User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions
GalliumBot (talk | contribs) m →DYK for Oxford (toy company): your hook reached 24,363 views! [vandyke v2.3.2] |
→Random pl.wiki question: new section |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
:I'm glad that the hook wasn't pulled. The reasoning was nonsense. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 01:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
:I'm glad that the hook wasn't pulled. The reasoning was nonsense. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 01:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::@[[User:SL93|SL93]] Indeed. As a DYK regular with 10+ years of experience, I am a bit concerned about recent happenings - this year I've had several near-close pulls or such, which is much more than in the past years. Either my standards are slipping or DYK standards (or some folks approach to enforcing them?) are raising too high (IMHO). <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
::@[[User:SL93|SL93]] Indeed. As a DYK regular with 10+ years of experience, I am a bit concerned about recent happenings - this year I've had several near-close pulls or such, which is much more than in the past years. Either my standards are slipping or DYK standards (or some folks approach to enforcing them?) are raising too high (IMHO). <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Random pl.wiki question == |
|||
Hi Piotrus, perhaps you can help me with this. I've noticed that the Polish Wikipedia is, together with the Italian one, one of the few that doesn't have categories on women: e.g., [[wikidata:Q7944338|Women writers]], [[wikidata:Q7039027|Women politicians]], [[wikidata:Q8084506|Women scientists]], etc. Their category:Women by occupation ([[:pl:Kategoria:Kobiety_według_profesji|Kobiety według profesji]]) is a bit more developed than [[:it:Categoria:Donne_per_attività|the Italian one]], but quite similar in concept. The Italians have [[:it:Categoria:Casalinghe|housewives]] and [[:it:Categoria:Prostitute|female prostitute]]s, and are the only WMF project to have [[:it:Categoria:Ereditiere|female heiresses]] and [[:it:Categoria:Guardie_donne_nei_campi_di_concentramento_nazisti|Female guards in Nazi concentration camps]] as categories; both the Italian and Polish Wikipedia have [[wikidata:Q7214189|Princesses]] and [[wikidata:Q7149103|Queens]]. Categorisation has recently been the subject of an [https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/208281/6/Dones%20de%20categoria.pdf impressive academic study in Catalan] and I myself have written something about it for my blog. So my request is this - could you point me to any discussions about this on the Polish Wikipedia? On it.wiki, the subject was discussed extensively between 2016 and 2021, I have reviewed those discussions and am now curious about the Polish ones. Thanks, [[User:Gitz6666|Gitz]] ([[User talk:Gitz6666|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Gitz6666|contribs]]) 09:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:50, 26 June 2024
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above. |
---|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
---|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
---|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Lurking stats
Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
Request for amendment at WP:ARCA about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
Hello Piotrus,
a request for amendment that affects the 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek
from the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case has been made at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Your input would be welcome.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Oxford (toy company)
On 25 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oxford (toy company), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Korean brick toys, colloquially called "Korean Lego", often feature themes of "war and danger", including sets such as military vehicles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oxford (toy company). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oxford (toy company)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 24,363 views (1,015.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2024 – nice work! |
- I'm glad that the hook wasn't pulled. The reasoning was nonsense. SL93 (talk) 01:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @SL93 Indeed. As a DYK regular with 10+ years of experience, I am a bit concerned about recent happenings - this year I've had several near-close pulls or such, which is much more than in the past years. Either my standards are slipping or DYK standards (or some folks approach to enforcing them?) are raising too high (IMHO). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Random pl.wiki question
Hi Piotrus, perhaps you can help me with this. I've noticed that the Polish Wikipedia is, together with the Italian one, one of the few that doesn't have categories on women: e.g., Women writers, Women politicians, Women scientists, etc. Their category:Women by occupation (Kobiety według profesji) is a bit more developed than the Italian one, but quite similar in concept. The Italians have housewives and female prostitutes, and are the only WMF project to have female heiresses and Female guards in Nazi concentration camps as categories; both the Italian and Polish Wikipedia have Princesses and Queens. Categorisation has recently been the subject of an impressive academic study in Catalan and I myself have written something about it for my blog. So my request is this - could you point me to any discussions about this on the Polish Wikipedia? On it.wiki, the subject was discussed extensively between 2016 and 2021, I have reviewed those discussions and am now curious about the Polish ones. Thanks, Gitz (talk) (contribs) 09:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)