User talk:Trackway

Welcome!

Hello, Trackway, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 01:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gnagyimage1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gnagyimage1.jpeg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. enochlau (talk) 05:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin A. Uman

I'm moving the article back to "Martin A. Uman". Wikipedia naming convention is that an article on a person is titled with just their name, not their title. It makes the article easier to find when searching. Thanks, NawlinWiki 22:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of American artists

I am sorry to undo your work but this article has previously been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American artists and should not be recreated unless there is a substantial difference to the original. You can read suggestions regarding it in the AfD. I suggest discussing any proposals on Talk:List of American artists. You might like to involve Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts. Tyrenius 23:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the above message, you have simply recreated the article without any discussion. Please don't do this again in breach of the AfD decision. Also there is no authority to bar red links from an article. Tyrenius 00:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If a user leaves a message proposing discussion, then it is best to discuss first, before acting, as this is a collegiate project. I do not object to a list in itself, merely the form in which it existed. The British list in date sections is much better. The original US list had no date sections. I think your new version was a great improvement, so well done on that, but I'm not happy with just one section for the twentieth century. This section will be by far the biggest and it will also attract all the non-notable entries. I think it needs to be broken into smaller segments, possibly of 25 years each. Please also post on Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts to involve the views of editors who are likely to be helping to maintain any such list. Let's get a consensus before setting something up which people might not be happy with. If you didn't keep a record of your new version, I can retrieve it if/when necessary. Tyrenius 01:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your draft to a user sub page, which I hope is OK, as this is the normal practice. Also the cats have to start with a colon after the [[ to stop them putting your user page on the category page. I've done this. Tyrenius 02:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed that! It took me a while when I tried originally. If you follow the coding, you can create sub pages for whatever you want. Just put the code on your user page and you'll get a red link to click to make a user sub page. The key is the slash. Tyrenius 03:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for restoring the lists of American artists, I've added some names, you've done a really good job. Congratulations. Modernist 12:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'd like to celebrate with a barnstar for you. Do feel free to use the model on other lists of artists! Tyrenius 23:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Excellent work on the recreation of List of American artists Tyrenius 23:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of American artists before 1900

I thought I'd bring this edit to your attention.[1] It struck me that it would be useful if an artist was known as a particular specialist, as in this case, that the information was included. Other possibilities that occur are "portrait painter", "landscape painter", "German Expressionist", etc, but only where this was clearly the case. It would help readers to locate what they were interested in. Tyrenius 07:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Gnagy

Your additions to Jon Gnagy appear to be a copy of this web page, which identifies the source of the text as "the catalogue of "An Exhibition of Paintings and Litho-Drawings," Idyllwild, California, 1964". Please do not cut and paste the text of web pages or other materials to Wikipedia. Without permission to use this material this is a copyright violation. For more information, see Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thank you. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 16:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cai Guo-Qiang Copyright violation

Hi, I have removed the majority of the text of this article that has been copied from www.caiguoqiang.com. Some of this text was included when you created the article. The artist is clearly significant and it should be possible to reinstate the main facts about him, but it should read like an encyclopedia article, not like publicity material. P.S Good work on the List of American artists.--Ethicoaestheticist 20:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urban Interventionism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Urban Interventionism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ros0709 (talk) 22:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Trackway! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Michael Smith (performance artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rhea Anastas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rhea Anastas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://roski.usc.edu/faculty/rhea-anastas.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trackway. You have new messages at Talk:Rhea Anastas.
Message added 17:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Allen and Helen Mains Elementary School

The article Allen and Helen Mains Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim of notability is present in article; high schools are considered to be inherently notable, but lower level schools than that are not inherently notable by current consensus.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhea Anastas

The article Rhea Anastas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CREATIVE, as tagged in April 2012.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hérisson de Cloche (click for a ring) 14:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:4parts samples2.jpeg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth A. T. Smith (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth A. T. Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Trackway, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth A. T. Smith (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabethsmithnyc. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Elizabeth A. T. Smith may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vincent60030 (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth A. T. Smith has been accepted

Elizabeth A. T. Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trackway. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trackway. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

art in America

Thank you for quality articles related to American artists and the exhibition of their work, such as List of American artists 1900 and after, Cai Guo-Qiang, The Shapes Project, Palm Springs Art Museum, Portikus, Elizabeth A. T. Smith, illustrated, for service from 2006, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1954 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trackway. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clocktower Gallery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Clocktower Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 00:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]