User talk:Jim1138/Archive 48

Archive 45

Archive 46

Archive 47

Archive 48

Archive 49

Archive 50

→

Archive 55

Aishwarya Rai

Hey Jim, I just got your message. Whatever I changed in the article of Aishwarya Rai, I did with a reason that I gave too. And I didn't removed the reference, I just placed it in a better place. If you have any problem with me then message me, I'll clearly understand it. And I am not use of getting blackmail. So, never tried to blackmail me with the messages that you'll "Block" me. Thank you. Many Words (talk) 09:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Many Words: You removed the reference here with an edit summary of Improvised; the reference doesn't look nice in the info-box... That does not justify the removal. I would recommend that you state that you are moving a reference, not what you did. Yes, you replaced it, but I had reverted and warned you before you replaced it. It appears that the warning level is too high for some reason. You got a "final warning" where it should have been an initial warning. My apology on this. BTW: it's not "blackmail", it is an administrative warning. An wp:administrator would make the decision whether or not to block you. I am not an administrator. Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Jim, I use wikipedia on mobile, and I recieved you msg after I had replaced it. I am sorry If I caused problem to you. And I didn't understand about this "You got a "final warning" where it should have been an initial warning" Many Words (talk) 09:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Many Words: You received this template: {{uw-delete4}} where you should have gotten a {{uw-delete1}}. Not a problem. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Edit to Mukundakam Sharma

Hi Jim,

I am working as the legal assistant to Justice Mukundakam Sharma, whose page I recently edited. Kindly revert the page to the changes that I made as I prepared the content as per his instructions.

Forodwaith92 (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

122.54.217.198

This editor needs to blocked. This person's unsourced claims which appear to be self claims need to stop. This person's latest annoyance is at 2017 Philippines Football League... yet again. 180.190.54.17 (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

"Pending revisions" dialog

Regarding Windows 10... I tried first to reject the IP's pending revisions. But in the "pending revisions" dialog I was not offered a "reject" button, only "accept". Any idea why that might be? Jeh (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jeh: Perhaps because the IP had self-reverted? Never seen that sort of thing myself. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I think I'll test it. Jeh (talk) 07:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

White-naped Tit

Dear Jim. Hope you are doing well.

Its my first day at Wikipedia and I am learning my edits. I am really sorry as I removed content unknowingly. Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhaval Vargiya (talk • contribs) 07:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you -

I'm sorry to trouble you, but I see that you've reverted some malicious edits on this page before, so maybe you can help with what's happening now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Stroehlein

The user making the edits is named "AlenaNemocova" but a mouseover shows this user "does not exist". How is that possible?

Arko1091 (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Arko1091: The account exists. Nobody has ever edited the talk or user pages. I will leave a message on Arko1091's talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

George Steiner

Hi Jim,1138

I received your message from a couple days ago regarding my removal of some content from the George Steiner page and I wanted to offer my reasons for having done so, which still stand.

I don’t typically edit Wikipedia pages but I took it upon myself to remove a portion of the introduction to the page on George Steiner because I thought it was very poorly and awkwardly put together. Specifically I removed from the introduction the sentence which read “An article in The Guardian described Steiner as a "polyglot and polymath", saying that he is either "often credited with recasting the role of the critic", or a "pretentious namedropper" whose "range comes at the price of inaccuracy" and "complacency".[6]” I thought that the entire subsequent paragraph was similarly inappropriate and ought to be removed but I refrained from doing so.

The introduction sections of longer Wikipedia pages should aim for simple, easily understood statements of fact. In contrast, almost half of the introduction of George Steiner page consists of editorial quotes and opinions of Steiner’s merit as an academic or critic from various other figures who aren’t centrally relevant to Steiner’s writing or his life. The featured quotations are cherry-picked and juxtaposed so as to depict him as a controversial, loved-and-loathed-in-equal-measure type of character. It’s highly inappropriate that the article’s introduction section offers splashy subjective content like that in the first place, but even more so that it comes before hardly any factual statements concerning Steiner’s career of over 60 years.

There’s something striking about how the introduction to George Steiner’s page ironically mimics the flaws he’s accused of evincing both in his writing and in his sensibility. The second sentence of the whole article refers to him as a “pretentious namedropper” while not only framing his work through the composite criticisms of relatively more obscure writers and intellectuals, but by making sure to reference, or at least present the opinions of, the most elite, such as the novelist AS Byatt, the philosopher A. C. Grayling, and the historian Harriet Harvey-Wood. No other figure of George Steiner’s ilk has a Wikipedia page prefaced by such a weird, unfortunate introduction.

If the highly specific quotations reprinted in George Steiner’s introduction should appear anywhere at all, they should appear in a section that comes after descriptions of his life and work. Biographical Wikipedia pages commonly feature opinions on their subjects under section headings like “Reception” or “Criticism and controversy”. The types of opinions currently featured on Steiner’s page have absolutely no place in the introduction section.

