User talk:Fermiboson

Welcome!

Hello Fermiboson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

At Wikipedia, new Users do not automatically receive a welcome; not even a machine-generated welcome. Welcome messages come from other Users. They are personal and genuine. They contain an offer of assistance if such assistance is ever desired.

I suggest to everyone I welcome that they may find some of the following helpful — there’s nothing personal in my suggestion and you may not need any of them:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Avoiding common mistakes
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dolphin (t) 11:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Fermiboson (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chris Carmack—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 08:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Apologies, it appeared to be the same IP which added "mediocre" to the page. Not knowing much about the subject I presumed the edit was similarly unconstructive. Fermiboson (talk) 08:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, someone got to it before I did, I see. WP:OOPS Fermiboson (talk) 08:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacific Maritime Security Program has been accepted

Pacific Maritime Security Program, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Method of virtual quanta has been accepted

Method of virtual quanta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

You tagged Andi Prifti, an article that's been around a while, as WP:A7. I declined the tag. I don't think that an editor with only two weeks experience here should be tagging any pages for speedy deletion.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FSS Independence has been accepted

FSS Independence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to All-American Canal: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Sheep (talk • he/him) 17:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I believe I have been doing so. Fermiboson (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Moving during AfD

Hi, you moved Ramaiah Institute of Management Studies into the draft space during an open AfD discussion. While this is not strictly speaking prohibited, it is discouraged as it can cause all sorts of confusion and problems. It has been moved back now, so the matter is back on track; I'm just mentioning this for future reference. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I see, thank you for the information. I will take note in the future. Regards, Fermiboson (talk) 15:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Contents of philosophy

A tag has been placed on Contents of philosophy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 10:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Thank you for being congenial in your questions. May I please request you to archive the discussion at AN? Thank you, Lourdes 08:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)