User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

Thank You (Belated)

For some reason, my personal user page was not added to my WATCH list. I recently viewed the history of my user page and saw that you reverted vandalism by an immature and now blocked user. Sorry for not saying this sooner, but thank you very much.

-hsxeric (talk) - 1:33, November 1, 2009

No worries. You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

My Mistake!

I thought i was in sandbox mode already haha

from Doombot69

Message from Superjoesh

You can have a link at the bottom but I would like to make my first page on this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superjoesh (talk • contribs) 23:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

i'm niot getting any info from you i have my own sources --Superjoesh (talk) 22:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me add on at least--Superjoesh (talk) 04:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Good Job

Just wanted to give you props for your work in Anti-Vandal and deletion of irrelevant articles!

DylanIloveYou (Talk) 00:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Edit summary

Thanks for this. I smiled. --John (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Sock

User:Lewbertswart45 is another clear sock of User:CNGLITCHINFO/User:Tdinoahfan. Do we need to reopen the case or can you just block them? Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Oops! My bad, I see you already got them. Thanks! - SummerPhD (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Malik Nadal Hassan

ABC News is reporting that he was one of the gunmen in the shooting at Fort Hood. Think a redirect is in order, or should we wait for confirmation from another outlet? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Never mind - I've seen it come up in newpages twice in five minutes, so I think it's worth doing for now. It can be undone later if need be. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

It can always be expanded if/when such a time comes. Right now, I think a lot of people are looking for info, and if we can redirect them to the article on the shooting, that's a good start. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah - I heard about it on newpage patrol before I saw it anywhere else. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for rv'ing my talk page vandal

...love the username, BTW. DJBullfish 23:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Yellow Star

Yellow Star Congratulations, Gogo Dodo! Within the past nine days, you received the Orange Star and the Red Star for being hard working, kind to others, and for being an excellent user in general. You've now been chosen to receive the next higher up award, the Yellow Star. This makes you eligible for the shiniest award of all, the Blue Star. A record of this award will always be kept at User:Meaghan/Shining Stars. Enjoy! Meaghan guess who :) 23:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Lactating goat

Very well. Thanks for settling this. I was getting fed up of him seeming to not even read what I was writing and, frankly, didn't care who was right as long as it was finished. Thanks for coming along when you did. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

deletion of simpleposters.co.uk article

Hello Gogo, did you not feel my reasons for retaining the article were sufficient? I was in the process of editing th article with more information when it was rather abrubtly deleted, please review along with my reason for why it should not be deleted; the reason you deleted.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonnyfraikue (talk • contribs) 22:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Robb Alvey Page

Thank you for updating the Robb Alvey page.

--Robb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbalvey (talk • contribs) 08:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Can you put the link to my IMDB page back since the coaster website and my entertainment career don't often cross paths. Thank you. --Robb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbalvey (talk • contribs) 08:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thanks for the words of advice. While I use Wikipedia on a daily basis I'm very new to editing (and was quite surprised to find I had a page here!) Thank you for your understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbalvey (talk • contribs) 08:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Here are more articles if these may help with the reference section:

http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/call-of-duty-united-offensive/535179p1.html

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/04/CMR6114JEA.DTL

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/28/technology/circuits/28roll.html

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/jul/16/cannonball-coaster-attracts-international-visitors/?local

http://seasonpasspodcast.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=444969

http://pc.ign.com/articles/507/507252p1.html

http://wii.ign.com/articles/959/959250p1.html

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/malltycoon/news.html?sid=2829746&mode=previews

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/51083812.html?dids=51083812:51083812&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Mar+15%2C+2000&author=DANIEL+YI%3B+E.+SCOTT+RECKARD&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Knott's+Suing+Windjammer+Ride's+Maker%3B+Serious+design+flaws+force+closure+in+winds+as+low+as+3+mph+and+cause+the+%249-million+roller+coaster+to+'self-destruct%2C'+amusement+park+claims.+Manager+wants+it+removed.&pqatl=google

