User talk:Spawn Man/Archive14
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A belated apology
Spawn Man, I am sincerely sorry for how I conducted myself when we last interacted. I hope that any negative effect my comments had on you at the time have long gone away, as what I said was mailicious and unwarranted. I hope you can return to your former glory in writing excellent articles, and again, my apologies for my actions - they were unnecessary, and inexcusable. Daniel 08:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, I just had a complaint from a user I removed the access to VP yesterday, and I found this edit today. Thought you may find it funny :) Daniel 06:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
The Dinosaur Portal
Hi, Spawn Man - I'd be happy to keep an eye out for topics of interest for the portal. J. Spencer 02:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the refs
Thanks for doing up the citations for your new photographer article. By the way, I think your spoof new message hack is officially against the rules. You ought to take it out. Dicklyon 03:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you know this guy? You should go take a picture of him. And I added some space, to give you something to argue about. Dicklyon 03:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Coordinating WP dino collab
You wanna do this again? Seriously I am a bit of a slob so forget about some of the housekeeping stuff. Completely forgot as I was buried in birds and toadstools, though have one at FAC now. Now schizophrenia is up at FAR which is right up my alley.....cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 06:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hell yeah. Fine by me to wipe it each month. We'll do the collaboration...umm, collaboratively.. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 08:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's mainly all the frigging around. Wikipedia is really unpopular in my house at the moment and I hate to have scheduled tasks that I might have to take time away from a few other things I really need to be doing at home. The userpage came from Sharon/Phaedriel. I copied teh code for user talk page but then made a mess of the page and she whipped one up for me. However she appears to have been deluged with requests since then...cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 02:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 26 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jeremiah Arkham, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Aksi_great (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
|
On 26 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laurence Aberhart, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Aquarius • talk 17:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
|
On 27 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Batman: The Last Arkham, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Smee 01:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Have fun
No worries, have fun. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 03:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
DinoBot
Hey Spawn Man!
Just a quick note to let you know that we may be going automated! Well, not fully automated, but one page may get automated updates. I requested a bot for the endless chore that is Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs/dinosaur articles by size, as it's difficult to keep the list updated regularly, and the tools we have to update it aren't ideal anymore. Some brilliant programmer is building us a beautiful, shiny new bot that will keep the list updated automagically. Tres chic, eh? :) Happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 07:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Dino Portal
Thanks for the update! J. Spencer 21:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)
The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
A great idea - maybe combine forces?
I'm going through all the animal anatomic articles on Wikipedia & noticed your post on Category talk:Animal anatomy & thought maybe you'd like to help me? You did post a long time ago tough, but if you're interested, I'm going through slowly. I've rewritten & expanded these articles so far: Dewlap, Armour (zoology), Neck frill & I've attempted to expand Club (zoology), but it's a harder topic. Drop by my talk page & maybe we can combine forces & polish each other's articles once we've rewritten them or something? Cheers, Spawn Man 07:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Man, that seems quite a while ago now, 'twas when I got the chance to dissect stuff in biology. To be honest, I don't really know that much on the topic... Do you have any tasks in mind? If you drop by my talkpage whenever you have a task or question, I'd be happy to help — Jack · talk · 23:37, Sunday, 10 June 2007
Hey Spawn!
Just saw your edits on Daspleto. Does this mean we can count on you to help? It is the closest thing to T. rex since... well, T. rex... :) Firsfron of Ronchester 05:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
I didn't revert all of them, just the ones that didn't improve the article. If you look I think you'll see several are still there. Sheep81 05:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- (continued from Talk:Daspletosaurus).
