User talk:Grouah

Speedy deletion nomination of Clams CasinoClams CasinoClams Casino References Clams Casino References Clams Casino[edit]

Hello Grouah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Clams CasinoClams CasinoClams Casino References Clams Casino References Clams Casino for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fluffyxxx (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clams Casino References[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Clams Casino References requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blythwood (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clams CasinoClams Casino References Clams Casino References[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Clams CasinoClams Casino References Clams Casino References requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blythwood (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 22:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grouah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Materialscientist, I'm a French Wikipedia user and contributor, you blocked me a couple of monthes ago, and I understand why you did it. But I ask you to unblock me. I don't want anything bad to Wikipedia and I actually love to contribute and create new pages. The fact is that that day I wanted to create the French page of Clams Casino, a pretty cool musician, and I used the new tool of "immediate translation", from the English version. But when I intended to create the page, there were a little problem that you noticed too, pages with weird name (Clams CasinoReferences...) were created. The fact is it might have been considered as vandalism but I just intended to fix the bug that this new tool provoked. Thanks ML--Grouah (talk) 17:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I, as an admin on the English Wikipedia, have no authority over the French Wikipedia. If you wish to take English articles and post the translated versions on the French Wikipedia then OK; but you must not post them in the English Wikipedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean, the thing I want to say is that I did not intend to create the pages that were removed, it was a collateral damage of using the "Translation" tool. I don't contribute to English Wikipedia, I just don't want to be blocked because of an error: I did not mean to create these pages; I don't wanna vandalize or anything; the question is not if I put articles on English Wikipedia, but how, and it was sincerely not meant, intended. I hope you understand what I'm trying to say. ML--Grouah (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Grouah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'm reiterating my request. I still want to say that the reason I was blocked is not my fault, it is due to a bug from the Translation tool in the French Wikipedia that automatically created a bunch of pages in the English Wikipedia (the Wiki I was translating from). Grouah (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Seeing as you were blocked years ago, and have been a positive contributor on fr.wiki, combined with the fact that the translation tool is now no longer usable as it was when you were blocked, I am unblocking you. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Burke (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter J. Burke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grouah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Burke has been accepted[edit]

Peter J. Burke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]