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MN&p_theme=mn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1192343A8EE44180&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/887603511.html?dids=887603511:887603511&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug+26%2C+2005&author=David+Colker+and+Jerry+Hirsch&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Six+Flags+Auction+May+Shake+Up+Southland's+Theme+Park+Sector%3B+Magic+Mountain's+owner+seeks+a+buyer.+Knott's+operator+Cedar+Fair+may+be+interested.&pqatl=google —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbalvey (talk • contribs) 08:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Indent, please. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 16:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

best regards

Matthew Cluver 07:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcluver (talk • contribs)

Message from DanielMorgan2

i'm sorry, stupid to delete whole section. :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielMorgan2 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Wait for a second!

i tried to apologize for deleting a wiki page, and my comment was deleted. It said that it was unconstructive... —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielMorgan2 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Comedy

Because you could always do with more. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

That made me laugh! Pedro :  Chat  08:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I wanted to leave that diff first! GedUK  08:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Now, now, no fighting. ;) Plenty of space on the trampoline for all of us. Boing! Boing! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Good Evening sir: Deletion of A page i submitted months ago,

Hi,

I had constructed a page for the Maldive digest months ago, and it was here for all this time. I am wondering why it has been deleted today. I usually login to wiki but today i saw a very sad thing.

can you please clarify why you had to delete this page. I can edit as you like. please tell me what happened to it. It rankes 23rd in maldives alexa rankling. please check.

Thanks in Advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy ameed (talk • contribs) 08:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of content

Hi, i had got a reply, isnt it enough the references i had shown(i didnt put more references becz, u may not like it becz it all external links). check alexa rating for the domain if you may not believe and compare to other maldives news sites. and how will i be able to give more evidence. please advice ( note, i pay to a person to list this please understand that)

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy ameed (talk • contribs) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Posting.

Please see the other maldives news sources listed in wiki. unlike other countries non of the maldives websites have reviews. only we can see them on mondo times. please check if you have time. (maldives news papers: miadhu, minivan news)

I gave the alexa ranking to show you the popularity of the site in maldives. Please Cross check with other media outlests listed in Wiki.

Yes, we have hired people who are paid to work they do(every article or publishing). I am very sorry i could not inform you one thing. And im very sorry I had asked you several times why this post was removed. Today one of my senior staff has reported me of vandalism of this site. it seems its done by a fired employee a day or so back. That person had been meddling with this site under a user name of neens_80. we had got some extortion mails recently.

Please pardon the postings in your talk page. Let me know if this website can be relisted. only then we will proceed under advice.

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy ameed (talk • contribs) 18:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Miss using Wiki

This person has posted links all over the wiki it. i have got saved files from our computer this person has used. i think the aim of that person is to remove this site from wiki. I had got this information after the first message was listed. - Maldive digest —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy ameed (talk • contribs) 18:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Sign your posts and please stop creating new sections every time you do so. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Reply to Admin

This is not a business, this is the non-profit organization, actually the only unbiased thing in Maldives media. I hope these guidelines apply to everyone, Since "all" the maldives news sources listed here have no reference. but, i heed your advice.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy ameed (talk • contribs) 21:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Cobus Potgieter

Hey, i'm not involved in the Cobus Potgieter article, but you suck for deleting it, like seriously, this drummer has been on TV he, just started by himslef, with his own equipment, now he's sponsored and he's very known with drummers, probably the best drummer on YouTube so far, yeah... you kinda suck man =[ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.16.136 (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, he kinda doesn't meet the notability guidelines for musicians. Seriously. Maybe in the future, yeah... kinda. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Maldive Digest

Please explain why you had deleted this page. It was first listed months ago, all these days it had met the criteria. now suddenly did the rules change?

