User talk:Hundnase

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Hundnase! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Snowdon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''Spiked'' 1 August, 2013. [http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/7641#.UfoEhFPe47A]]</ref> <ref>"Anti-smoking activism
  • Tactics website: Chris Snowdon [http://www.tobaccotactics.org/index.php/Christopher_Snowdon]] | accessed 08 August 2014</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Bokova[edit]

Hi, I saw that you have made some edits on Irina Bokova. I've moved them to the talk page, so that we can discuss them there, before (if) moving them back. Veni Markovski | Вени Марковски (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Veni Markovski very much appreciate the notice -- I missed it here, apologies. Hope we can get this sorted, and NPOV. Thanks again Hundnase (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleko Elisashvili for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleko Elisashvili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleko Elisashvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks -- I think it would be a bit premature to delete, as this is a major candidate, with a high profile, in a key election. That does not guarantee notability, but he is a major candidate. Thanks again for the note. Hundnase (talk) 04:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levan Berdzenishvili has been accepted[edit]

Levan Berdzenishvili, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, will try to expand with a few things over the coming weeks Hundnase (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lelo for Georgia (January 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Need more independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hundnase! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lelo for Georgia (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Mamuka Khazaradze. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This should merge to Mamuka Khazaradze until it has enough notability without its key leader.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this is the reason why few people contribute to Wikipedia -- it just seems pointless. Here we have a party that will contest a big national election; it is referenced in multiple sources, among them Al-Jazeera; it integrates a party that previously had a Wikipedia entry; sure, the article is still short and more can be added, but it just so happens that this country does not have huge attention by BBC, CNN, and so forth, so there are not many dozen mentions; and because of that, it is just swiped away, rather than being made available so that more people can add to it. Disappointing. Hundnase (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Hundnase! You created a thread called reviving entry on political party in Georgia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mamuka Khazaradze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lelo for Georgia has been accepted[edit]

Lelo for Georgia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi KylieTastic -- thank you. I will work on improving/expanding it as the English language media covers this more! Thank you again. 06:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Hundnase! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:13, Tuesday, October 27, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Georgia[edit]

I noticed you are a recently active member of WikiProject Georgia (country). There is ongoing Request for Comments (RfC) regarding content on the Georgia (country) article. You are cordially invited to join the discussion because as WikiProject Georgia member you may be able to offer valuable perspectives. Kind regards --LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 10:07, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LeontinaVarlamonva thx, good discussion Hundnase (talk) 08:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mauricio Antón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2023 submission[edit]

Dear Hans,

On behalf of the Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2023 programme committee, I am pleased to inform you that your submission titled "Microcontributions to Scholarship -- Streamlining Wikipedia into Higher Education" has been accepted as a lecture. If you have not yet registered for the conference, please fill in the registration form. In case you have any additional requests or questions, do not hesitate to contact me or any other committee member.

Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kiril,
super, have registered! I will publish several pieces on Wikipedia in the coming weeks also.
Thanks!
Hans Hundnase (talk) Hundnase (talk) 20:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gigi Tevsadze moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Gigi Tevsadze. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the information on it does not indicate how this person is notable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough -- I had wanted to add more but suddenly had to leave. He is the founding director of one of the country's top universities, and author of multiple books, but I need to add that still. Hundnase (talk) Hundnase (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gigi Tevsadze has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gigi Tevsadze. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 07:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigi Tevsadze has been accepted[edit]

Gigi Tevsadze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hundnase just about passed. I would still like to see a couple more secondary sources that discusses him, but my feeling is that it's over the line as is. Qcne (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne thank you so much for your quick reaction and support! I will add more links, yes! Hundnase (talk) 10:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy K. Blauvelt for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy K. Blauvelt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy K. Blauvelt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scam[edit]

I can assure you that I have never contacted you. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning for information about these scams. File Éireann 21:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you -- that is very helpful, and yes, this is what went on there Hundnase (talk) Hundnase (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hundnase&oldid=1196103288"