User talk:Neutrall

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Neutrall! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, ask me on my talk page, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. And remember, no question is "stupid"; if you have anything, absolutely anything that you'd like to know, feel free to drop on by and leave my a message! :D Happy Editing! Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help My Talk Page New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

GeorgeMoney ☺ (talk) ☺ (Help Desk) ☺ (Reference Desk) ☺ (Help Channel) 04:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Fabian Osuji

I've nominated your article on Fabian Osuji for speedy deletion, as I think that, as it stands, it is "a biography of a living person that is negative in tone and unsourced", see WP:CSD. Feel free to create another article with references, see WP:VERIFY. Regards, Mr Stephen 21:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

the article in question is not yet complete. You are welcome to do some research an upgrade the article. (Neutrall 21:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC))

The article is not complete

It is good you noticed it, but the article is not complete yet. (Neutrall 21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC))

Add {{underconstruction}} to the article, but see for example this about biographies of living people . Regards and good wiki-ing, Mr Stephen 21:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info Mr Stephen (Neutrall 21:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC))

Images

Hi Neutral,

I have responded to your question on my own talk page. Not sure if you read it yet, but I thought you might have expected me to respond here. Kind regards, — mark ✎ 07:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Foreign Ministers

Hi, regarding your edits to the various foreign ministers of Nigeria, the succession boxes seem to have some significant errors. Firstly, the box should link to Foreign Minister of Nigeria, not the generic Minister of Foreign Affairs (which can apply to any country and is therefore not specific enough). Secondly, the dates you've been adding don't match the dates given in Foreign Minister of Nigeria, or in fact the correct dates from other sources. Thirdly, you've created a number of articles with essentially no content aside from these succession boxes, and while stubs can be useful it'd be nice to see at least some research go into them. Hopefully you can remedy these points; I'm supposed to be on wikibreak! All the best, Ziggurat 20:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

point taken (Neutrall 21:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC))

Bolaji Akinyemi

I expanded this article, which you created, and it was featured on template:did you know. Picaroon (t) 15:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joy Ogwu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joy Ogwu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neutrall! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Henry Adefope - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Nuhu Bamalli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ebuka Obi-Uchendu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Bayo Ojo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Magaji Muhammed - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Kema Chikwe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Robi Ludwig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robi Ludwig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robi Ludwig until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 14:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Proposed deletion of One Week to Save Your Marriage

The article One Week to Save Your Marriage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found only PR and passing mentions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)