2604:2000:C641:1300:FD76:4964:5819:A69B (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Please leave an wp:edit summary explaining the reasoning behind your removal. If it is too detailed, such as what you left here, please start a new section (tap at top of each page), leave the information there. Then remove the content and say "See talk page section: Name of section here". It won't help leaving it on my talk page as someone else won't understand and undo your edit. See wp:talk page guidelines for additional information. Thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Finding Dory

Can I use the film itself as a reference? Also, there's so source on Finding Dory taking place in 2016. 24.207.19.63 (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, yes. Why don't you ask LordofMoonSpawn why he believes it is set in 2016? LordofMoonSpawn reverted you with "film's set in 2016". I just reverted you as you changed a date without giving a reason. Also, see wp:dispute resolution. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Changes in Moviment Patrijotti Maltin Page

Dear Sir/Madam, MPM has noted this page which is full of incorrect and unfair statements about MPM, we are not extrem right or anti amigration, Malta simply has to much population (1400 per square kilometer), we are not nationalists, our politics can be left and right depending on the issue and the need of the country and it's citizens, last but not least we are not political people we are the people who had to establish a political party to sound the voice of the people in the illusion democracy that we the citizens of Malta live in.

Simon Borg simonborg@patrijottimaltin.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.11.4.54 (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Bernard O`Mahoney (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Bernard O`Mahoney

Hi Jim, The Dream solution is a book I wrote and which Mainstream published. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dream-Solution-Murder-Alison-Shaughnessy/dp/1840185937/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1491247460&sr=8-2&keywords=dream+solution The Nick Davies article was dealt with at court. The Dream Solution has been the subject of three documentaries and a very long High Court case which I won. It is ridiculous to suggest a book by a leading publishing that has been tested in a three year High Court case isnt supported and should be removed, please change the edit back. I am an author/journalist. An individual using the following IP address 95.149.142.233 is publishing vile allegations about me on wikipedia but you seem content not to remove the offending allegations. (I murdered my wife (who died tragically) I abuse young boys etc. I would like to be able to trace this person to prosecute them, can you offer any advice Jim? (Redacted) Bernard O`Mahoney (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bernard O`Mahoney: I've hidden your personal contact info as anyone on the web could see it. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I have provided some additional advice on the user's talk page. MPS1992 (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bernard O`Mahoney: I do a lot of editing, your edit has been hidden via wp:revision deletion, so I am not sure what you or I did. It appears that others are looking into the issue. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Changes to the page Kozhikode

Hi Jim,

I just found that the changes i made against the page Kozhikode has been taken down since i didn't mention the source. The details i added in the section are mostly based on my own experience about the place since Kozhikode is my hometown and i have been living there for a long time. Would you please consider this and see if the details provided can be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjitha121 (talk • contribs) 04:49 04 April 2017 (UTC)

@Anjitha121: What you are referring to is considered original research on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a wp:verifiability policy and any information needs to wp:cite a wp:reliable source. So, you would need to to leave your phone number and answer calls regarding this 24/7. Which is not really practical to say the least. So, Wikipedia has a policy of wp:No original research. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

weev edit

I'm confused? How can I cite a source to remove incorrect sources? Laymen publications with little knowledge of domain specific subject matter often get things wrong, or shade through the gaps of nuance in a story which--to someone intimately familiar with the subject--renders the story basically as a fabrication. What sort of source can I cite to this effect? Just to be specific, for example, weev actually had zero technical contributions to the AT&T data breech which essentially every single major publication cites as his (only) bona fides as to being a "hacker". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.9.8.232 (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

F-35 Lightning II

Hi, You reverted an edit relating to the F35 LiftSystem. The article implies that Lockheed Martin designed the LiftSystem. I believe this is incorrect - the LiftSystem is a Rolls-Royce designed and developed product. I work for Rolls-Royce, by the way (though I'm not editing Wikipedia in any official capacity on their behalf). 108.171.128.180 (talk) 11:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I undid your edit as you didn't explain why you removed the information. Personally, I don't care what the facts are as long as they are correctly reported. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Visibility of Wikipedia article on google search rersults

Unaissait (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)hello Jim, I am Unais. As we had already discussed , the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Product_Design_and_Manufacturing is not coming in search engine results such as google.I would like to know why it is not coming in google search and what are essential things i have to do in order to make it visible.

@Unaissait: I don't know. I believe that Google is constantly tweaking their search engine (for the worse in my opinion) and keep their methods and algorithms under wraps. You might do better to search on yahoo or bing for such criteria. Google may obscure or obfuscate searches for such information on their own search engine. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

My edit

Hi Jim,

Penrith is famous for its toffee - as cornwall is for its pasties, cumbria is for its sausage etc - so sorry if I've been 'distruptive' by making a change that would be beneficial to readers.

I alsoo edited a photo on there 'The former Penrith Co-operative Society had a large department store and supermarket in the town centre.' now closed and stading empty. But hey, leave the info incorrect - I give up!

