User talk:DonkeyKong64

Welcome!

Hello, DonkeyKong64, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hi - - you've been on a while and no talk page welcome at all! SatuSuro 09:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: University of Notre Dame Australia; Australia and New Zealand School of Government; Spencers Brook, Western Australia; University of the Sunshine Coast; Analytic philosophy; Logicism; Central Queensland University; Western Australian Academy of Performing Arts; Supplication; Impredicative; RAAF Curtin; Property (philosophy); Bond University; The Blue Flowers; RenFile; Philosophical anthropology; Flinders University; Subjective idealism; Philosophy of psychology

Cleanup: Contemporary philosophy; Medieval philosophy; Gettier problem
Merge: Parameter (computer science); Leibniz's rule (derivatives and integrals); Queensland University of Technology
Add Sources: Parsing table; Virtue ethics; Edgeworth paradox
Wikify: Object-Relational impedance mismatch; Constructivist epistemology; Greek philosophy
Expand: Positivism; Moral realism; Pedro Almodóvar

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics CotW[edit]

Hey DK, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks

P.S. The original was the best... SNES forever!--Cronholm144 21:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, Thanks for the tip. I don't get around to getting online much at the moment, let alone contributing on wiki, but I'm interested in the project... we'll see. Feel free to leave me more messages about what's going on (expecially if you're working on any articles on, say, graph theory).

P.S. Yeah, I'd have to agree with you about the Donkey Kong games on SNES. Actually the reason why I chose "DonkeyKong64" was that DonkeyKong was unavailable. The origin of my nickname "DK" is a slightly longer story. DonkeyKong64 14:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey![edit]

Hi DK,

Thank you so much for welcoming me :) Sorry I couldn't respond earlier, I was busy adding so many insane userboxes to my user-page :-P

It's great to have someone with similar interests to talk to. I was also an atheist once, for about 2 years ... but I was a little kid then :-D I walked up to my parents one day and said, "Mum, Dad, I've decided I'm going to be an atheist." They said "OK". Then one day I said "I've decided to believe in God again". They said "OK". I guess that's where I mostly draw my religous philosophy from -- I believe it to be purely a matter of personal choice. Sorry for rambling like that, I'll stop myself mow.

I saw ur blog too, it's nice.

I'll be glad to talk to you about Hinduism and other stuff, whenever u feel like. Thanks again, take care. Chow. -- Amit 12:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, but you haven't replied yet, right? ["I am now going to my talk page to reply to your post.DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) 23:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)"] --Amit 14:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of post on Amit's talk page: Sorry I didn't end up replying like I said I would. I've been busy recently... I intend to reply at some point when I get around to it. :P - DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) 17:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been loved by ReluctantPhilosopher[edit]

Hey there! ReluctantPhilospher has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. Remember to pass it on to all your friends by adding {{User:Arknascar44/Love Cabal}} to the top of their pages. Don't forget to add your name here! Love and best wishes, Amit@Talk 04:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better layout - Formatting lists in columns[edit]

I noticed a good improvement to the See Also section of the Logarithm page. User:Giftlite made the change so that the See Also list is displayed in 4 columns. I think columns like this should be used more widely for lists in Wikipedia - it's much more compact than a single-column list, meaning less scrolling and more text on-screen at one time. Good stuff. :)

The code I'm talking about is:

Which produces something like this:

link1
link2
link3
link4
link5
link6
link7
link8
link9
link10

- DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophical zombie[edit]

Hi DK, I noticed you added philosophical zombie to the list of articles that interest you. So I thought you might find this interesting. Cheers! :-) ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. Feel free to tell me of other sites you think I would be interested in. Not sure if this is the most appropriate place though. *shrug* Maybe send me an email via the "E-mail this user" link? DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Wanna help out [1]? It allows more stuff about DK than this place does... 98.237.178.131 (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. My username is actually derived from a nickname (a reference to "DK Mode" in Goldeneye 007). I have no particular interest in Donkey Kong, although I did rather like the Donkey Kong games when I used to play video games regularly. DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician / Simulation Modeller) (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saint Patrick's Day have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

This account is possibly compromised, possibly LTA. Related accounts include, but are not limited to: Supergamer99 (talk · contribs · block log), GN10Gaming5 (talk · contribs · block log), GN10Gaming V2 (talk · contribs · block log) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzuuzz: Thanks, it does appear that my user account was compromised. I rarely log in here so an indefinite block was the right call. I didn't make any of the 4 edits from 18 March 2021 that are attributed to this account. I'm guessing that my account credentials were compromised and used to log in to my account on a remote machine. I had a very insecure password that I previously used across many different sites. Maybe my Wikipedia password was guessed based on a data breach on one of those sites. I've now updated my Wikipedia account to have a unique, secure (long and randomised) password, as I previously did on several other sites. Do you think there's anything else I should do to mitigate against unauthorised account access before I submit an unblock request, or would the password change be sufficient? DonkeyKong64 (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, password sharing is the most likely compromise vector, and probably from an account listed on your user page. You probably also want to check/change your email password, and/or the address in your preferences. In situations like this it's always difficult to know whether we are talking to the originl owner of the account, or a newer owner. I don't suppose there's anything you could offer to make that easy? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]