ANd, i want to tell you why are other unpopular news sites of maldives listed here. Please explain.and can you answer my previous question please. also, please do not remove lot of work done by people. had you checked this website as told? please dont use your powers wrongly. I am from maldives and i know what is popular here. and i have never vandalized wiki. and respect it. and i respect you as an admin. so please do not miss use your powers and let good content be there.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.101.249 (talk) 07:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

The criteria never changed and time does not matter. The article did not establish why the website/company is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the respective guidelines at WP:WEB and WP:CORP. If you disagree with my deletion, you may either create an account and recreate the article with the proper references (there were none) or file a deletion review. I never said anybody vandalized anything regarding the article. I also suggest you read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:POPULARITY. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Hi Gogo Dodo: you wrote: "I saw your two WP:AIV reports today and wanted to mention a few things about them. Both of your reports resulted in no action. The first is that both reports were stale in that the IPs in question had not edited for hours or days before you reported them. Secondly, unless the vandalism is similar to the previous block reason, IPs are generally not immediately reblocked unless it is an obvious shared IP like a school IP. Finally, your request for an indefinite block of IPs is not likely to be done. IPs are very rarely blocked indefinitely." Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. A recurring issue seen is that when other involved editors revert vandalism, they frequently neglect to check the vandal's contributions to see what type of user they're dealing with. Where I request an indefinite block, I've confirmed that the IP or user has in fact been an bad-faith editor. The fact that my AIV request occurs several hours or more after the last vandalism edit is trivial in comparison to the vandal's action.

To quote wp:warn: "If a user stopped vandalizing some time ago, and their edit histories don't suggest a pattern of chronic vandalism, there's no need to warn or block them at all (although a welcome template might help future visits). Likewise, if a user is in the midst of an obviously bad-faith vandalism spree, there's no need to warn them before temporarily blocking them."

I would point out that being a day late in issuing an AIV request does not fall into the user having '[vandalized] some time ago'. If the user has committed 20 or so vandalism edits in a span of three weeks, with 0 good edits, you can be reasonably assured he/she is a bad faith editor. If an Admin chooses to ignore the obvious then a disservice is being done to Wikipedia, its target audience and its legitimate editors. I would also suggest that wp:warn be improved to remove non-specific language such as 'vandalism spree' and 'chronic vandalism', since such phrasing is open to interpretation which results in Admins chastising AVU staff for cleaning up after vandals. Like any business process, a lack of precise language will ineveitably cause confusion and conflict. B.T.W. in the past other Admin staff have agreed to requests for indef. blocks of Vandalim Only users. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 03:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Re your message: WP:AIV is for recent vandalism reports. Not edits that have occurred days in the case of 24.173.92.65 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) or hours in the case of 71.192.98.65 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) earlier. In the case of 24.173.92.65, your issuing of warnings were also incorrect. The last edits occurred on the 9th, you warned him three times in rapid succession [1][2][3] 18 hours after the edits were bot reverted and the IP was warned [4]. You should have not warned the IP at all. You then reported the IP to WP:AIV three days later. During that intervening time, the IP made no edits. As for indefinitely blocking IPs, that is very rare. Neither of these two IPs would warrant an indefinite block in my opinion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi again: Thanks for the advice and assessment. Until wp:warn is updated to allow for improved responses to vandalism sprees, vandalism-only accounts and bad-faith editors, I'll limit my AIV requests to those responding to vandalism edits less than 5 hours after they occur (a reasonable timeliness to respond to such acts, would you agree?), and I'll remember to provide the uw-v warnings on a staged basis as apposed to lumping them together when responding to sprees. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Netmovers CSD

I don't know how many times this has been re-incarnated, but it was deleted by AfD, which was your rationale for declining speedy. [5] which was fairly recent. Miami33139 (talk) 04:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Letting the AfD continue is fine. I hope it does not become battleground with SPA accounts. Thanks for your time to reconsider. Miami33139 (talk) 16:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Paulman Berg

Hi Gogo Dodo. I was trying to write an article and make it have importance for the band Paulman Berg, but was not given enough time to develop it and connect it to other articles already existent on wikipedia. How is it that bands are allowed to have articles on wikipedia, when it seems they're just deleted immediately by the censors that troll these sites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BumpStopBump (talk • contribs) 08:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

weta barnstar

		You make weta smile
		This cute little weta here has noticed with Ilyushka88 that you do great job at deleting pages tagged as speedy deletion, or pages that fall under this criteria. That's why he wants to give you this barnstar for the great job you have done. Great job!