- Well if you'll read what you wrote, you'll notice you didn't specify anyone else but me, so it's not hard to see how I might have thought you were dumping it all on me. I'm also not sure how else to read "I'm sure I'll be able to support in any future FAC this article might have if you fix the problem" other than how Dinoguy did. And I'm flabbergasted that when you said "The text on the relationship between Gorgi & Daspi is too overpowering & consumes a large portion of the text..." you were really only referring to one sentence in the entire article, since apparently you are fine with the rest. So maybe you just need to work on writing what you actually mean. That's all I'm gonna say. (shrug) Sheep81 07:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well A) I'm not going to talk about it anymore, and B) we aren't talking about Daspi now, just bitching about each other. Feel free to write whatever you like on the Daspi talk page though. Sheep81 08:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete what you like. Would be weird to delete something when the consensus is to keep it though. (shrug) Sheep81 08:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't a discussion anyway, it's you demanding a ridiculous nitpicky change and nobody else agreeing with you. I'm tired of repeating the same points over and over when you don't listen to them anyway. So no, I'm not going to "discuss" it anymore. Go ahead and delete stuff unilaterally if you feel the need, consensus will eventually determine what remains and what doesn't. Sheep81 08:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete what you like. Would be weird to delete something when the consensus is to keep it though. (shrug) Sheep81 08:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well A) I'm not going to talk about it anymore, and B) we aren't talking about Daspi now, just bitching about each other. Feel free to write whatever you like on the Daspi talk page though. Sheep81 08:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apology. But dude, I do have to go to sleep at some point. It was after 2am when I signed off of Wikipedia last night. And I have to eat and pay rent, so after that I was at work. I wish I could get paid to write dinosaur articles on Wikipedia, but alas I have to go slogging around outside all day. So no, I haven't been ignoring you, just attending to my real life (such as it is).
- Regarding your question about that one sentence, like I said, I'm through arguing with you about this. It goes nowhere except in circles. You think that one sentence, a whole 169 bytes out of all 30,018 bytes in the article, which briefly mentions Gorgosaurus in passing, is somehow "overpowering" and somehow makes you think the entire article is about Gorgosaurus. How can I argue with that? So no, I'm not going to bother to get into another argument which will end the exact same way the last one did. I feel it would more productive and waste less time to just bang my head against the wall. I'm sorry if that's "childish". Sheep81 05:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well they aren't just random dinosaurs, they're other tyrannosaurs. The sentence before lists a few unique characters of Daspletosaurus, this just shows another way to differentiate Daspi from other tyrannosaurs. I don't know how relevant it would be to list the ways you can tell Daspi from Anchisaurus since their most recent common ancestor (probably) lived in the Middle Triassic, but I do think it's useful to show the reader how to tell apart three superficially identical tyrannosaurs, two of which lived in the same place at the same time. Sheep81 06:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- How do readers know that these animals aren't all the same if we don't tell them how? Sure we say they have different names, but we can give different names to any number of things we please, even if they are identical. What is it that makes scientists think they are different enough to deserve different names?
- Regarding your question about that one sentence, like I said, I'm through arguing with you about this. It goes nowhere except in circles. You think that one sentence, a whole 169 bytes out of all 30,018 bytes in the article, which briefly mentions Gorgosaurus in passing, is somehow "overpowering" and somehow makes you think the entire article is about Gorgosaurus. How can I argue with that? So no, I'm not going to bother to get into another argument which will end the exact same way the last one did. I feel it would more productive and waste less time to just bang my head against the wall. I'm sorry if that's "childish". Sheep81 05:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't want to list all the other tyrannosaurs, that would be ridiculous, just like you said. So I picked Daspi's closest relative and the one that was contemporaneous. You know, the ones people might be most likely to compare to Daspi. Shocking! I don't care if 100 other dinosaur FACs don't compare to their subjects to other dinosaurs. They SHOULD. That's comparative anatomy. It's important. It's a foundation of modern biology. Tens of thousands of words have been written comparing Daspletosaurus to its relatives. This is one sentence of comparative anatomy in a whole article. Please, for both our sake, just let it go. Sheep81 06:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I