User talk:Drugzarebad69

Please stop adding inflamatory and incendiary and incorrect terminology to this important newsworthy page.

im not!

November 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Meghan Trainor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Meghan Trainor was changed by Drugzarebad69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928406 on 2014-11-26T22:18:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Trainor with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 22:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Meghan Trainor with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey what was wrong with that edit?

Your recent editing history at Shooting of Tamir Rice ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Frosty ☃ 22:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Drugzarebad69, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Drugzarebad69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drugzarebad69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

um idk why i was blocked. i didnt do anything! Drugzarebad69 (talk) 22:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not the place to post insulting commentary about people. This is an encyclopedia, not a men's room wall. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.