User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

CashedKingdom Records

Would you mind explaining the reason for which you deleted the CashedKingdom Records wiki page? I'm not quite sure that I understand why it was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.210.52 (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it did not establish why the company was notable enough for inclusion per the notability guidelines for companies. See the notability guidelines for musical artists, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Socks

Part of User:HoaryHambone's unblock request was a link to User:Zany Zebu Redivivus, which indicates multiple socks. Should this be consolidated somehow, or will that just inflame the situation? (See also: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Krazy Komodo. Apparently this has been going on for some time. Steamroller Assault (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleting others' comments from Editor Review

I'm wondering if I should remove a comment from User:Nothughthomas from WP:Editor review/antiuser. The user is trying to discredit me because of their objection to this incident report I started about them last night. I don't want someone to stumble upon their comment on my ER and take it as true, not knowing this user's history of disruption, but at the same time I feel that I can't directly comment on there without breaking WP:NOTTHEM (even if this isn't an unblock request) or fueling the drama. What do you think is the best course of action? Just leave it alone? Thanks for your time, XXX antiuser ^eh? 19:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Bclrocks10

I'm not sure what to do about this. I have tried warning this user several times, and when I did get a response it was laced with some combative language. I think he/she must have some sort of "net nanny" filter on his/her computer which tries to delete all offensive words or something. In any event, the end result is vandalism. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Happy Gogo Dodo's Day!

User:Gogo Dodo has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Gogo Dodo's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Gogo Dodo! Peace, Rlevse 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Please reactivate account

Dear Gogo Dodo, I am requesting you that, please reactivate my following account which you have blocked. Account Name : AmenderTechnologies

And please restore my user page, that was you deleted. I will edit the article by using guidelines. After that I will close this Mictesting123 account permanently & I will use AmenderTechnologies account. Please Please Please ...It's a request.

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mictesting123 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind & quick reply

Dear Gogo Dodo,

I know this is user violation because of my account : AmenderTechnologies. But I am requesting you that please release that account & block my this Mictesting123 account. So that I will use only one account & that is : AmenderTechnologies. So after that it wouldn't called as user violation because of Mictesting123 will be blocked. You please keep my only one account in use, that is AmenderTechnologies & block Mictesting123. I give you word that I will not use this Mictesting123 account after that. AmenderTechnologies account is very important for me. Please do the needful. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Restoration of page

Dear Gogo Dodo,

Ok it's fine. Do not release my AmenderTechnologies account, but can you restore that deleted page from AmenderTechnologies account to my Mictesting123 acoount on my user page section ??? That page is very important & I have been taken efforts to create it.....please. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I know that but I deleted that page from user page section of my Mictesting123 account and copied that page in user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. And after that you deleted that page from user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. So right now I haven't that page. Please restore that page in Mictesting123 account.

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Game

What was wrong with the page? I wasn't finished editing it yet, and it was far from a finised project. What can I do to improve the quality? Jingle38 (talk) 19:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Max Leger

WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max Leger (talk • contribs) 02:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Once upon a time in a far away land

Hey, just so you know, this looks like just another new user who has been biten, badly. Why don't you look in his contribs? I have already asked the blocking admin why he did, but he hasn't answered yet. Honestly, stop biting the newcomers. How will Wikipedia survive if you infa-block every new users that joins? Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I guess so. Even though he actually only made two bad edits, and was only warned twice and then blocked for a non-trolling edit... oh well. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I think he is a sock, an IP has just randomly come and supported him on his talk page, so you may want to just keep him blocked... Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Adriano Espaillat

Dear Gogo Dodo,

Thank you for your reversion of the article Adriano Espaillat.

This article has been VANDALIZED and PAGE BLANKED several times over the past 24 hours.

Even after being restored by an Administrator, the page was BLANKED within a matter of minutes.

Some protection for this page may be appropriate.

Thank you again for your help.

Regards,

69.203.119.66 (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Adriano Espaillat -- AGAIN

Dear Gogo Dodo,

As you can see, your own restoration of Adriano Espaillat was just PAGE BLANKED.

I believe this article needs some page protection.

Thank you,

69.203.119.66 (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that is necessary just yet. The editor in question has been blocked for edit warring. If another editor appears, then semi-protection may be necessary (see WP:RFPP). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I was away for a bit - thanks so much, Gogo Dodo, for not only handling the user, but taking care of the BLP problem. JamieS93 21:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

All sourced and verified now. JamieS93 14:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Re: Favor: Send me a deleted page please!