 Ilyushka88 Talk to me 07:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Kristen Stewart (from TWILIGHT) or Bella Swan... soon to be CULLEN

Could you zap this page again? I think I tried to tag it at the same time it was deleted, and Twinkle recreated it. Thanks in advance, --Bfigura ^(talk) 23:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :) --Bfigura ^(talk) 23:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Bot from another world...

Hi Gogo Dodo, I've blocked this account for...well, I had so many reasons to do so I had a hard time fitting them all into the block log. In any case, do you think you could take a few minutes to go through that account's contribs? He seems to have messed up a bunch of AfDs and I always seem to cause trouble whenever I show up in that area... Thanks much! Risker (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure, no problem, I've cleaned up the mess. Everything has been removed, reverted or deleted. The AfD created was in bad faith and didn't make much sense, so I deleted it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again. I suppose I should get someone to figure out what the main account is now... Risker (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll leave that up to you. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Carol Zara

Why was Carol Zara's wiki deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.38.30 (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Read this. She didn't appear notable, obviously. Not every person has a page on Wikipedia. For example, I don't, even though I keep the world safe from alien invaders all the time. There just aren't any reliable sources detailing my classified, classified missions. >.> --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 16:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Your grounds for deleting Carol Zara are unfounded. We wish to resolve this issue. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnimorphic (talk • contribs) 16:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Merging threads. See above. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 16:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Carol is the 7th most followed REAL person on twitter in Canada. She is currently being invited to speak at events in Toronto, and will be on televison next month. She has obtained twitter celebrity status in under a year. If you were not so busy fighting Aliens, you may have googled her or checked her twitter account. As a blogger she gets tens of thousands of hits a day on digitallyblonde.com. Please consider revising. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnimorphic (talk • contribs) 16:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

She's a Twitter person? Is that it? And only the seventh most popular in Canada alone? If so, I can tell you right now, that is not notable. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 16:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, you clearly want to power trip. It's cool - Pathetic, but cool. Let's see if if her followers feel the way you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnimorphic (talk • contribs) 17:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

How the hell am I power-tripping? One of my friends, who is a successful, published author/artist/musician/horse-rider has no page on Wikipedia last time I checked. She wouldn't be classified as notable according to the policy. I follow it. You should too. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Please reinstate Carol Zara aka Digital Blonde to Wikipedia. Thank you! 98.22.189.28 (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC) Daniel T Perez

I think Carol Zara is a notable person. You don't need know her to see it! Dmpclan (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Read the above comments. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Carol Zara's page needs re-instating... I will run naked across the Brooklyn Bridge if it is ;) Ian Stokoe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.46.43 (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Dude, being 7th anything in Canada is an accomplishment. Carol Zara has more followers that Victor Lucas of Electric PLaygroud and Reviews on the Run. Be a man, and put Carol Zara back where she belongs -The Controllerpunch.com Team —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.42.137 (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

What if I were to say I was a woman? I'm not but "be a man" is one of the dumbest thing anyway can possibly say in my opinion. Secondly, find a source that says she is notable outside of fan's opinion. I direct you to the statement I made about my author friend. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Because only a man would be this fickle about how 'notable' a canadian is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.42.137 (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

What the hell? Seriously, what is that supposed to mean. *points at Stargate SG-1* That is my favourite show, made by Canadians in Canada. *points at MSN contact list* Six Canadians there, all good friends. Now, would you like to explain just what the hell you meant by that? --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Easy, none of your friends are talented celebs. Carol is big in the indie/fan scene. She has dedicated followers all over the world, and again, you seem to easily skip over the fact that she is more well known than Victor Lucas (but not Tommy Tallarico, that guy is the MAN DAWG). You want to clarify what having Canadians on your msn is supposed to prove and clarify how you can compare an entire television series starring the goddamn Macgyver to and up and coming, but no less popular Canadian talent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.42.137 (talk) 18:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

