I can help you with? --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I laughed like an idiot when I was reading your page, very funny, keep going like this! :-))))))))))))))) "...had relations." :-)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdayKAZ (talk • contribs) 08:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Vagabond

how are you deciding which vagabonds are allowed to be mentioned on the vagabond page and which ones aren't?

Timeisrunningshort (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Awesome catch!

On this sock! There's a new one, they've moved on from the Central Mosque page, but the style is still quite distinctive. Thanks for catching that! Ariel♥Gold 22:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I just happened to watchlist that article yesterday in case he came back. Cluebot did most of the work though. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee, yeah ClueBot is awesome. I watchlisted it too, and requested 24 hour protection because the ACB blocks weren't effective. If you see it getting out of hand again it might need another 24 hours, but the latest sock moved on to a new article, so it may not matter, ultimately. Nice to know you're aware of the pattern though, thanks again! Ariel♥Gold 22:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. I found it amusing, I think all he actually did was move up the vandal counter. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

That's what he did. I've had that happen to me several times. I guess they think they are funny. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again. =) We won't be seeing that editor for a few hours. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

BRC

You've been invited. Lara❤Love 04:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Lol, no thanks, cute page though. I'm not really a bathrobe kind of guy. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Haha, that's cool. Keep up the funny. Lara❤Love 03:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

You'll be sorry! the_undertow ^talk 01:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays Bongwarrior/Archive 2. Have a Happy New Year !

^{Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C)}

Thank you, that was very nice of you, MC/HH to you too. Best wishes. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Username reporting

Hello! By the way, it wasn't just the username of that user that concerned me, I noticed some edits like this as well (notice all the other people's comments that were removed). Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, it could have been an honest mistake, it's certainly not something I'd rake someone over the coals for. He appears to be a good faith contributor who has been using his username for over a year without incident. I just don't think a username block is the best course of action in this situation. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for the reply and Happy Holidays as well!  :) Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Help, please: half of my "Further readings" are Harvard, and the other half are Author/Date

This is somewhat embarrassing... :(

After using identical coding to update/expand the "Further Reading" list(s)on the Eltham, New Zealand page - the citation styles diverge... Any idea why?

TIA

Boethius65 (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I just had a look. What do you mean by diverge? If you're talking about the way some of them start with the title and some start with the author, I'm not entirely sure, but I think that may be normal. I wish I could be more authoritative, but I've never had to do a big "further reading" list like you're doing, so I may not be the best person to ask. Plus, I just got back from Christmas shopping and my mind is mush right now :-\ There's some info on the template you're using at Template:Citation if that helps at all. Good luck and have fun. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Bribery

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Now will you quit beating me to reverts and blocks?! ;) But seriously, this is for your excellent anti-vandal work! delldot talk 10:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Closure of an AFD

I've closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagabond (person) as a keep. If you have any other concerns, don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Thank you. Regards, Rt. 20:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching that vandalism to my userpage and reverting it. Seems odd though since the rest of that users edits appear to be good, their only vandalism was to my userpage. TJ Spyke 22:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed that too. Weird. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Still having issues with citations

Hi Bongwarrior (and thanks for last time - I got it straightened out)

Just done a kinda large bibliography at "Hawera."

I've consistently used the same citation style - and at one section ("Schools"), all I'm seeing is a hyperlink to Template:Citation where each entry should display. If the style is consistent throughout, any reason why the wiki is spitting the dummy of the last section?

TIA...

Boethius65 (talk) 08:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, no idea. They should be showing up I think, but they aren't. Maybe there is some sort of limit? I copied and pasted the section that wasn't working into its own article and previewed it, and they all showed up fine. So I went back and tried removing the last few cites before everything went goofy, just in case something was formatted wrong and it was messing up everything that followed. It didn't work. I'll try to have another look later and see if I can figure anything out. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

In response to your message to the World Champ.

You welcomed the Empire World Champ? How can I ever repay? Wanna title shot? Ha Ha. Pro. Wrestling humor there. Many thanks for the welcome. Well, ta-ta...-- EWC Champion (talk) 07:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks again for reverting my user page. =) I sense an indefinite block in that editor's future... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

And yet again. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Always a pleasure, they seem to like your page as much as mine :-) --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Ghana Edit

I think the Ghana Edit is inappropriate because, such news should have their own page. That is to say, no other country has news like that on their front page...Medicineman84 (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)1/4/08

You're right. I only reverted it because you inadvertently removed a bunch of needed sections at the end of the article, which you obviously didn't mean to do. I see you redid your edits, and I agree with your changes. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the revert on my talk page...

...but I reverted it back. I keep a policy of never removing anything from my talk page...ever. Even stupid, nonsensical, personal attacks. Your revert is much appreciated nevertheless, keep up the good work! --omtay38 23:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw you had reverted it back and I was momentarily confused. Your talkpage, your rules, of course. I'll try to keep it in mind in the future. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem! (I don't have it posted anywhere so you'd have no way of knowing.) Also the user has been posted on WP:AIV for personal attacks after last warning. --omtay38 00:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD:The True Snow White - Thanks

Hi. I started an AfD for The True Snow White. If I'm understanding this correctly, you relisted this "to generate a more thorough discussion."
(A) Thanks for doing so, and
(B) This "relisting" thing is a new one on me. Can you steer me to any policy or guideline info about this, so I'll know more about it?
Thanks -- Writtenonsand (talk) 04:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Writtenonsand. There is a little more information about this here. Because only one person had commented at the time, there was really no way to determine consensus. Relisting allows people to have another look at the discussion. It's starting to look a lot more decisive now. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Aimee Knight deletion

why did you delete aimee knight? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singa87 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I deleted it because the consensus reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee knight was clearly in favor of deletion. The subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for musicians outlined at WP:MUSIC. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

You were right

Bonadea (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the message on my talk page, and for being kind about my wrongful revert and warning! --Bonadea (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, thank you for fixing everything. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Glitch

I'm not sure if there is a glitch or not but the Dr. Eli Todd article is not showing all the text it should. Can you please click on the link and edit it to see all the text that should be there and fix it or explain on my talk page.--Eli Todd (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Creating a new article

First of all sorry for adding such an unapproppriate extra link, but it's my first day and i am not quite sure about how it goes here:) Well, i noticed that there are articles talking about companies, persons, and i would like to create a new page for my company to define it and put some information about it; but i have been reading the guidelines and it looks that such articles are restricted. Would you please advice if i can proceed with creating such a page since it will include informative facts and not just promotive or advertising?

Creativecopywriter (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)CreativeCopywriterCreativecopywriter (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I would strongly advise against it. Aside from conflict of interest issues, Wikipedia's notability guidelines also come into play. Even if an article isn't just an advertisement, it still has to be notable. Usually, if a subject is truly notable, someone else will write an article about it eventually. Welcome, and take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I would strongly advise against it too. Just requested Groove Advertising And Marketing Solutions for G11 due to the blatant advertising. Was also weighing up if the text was a copyvio of a webpage of theirs. --Breno ^talk 16:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of John Cowne

An editor has nominated John Cowne, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cowne and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)