can tell you the specifications of Rex and Gorgi orbits... IN FACT I DID IT IN THAT VERY SENTENCE!!! (gives up) Sheep81 07:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Gorgi's orbits aren't anything but circular, because they're circles. Circles are by definition circular. So maybe when I say "the circular shape seen in Gorgosaurus" you would think "oh he means a circle". And when I use the term 'keyhole' to describe Rex's orbits, it's because that's the term used in the literature, it's more concise than saying "the orbit of Tyrannosaurus, which is constricted caudally by a forward-pointing process of the postorbital" and it has the added advantage of being in plain English. If someone really wants to see the shape of the orbit of Rex, they can head right over to that page and see what I mean in about 5-10 seconds depending on their connection speed. And yes, there are many shapes that could be between a circle and a 'keyhole', but you don't have to imagine all those shapes because I just told you that it was a tall oval! Not too hard to picture, I don't think! A first grader can understand "tall oval". You are obviously grasping at straws here, NOBODY agrees with you (even though most haven't posted anything because they see that an argument with you is like being sucked into a tar pit), so I see no reason to keep defending the sentence. This time, I'm really not going to respond further. I've explained myself as best I can. I can't believe I got into an argument about shapes with you! Shapes!! Arrrgh... so much wasted time... but feel free to have the last word on my talk page if you please. Good night. Sheep81 07:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I can tell you the specifications of Rex and Gorgi orbits... IN FACT I DID IT IN THAT VERY SENTENCE!!! (gives up) Sheep81 07:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't want to list all the other tyrannosaurs, that would be ridiculous, just like you said. So I picked Daspi's closest relative and the one that was contemporaneous. You know, the ones people might be most likely to compare to Daspi. Shocking! I don't care if 100 other dinosaur FACs don't compare to their subjects to other dinosaurs. They SHOULD. That's comparative anatomy. It's important. It's a foundation of modern biology. Tens of thousands of words have been written comparing Daspletosaurus to its relatives. This is one sentence of comparative anatomy in a whole article. Please, for both our sake, just let it go. Sheep81 06:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I've also gotten involved with an FAR of schizophrenia, though it really seems too much like work to me. As I'm a doctor I'm worried I've descended too much into jargon. If you had time, let me know any specific criticisms of the article as its giving me a headache....I gave it a big cleanup and shakeup but there's pressure to complete the job and copyediting isn't my forte....cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 07:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:TOL
Spawn, please discuss stuffl ike this first. I don't know what you are using to define "reptile", but every definition I've ever heard includes dinosaurs. Even phylogenetically, there are two definitions. One, monophyletic, would include birds and other dinosaurs as reptiles. The traditional, paraphyletic definition used on TOL for simplicity's sake is paraphyletic and excludes birds and mammals, not non-avian dinosaurs. Any way you cut it, they are reptiles. As are pterosaurs, but you didn't remove WP:Pterosaurs... they're warm blooded, have "fur", etc. Also, you're post on Mgigantius' talk page seems to indicate that you're mis-reading the quote from Dinosaur. You seem to think that because some prehistoric reptiles were not dinosaurs, dinosaurs were not prehistoric reptiles. This doesn't make sense. What it actually means is that all dinosaurs are reptiles, but not all reptiles are dinosaurs. Dinoguy2 09:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, back in the old days groups were loosely defined based on characteristics like fur or metabolism. Bakker thought that since dinosaurs may have been warm blooded (no solid evidence all of them were anyway), they should be in their own class, Archosauria, with birds as a sub-class. People accepted a lot of his ideas but not his classificaton (Greg Paul tried something similar with the same result). Nowadays there are two ways of classifying--one doesn't use classes, so nothing ever 'splits off' from anything else. Dinosaurs are reptiles are tetrapods are vertebrates are bilaterians are animals are bacteria etc etc. The older way is used to divide up the wikiprojects, and they keep the traditional classes of reptiles, mammals, birds, etc, with Archaeopteryx as the split-off point between reptiles and the new group, leaving all the other dinos in Reptilia (aka Sauropsida). Now, the advent of the new system basically made vertebrate paleontologists completely abandon the old one (a lot of other scientists continue to use both), which is why Bakker's class Dinosauria or Archosauria as seperate from reptiles never caught on... would have been nice, but what can you do. Bakker also wanted to seperate pterosaurs and crocodiles from reptiles and put them in one class with dinos and birds, btw. Dinoguy2 15:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Spawnie!!!
