Women in Shakespeare's works
 |
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Shakespeare or the Shakespeare Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (May 2009) |
 |
This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (February 2009) |
Women in Shakespeare is a topic within the general discussion of Shakespeare's dramatic and poetic works. Women appear as supporting and central characters in Shakespeare's plays, and these characters, as well as the so-called "Dark Lady" of the sonnets, have elicited a substantial amount of criticism, which received added impetus during the second-wave feminism of the 1960s. A considerable number of book-length studies and academic articles investigate the topic.
Several moons of Uranus are named after women in Shakespeare.
Contents |
[edit] Historiography
[edit] 19th century criticism
Early criticism of female characters in Shakespeare's drama focused on the positive attributes the dramatist bestows on them, and often claimed that Shakespeare realistically captured the "essence" of femininity. Helen Zimmern, in the preface to the English translation of Louis Lewes's study The Women of Shakespeare, argued in 1895 that "of Shakespeare's dramatis personae, his women are perhaps the most attractive, and also, in a sense, his most original creations, so different are they, as a whole, from the ideals of the feminine type prevalent in the literature of his day."[1] Lewes himself strikes a similar tone of praise in his conclusion: "The poet's magic wand has laid open the depths of woman's nature, wherein, beside lovely and exquisite emotion, terrible passions play their dangerous and fatal part."[2]
This early period of women in Shakespeare, which ends in the beginning of the twentieth century, is characterized by a very conventional tone and treatment and the confirmation of female submission. The editors of a 1983 collection called The Woman's Part, referencing three books by women authors from the 19th century (an authoritative book, Shakespeare's Heroines by Anna Jameson, originally published 1832, and two fictional biographies in novel form of two of Shakespeare's heroines from 1885) conclude that these early critics are "uneasy" when Shakespeare's heroines behave "unwomanly", and that adaptations of their stories "praise girlish sweetness and modesty in a style that today appears effusive." These are, they say, "culturally induced limitations" on the part of the female critics and authors studying and adapting Shakespeare's women.[3]
[edit] Modern criticism
Recent critics take a variety of approaches to the topic. For feminist critics influenced by French feminism, the analysis of the female body in Shakespeare's plays has proven fruitful. Carol Chillington Rutter, author of Enter the Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare's Stage (2001), focuses for instance on the body of Cordelia, as her father, King Lear, carries her on to the stage; on the body of Ophelia in the grave; and on the bodies of the two women on the bed at the end of Othello, "a play that destroys women."[4]
[edit] Notable female characters
- Beatrice, in Much Ado About Nothing
- Cleopatra, in Antony and Cleopatra
- Cordelia, in King Lear
- Cressida, in Troilus and Cressida
- Desdemona, in Othello
- Goneril, in King Lear
- Hermia, in A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Hero, in Much Ado About Nothing
- Hermione, in A Winter's Tale
- Imogen, in Cymbeline
- Isabella, in Measure for Measure
- Julia, in The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Juliet, in Romeo and Juliet
- Katherina, in The Taming of the Shrew
- Lady Macbeth, in Macbeth
- Lavinia Andronicus, in Titus Andronicus
- Miranda, in The Tempest
- Olivia, in Twelfth Night
- Ophelia, in Hamlet
- Portia, in The Merchant of Venice
- The Princess of France, in Love's Labour's Lost
- Regan, in King Lear
- Rosalind, in As You Like It
- Three Witches, in Macbeth
- Titania, in A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Viola, in Twelfth Night
[edit] References
- ^ Lewes, Louis; Helen Zimmern (trans.) (1895). The Women of Shakespeare. Hodder. p. vi. http://books.google.com/books?id=Hg0WAAAAYAAJ.
- ^ Lewes, The Women of Shakespeare, 369.
- ^ Lenz, Carolyn Ruth Swift; Gayle Greene, Carol Thomas Neely (1983). The Woman's Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. U of Illinois P. pp. 10–11. ISBN 9780252010163. http://books.google.com/books?id=TnaEzQBjxMQC.
- ^ Rutter, Carol Chillington (2001). Enter the Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare's Stage. Routledge. p. 151. ISBN 9780415141635. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Q3BhvzSFqpgC.
[edit] Bibliography
- Dusinberre, Juliet (1996). Shakespeare and the nature of women. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780312159733. http://books.google.com/books?id=m_vMp1nS8GQC.
- Weber, Harold (1986). The restoration rake-hero: transformations in sexual understanding in seventeenth-century England. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9780299106904.
[edit] External links
- Lewis, Liz (November 2001). "Shakespeare's Women". http://www.literature-study-online.com/essays/shakespeare_women.html.
- "Queen Victoria, Shakespeare, and the Ideal Women". Folger Shakespeare Library. 2008. http://www.folger.edu/template.cfm?cid=1792.
