User talk:Fothergilla

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw and appreciated your edits at Refugium (fishkeeping). You may perhaps also be interested in WP:WikiProject Aquarium Fishes. Please feel free to get in touch with me at my user talk page any time if you have any questions at all about editing Wikipedia. (By the way, per your user page, my own first edits were also reverted, so I think that you will find that this is a very common occurrence.) --Tryptofish (talk) 15:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fothergilla! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Reify-tech (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Help me[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a best way to cite unpublished physical works that are in my local libary's collection? I have a number of these on the Six Moon Hill page I have been editing Fothergilla (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate on what you mean? What sort of potential source(s) do you have? Primefac (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a best way to cite unpublished physical works that are in my local libary's collection? An example from a current page I am editing is "Moon Hill Memories: 50th Anniversary. Cary Memorial Library: LEX ROOM 974.44L H628mhm: Unpublished pamphlet. June 14, 1997" Does this meet Wikipedia standards? Thanks Primefac for previous response — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fothergilla (talk • contribs) 23:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In general an unpublished work cannot be cited as a reference on Wikipedia. If you are seeking to cite an unpublished document, it almost certainly means you are engaged in original research, something we, as Wikipedia editors, should not do.

Still, providing enough information about a document that would allow a sufficiently interested reader to locate it in the library's archive is a good practice and you should follow it when you write up your findings to post somewhere that allows such research. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Fothergilla! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is linking to a photographer's website with relevant photos legitimate?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am looking for the proper format for citing a video lecture which has been posted (by a reputable source) on YouTube. The templates dropdown I see only has web, book, journal, news none of which includes all of the fields that are needed. Ideally there would be a place to document minutes into the video where the statement I am referencing is made. If there is a way to add additional templates to my dropdown I'd be interested in a pointer to that too. Fothergilla (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Citing sources, Template:Cite AV media. Hope this helps. — Maile (talk) 18:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I believe you are looking for {{Cite AV media}}. If you're ever looking for a specific template, every cite X template has a full list of available citation templates. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fothergilla: does {{Cite AV media}} work for you? -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 18:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments @Primefac. @Asartea I think Cite AV media should work. The thing I was looking for was a way to denote the number of minutes into the recorded presentation where the referenced content occurs in the media. Do you believe that's what the parameter "time" means? Fothergilla (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Fothergilla! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creditable source tells me name is mispelled in article title, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox2 (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fothergilla/sandbox2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Fothergilla/sandbox2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fothergilla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Fothergilla/sandbox2[edit]

Hello, Fothergilla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Fothergilla/sandbox2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]