Spawnie!!! So nice to hear from you, baby, how's the married life treating you? :) Well, aside from the usual stuff, and the Mediation at Cherokee, not much here either - but hey, getting a Portal to Featured is big news! I might drop by and add my 2 cents to the discussion, if you allow me ;) Love, Phaedriel - 09:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the birthday wishes, but...
The "big day" isn't til the 21st... well, not a very big day, 19 is not one of those birthdays that are very exciting :) Plus it's in the middle of exams! How's engagement treating you? Take care, Riana ⁂ 06:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar alert!
- My understanding is that you did a lot of work on coding the Dinosaur Portal; at least, looking thru your contribs, that is what it looks like. So, I believe you deserve the barnstar. You do a good job promoting dinosaurs and the wikiproject on Wikipedia; you deserve recognition for that. As far as Daspletosaurus goes, I'm glad to see you are trying to make amends on Sheep's talk page. These arguments will happen, and it's nice to see that even though the two of you disagree, you haven't reverted to the name-calling and stuff that you used to do in days long ago. You've grown a lot; we've all grown a lot. Happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 04:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- My advice, Spawny, is just to forget about this silly argument, and move on. What started out a civil discussion about the article has devolved into... well, basically a tar pit. I don't want to get involved, because I have a lot of respect for both of you, but I don't see what was wrong with the original article as written, and I think the dispute could easily be solved by sending the article to scientific peer review, where a neutral group of readers can decide what they think of the article. Sheep didn't say that you have the knowledge of a first grader, only that "a first grader can understand "tall oval"". With thousands of very incomplete articles to work on, there's no reason for you to leave and plenty of very good reasons for you to stay (Avemetatarsalia, Vulcanodontidae, Predentary bone, Plateosauridae, Rostral bone, etc). You could add ten words to any of these articles and pretty much double their size. Firsfron of Ronchester 08:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, I have to ask - do you have these sort of conflicts in real life too? I find them funny sometimes (as you know) - the image is something like John Cleese from Fawlty Towers, or Dylan Moran from Black Books...cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 08:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Nice Work
Nice work on creating those image review catagories - it's great to see all the dino images in one place. Great job AW! Spawn Man 07:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- That was mainly Dinoguy's idea but thanks for the note. Would it make sense to add a link on the Dino portal (that way other folks outside the project can easily consult these images)? Cheers. ArthurWeasley 15:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- There are currently 133 approved images and this without counting the historic ones, scale diagrams and skeletals. You'll probably better off selecting a few that are aesthetically above the others, besides being anatomically correct. ArthurWeasley 04:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- 30-50 images would be enough I think. Well, go ahead, select some good looking theropods and may be ask Firs and JSpence to choose some of the boring ornithischians ;) Cheers. ArthurWeasley 04:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- There are currently 133 approved images and this without counting the historic ones, scale diagrams and skeletals. You'll probably better off selecting a few that are aesthetically above the others, besides being anatomically correct. ArthurWeasley 04:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply
Hiya, Spawn(Man). For a grouch you're pretty nice, and thanks for the welcome :). I do plan to stay here for some years to come and keep up the good work! :), from, SWEETCARMEN♥16:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the greeting!
See you around, I'm sure! Jokestress 07:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Re. My main man!