She's on Twitter of all things. If she is notable, then fine. But all I have heard so far is "Twitter this, Twitter that." Some have said she's been on TV. Good for her, so have I. But not one has come up with a source to back anything up. She's popular. So is my author friend mentioned above (below? The thread's highly fragmented). I'm not clamouring to make her a page. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Just because she's Canadian does not mean she shouldn't have her own Wiki Page... do you realize who you have deleted. She is the Canadian Femme Superhero of our time, plus see awesome.

Thank you, StealingKitty —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.103.13.171 (talk) 17:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Who here implied that her nationality has anything to do with it? For anyone that was linked here via her Twitter I highly recommend you read Wiki's policies on notability before making an uninformed comment. -- Phoenix2 17:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Okay, I'm seriously considering calling fanrage here. All this over one measly article from a bunch of new accounts? Listen up people, this section already exists and points have been made as to why it was deleted. Unless you can come up with reasons for reinstating the article, I think I'm going to start deleting further threads unless I am told otherwise by an established user. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that carol zara's wiki page got deleted. If she is deserving of a wiki page for having alot of followers on Twitter, then I deserve one for having alot friends on facebook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.163.3 (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

She's a well-known geek girl from Canada. TV Host/Reporter/Producer, Cosplayer, Gamer Girl, Blogger, gonna be featured on a HUGE AMERICAN TECH TV show next month. Interviewed many celebrities, recognized by the Ninja Turtles and Mirage Studios team as the BEST APRIL O'NEIL EVER. That's not enough for you?? Dude, c'mon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbanks123 (talk • contribs)

Stop with the new sections and read. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

If that's all it takes to be notable, I've got at least three former high school classmates that warrant pages. That's not sufficient. -WarthogDemon 17:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I have still to understand the removal of Carol Zara's page. But yet you have undesired information on undesirable celebrities (i.e. porn stars). She has tons of information on today's technology and the world. Please re-instate her. She already has a big following and could be that much more viewers coming to your site. Leonard (BRiZL)74.220.98.35 (talk) 18:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

The fact there are things you don't like on Wikipedia is not a valid argument. -WarthogDemon 18:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Listen up! Carol Zara is the seventh most popular person in Canada alone (not the whole world). She has... oh, wow. 8706 followers! Oh, she's totally notable. /massive amounts of sarcasm. I direct you to Stephen Fry. He has 1015782 followers. Now, he's notable! Not. If he was only known for being popular on Twitter, he would not be notable and would not have a page, even with that amount of followers. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Now, now. Let's not flame Carol here. Just because she's not notable, she doesn't need to get slammed for it. -WarthogDemon 18:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• The reason the article was deleted is because she has not "been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." –xeno^talk 18:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it seems that many people disagree with your definition of notable. You should not fight back with what you think, rather, examine more closely what people are saying to you. This is not a popularity contest, I agree. Asking for interviews with Carol, is sort of missing the point. You've clearly just upset a number of people. In Canada, numbers are not like they are in the States. This is an important element of the argument, b/c our population could easily fit into ONE state -say California. Percentage wise, she is a major influence in the tweeting community. Canada, though small in number, has the HIGHEST per capita social network usage, with 80% of it's populace "plugged in". bearing that in mind, being 7th, is NOTABLE. OUTSIDE of twitter, she has been to numerous events, and interviewed many people. since your earlier comment, there have ben offers to interview her, simply to meet YOUR guide lines.