What a waste of time editing on here is! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eden Cumbria (talk • contribs) 09:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Expressways changes

Those expressways which I have removed never existed in India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.220.238.23 (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Plessey page

Hi there, I am a current employee with permission to update this page. Plessey Semiconductors Limited is a company which is still in business and has now moved it specialties to LED manufacturing. My intention is to update this page with the current information whilst still retaining the history currently displayed on the existing page

Plesseysam (talk) 11:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Leicester City

I object to your anti_leicester City trolling and the fact that you will not allow corrections to be made.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bapcav (talk • contribs) 15:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Will Hurd

Jim-- I didn't realize I was essentially reverting your edits to Will Hurd, but I removed the same part the IP did. I agree the edits are sourced, but the IP is right that it seems wholly irrelevant to the article. Cheers! Kharkiv07 (T) 13:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Kharkiv07: I don't mind being reverted. The IP's ES didn't seem to match his actions. Obviously, should have looked closer. I do find a lot of whitewashing. The source was a letter to the editor here. This is the sort of being reverted that I object to: here. Thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Removal of an edition

@Jim1138:

Hi

I've removed a part of an article about Iranian presidential election, 2017. Please check the page's history (it was removed by others a few times already).

The "candidate" that I removed is only identified by a primary source (with not a single Persian word), claiming to be the founder of a "group" that doesn't exist anymore since the 12th century ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayy%C4%81r ).

The secondary source is not giving any specific information about the said candidate (proof: members are asked by editor to "contact Iranian Embassy of France to have confirmation"). And the guy doing his promotion on Wikipedia says that "I'll modify the article each time you change it."

Thanks

Reza Fariborz (talk) 09:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Reza Fariborz: Your edit summary was removing unsourced materials. There is a source. If it was wp:primary sourced materials, you should have stated that. People reuse names such as Ayyār all the time. Just because it hasn't been used for awhile, doesn't mean a group with that name doesn't exist.

BTW: Please use English wp:commonnames. i.e. the English word "Persian" instead of "Farsi" Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138:Thanks for your answer, and friendly message. I've corrected my text here about Persian. About the "group", a google (on dot fr) search gives, with the request "France Ayyaran", no relevant result, nor you can find it on a specific site : http://www.france-politique.fr/wiki/Catégorie:Partis_politiques . So, yes, my summary was wrong, but I still believe the part I removed was advertising. Anyway I leave the decision up to you. Cheers to you too

Reza Fariborz (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Reza Fariborz: Go ahead and remove that content. I'm not the boss by any means. We are all volunteers here. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Someone else seems to have done it. And I've stopped editing (altough the random article is fun to find stuff to do), to take the time to read the links in your message to me. Cheers, Jim Reza Fariborz (talk) 10:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Hadji

I went ahead an RV'd you "RV". The actual article on the term "Hadji" and it's various uses, including by U.S military personnel is adequately sourced in the actual article. According to Wikipedia style, disambiguation pages are generally not "sourced". 96.40.114.242 (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Smithtown NY

How was that vandalism? I added a notable person to the list. Please do your research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.5.142 (talk) 03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

IZZY GETS THE F*CK ACROSS TOWN

Hey Jim -- thanks for your vigilant watch on these pages.

I'm the filmmaker of "Izzy" and just wanted to change a few parts to reflect a more accurate version of the film.

Best,

Christian Papierniak — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFAE:4930:D98:AD82:3F63:DDD7 (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Metro Radio

I truly am sorry Jim, but it was the new web address and pasted it twice by mistake, so I think this was a huge mistake Jim, Kennycarr2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennycarr2016 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC) @Kennycarr2016: No problem! Please use an wp:edit summary to explain your edits. Would likely avert such misunderstandings. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Mix-up

If you don't mind, how did this mix-up come about? I ask because of a very recent impersonation situation that I just had to deal with. Thanks. DarkKnight2149 21:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@Darkknight2149: I have no idea how that happened. Especially strange that you hadn't made any edits that day. I also incorrectly warned Elevatorone for 3RR. Elevatorone asked why which is how I found out about it. I believe that I had opened the two user's talk pages who were edit warring on Kevin O'Leary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Yet, I somehow didn't open them and yours and Elevatorone's user talk pages were open, so I warned you two. Browser problems: no excuse, I should have been more thorough. I don't believe there was any impersonation involved, just my blunder. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for clearing that up. I was just making sure this sock puppeteer wasn't involved. They recently created a slew of lookalike accounts modeled after mine. DarkKnight2149 22:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@Darkknight2149: How come you have all the fun? ;o) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello

I just wanted to say thanks for handling my edits well. Other people do things from changing it without an explanation to playing follow my edits and erasing them thats why I had to make this account! I just want to say thanks for being so nice!07:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)IHatewrongpeople! (talk)

T.J. Scott

Hi there! My edits on TJ Scotts page were not a test! There is information on the wiki page that was outdated and incorrect due to the content bring pulled from online interviews and press releases generated and monitored by an inaccurate PR person. I am unfamiliar with Wikipedia so I may have done the edits incorrectly, but the information and sources is accurate and the correct blurbs have stayed from the original page. Hope you can help, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:B157:C294:2586:CBAB:CA23:AEF3 (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your IP address changed which will make it very difficult to communicate. Please get an wp:account!