Hello Spawn Man. Thank you for your comments and support. I'll attend to your request and see if I can re-organize the portal later today. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 14:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Erm, no, I still have not. I should really allow myself a few minutes to read the instructions on how to create a WikiProject. I will probably also need someone's bot to start tagging articles within the scope of the Wikiproject. Best regards, Húsönd 14:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Gnome Week
|
Hello, Spawn Man! You are invited to participate in Gnome Week, a mass article cleanup drive between June 21 and June 28, 2007. |
| This week, backlogs will be cleared. Articles will be polished. Typos will be fixed. Bad prose will be edited. Unreferenced articles will be sourced. No article will be safe from our reach! The more people who participate, the better Wikipedia will become as a result. | |
| I would love it if you would participate! - Arnon Chaffin (Talk) | |
| Edit message |
- Thanks a lot for the invite! I've been looking forward to the event for a while now, so have already joined. Cheers, Spawn Man 02:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Images requests
Hi Spawn, It would be a pleasure to make all these images for you. All I need is some good skeletals to work with. Actually, I think I've drawn more non-dinos than dinos so far. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 04:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- OK, got the pdf. Err, what should I do with Edaphodon? Seems to be known only by teeth. ArthurWeasley 05:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Here is the first one: Mauisaurus (your national plesiosaur, I believe). For the others, let me see, Chamitataxus is known from an incomplete skull but we could reasonably assume he had a body of a badger, Kaganaias, we don't know much about it, lots of guesswork and Osbornoceros should look like a pronghorn but do you have a skeletal? ArthurWeasley 06:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, I am a fast drawer ;). Will try to make the others during the week. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 07:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Did you know?
|
|
On 17 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kaganaias, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 20:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Chamitataxus
Next in the list. ArthurWeasley 04:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Looking for your your very own personal illustrator? Sure. No problem. Send me wish list. ;) Cheers. ArthurWeasley 06:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I saw it on the front page! Not a whole lot of non-dinosaur fossil reptile articles so I had a look. Saw a little debate on the talk page so I thought I would help out since I had the article handy. Nice little article... we really could use a lot more Mesozoic non-dinosaur articles so bravo. Arthur Weasley your personal artist! Now there's a tough 1-2 punch! :) Sheep81 11:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Commas or parentheses for scientific name in opening sentence and elsewhere
(Now that was a long header wasn't it?) There's a debate here about commas versus parentheses for scientific names for organisms (well in this case birds). I'm not sure whether this has been raised elsewhere but would be good to establish once and for all here and could apply as MOS across all biology articles. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
9000th edit:
Yay! I'm nearly up to 10,000 edits!!! Anyway, you're probably one of my best friends on here right now, so you can have the gift of my 9001st edit! ;) I was thinking of making Allosaurus my next pet project after Ive finished creating some non-dinosaurian articles first. What do you think? Would you join me? Spawn Man 03:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Spawn! Happy 9K! Yes, I'd be glad to assist on Allosaurus, though I promised user:Orangemarlin to help on K-T extinction event, I promised Sheep to look over his new copyedits on Velociraptor and to review Daspletosaurus for peer review; I never finished work on Herrerasaurus (still six papers left to check); and the current collaboration is supposed to be Plateosaurus. I'll try to wedge everything in! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 07:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Kaganaias
Here's your favorite japanese aquatic lizard. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 07:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Osbornoceros
I did not find any skeletal and the only reliable reconstruction I found on the web is on this page. I guess you need to create some new articles to illustrate now ;) Cheers. ArthurWeasley 06:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
FYI
User:WBardwin has attempted to convert the pop culture section of Tyrannosaurus into a list. I reverted it, he reverted it back, I re-reverted it, and now he has added some trivial reference into the section. I cannot revert it again for fear of breaking WP:3RR. See my attempt at civility here: User_talk:WBardwin#Tyrannosaurus_rex_pop_culture. I let Firsfron know since he has the whole patience thing down, unlike the two of us, but I thought I'd let you know in case he doesn't see it our way. :) Sheep81 08:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said, he has nailed the patience thing. I informed you in case he needed some backup, hehe. Anyway, I wrote a fair-use rationale on the picture page, do you think that is adequate? Whatever you think is best... I don't care if the image stays or goes honestly, but I think it looks nice. Sheep81 10:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Odd.....
