Jump to content

Earmark (politics): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 February 2024

29 December 2023

1 September 2023

3 May 2023

20 April 2023

25 January 2023

15 September 2022

28 August 2022

2 February 2022

28 December 2021

27 December 2021

9 September 2021

22 May 2021

15 April 2021

4 March 2021

2 March 2021

18 February 2021

13 January 2021

18 December 2020

22 November 2020

21 November 2020

3 August 2020

7 March 2020

3 December 2019

25 October 2019

  • curprev 05:1605:16, 25 October 201947.146.39.81 talk 29,004 bytes −1,014 Citation needed, removed under rule 1(a): We do not take an editorial role: Because the Wikimedia Projects are collaboratively edited, all of the content that we host is provided by users like yourself, and we do not take an editorial role. This means that we generally do not monitor or edit the content of the Project websites, and we do not take any responsibility for this content. Similarly, we do not endorse any opinions expressed via our services, and we do not represent or guarantee the tru undo

28 September 2019

  • curprev 16:1216:12, 28 September 2019Moreau1 talk contribs 30,018 bytes +225 →‎Legislation: Questions about the accuracy or meaning of a phrase in the article should be raised on the Talk page, not the article itself. To answer the question: Not identifying a project does not necessarily negate the purpose of a particular earmark. The earmark may specify certain criteria, for which only a particular project qualifies, even if not identified. This para needs a reference. undo
  • curprev 15:0215:02, 28 September 2019Chandast talk contribs 29,793 bytes +156 →‎United States: The page ignored the existence and importance of the Authorization process and implied that Congress just gives a chunk of money to an agency which is then free to do what it wants... unless evil earmarks are used to "force" specific actions. That is a distortion along the lines of equating earmarks with corruption. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 September 2019

1 August 2019

15 July 2019

20 June 2019

9 May 2019

8 May 2019

10 March 2019

6 February 2019

13 January 2019

13 December 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)