• Please use an wp:edit summary (ES) explaining your reasoning for the edit.
• You removed the two lines at the top, wp:tags which should remain. If you have a good reason to remove them, do it with one edit/save cycle giving your reasoning in the ES.
• You doubled the wp:category count which was why I called it a "test".
• Avoid wp:puffery "multi-award winning". Use an encyclopedic wp:tone (i.e. rather dry) instead of a promotional tone. Note that Ridley Scott does not say anything like that at the top. It does state in Ridley Scott#Awards and nominations section.
• The section T.J. Scott#1990s: Early feature film and TV work should stay. This is his history, not necessarily what Scott wants on the page.
• Same with the Orphan Black section.
• The article is meant to be a biography, not a promotional article.

Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Cool, thank you - I'll work on the edits per your notes. Cheers, A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aagendel (talk • contribs) 20:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Carrie Lam criticism - updated by whom?

Jim1138 - thank you for your service in maintaining stability and image for our public servants for the Hong Kong S.A.R. The previous edits have been detected as part of an public IP scan and has been edited to ensure National safety continues. We thank you for your assistance and will closely monitor your future edits to ensure damaging IP are identified.

Possible protection required

@Jim1138:

User:HelenOnline had made multiple very large edits and I don't know if I should be concerned with how many occured within a short time span (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boerehaat&action=history)

Regarding the page , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanthapuram_A.P._Aboobacker_Musliyar

Hello Jim, I am Luqman. I just edited the introductory content of Kanthapuram A.P Aboobacker Musliyar article but you replaced it. I edited it because some of the data were not updated and disorder. I wanted to give a nice structure to the essay adding adequate and relevant links. but i still don't understand why did you remove it.

Regarding edits in Vasundhara Raje

Hello Jim,

Thanks for your reference, I will keep those things in mind while editing wikipedia. I would like you to inform that i had taken permission from the user regarding the content and they allowed me to use that content.

who are you

are you some kind of hacker or stalker cause if u are please stop!

deletion Grace Wan

I am not trying to delete the Wikipedia users names. I am deleting the bad comments about deletion Grace Wan. I want Grace Wan keep and saved it on Wikipedia. Please let Grace Wan appear on Wikipedia because it is real person.

talk : Hanmi Pharmaceutical

i'm a member of hanmi pharnmaceutical. now I requested modifications on the text.

1) revision: Our headquarter is not located in dongtan & hwaseong but in seoul. http://www.hanmipharm.com/ehanmi/handler/Company-CompanyMap

2) delete :Prosecution investigation is closed and suspicion is not in company but in individual. http://www.theinvestor.co.kr/view.php?ud=20170309000925

3) LAPSGLP/GCG, Poziotinib, Olmutinib is licensed out and Luminate is licesed in.you can check Hanmi Pharm website. http://www.hanmipharm.com/ehanmi/handler/Company-CompanyNews

Deendar edit

@Jim1138:

Right wing hindutva facists are now maligning and changing every bit of narrative on internet. Deendar's are an open book. They do not get covered in mainstream media because they carry very low profile from limelight, thus making it difficult to quote references. I had personally visited headquarters and met the deendar preachers personally. They are totally all about mysticism. Have never seen such an organization which gives a message and unites all religions, castes and creed. Narrow minded Muslims hate them because they read hindu scriptures and right wing hindus hate them because they think they are trying to convert hindus to muslims.

Regarding updates on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lokmanya_Tilak_Terminus_Hazrat_Nizamuddin_AC_Express

I have the details of the train verified, removed some not necessary facts like the train being called rajdhani express and Flickr links as that was not a reliable source for verifying train details.

Please restore my updates.

Thanks and Regards Pratik Mantri — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.220.238.135 (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@167.220.238.135: Would you be able to cite the sources using reliable sources? Flickr does not count unfortunately as it is user generated content. A newspaper, magazine or large media outlet works best if they report the details. -- Dane ^talk 05:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

@Dane: No interest in WP:V; sigh... Jim1138 (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Changes to Transcritical cycle

Hi Jim1138, I didn't mean to not be civil. It's just that what was added by Charlieb000 WAS rubbish. It did not have anything to do with the topic and did not belong on the page. I don't know how it was approved in the first place. The page needs to be updated with real information and I will be glad do this in due time. I just need to find it first.

Cheers, Luschwitz (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC) luschwitz.