I just checked edit count & noticed that the count only had me down for 288 edits to the article Dinosaur. This is odd because I specifically remember that's the only article I've ever made over 300 edits to. How could my edit count for that article have gone down by 12 edits? Thought you might know since you're all up with your edit count etc. Cheers, Spawn Man 11:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Spawn Man,
- Yeah, you're right; I keep a close watch on edit count. I think it's really interesting, and the tools people make are so neat.
- Hmm... Both Wannabe Kate and Page Statistics agree that you have made "only" 288 edits to Dinosaur. They're only bots, and they do make mistakes (because of corrupted data or whatever), but are you sure you counted right? The only other thing I can think of is that versions of the pages were oversighted (removed from the history), but that almost never happens. Still, you shouldn't feel bad that you "only" made 288 edits; you should be proud of your accomplishments on that article; it's Featured because of you! Firsfron of Ronchester 11:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi Spawn, just want to say thank you for the barnstar. Very much appreciated. For the next project, I am thinking it can goes the other way round: I have a few illustrations that do not have any article, such as image:Baurusuchus_BW.jpg and image:Uberabasuchus_BW.jpg. Would you be interested in writing up these articles? Cheers. ArthurWeasley 15:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've just e-mailed you a few pdfs. If you could write up something from these, great. If not, no worries. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 07:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
WP Dino
Hi Spawn Man, Thanks for making the effort to try to apologise about our WP Dino argument, but it hasn't done anything to change my mind about you. It seems to be your way, blow up at someone, then turn around and apologise (in a backhanded sort of way). Every other editor responded positively but you, because I think I made a reasonable point in a reasonable way. That you trumped it up to some sort of vicious attack and managed to get personally offended is tiresome, and I just don't need that kind of pointless aggravation on the Wikipedia. — John.Conway 09:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Spawn Man,
My original comments on the dinosaur talk page were respectful and appropriate, and I think you need to ask yourself why you are the only one that has reacted in a negative way. As for me now knowing you well enough, or giving you chances; well, you have done this to me before (see the Strutiomimus talk page), and I've seen you do similar things to other editors. Look, this isn't a personal crusade on my part, I just don't want to have to deal with your over reactions to honest criticism. And since I don't think you're about to change, that means having as little to do with you as possible.
P.S. If you'll read my comments again, I think you'll find I never called you "vicious", I was on fact referring to that fact that you have misinterpreted my criticism of the dino project's direction as a vicious attack on you, which is not the case.
— John.Conway 16:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Hi Spawn,
Just a reply to the comments you made on my talk page: Hmmm, I smell treason about me.... It's always nice to know people never stop talking about you behind your back eh?
- Actually, my comments were mostly about John, made on a public talk page where anyone can read them. I certainly didn't think you'd be upset, or I wouldn't have made them.
I don't need you apologising for me Firs, I'm quite capable of doing it myself, as I already have in a way.
- I wasn't apologising for you; I asked John not to let his feelings about you keep him from working on the project, not "Sorry about all the things Spawn Man said." There is a big difference. I'm glad you aplogized to John, but as he already knows it will only be a few more weeks before a fight erupts between you and someone else over a misunderstanding, and he clearly doesn't want to deal with it, he is not seriously considering working within the project. Which is a shame. But even you know it will only be a few more weeks before a fight erupts between you and someone else over a misunderstanding, as you've said in the past. One time, you went 40 days without an argument.
If you have a problem about how I act, place it on my talk page, not someone elses.
- Where did I say THAT, Spawn? Certainly not on John's talk page. Spawnie, sometimes I think you get upset about things that aren't even said. I certainly didn't say the things you accuse me of, above, and didn't see a problem leaving a note for John that was pretty much about John on John's talk page.
I wouldn't want to be a problem or a hinder to anyone wanting to get things done around the project. In any case, it's good to know who your friends are...
