User talk:MKL123

Welcome!

Hi MKL123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe) was changed by MKL123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895571 on 2021-10-22T20:06:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tobey Maguire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 17:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you have been editing pages (Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe)) but you haven't been including proper, informative edit summaries. I know you are new here, but I just thought I would leave a suggestion!BMB YT 500000 (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Spider-Man: No Way Home, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, you may be blocked from editing. —El Millo (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living people, use citations

You added unsourced personal information to Max Verstappen, please have a look at WP:BLP. Any such information you add needs to be supported by a reliable source otherwise it's in breach of Wikipedia policy. Please keep this in mind for the future. --TylerBurden (talk) 03:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Max Verstappen. Please do NOT use Instagram as a source for anything. You did that on Lando Norris too, where you claimed a "cryptic caption" "appear[ed] to confirm the pair were in a relationship". First of all, NO Instagram; second, no original research. PLEASE read WP:RS and WP:BLP and act accordingly. Finally, we are not the tabloid press, so please keep that relationship gossip and speculation on Facebook. Drmies (talk) 18:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022 Formula One World Championship into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 18:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Max Verstappen. You have been warned about this already, please start providing citations, if I see this again I don't see what else to do but to report you. TylerBurden (talk) 03:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peter Parker (The Amazing Spider-Man film series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WuTang94 (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hi MKL123! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 1957 Pescara Grand Prix several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:1957 Pescara Grand Prix, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. FozzieHey (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

A list of a single thing is not a list. This can happily be part of his bio.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MKL123/sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:MKL123/sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MKL123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2021 Formula One World Championship into 2021 Belgian Grand Prix. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hello. Please complete template source as you add new contents. Adding <ref> url link </ref> is not sufficient. Island92 (talk) 22:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:MKL123/sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen

Hello, MKL123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:MKL123/sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:MKL123/sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen

Hello, MKL123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 São Paulo Grand Prix

Please add relevant things to the event. Missing press-conference is not a big issue for a driver. Island92 (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Official entry list to be published yet. Only then will Norris be included or not. Island92 (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, not a website-news-blog in which everythings that happens should be added anyway.--Island92 (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your recent editing history at Max Verstappen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. T v x1 14:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2023 Formula One World Championship without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2023 Formula One World Championship‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 12:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2023 Formula One World Championship, you may be blocked from editing. H4MCHTR (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mike Allen 14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 15:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lusail since 2021

Current name since 2021, as F1.com confirms. Island92 (talk) 18:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please complete them. Adding <ref>link</ref> is not sufficient. Island92 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same again. Island92 (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a stats website

Wipedia is a free encyclopedia, not a website F1 stats. Island92 (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding stats on stats. We are on an encyclopedia. There is this website if you wish to look for stats. When adding a source, reporting <ref> link </ref> is not sufficient.

Not a interview website

Why do you report what drivers say during an interview? This is not an interview website. Island92 (talk) 03:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Section is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User_MKL123 Nobody (talk) 05:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an interview website

Stop adding what drivers say in their comment. This is not an interview website, again. Island92 (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who cares for what they say? There is the press Conference for that, not Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia first.--Island92 (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take what they say for yourself, and not posting what they think here. Thank you.--Island92 (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree pre-race comments provide important background context for a weekend . Pre-race comments are an encyclopedic thing in my opinion. This should be allowed as part of the accepted wiki template. MKL123 (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. For that you can look for a website which takes care of F1 news and interview for example, rather than navigating on Wikipedia which normally reports more generic information of its articles. Island92 (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia needs to be less generic to be a better encyclopedia. MKL123 (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Less generic does not mean adding every word involved provived by team principal and drivers. Wikipedia acting like a press conference website? That is not the case. Island92 (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These words provide better context where do I put in an appeal to get this material reinstated MKL123 (talk) 20:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For which purpose to get it reinstated? Island92 (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To give more detail and improve depth of undrstanding for new fans and bettte contexualistion . Wikipedia used to allow pre and post race information. Why not now? MKL123 (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better sorry.

MKL123 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because not everything is vitally essential to be added. There are dedicated spaces for that, external websites whether necessary. Used to? When? Formula One Grands Prix articles are so similar to each other courtesy of following a scheme, without being filled by redundant information. Regards. Island92 (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider drive quotes redundant. Please discuss with F1 article admin if you can to alter policy. MKL123 (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proofreading

Please spend a bit more time proofreading your contributions. Additions like these ([1][2][3]) all contain numerous errors that a simple spell check would fix. Cerebral726 (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source

A source needs to be completed with right parameters. Adding <ref> url link </ref> is not sufficient. Island92 (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]