Jump to content

Coastline paradox: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 July 2024

23 June 2024

21 June 2024

19 June 2024

12 June 2024

28 April 2024

27 February 2024

20 February 2024

3 February 2024

31 January 2024

14 January 2024

4 January 2024

31 December 2023

29 November 2023

27 November 2023

26 November 2023

25 November 2023

26 September 2023

17 September 2023

4 September 2023

26 August 2023

24 August 2023

15 August 2023

17 July 2023

10 June 2023

15 May 2023

1 March 2023

15 February 2023

25 January 2023

9 January 2023

7 January 2023

1 January 2023

16 December 2022

  • curprev 19:4919:49, 16 December 2022Lsteinm talk contribsm 16,166 bytes +17 →‎Discovery: The sum of the segments (S) and the length of the segments (L) are not related via inverse proportionality. That would mean there is a linear relationship. But you can easily imagine, that the function of S over L can jump very erratically. I'm not sure if Richardson was wrong on this or if the author of this chapter wrongly paraphrased him. undo

27 October 2022

1 October 2022

29 September 2022

8 August 2022

5 August 2022

18 May 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)