Jump to content

User talk:SpacemanSpiff: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
→‎Blocked: new section
Line 57: Line 57:


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Wading through the miasma|Wading through the miasma]] ([[User talk:Wading through the miasma|talk]]) 08:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Wading through the miasma|Wading through the miasma]] ([[User talk:Wading through the miasma|talk]]) 08:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|30px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for [[sloth]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
{{-}}

Revision as of 16:05, 15 May 2011




Archives
2009: J · F · M · A · M · J · J · A · S · O · N · D

2010: J · F · M · A · M · J · J · A · S · O · N · D
2011: J · F · M · A · M · J · J · A · S · O · N · D

Letting the Shudra fur fly...

In my ongoing project to target "caste puffery", I dove into Kapu (caste). Started footnoting everything I can, and also pretty swiftly found that they are (as I suspected) listed as an "upper Shudra" caste in most academic references. I added that in, so I expect to see some hatred and discontent coming my way from IPs, particularly as the article gets 4.5k hits per months[1]. I don't feel I'm being at all malicious by adding "Shudra" to articles where documentable, but I do derive some satisfaction from the idea that I'm fighting POV and forcing people to come to terms with academic reality. I know you're pretty busy, so not asking your involvement, but thought you might find it interesting. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

Need comments on this RFC - [| discussion]

Need your views and comments. One should also go through ['no consensus' discussion]. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 07:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote on article name

Hello. You are invited to take part in a 'Gordion knot vote' with three options on the future title of List of Indian inventions and discoveries. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I see you are away at the moment, which is unfortunate. In any case, an article you created Julie Stockton, has been nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Stockton. The nominator seems a bit inexperienced and hasn't notified you, so I'm taking care of that for them. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Two Leaves and a Bud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two Leaves and a Bud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Leaves and a Bud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wading through the miasma (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for sloth. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]