User talk:Petrandreev13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 () 19:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death wish[edit]

Hi. We seem to disagree as to whether the plot summary needs the names if the guns in in. I started a discussion on the talk page, please comment before re-adding the content. Scribolt (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Petrandreev13! You created a thread called Change an article name. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{NoACEMM}}

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages[edit]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Umka is Looking for a Friend moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Umka is Looking for a Friend, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Petrandreev13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Korabelnikova moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Margarita Korabelnikova, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Yakovlev (writer) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Yuri Yakovlev (writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 10:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Korabelnikova moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Margarita Korabelnikova, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 08:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuri Yakovlev (writer)[edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuri Yakovlev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Margarita Korabelnikova[edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margarita Korabelnikova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rabbit Over the Void, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Yefremov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Othello (1956 film)[edit]

Hi. You recently made an edit to Othello (1956 film) saying the release date was 1955 and not 1956. Do you have a reliable source for this? If so, please let me know and I'll update the release date and also move the page. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Petrandreev13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Petrandreev13

Thank you for creating Aleks Le.

User:TheTechnician27, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article is well-made; however, without reliable, independent sources (MyAnimeList and Behind the Voice Actors are, to my knowledge, WP:UGC and therefore are not acceptable as reliable sources), I cannot mark the article as reviewed. Please find at least reliable, independent sources discussing this subject in substantial detail, and I can mark the article as reviewed, releasing it for catalogue by search engines. Please also see the WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, and WP:ARTIST for why this is the case. As example of a reliable, independent source would be this Polygon article were it to actually discuss Le in any substantial detail (it doesn't). Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Nazvanov moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mikhail Nazvanov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Umka is Looking for a Friend".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aleks Le moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Aleks Le, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Hi, Petrandreev13! I'm Dswitz10734, and I wanted to talk to you bout your edit on the My Son Hunter page. First, thank you for your copyediting on the page improving several details I missed. About the category you added, American Propaganda Films, I don't necessarily agree about that. Usually propaganda is produced by the government to make you think a certain way. This movie is being developed by an independent producer (The Unreported Story Society) and isn't like a documentary where people are actively presenting the facts. This is meant to be a film based on a true story, but certainly some elements will be fictional, like Gina Carano's character, who is supposed to bring a comedic take to the film. If your argument is that this will have political messaging or a biased POV, then I'd agree. However, it's hard to find a movie these days that doesn't have political messaging. In that case, the category would be full with every Disney movie produced since 2013. We both know that political messaging has become too engrained in the film industry, but to put this film in a propaganda category I wouldn't agree with. I hope to hear from you soon, Dswitz10734 (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice[edit]

I have reported Radiohist to AN/I for their behaviour here on your Talk page. This is the discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#WP:OWNTALK_violations Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Ross moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Liza Ross, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Language of sources[edit]

Hi. You asked: And the sources in the English page must be in English language? No, they needn't be. What matters is that it is a reliable source. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Petrandreev13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikolai Sergeyev (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 08:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason I choose not to fill in the summary field is because it memorizes the text I write, which then uses as a suggestion in later edits. And I don't want suggestions to keep adding up and popping up when I write the text, but I don't know how to turn them off. But alright, I'll write the summaries from now on. Petrandreev13 (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]