You should restore the page, and issue an apology. This was a very unnecessary expenditure of time. -—Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnimorphic (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about Carol Zara being Canadian. I'm sure that's not what is hindering her from being on Wikipedia. However, she does several video chats, has done many interviews at conventions, and has also had several videos on youtube. (while I know youtube isn't a credible source, in the conventional sense, neither is Wikipedia in that ANYONE has the ability to add or subtract information.) Even the dictionary adds words/phrases used in popular culture. The same argument can be used for Carol Zara. She's a growing pop-culture influence that CAN become "official" in the eyes (words) of Wikipedia.

-snapthejap

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

No Problem. I Could Use Some Drama Anyway.

Cheers and here's hoping my entry won't further complicate your talk page. :D -WarthogDemon 18:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

And once again, no prob. :D -WarthogDemon 23:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Question...

Kind of a weird question, but you seem to be experienced... Can you revert and warn an IP that asks you to marry them on your talk page?

*Pepperpiggle*^*Sign!* 00:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Almost makes me want to ask, just so you CAN say you've dealt with it. :D -WarthogDemon 04:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Team Touchdown

HI Gogo Dodo I've just noticed that you deleted our Team Touchdown FC page and i was wondering if you could give me some reasons and let me have my say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insertnamehere10 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

damn sorry

I am damn sorry. I was so stupid. Ghesd (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Consider yourself lucky that Acroterion removed your warning. I wouldn't have been as forgiving... --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

An apology for that sort of thing is such a rare event that it deserves to be rewarded. Acroterion _(talk) 19:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

It just didn't seem all that sincere to me. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 19:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

It is indeed a very rare event. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Message from Dylankawani

dont touch my articles again. if you do again you lose so dont make a problem for your self —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylankawani (talk • contribs) 21:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

TONY WANG

please explain why you deleted this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.202.241 (talk • contribs)

The article was most recently deleted because it was a repost of an article that was deleted through the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Wang. If you are asking about my particular deletion of the article back in October, that was because the original author blanked the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

The article has changed since the original article with new citations. It is not the same article as the original one from before simply with the citations to make him notable. As such, it shouldn't be deleted since it is not a repost but an updated version that passes wiki's criteria for posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.202.241 (talk) 04:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

That's why we have deletion review. Katerenka (talk) 04:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I was not involved in the closure of the AfD or the deletion of the reposted content. As noted by Katerenka above, you may request a review of the deletion by following the procedures at deletion review. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Template:J.Reu

Hi Gogo, I need your help with this. I'm honestly not too sure what to do about it as it obviously doesn't belong in the Template name space, but I'm not sure it qualifies for the CSD criteria I tagged it as. Any help is appreciated. @Kate (talk) 08:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the help. :) @Kate (talk) 08:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedian of the

Congratulations, Gogo Dodo! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "Wikipedian of the Day" award for today, 21, November 2009! Keep up the great work!--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 21:30, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Note: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week!

Survivor: Samoa edits

Hi. I do not understand why you removed the fact that Russ Landau composed the theme song for Survivor: Samoa. It is properly referenced, and is completely related to the article. Please explain why you reverted this edit. --Untitledmind72 (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I have a found a link to iTunes...will that work as a reference? Here is the link. —Untitledmind72 (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. If you need any help monitoring Tocantins or even any season, just ask me. Again, thanks for your help! —Untitledmind72 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello Sir

How may my organization not be deleted under speedy deletion article A7? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.38.222 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

See here. That should explain everything. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 23:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

If I re-make my page, can you please grant me the time to hold a good case to my cause instead of it being deleted so quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.38.222 (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

If you truly believe the page to be notable, use my sandbox to construct the article and then I think there's somewhere you can go to request a review of the article to see if it's acceptable for the main encyclopaedia. Just make sure not to delete the information there I left for BlazerKnight. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 23:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

You may recreate the article once you log back into your account and provide the necessary citations from reliable sources covering your new political party. For your party to be notable, you will need to provide links to sources covering your party's activities. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nangparbat sock?

Sorry, I've been out for a while. Do you still need me to look at this? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Vesuvius Johnson Superhero Debut

Why on earth wouldn't you allow this? I'm the writer and creator of this character.