I understand that you have no obligation to send me the deleted page (Jennifer Fabes) and that the second half of the page was a copyright violation (I'm not looking for that half of the page), I'm only asking for the favor because I did write the rest of the page myself, and while I understand it was an attack page I would like to be able to see what I had written on this subject quite some time ago. There were a few quotes on the page as well that I would like to have. So if you could send me the page minus the copyright violation I would be extremely appreciative. I don't know what to offer really, but I would be willing to contribute nearly anything for a chance to have the text I added to that page again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B-Fir3 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

...for getting rid of that vandal. I didn't expect someone to vandalize "my" articles on enwiki after I blocked him at dewiki. --PaterMcFly talk ^contribs 15:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Message from John2228

i will respectthe guid lines —Preceding unsigned comment added by John2228 (talk • contribs)

Message from Jimm222888

i am sorry for my inappropriate coomets i will keep them to my self —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimm222888 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Adriano Espaillat is under attack

Gogo Dodo,

Please look into the history of the following IP address:

69.203.119.66

I believe this person represents a vandal who has a clear motive to defame Assemblyman Espaillat. Please look into 'attacks' on his web page and then follow the (history of 69.203.119.66) trail to discover who this person is.

Also, the page has been corrected but misinformation can still be seen via a Google search of Adriano Espaillat because the info that comes up on said search is affiliated with what can be seen by clicking on the "Cached" link and not the corrected article.

Please advise because the last thing we need is sick people with a deceptive agenda using Wikipedia as a platform to lie about a good man.

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.97.104.30 (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

69.203.119.66 has not edited for several days so there is nothing that needs to be done. You, on the other hand, removed content, which is not allowed. You also seem to have a connection to a registered editor. Finally, your IP address resolves to a network belonging to the New York State Assembly, so you probably shouldn't be editing the article anyways (see WP:COI and WP:ASFAQ). As for the Google cache, there is nothing I or anybody on Wikipedia can do about that. That is completely under Google's control. Eventually the Google cache will be updated with the current version of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Message from 173.77.189.59

Gogo Dodo

Regarding Assemblyman Adriano Espaillat's vandalism problem, his wikipidia could be updated from his office (NYS Assembly). It is not a political/ campaign related matter.

Thanks.

G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.189.59 (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Uh huh. See WP:COI and WP:ASFAQ. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

List of U.S. cities with minority mayors

I am going to recreate the article and actually add the list, as I was going to do, but not had done yet. I also did not receive enough notification before deletion, as it was deleted at 02:48, but I received notification at 02:58. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Never mind. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks....

Hi, just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talkpage.ElvisFan1981 (talk) 10:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains

Since the premiere yesterday (and even before that), there has been much vandalism to the Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains article. I suggested on the talk page to semi-protect the article because of this, but the only problem is I don't know how to semi-protect! If you agree to it, would you do everyone the favor of semi-protecting the article? —Untitledmind72 (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Does that mean all tables including "The game" and "Ratings" sections? —Untitledmind72 (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

And, one more thing, I just wrote up the Nielsen ratings for "Slay Everyone, Trust No One". Since it was a 2-hour premiere, I listed it as two separate time slots with their own stats. TVbytheNumbers.com also has the data for the single premiere, which should I put it as? —Untitledmind72 (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to say thanks a ton for your help. I'll be sure to help out on the article as much as I can! —Untitledmind72 (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Message from Thankful777

Hi, Gogo Dodo, thanks so much for you message. The editing I did was absolutely not for any promotional purposes--- please read the changes and let me know what I can do to ensure you that it is true/factual and important information for the accuracy of Wikipedia articles (Thankful777 (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)). Thankful777 (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks so much!

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your message. How can I change the tone for it to be appropriate?

Thanks so much! Thankful777 (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC) (Thankful777 (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)).

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Also, I checked out the neutral point of view and external link guidelines. I can find many citations to support the validity/reliability/factuality of the edits. I may be able to work on and complete this: do you have any suggestions, advice, guidance, help, etc you may be able to offer? Thanks so very much, Thankful777 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC) (Thankful777 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankful777 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Recent removal of external link

Hi, i am very new to wikipedia and added a couple of external links to some pages in the internet marketing category. they were removed because of being called advertisments. they are in fact articles about internet marketing. yes, they have a resource box at the end of the article, but that is really acceptable as internet protocol.

the link was: http://vegasrecommends.com i would appreciate your review and inform me of how these articles really constitute advertisments. Truthfully, i see many, many links on wikipedia that lead to articles, and that was the reason i felt that articles were ok.

The articles really are not sales pages, and i really do understand keeping Wikipedia neutral in that area.

Please give me your comments to my email address at startist777@gmail.com

thank you RichardStartist777 (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

survivor HvV

It's not necessarily wordy, but just getting into too much detail - but without checking I can't tell what was yours and what gets added afterwards. But things like "Jeff asking questions" or spelling out the actual events during a challenge are things that bloat it and encourage anons and others to add more. --MASEM (t) 23:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Exile Island

Listen, there might be a exile island in Survivor Heroes vs Villains. I know there has to be bcuz i just know it. But i think that Russell will find the Hidden Immunity Idol again. So, there might be a exile island. Bclrocks10 10:49, 12 February 2010 (EST)