User talk:Unknown author india

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Unknown author india, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ninney (talk) 14:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tumpa Paul[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tumpa Paul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tumpa Paul (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Full of blatant promotional npov phrases such as "Paul is Very Beautiful Model & Actress"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tumpa Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tumpa Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unknown author india! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tumpa Paul moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tumpa Paul, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tumpa Paul (March 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tumpa Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tumpa Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tumpa Paul (March 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not notable enough based on the single role per WP:ENT You'll need a lot more sources to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tumpa Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tumpa Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tumpa Paul (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Beder Meye Jyotsna (2019). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is only a one-sentence stub. Please do not resubmit until it has been expanded with other reasons for entertainment notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tumpa Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tumpa Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tumpa Paul concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tumpa Paul, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tumpa Paul[edit]

The article Tumpa Paul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MB 16:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tumpa Paul moved to draftspace[edit]

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Tumpa Paul, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Rosguill talk I am not getting paid and i dont have conflict of interest with the subject. I am new to Wikipedia so a little weak at writing articles. Please help. Do the needful. Unknown author india (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify how you came across this image, which you included in the article? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's in Google. She is very famous in my State. Its in IMDB. Unknown author india (talk) 23:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not able to find this exact photo in a reverse image search--could you provide a direct link to where you found it? As an additional note, we generally can't use random photos off of the internet because they are usually not released with the appropriate copyright license for Wikipedia, but providing the link to this image will at least let me verify your claim of where you found it. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11482732/ Unknown author india (talk) 23:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the link from i got the photos. Its in Google knowledge panel also. Unknown author india (talk) 23:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it saying This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. ? Please help, what should i do now? Unknown author india (talk) 23:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that explanation seems plausible. The file is going to have to be taken down because of it having been uploaded with an incorrect license. The article has also been nominated for deletion because it does not currently have enough sources to establish that it meets the general notability guideline.

Repeatedly resubmitting an article that has been declined at AfC is a form of edit warring and is often taken as a sign of paid editing. Going forward, please take care to address other editors' concerns with your edits before resubmitting an article. It is possible that it is simply too soon to write an article about Tumpa Paul at this time. If you can't find better sources that contain significant coverage of the subject, I would suggest that you direct your time and energy elsewhere on Wikipedia. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What should i do if i find sources of the subject that contains significant covarage ? How much time is left for the article to get deleted ? & Thank you for your help. Unknown author india (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would look in magazines and newspapers (as well as online publications). Non-English or offline coverage is ok, but you need to be able to provide enough information for others to verify (e.g. scans or transcriptions of text). This is an example of gold standard significant coverage. Less detailed coverage would be considered, but you need to go above and beyond routine announcements of casting, photo reels without substantial prose, or interviews with the subject or costars. The deletion discussion will stay open for a minimum of 7 days, but if you find better coverage down the road you can ask for the article to be restored by filing a request at WP:DRV so that you can continue work. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. Unknown author india (talk) 23:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox dance festival[edit]

Template:Infobox dance festival has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why has it been nominated for deletion ? Have provided proper resorces. Unknown author india (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are using Template:Infobox recurring event at Kolkata International Dance Festival, not this template. Gonnym (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Unknown author india (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sandipan Mondal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kolkata International Dance Festival[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kolkata International Dance Festival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 19:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolkata International Dance Festival (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kolkata International Dance Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]