User talk:Volontaerin

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Volontaerin. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 14:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LegalResourcesFoundation/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse[edit]

Hello! Volontaerin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:30, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I unblocked you and completed the rename. -- Avi (talk) 01:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legal Resources Foundation (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legal Resources Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Legal Resources Foundation has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Legal Resources Foundation. Thanks! Happy Squirrel (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legal Resources Foundation (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legal Resources Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legal Resources Foundation (August 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wxidea was:

Hi. You've been in proposal limbo for a while. I suggest you take a hatchet to your article, it's really too detailed. Keep details which can be directly backed up (cited to) independent articles. Even if the foundation were incredibly famous, some of the details are really extraneous, like the exact number of pamphlets or facts which will be unstable like the the precise staff count. We also don't need to know what the staff eat for lunch. I think that as a side-effect, trying to cut this back and tighten it will solve the other problem that it still reads too soft and promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legal Resources Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wxidea (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legal Resources Foundation (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

There are far too many statements/paragraphs that have no source. It might be better to cut this article back to what you can reference with a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legal Resources Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 05:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Legal Resources Foundation has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Legal Resources Foundation. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 14:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Volontaerin! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 14:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Offer of help[edit]

Hi. I see you've done a lot of work on the article for the Legal Resources Foundation, but it hasn't passed Articles for Creation. The article needs different kinds sources, in particular it needs newspaper or journal articles that are about the organization and its work. I don't have good access to Zimbabwe news, but if you can find 3-5 substantial articles that have come from reliable news organizations, I can try to do an edit of the article.You can post the links here, or on my talk page. LaMona (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help - article seems to be deleted (G8)[edit]

Hello, I still try to get the article about the Legal Resources Foundation in Zimbabwe published. After various submissions, all of them declined, I've shortened it recently and just noticed, that the article is now deleted or is a non-existend page (G8). I don't understand how to contact the wikipedia editor either, who apparently did this. Sorry, I feel quite demotivated now and really need some help as I try to publish the article since 1,5 years now. Regards, Volontaerin (Volontaerin (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volontaerin (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would still need all additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall; please no press releases, interviews, social media or trivial passing mentions (such as 1, 2 to 3 simple mentions).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volontaerin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Volontaerin[edit]

Hello, Volontaerin. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Volontaerin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 12:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]