@Luschwitz: As it says on wp:NPA, Comment on content, not on the contributor. There is way to much hostility on Wikipedia, so please use something a bit more benign such as removed unsourced, off-topic content That would presumably convoy the same thing and might help get the point across to others.

wp:Anyone can edit. And unfortunately, often anyone does edit. Jimbo Wales wants it that way. Many,including myself, would like to see that people must get an account first. While many with accounts are bad editors, the ones editing under an IP are often (but not always) worse. Thank you Jim1138 (talk)

BTW: I do wp:RCP, so I am probably one of the most despised on Wikipedia! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Reviewbest (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC) I need to do changesReviewbest (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Reviewbest (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Hello Jim.

Its very confidential but this controversies part should not be their as Shashi Tharoor doing so much for country and nothing is mentioned about it. So can we add his achievements instead of controversies. He is honorable Minister of India. How Can I do it please tell me I need your assistance and kind attention on it.

Regards

Reviewbest (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

@Reviewbest: That information is in the Times of India, Indian Express, and Samay Live. You won't be hiding much by removing it from Wikipedia. It sounds like Shashi Tharoor needs someone to help him keep his mouth shut. Not nearly as bad as our current Twitterer-in-Chief, so count your blessings! The content should stay unless you have some very good sources that say it didn't happen that way. See wp:DUE. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC

Reviewbest (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok how can I add more parts on it with citations. I am saying as he represent country India. and nothing to keep mouth shut or anything .. Reviewbest (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Page Deleted for No Vaild Reason

Jim, there was a page deleted for no valid reason as it is properly sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.79.192.215 (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: Portrayal of East Asians in Hollywood

Thanks!

Will go through them later as soon as I can devote a bit of time to the issue. 82.57.69.86 (talk) 08:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, it seems as easy as deleting a duplicate statement. Let it be a lesson for me; always check at least the whole paragraph. :-P 82.57.69.86 (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Iraj Weerarathne

Raptorz12 (talk) 14:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC) As a Sri Lankan, Iraj normally uses the spelling "Weerarathne". The alternate spelling "Weeraratne" can be also used. But I'd like to move the page to the name "Iraj Weerarathne". Also, the source you mentioned is unacceptable.

Thanks for the pep talk

Jim,

I don't do many edits in Wikipedia. But, as a retired journalist, sometimes I can't let the bad English or poor style go uncorrected. :-) Now, as unofficial editor of the Pecos Conference page, I may be contributing more frequently. Thanks for correcting the location of the link. I'll read the guides you sent to make sure I'm doing it right.

Charlotte Wolter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techlady (talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

The map of Kingdom of Tondo

The sources are either non-peer reviewed (blogs without academic approval) or unreachable (http://elgu2.ncc.gov.ph/mauban/index.php?id1%3D3%26id2%3D1%26id3%3D0). I will write more debunking the plausibility of the Kingdom of Tondo extending far beyond to the Bicol peninsula, but I guess the fact that the sources aren't even peer-reviewed is enough reason to remove the map. Stricnina (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to have to concur with this. There's a popular sentiment pushing for the aggrandizement of the Pasig River Kingdoms which has been well documented and widely debunked by scholars (entire chapters of Nick Joaquin's Culture and History focused on this), and for some strange reason, Kingdom of Tondo seems to have become a flashpoint. I mean, for crying out loud: at one point, I've had to beat back a theory that the Song Dynasty somehow migrated to Luzon after it's downfall in China. The reliability of sources is definitely going to need checking. - Alternativity (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Nextio entry

Hi. There is a new company named Nextio. There was an old company with that same spelling (but different capitalization -- NextIO) that went out of business a few years ago. Someone edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NextIO to refer to the new company, but you reverted those changes. If you go to the url www.nextio.com, you'll see that it points to the new company.

Can you let me know why you reverted the changes? And if you know how to best handle situations like this where two entities have the same name, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Driveybydude (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

@Driveybydude: Create a new article. Don't hijack the old one. It's hard to get to the blank page, but here it is: Nextio Make sure that it meets wp:notability. Add an {{about}} or {{about2}} to the top of both pages so people can find the other article easily. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the instructions! Driveybydude (talk) 20:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

@Driveybydude: You can also start it with a wp:AfC or in your sandbox. Then, you won't have to deal with the wp:speedy deletions Jim1138 (talk) 20:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Asaram

Sir,

many information on the wiki page of asaram is wrong, i would like to draw your attention on some of them.

1. Page Name :- Asaram

Sir its a request to change the name from Asaram to Asaram Bapu Ji or at least Asaram Bapu.

2. Title Arrest

Sir, in this title it is written that "The girl's parents filed a complaint with the police in Delhi, and a medical examination report confirmed that she had been assaulted.[55][56]"

However the truth is in medical report No Rape or Any type of sexual assault has been found. You have also mentioned it in your article (In October 2016 the India Times reported that the medical reports found no proof of rape or assault.[64]) but later, and these two contradictory statement on same page doesnt look nice. The truth is in medical report No Rape or Any type of sexual assault has been found. Pls mention it.

The second truth is, later during investigation with the help of girl's certificate it is found that the said girl is not minor but an adult.

