User talk:MojoTas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Magistrates' vs. Magistrates[edit]

I know that various Magistrates' Courts in Australia have logo-designers and website-constructors who are not as concerned as the rest of us about correct punctuation. The Magistrates' Courts in England do not tend to be as sloppy, q.v. I would be willing to be persuaded that the Magistrates' Court of Tasmania knew what to call itself if there were any serious justification for the lack of apostrophe. Are you aware of any? I would be even more willing to be persuaded if the inconsistency between the two various forms (see the Magistrates' Court of Victoria website - there is a link from the page), had any rhyme or reason to it.GSTQ 23:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OneSteel[edit]

No problems. It'd been a long requested article, thanks for creating it. There's a few links about the place linking to Onesteel. I fixed one at David Tweed but I'm sure there's more about. Cheers. -- Longhair 02:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating subpages[edit]

Hi MojoTas. Apologies for my late reply. I've been suffering internet connections problems here at home but I think I'm back for now. You asked at my talk page,

Longhair, can you tell me either how to make subsidiary pages within a page (i.e. in a discussion page, creating an archive page; or in a user page, making sub-pages) or where I can find this info? Tried with no luck.?.

Creating a subpage is very easy. Just add /pagename after the URL in your browsers address bar, press enter, and begin to edit your new subpage as per normal editing. Archives are usually created much the same way, but let me know exactly what you're trying to do and I'll point you in the right direction. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 22:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Paul Lennon vandalism[edit]

Apart from blocking off the whole university there is nothing really to be done. If it's just once per month it's quite minor compared to what happens elsewhere on Wikipeida. Just keep watch of the page and revert it when you see it.--Konst.ableTalk 12:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

System Shock[edit]

Where does it state in the game (or even the manual) that TriOptimum and Tetracorp developed from softdrink giants? The only relevant thing I recall is in System Shock 2 there is a reference to the two softdrink giants of the 20th century, but there is nothing about a connection to Triop.--Drat (Talk) 10:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australia and the United Nations[edit]

Australia and the United Nations has been selected as the new Australian collaboration of the fortnight. I created a tiny stub. Please help to improve it however you can. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 13:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV[edit]

You should report vandals on WP:AIV. Amos Han Talk 01:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that the vandal IP that we reported on WP:AIV comes from Australia. I clicked on "IP Info" on the very bottom of the IP talk page. Since it has a very long history of vandalism and blocks, I am thinking that it might be a school IP. Amos Han Talk 02:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:203.217.22.2 (the IP of the vandal we reported) finally got blocked. It has been blocked for 1 year. Now we can rest, but I've got more vandalisms to revert. Amos Han Talk 02:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bend It like Beckham[edit]

He was blanking the entire page, section by section. He's also had a history of vandalism. Bsroiaadn 04:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buff Bagwell[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Buff Bagwell, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! RFerreira 06:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

I was just mucking about with the wdefcon style you're using, and checked your userpage to see if it broke anything. It did, but your userpage looked like it was somewhat broken before that. Did [1] fix it? I'm not sure what you originally intended. Apologies if I've just made things worse :P-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slim[edit]

I don't think bursting into print about allegations (reported in the media or not) is fair to Slim, unless & until these allegations are tested & proved or disproved in court. Anyone can allege anything about anyone (I could make up something about you) & if these are all included in an encyclopedia it would degrade it. GrahamBould 08:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Why can't we all have a little fun with wiki now and then?

New South Wales v Fahy[edit]

Hey, no problems. Just out of curiosity how did you find out about this case? The judgment hasn't appeared on the High Court/Austlii site yet. Kewpid 04:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

media[edit]

Banned long time persistent nasty abuser. Period. It is not like he added some unique irreplaceable info. `'Míkka 02:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To satisfy your curiosity for this case, he just cut'n'pasted the corresponding section out of Romania. `'Míkka 02:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter[edit]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter[edit]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for your comment on keeping the above article. If you want to help save the article from deletion, you need to post your comment again in the deletion debate before it closes. - Neparis (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hobart meetup[edit]

Hi MojoTas, just letting you know that a Hobart meetup is planned for Monday 19th January. If you're around it would be great if you could come along. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Hobart for info. thanks, pfctdayelise (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum[edit]

Hi MojoTas,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello MojoTas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Peter Harvey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal[edit]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Australian Supreme Court cases for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Australian Supreme Court cases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Supreme Court cases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart meetup[edit]

Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart area articles[edit]

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]