- I'm glad to know you at least still know we are friends. Firsfron of Ronchester 14:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I don't think you're mean; I like you! I said you get into a lot of arguments. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 03:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm glad to know you at least still know we are friends. Firsfron of Ronchester 14:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Yanoconodon
Hi Spawn, got your pdf. Looks good. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 06:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, will try but not tonight. It's almost midnight over here, and I am going to bed in a few minutes. ArthurWeasley 06:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Here it is. ArthurWeasley 06:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Dinosaur
I made some comments on the nomination. I would wait a couple more days before promoting the portal. Aquarius • talk 16:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- The portal have only been up for three weeks, and you are already tired of it. I nominated Portal:China twice, and the first nomination was up there for two months. The second nomination is now here for two months yet again, and no one is willing to promote it. It is impossible to keep the interest with this much of inactivity (which is frustrating), but that's just the way it is. Anyways, the Dinosaur portal is nicely done, and has been actively maintained since March, so I promoted it. Good work. Aquarius • talk 05:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Yanoconodon
|
|
On 29 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yanoconodon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 17:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
_Alt.png)
|
The Fauna Barnstar | |
| For your contributions to Yanoconodon and various other fauna-related articles, I hereby present you this award.Rosa 21:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC) |
RfA thanks
|
Hi Spawn Man. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance. |
|
Yanoconodon featured
Ooh man! Missed it... Congratulations, Spawn. Cheers. ArthurWeasley 14:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- btw, I've nominated Excalibosaurus yesterday. ArthurWeasley 14:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Re. Your RFB:
Hello Spawn Man. Thank you for your support and kind words. Although my RfB is set to be closed as unsuccessful in a few hours, I couldn't be happier for all the support I've received from so many users I hold in great esteem. :-) I'm also glad to see you're becoming interested in the Basque language. It's a fascinating language. Best regards, Húsönd 15:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, Spawn Man, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
Official thanks now you see. :-D Regards, Húsönd 23:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
JP discussion fixed
OK, I've moved it to the most appropriate page as Bakker says his Utahraptor is a better fit anyway...dunno when Raul's sweepin' by again so drop back soon....:) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Offer of admin nomination
If you're ready, I would like to nominate you for RfA. (But first, please remove the annoying fake "You have new messages" box from this page, as you'd get a flood of opposes for that.) WaltonOne 17:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough, although I think you're overestimating people's opposition to your candidacy. Nonetheless, even if you don't intend to run for adminship in the immediate future, I'd still strongly advise getting rid of the fake messages bar. It's irritating, and there's no justifiable reason for keeping it there. WaltonOne 15:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Smile!
Here's an echidna for you! Echidnas somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 00:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Why, of course! :-) Besides, I guess I'm everybody's Wikifriend by default anyway. Best regards, Húsönd 12:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Editor reviw
I will be happy to. :) — $PЯIПGrαgђ 20:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Cuddly Panda
#1 and #3 seem more than reasonable to me. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 03:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, that's what I was thinking. If the user's problems are sorted out, I'm sure the rest will come along. I'll go do that now. Cheers, Spawn Man 04:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Spawn,
- I'm not mad, and thought you were mad at me, based on some of your recent messages. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 11:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Spawn Man, there is still plenty that needs done, and we've got some very popular and well-known dinosaurs that need tons of improvement (Brachiosaurus, Apatosaurus, Allosaurus, Coelophysis, Plateosaurus, many others). These articles are under-referenced and need your help. If you're bored working on dinosaurs, by all means, go work on something else for a while, but like I said before, there are over a thousand articles which need major improvements, so it's not like you ever have to come into contact with someone you disagree with: it's like a house with a thousand rooms. Plus, there are still around a thousand reptile article that need creating, on the lists of pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, mosasaurs, etc. Firsfron of Ronchester 12:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- You take things too hard; too