3. In your article it is written that "He (Asaram Bapu) had also said that he was impotent and not capable of sexual assault; according to India Today Asharam Bapu passed a potency test administered by a local medical college.[62]

Truth : - He has never told that he is impotent. 1.186.116.146 (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

edited

yes i edited the page coz i m a localite here and some of the imformation of my city is written wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xing ling (talk • contribs) 13:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

removal of DNA references in British Israelism

Did you read my comments under Nebel in the talk page before reverting my deletion? I think it's you that needs to continue the conversation and justify why you put it back. Wilfred Brown (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

@Wilfred Brown: It is being discussed on the talk page. Get wp:consensus, then change. See wp:BRD Jim1138 (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Pico Far East Holdings Limited

@Jim1138:

wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pico_Far_East_Holdings_Limited

Issue: 1. This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles (Please indicate accurately). (July 2016) 2. This article contains content that is written like an advertisement (Please indicate accurately). (April 2017) 3. A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject (major contributor since many changes by your side). (April 2017) 4. This article needs additional citations for verification (Please indicate accurately). (April 2017) 5. This article relies too much on references to primary sources(Which is Primary sources?). (April 2017)

Please share more on the how should we change the content since it is subjective. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.103.57.11 (talk) 01:46 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Copying this info to talk:Pico Far East Holdings Limited and replying on that talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 02:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding article of jeedimetla

I belongs to jeedimetla what ever i have edited is 100 % perfect but how can you say that is improper and irrelevant... Praveen Netha.1995 (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

When kukatpally is a neighborhood to a hyderabad then what about jeedimetla...it doesn't belongs to hyderabad or what..?? Praveen Netha.1995 (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

For your kind information ranga reddy district is sub divided into ranga reddy and medchal and jeedimetla belongs to medchal district not ranga reddy...if you people don't know a proper information how can you say that what i have provided is incorrect . Any one can edit in wiki not me...?? Praveen Netha.1995 (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friday the 13th: The Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

King of the Hill/Hank Hill reversion?

@Jim1138:

The previous version that you reverted mine to makes extremely sloppy (and repetitive) use of the term "conservative," conflating Hank's Conservative politics, conventionality, modesty, and morality. My edit also corrected the sloppy use of "progressive" and redneck, and added the fact that Hank can and does (reluctantly) adapt to novel situations with alacrity and skill, as well as improving the phrasing. Why was this any of a problem? Do you disagree with those points? I could provide numerous episode citations, but why should that be necessary? I said nothing objectionable. The previous version you prefer was controversial and prejudiced, mine is not. Please change it back. Johngorno (talk) 05:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

@Johngorno: It has been that way for at least 18 months. If you look online for sources, you will find Hill described that way, such as here. I don't think your description of Hill fits. BTW: conservative is not a proper noun and probably should not be capitalized. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: The previous version's duration doesn't make it superior: if you have a particular disagreement about a Wikipedia entry, it would be better to change the particular you disagree with, rather than discarding an entire edit.

Firstly, do you disagree about the points I made about the sloppy terminology? See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservative for the synonyms I am substituting. Wikipedia also correctly capitalizes Conservative in the context that I have corrected. The version I am correcting sloppily uses "progressive" to refer to the unconventional and uses the often-derogatory "redneck" without quotations.

As for Hank's character, one can forgive a source outside of Wikipedia for its imprecision or failure to present a thorough, nuanced approach, as it is seldom intended to serve as an encyclopedic source, rather, to make particular points of interest to the author. How much of the show have you watched? In the pimp episode, the quicinera episode, the Ren Faire episode, the nude resort episode, and many other examples, Hank's adaptive abilities are clear. Johngorno (talk) 01:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Johngorno: I have moved the discussion to talk:Hank Hill. You may wish to read wp:talk page guidelines. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

removal of a page

Could you please remove the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavian_Bunkering? I have put a delete tag on it but that seems to be removed and the content itself was edited. This company has been acquired by another company and this name or company doesn't exists any more. In fact when we search new company's name on Google it will feature Scandinavian Bunkering logo and copy which is sourced from wiki. I don't know how many times we need to request this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faris ma (talk • contribs) 05:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Faris ma: I left a message regarding most of this on your talk page. I doubt that there is any Wikipedia wp:policy dictating the deletion of articles based on how others want Google search to behave. Jim1138 (talk) 06:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: I don't understand. My request is this, how would I remove this page. If its not possible easily how would I edit the content, logo, and link of the page completely to the new one? Please help.Faris ma (talk) 06:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The article per WP:DEFUNCT should stay and the topic should continue to be about Scandinavian Bunkering. Wikipedia does not delete or obscure articles on defunct companies. There are many articles on defunct companies on Wikipedia. Example: Spinnaker Software, Dysan. So, Scandinavian Bunkering is not an especially unusual case. You should create a new article. Suggested name: Glander International Bunkering (It is a wp:redlink because there is no content. You get to create the page). See your talk page for links about creating the new article. Note, in Scandinavian Bunkering, there is a redlink to Glander International Bunkering. Jim1138 (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Additions

I am currently Sourcing it. (I have been having issues getting it to work.) I apologize if I made a mistake in my sourcing.

