User talk:Oceanyam
Welcome[edit]
|
Welcome![edit]
August 2012[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Antisemitism in Europe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Antisemitism in Europe was changed by Oceanyam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860345 on 2012-08-02T15:32:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this also your account? VolunteerMarek 01:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC) |
{{unblock| Hello. Any Administrator, Sorry to have such a complicated request, but please bear with me! This is important to me. No one in this case has ever been accused of being "racist" against Polish people. They (two non-administrators) have been deleting my valid suggestions and contributions. Then they are replacing it with big words "RACIST" , and a scroll box. Since have removed the scroll box and just left "racist" . They had done this prior to the end of the investigation, I am litigating. (They are doubtless stalking this page), (poeticbent and volunteer Marek). They are Anti-semites if they did this, and cover their tracks well. I am not taking this charge lightly. The "racist" incident against Turmerick is in the process of being repealed, and were ungrounded, and we plan to eventually return. These that these individuals are doing to me are the real thing. Research, I beg you.
The rules state that bans or investigations can not be brought to penalize, or take control of content.
These are the reverts. Notice, that they are mainstream and valid suggestions with accurate sources: First to this slanderous revert. I had never said a bad word to either of them (they and their, real well hidden sockpuppets, have called us 'illiterate' 'unencyclopedic' etc. prior to the ban, I responded politely or not at all). At the time the investigations were incomplete, yet I had just been banned by these two, who brought the charges hours earlier, consequently making it impossible to request an end to their vandalism. Our source for the claims above were |The Chicago Institute of Technology Boder, which is from the most valid Jewish Holocaust resource available. It is direct quotes compiled from 3 survivors, who barely survived working, and being starved to death. They then went on to delete (revert), this edit claiming it is anecdotal, yet it had passed through three admins to get placed, this was also done a day after the ban so I can not fight his vandalism. The recorded Isakivitch interview is representative, according to multiple sources. What this true racist did is truly beyond the pale. I created the whole section "Romania" on that article.
Before I mention the other reverts, I would like to state clearly that the original checkuser charges were only brought, so adamantly, by these 2 so that we can be punished. Then they could erase records of Polish anti-Semitism and the Holocaust. The next revert, The checkuser accusations were brought to punish me for questioning Polish anti-Semitism!, and they wrote "Racism" everywhere about me, on public pages where I am defending what is factual and sacred other sources I used were the Krakow Post, a BBC documentary and the seminal documentary on the subject mentioned on Wikipedia The Shoah a French documentary that is 8 hours long. They are trying to erase as many mentions of anti-Semitism in Poland as they can get away with. They edit with their real sockpuppets (a concept I never heard of until two days ago) the page "An eye for an eye" which blames all of Polish Communism on the Jews. Every once in a while they are loose and edit it in their own names. The page goes on to say Jews starved Germans and Poles to death in concentration camps, I guess it was the 8% of Jews that were still alive, and had no property (sorry for the macabre sarcasm).
They plan to use this ban as a precedent, to claim consensus, and remove all claims of anti-Semitism within Central and Eastern European history on Wikipedia, as a method of censorship. They have already made that clear in the statement "wild accusations of anti-Semitism" . I am not as positive as they, no matter how much power these types gain on Wiki by gaming the system, how wild these claims are see [1], or [2]. Our claims are--not even remotely--a tiny fraction of the historical truth recorded in dozens of books, referring to extra-Holacaust and pre-holocaust treatment of Jews. It enhances the spectrum of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a travelogue for Poland, and the page Poland itself has no interest to me. It is they that have an obsession with the page Jews in Poland. Jews are a group of humans who have been dealt collective punishment on and off for over 1000 years in Central Europe, it is being censored.
The exaggerated, exaggerated, trumped up charges against me also did not allow me to debate their revert, note reverter says it doesn't say 1648 was the first that is because I wrote on the page 'it was not the first', and I wrote 'large scale' anti-Jewish riot. Here note on this one he claims in his revert summary 'that is not what the source is about', that is exactly what the source is about please, please read the source here |Jamie Stokes mentioning antisemitism in Poland and was also directly from a British ITV documentary about modern anti-Semitism in Poland. This edit was removed that the equivalent of the 5 dollar bill in the Ukraine has his picture is not important? when he killed 300,000 Jews see the last sentence of the second paragraph of this Jewish Encyclopedia article please please. There are other crazy examples of their trick to censor me and its evidence, but this is very very long already. Help me, please! while i fight our ban with the arbitrators, please, at least remove the "racist" it is so evil, I am not "racist" . I am not racist against the Polish or any people, the thought is preposterous, I had gotten my impetus from complaints by, and am writing for, over 5 lower middle-class elderly Jews, who can not edit Wikipedia on their own. Neither was anyone ever charged with racism against Polish people, and I never with racism at all. I just want to include the historical truth among the lies about how Poland was 'a paradise for Jews' as the article states, while not deleting that claim just including both.
They clearly had manipulated the system to penalize my content, when these had nothing to do with the charges against me. I really ask that the edits publicly calling me "racist" on Talk:History of the Jews in Poland, and the vandalism they did to Antisemitism in Europe where they removed our very long contemplated, appropriate, section and just left the first non-contextual line that I had written 'Romania', which in fact was not erased or dismissed by many real experts on the topic.
And somehow they got a hold of our IP, and sent us a virus with Polish curses, which disabled my router.Oceanyam (talk) 13:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Oceanyam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please read my request above, on my talk page. Also somehow they got a hold of my IP address and sent my router a virus with Polish curses, which disabled my router, on the night I was banned. Oceanyam (talk) 13:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That huge accusatory screed, coupled with the claim you are "litigating", will most certainly not get you unblocked. And your style of argument is the same as from your previous account, so the sock charge looks pretty solid to me too -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.