personally, Spawn. It's 6 AM here. Firsfron of Ronchester 12:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Spawn Man, there is still plenty that needs done, and we've got some very popular and well-known dinosaurs that need tons of improvement (Brachiosaurus, Apatosaurus, Allosaurus, Coelophysis, Plateosaurus, many others). These articles are under-referenced and need your help. If you're bored working on dinosaurs, by all means, go work on something else for a while, but like I said before, there are over a thousand articles which need major improvements, so it's not like you ever have to come into contact with someone you disagree with: it's like a house with a thousand rooms. Plus, there are still around a thousand reptile article that need creating, on the lists of pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, mosasaurs, etc. Firsfron of Ronchester 12:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Sure
|
The MONGO complaint board Barnstar | |
| As promised! Best complaints to the MONGO complaint board get awarded the Inflated Eagle Barnstar™! What a crappy life man...so sorry...was that coal mine a 10 mile (16 km) uphill walk both ways from your home too?[1]...--MONGO 05:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The MONGO complaint board Barnstar | |
| As promised! Best complaints to the MONGO complaint board get awarded the Inflated Eagle Barnstar™! You do deserve two!--MONGO 05:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Wandalstouring 10:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
First Edit
Happy First Edit Day
|
Happy First Edit Day, Spawn Man', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Spawn Man (talk) 07:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC) |
FROM YOUR FRIEND: ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 08 August 2007 (UTC)
- You are WELCOME!!! Enjoy the rest of the week. And Happy Editing. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:45, 08 August 2007 (UTC)
Check this out
Here we go again.....here cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tyrannosaurus in popular culture
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tyrannosaurus in popular culture, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrannosaurus in popular culture. Thank you. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Breaking my vow of silence:
Hi Firs! I think I've done pretty well staying under the radar recently - heck nobody even knew it was my second first edit day bar one guy! Mind you no one would have remembered anyway lol. ;) Anyway, I've still got a nagging feeling about that user User:Cuddly Panda. Firstly, I get blocked on site for any incivilty, however it ergs me that this user has been abusing the image and uploading system numerous times for a long while without even a single warning. After I came to you with this problem last time, I gave the user a comment about the uploading rules, which they ignored, and as I said I'd do, I placed a complaint on the admin's noticeboard. This went without any comments on it and nobody warned the user. Since then I've seen the user place at least one fair use image (without trying to look for more as I've got better things to do) on Tyrannosaurus in popular culture without fair use rationale (I've noted on the article's AfD that it needs rationale) so this indicates that the user has not responded to any of the messages I've left or the bot warnings. I'm coming to you not as a friend, but as a user who is citing another user for abuse of the system. A simple warning would make me happy, as the user has not recieved one despite my best efforts. And the noticeboard hasn't been useful either times I've managed to use it, so I thought I'd see if you could do something. People listen to admins. Cheers Firs. :) Spawn Man 05:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I also have a hunch that the user is also using a sockpuppet - I'd do it myself, but I don't know how, but is there a way we could check user User:Not an anon anymore? The user has the same user boxes, has been in contact with Cuddly Panda, has had the same problems formatting their signature, writes in similar articles and has a similar mannerism. I thought this might be enough to warrant doubt? And none of their edits overlap by the looks of things. Anyway, please get back to me. Cheers, :) Spawn Man 05:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Spawn!
- CP and NAAA just look like good friends: they don't appear to have the same userboxes (you and I seem to share more interests than they do!) And I certainly haven't seen any evidence either one has used either account abusively (!voting on the same discussions, etc). Failing to provide a Fair Use Rationale will only result in the image being deleted, so it's to the user's benefit to provide one, but I can't force someone to provide a Fair Use rationale, and he/she will already receive a warning each time such an image goes up for deletion, so there's no reason for additional warnings.
- You certainly have been under the radar lately: that's true! How are things going otherwise? Happy belated second first edit day! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 10:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Typical... Thanks I guess.... :/ Spawn Man 11:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
question
thank you very much! that helped me a lot! would you be able you sign up on my wiki and design my userpage like yours? i use that i could find more people like you to help me out as this is my first time doing my own wiki. JoeyLovesSports 05:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)