It is not original content. The current information on the page is entirely inaccurate and even contradicts itself. I am clarifying it and adding sources. Please don't mess with it before I've had a chance to complete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.77.45 (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Why do you feel the need to message me about this? 2600:8800:5100:38E:44D9:1CDF:82A1:80D6 (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Foreign Language References

Do you rely on Google Translate to validate assertions and innuendo made in the biographies of living persons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.129.135.251 (talk) 07:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

your waring

Why did you template me without checking his actual intentions(I was Removing bare Urls fro the page using Prove It the edit summary said so and beyond that loss of content the edit did remove a lot of bare UrlsFORCE RADICAL (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Forceradical: You lopped off the top seven or eight lines of the article which seemed rather important. See your edit here. Please check your work. Try wp:Show preview Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Lakshmi

At least read your Own Wikipedia pages on Lakshmi. Quote:

"Lakshmi (Sanskrit: लक्ष्मी, lakṣmī, ˈləkʂmiː) is the *Hindu* goddess of wealth, fortune and prosperity. She is the wife and shakti (energy) of Vishnu, a major god in Hinduism.[2] Lakshmi is *also* an important deity in Jainism and found in Jain temples.[3] Lakshmi was *also* a goddess of abundance and fortune for Buddhists, and was represented on the oldest surviving stupas and cave temples of Buddhism.[4][5]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.5.224.211 (talk) 11:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Replied to user on own talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 14:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hatty Keane

Hi Jim, thanks for your message.

I represent Hatty Keane and work for her label and manager. I have been updating the page with new and more relevant information.

I am struggling with the last part though, the 'external links', I think I messed that part up and deleted some vital HTML codes that I now dont know how to restore. Are you able to help me understand how I add external links? Right now its just a mess with a bunch of red sentences.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelly David (talk • contribs) 15:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

hatty Keane

Hi again Jim, thanks for the advice of external links etc.

When I go back to her wikipedia page now everything that I've updated is gone, everything is back to the old version, why is that?

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelly David (talk • contribs) 15:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Nik & Eva Speakman

HI Jim,

We are Nik & Eva's management please could you allow us to edit this page correctly.

Many thanks,

Katie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.197.95.234 (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Shark Shield

Hi Jim,

I have been editing the Shark Shield page (my company) over the past few years under another user name and assumed that the best way to show who was editing our company page was the company, you suggesting that this is not correct and that company pages should be edited by anonymous user names, is this the correct policy? IBM can not edit their company page as IBM it must be a different user name? Thanks for your assistance.

Best regards Lindsay Lyon, Managing Director Shark Shield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SharkShield (talk • contribs) 04:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

@SharkShield: It's not about anonymity, it's about a conflict of interest. IBM is not welcome to edit the article about them. It is not "their" page, it is our page about them. Employees of IBM are welcome to edit any article that is not about them or their competitors. Likewise, the Shark Shield page is not your page, it is our page about your company. You are not welcome to edit the page about your company or your competitors. You have a conflict of interest with regard to those topics. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Understand the conflict question and who "owns" the page, however it is impossible for "other" people to know more about the history of my company that I own, it is simply not possible and can only result in misinformation, without my knowledge the page on the company I own and am building can never be accurate, conflict of interest or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkpro (talk • contribs) 04:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

@Arkpro: I replied / left info on your new talk page. Remember to sign your talk with four tildes: "~~~~" Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Just a line to say thank you for your kind words and welcome. I appreciate it.2602:306:8B8C:29A0:6101:9A94:F919:46FF (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SatanicChildRaypist

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:SatanicChildRaypist, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Winged Blades ^Godric 05:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

@Winged Blades of Godric: Most interesting post on my page in awhile! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

RE, Article EVERGLADES CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE,

Hello, How Are You, Have reverted your decision, the notable of the person is included in the citation of the articel, cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.12.178 (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Sorry I couldn't come to your aid, thanks for holding down the fort. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 15:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Sturmgewehr88. That much appreciated!. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nepal

Edit made to this page is not a test but official.

Icanbasanta (talk) 06:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Basanta HOD - IT ICAN

Jim I am damn confused what is going on here?----tubbysauto

Hey Jim I have no idea what is happening anmd what I am to do can you put my friends wroiting back up please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubbysauto (talk • contribs) 10:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@Tubbysauto: What are you referring to? You haven't made any edits under that account (Tubbysauto) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

JIm I dictated an entire huge paragraph to my buddy to change the Karma To Burn to the correct story and you took it down, for some reason wiki kept logging me out so tubbysauto wasnt on it but that part you took down is what I want up is that ok?----tubbysauto OHHH Jom i made changes on Karma Toi Burn that is my band,,,I own the name and all rights to Karma To Burn. I can prove it if you need corporate tax nunbers or whatever Also I am sorry the other guy was impatient he tought you were a bot. I am appreciative and wish you could help me to fix my own site as well please someone has made several...

