User talk:Journalist.Abid

This is Journalist.Abid's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Journalist.Abid! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Journalist.Abid/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Journalist.Abid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Journalist.Abid/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello Journalist.Abid. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Journalist.Abid. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Journalist.Abid|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Daiyusha (talk) 04:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I am not paid by anyone but I've just saw some of the necessary updates about the organization so I did that. If you don't think this is according to your rules you can delete them. Journalist.Abid (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qasim Ali Shah Foundation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qasim Ali Shah Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qasim Ali Shah Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 08:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added this article just because I saw the work is red on another page. I was curious why this is in red format. So I search on google and got that wikipedia make words red which they think should have page on wikipedia. That's why I've created the page, may be I don't know the rules and regulation but I will try to read before writing any article next time. Journalist.Abid (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Qasim Ali Shah Foundation[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Qasim Ali Shah Foundation has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://qasimalishahfoundation.org/about-qasf/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Bishonen | tålk 09:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When we are writing for a company then I think one of the best source of information is the official website. It doesn't under the copyright as I've write about the company and information is taken from the official website of the company. Journalist.Abid (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, the best source of information is absolutely not the official website. The websites of companies are generally full of self-promotion (and the Qasim Ali Shah Foundation's site is actually even worse than most in this regard). Wikipedia is supposed to be a neutral encyclopedia - it's not for promotion of companies. The best sources of information, and pretty much the only sources of information allowed on Wikipedia are secondary sources that are not connected to the subject. Please don't use promotional sources again. Moreover, you didn't just use the company site, you copied it, and yes, that is certainly a copyright violation. If you violate copyright again, you are likely to be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 13:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Please answer the question you were asked above[edit]

Journalist.Abid, you were asked above if you are being paid for your edits. You were also requested to not edit further until you answered the message. Perhaps you missed that. Anyway, you didn't answer, and you continued to edit. Please now reply about possible paid editing. If you ignore this message too, and simply continue to edit, you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 10:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I am not editing anything now, I am not getting paid by anyone for the changes I've done on wikipedia. Journalist.Abid (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 13:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Qasim Ali Shah. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]