Mike Naylor http://vesuviusjohnson.com

I'm also a filmmaker. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0623295/

This is notable if you want I can link articles in papers and on the web to show his debut November 7th 2009 as West Texas Comic con. http://www.dailytoreador.com/la-vida/comic-craze-1.2056604

Please let me know what you think needs to be done to have this new Superhero listed.

Thanks, Mike Naylor

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

This is very funny. I could actually care less. I don't need Wiki to include my Superhero. What you consider notable others may or may not. We could argue this all day but you're a gate keeper and your keeping your gate. I would think that A category such as A comic book super hero debut. YOu might want Comic Book Superheros that had their debut. I guess not. A filmmaker or write who creates a new super hero and has a comic published is not notable. Anyway I don't have time for this crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmikewnaylor (talk • contribs) 21:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

This is very funny. I could actually care less. I don't need Wiki to include my Superhero. What you consider notable others may or may not. We could argue this all day but you're a gate keeper and your keeping your gate. I would think that A category such as A comic book super hero debut. YOu might want Comic Book Superheros that had their debut. I guess not. A filmmaker or write who creates a new super hero and has a comic published is not notable. Anyway I don't have time for this crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmikewnaylor (talk • contribs) 21:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

You clearly haven't read the COI or you clearly don't understand what it means. The whole purpose of wiki is to have accurate information. In some cases a COI edit is good thing. Accurate and current information being the most important. YOur deleting of accurate information because you think it's not notable. Who are you? I think it's notable. Our fans think it's notable. You think it's not. I think your not notable and you should be deleted from Wiki.

How do you like them apples gate keeper? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmikewnaylor (talk • contribs) 21:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Mystery Google

Hello Gogo Dodo!

I'm not very familiar with wikipedia, but I saw that you deleted an article on Mystery Google.

I was wondering if you could help me bring the article into the correct formatting?

Here are some links to notoriety:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/mystery-google-surprise-y_n_318089.html

http://mashable.com/2009/10/12/mystery-google/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6316140/Mystery-Google-returns-other-peoples-search-results.html

http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/i_wasnt_looking_for_that_myste.php

The site had 8 Million pageviews yesterday and is definitely notable. Just check out the topic on twitter currently:

http://twitter.com/#search?q=mystery%20google —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.161.121.230 (talk) 09:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

These links do help establish the site's notability. The article has already been recreated at Mystery Google, so you should be able to add in the additional references yourself. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Corre Page Deletion

Could you please let me know if there was anything wrong with the Joseph Corre page I wrote. It says it has been deleted by the Author, but I was the author, so do not understand how it could have been, nor why your username is associated to the page.

Madathanu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madathanu (talk • contribs) 17:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Icemaker

Hi Gogo Dodo. I am new to Wikipedia. The section on suppliers for IceMakers was deleted a couple days ago. I renewed that section and added a new link. Why is this not allowed? Thanks, kwpwiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwpwiki (talk • contribs) 18:33, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

School logos

Looks like me might be working on the same issue with regards to Team1525 (talk · contribs) and his "replacement" images. I shall defer the rest to you, sir. — Kralizec! (talk) 21:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Great minds, great minds ... — Kralizec! (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedian of the Day

Congratulations, Gogo Dodo! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "Wikipedian of the Day" award for today, November 24th, 2009! Keep up the great work!
Note: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week! December21st2012Freak ^{Happy Thanksgiving!} 00:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! =) It's an honor to be WOTD. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Elia Ivette Hernandez

Im Elia is there a problem with this section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatsaves31 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Article: Scootering

I made an attempt at removing information on the article 'Scootering' and created 'Freestyle Scooters' and put the information there. but i believe you redirected freestyle scooters to scootering.

Whoever first created "scootering" did not represent it correctly and it should rightly be named "freestyle scooters"

"scootering" should be redirected to "freestyle scooters" not the other way around.

Memulligann (talk) 20:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Another account

Check [6]. The same guy using another account.Tintor2 (talk) 20:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)