---

tubbysauto

Jim I realize you are busy but i just need you to answer a few questions for me... 1. you wont paste my wall of text up on KTB site so peopple can lie on these pages as long as a website backs them up? Cause I am about to stop donating if a person cannot edit thinhgs written about themselves 2. how do I edut what is wruitten about me? Please answer without cut and paste that shit is too confusing --3. also I need that wall of text place it somewhere so I can copy paste somewer else --tubbysauto

Erika Jaynes

Not sure I understood your revert. I provided two sources for the information provided on her son and husband. In both cases they were derived from interviews with the subject. 108.31.146.219 (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:5B07:5200:E4FA:E965:9828:4F1C (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC) see the Jim, I am confused post as thats me the writer

---

tubbysauto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubbysauto (talk • contribs) 11:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

back to Richard Mullins

Jim I need your hellp there is no conflict, and I put noting but positive stuff up in my text also i have my own HBO show now with my partner Mike Judge and do not have any cross over withg my old band mates I play with Billy Joe Shaver now as well so again no conflicts - so its my writinbg not dictated and there is no conflict and the old one is false in several sections please let me change it to the truth

---

tubbysauto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubbysauto (talk • contribs) 11:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Can you put the wall of text from Karma To Burn here so I dont have to tyope it and I wikk post in the facebook at leasat?----tubbysuato

These links are not valid, and the author asked me to erase them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.183.238.190 (talk) 13:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit war

Your recent editing history at Michael Del Zotto shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I've reported your disruptive behavior to the administrator noticeboard and pinged you there. Please do give it a look. --140.32.16.52 (talk) 07:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia

The subsections I deleted are rather questionable, to say the least; I'll rewrite them in the future instead of simply deleting them. You reverted too far though; back to start of edits. There is good edits there and I'm going to go back to the revision where I added on info; but restore the large sections I just deleted. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.97.209.110 (talk) 08:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Changing the title and content

@Jim1138:

I understand that Wikipedia page of Scandinavian Bunkering can not be deleted. Would it be possible to change the heading and content to a completely different one? Which means, in the URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavian_Bunkering, Scandinavian_Bunkering should be changed to a different one.Faris ma (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@Faris ma: Please leave Scandinavian Bunkering alone and create the article Glander International Bunkering. Please? Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

UK Mail - Wiki Page

UK Mail - Wiki Page - I am seeking that our legal team look at this article. Until such time that we can review this story, I would advise that you kindly remove from the UK Mail Wiki page - I request this to happen within the next 12 hours. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.114.35 (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Love.Live.Life

Hey Jim, I see you've reverted the user Masheenya on Cover Drive. Can you also revert them on Love.Live.Life? I've gone up to my three-revert limit there, but they have added unsourced content there as well and used a dead link to attempt to cover it up. Ss112 20:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding the edit I on keep doing.

Don't quote Polygon, and the so called "critics" that made the articles regarding Persona 5's localization aren't even professionals. They are actually bunch of fan translators/amateurs when it comes to localization in games and most of them didn't even work on a single professional project. They were only making such articles just to grab some attention and potentially give them a real job in an official localization. The Persona 5 English localization has few clunky text but they are no where near as problematic has these people are making it to be. Most of the reviews from Metacritic don't even mention the faults and some even praised the localization effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonCl (talk • contribs) 03:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Salesforce Tower Criticism Section Deletion

It's frustrating that I am having difficulty removing a section clearly unsuitable for encyclopedic writing. Especially given that it blemishes an article of relative importance. Please consider vouching for its deletion. To spare you the trouble, here is a sentence by sentence rundown:

1. "Pelli's design for the Transbay Tower has been subject to significant criticism due as its oblong shape and relatively underwhelming design compared to other proposals by architects such as SOM and Richard Rogers." "Relatively underwhelming" by academic consensus? Purely the writer's opinion, unsupported by the citation provided.
2. "Despite the tower not being completed, San Francisco Curbed readers rated Salesforce Tower as one of the 20 ugliest buildings in the city". Cites a post from a blogging network, hardly an encyclopedic source. The blog does not elaborate on their methodology for ranking the "ugliest" buildings in San Francisco."
3. "Many also noted their disappointment that the tower, built on formerly state-owned land and claiming the highest elevation point in San Francisco, does not have a public viewing deck." "Many" is a weasel-word. The citation does confirm that the tower lacks a public viewing deck. This is perhaps the only relevant information that could be included in a future revision of the criticism section.
4. "Satirical blogs have also ridiculed the tower for its 'provocative' shape." Cites a blog-post on medium, potentially self-published.

I urge you, in the interest of maintaining a minimum standard of quality, to delete the section as it's currently written. 69.181.43.224 (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)