User talk:MJF2000
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
This is MJF2000's talk page. Feel free to leave a message.
| Year | Month | Link to talk page | Number of talk subjects |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | December | User talk:MJF2000/December 2009 | 11 |
| 2010 | January | User talk:MJF2000/January 2010 | 5 |
| February | User talk:MJF2000/February 2010 | 4 | |
| March | User talk:MJF2000/March 2010 | 0 | |
| April | User talk:MJF2000/April 2010 | 7 | |
| May | User talk:MJF2000/May 2010 | 0 | |
| June | User talk:MJF2000/June 2010 | 6 | |
| July | User talk:MJF2000/July 2010 | 4 | |
| August | User talk:MJF2000/August 2010 | 3 | |
| September | User talk:MJF2000/September 2010 | 10 | |
| October | User talk:MJF2000/October 2010 | 0 | |
| November | User talk:MJF2000/November 2010 | 0 | |
| December | User talk:MJF2000/December 2010 | 3 | |
| 2011 | January | User talk:MJF2000/January 2011 | 6 |
| February | User talk:MJF2000/February 2011 | 2 (to date) | |
| March | User talk:MJF2000/March 2011 | 1 |
Orphaned non-free image File:ITV1 Bumper Cars 2010 ident.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:ITV1 Bumper Cars 2010 ident.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Bungo to the Rescue has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 20:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Disney Channel (UK & Ireland) Events for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Channel (UK & Ireland) Events is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel (UK & Ireland) Events until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 23:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Pet Nation.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Pet Nation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 12:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Playmobil Catalogue.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Playmobil Catalogue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Mosquito Productions for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mosquito Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosquito Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Special Agent Oso Title Card.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Special Agent Oso Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Night Before Zipsmas (Jungle Junction) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Night Before Zipsmas (Jungle Junction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Night Before Zipsmas (Jungle Junction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk YO! 10:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of A Gift for Zooter for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Gift for Zooter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Gift for Zooter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Spider Eye Productions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication whatsoever of notability, with only company links. There's four short sentences in one reliable source (from 2011) that I'll add, but that's not enough for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Spider Eye Productions for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Eye Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Drmies (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The article Where Is Warehouse Mouse? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Was unable to find any sources on GNews, ProQuest, GBooks, or Newspapers.com
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)