Jump to content

User talk:WillowW: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wikiprojects invite
Line 134: Line 134:
<nowiki>"</includeonly><noinclude>"</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>"</includeonly><noinclude>"</nowiki><br>
it saves an extra space below the box when displayed. An example of what I mean is at [[Template:User dressmaker]]. Regards, [[User:Rfrisbie|Rfrisbie]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rfrisbie|talk]]</sup> 19:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
it saves an extra space below the box when displayed. An example of what I mean is at [[Template:User dressmaker]]. Regards, [[User:Rfrisbie|Rfrisbie]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rfrisbie|talk]]</sup> 19:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

== wikiprojects invite ==

You might enjoy visiting the talk pages of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics]]. In particular, I'd encourage you to add your name to the "participants" list on both these projects. [[User:Linas|linas]] 19:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:28, 1 June 2006

Hello WillowW! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! --ElectricEye
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Hello. Please note that you don't need to write [[multiplole exapansion|multiplole exapansions]], since [[multipole expansion]]s suffices. Similarly if you write [[Austria]]n, [[dog]]s, [[evolution]]ary, [[hyphen]]ated, [[logic]]al, [[metaphor]]ical, [[rabbi]]ical, etc., then the whole word, not just the part in brackets, appears as a clickable link to the page whose name is in brackets. The more complicated form can be used for things like [[France|French]] or [[philosophy|philosophies]]. Michael Hardy 23:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think you're using too many capital letters in section headings. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style and my edits to Lamm equation. And generally the title phrase or title word should be bolded at its first appearance in an article. You don't need to add an "external links" section heading unless some external links are actually there. Michael Hardy 00:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Edwin J. Cohn, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man 08:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Line shift

Hey... I see we have some overlapping interests (not knitting though), so I've been editing some of the pages you created. I have noticed that you have a lot if newlines in your text, even though it is not a new section. You don't need to hit enter everytime you have filled up a line, just write it out in on any Wikipedia will take care of the formatting for you. And welcome to Wikipedia by the way.... :-) Kjaergaard 06:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Centripetal force

Nice rewriting! Henning Makholm 08:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disulfide-thiol references

Hey... I've been looking through the Thiol-disulfide exchange article. I'm not able to find the review paper you mention on PubMed... Not one from '90 anyway.. There's this one Template:Entrez Pubmed and this one Template:Entrez Pubmed by the author you mention. Is it one of these you are thinking of.... Kjaergaard 01:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for following up on that!  :) I had been thinking of the second paper, Template:Entrez Pubmed, and got the date wrong by foolishly relying on my memory. His isomerase paper is good, too, although others might be better suited. I have some other good papers on both topics lying around, if I can only find them. :P Thanks again for the nice welcome, and see you around in Wikispace (which I'm really liking)! WillowW 02:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC) P.S. A few protein hydrodynamics articles coming up, which you might enjoy.[reply]

Hi, Kjaergaard, it turns out my memory wasn't so bad after all. I was really thinking of the 1990 Gilbert review paper in Advances in Enzymology. I just added both ref's to the page; thanks again! :) WillowW 21:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, you can add links to Pubmed in your reference sections by using the template: Template:Entrez Pubmed..... Kjaergaard 05:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ancient Greek Wikisource

I understand from your userboxes you're interested in Ancient Greek. I've submitted a proposal to add an Ancient Greek Wikisource on Meta, and I'd be very grateful if you could assist me by either voting in Support of the proposal, or even adding your name as one of the contributors in the template. (NB: I'm posting this to a lot of people, so please reply to my talkpage or to Meta) --Nema Fakei 20:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to another knitter

Thanks for your message! I'm thrilled to see that you're submitting fiber-arts-related articles. I'll take a peek—maybe I can contribute some pictures, since I have swatches out the wazoo. (Hazard of the occupation, as I'm sure you know.) Taking some pictures wouldn't be too difficult, if I can find my camera battery charger. Anyway, looking forward to seeing those articles develop. Hey, maybe there's even a bit I can add. :D Happy knitting and Wiki-ing both! (Doi. Forgot to sign.) —PaperTruths 03:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno about there being a page with all the Wikipedia tricks, but here are some pages I found useful:
As far as the knitting articles go, I really like what you've done so far. The important thing is getting the pages up, I think. :D I'll work on getting some photos to add, and then might play with the things a bit and add some info. But as far as "accuracy" goes, knitting is far too international and long-standing a craft for there to be a specific orthodoxy. Since knitting is in vogue right now, I very much suspect there'll be plenty of other people contributing. Anyway, it's quite an exciting project, and thanks for getting that ball rolling! You've contributed to an impressive number of articles in a bunch of areas. (I've been getting caught up in the maintenance side of things.) Way to go! —PaperTruths 19:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, hi.  :) Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you! I've been looking all over for policy on the creation of User categories, but the Help section has so much information that it can be hard to find what you actually need. I haven't found anything yet, but I'm so frustrated with the Help section that I'm planning on creating my own private index.  ;) Maybe I'll run across it then. In the meantime, I've been thinking about proposing a WikiProject dedicated to improving and linking fiber arts articles. The proposal process is noted at WP:PJ. What do you think? —PaperTruths (Talk) 21:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protein structure articles

I noticed your creation of the structure prediction articles mentioned on my userpage - thanks, they look good! Nice to see another active biochemistry person. I will probably expand the DEE page first with the pairs criterion and possibly an implementation outline/pseudocode when I get a chance. I'm thinking of separating the mean-field method of structure prediction off the main mean field theory article, since people looking for Ising models probably don't care about proteins and vice versa. I'll see what I can do about the Ewald summation derivation but honestly, my familiarity with the method is from molecular dynamics, so I've never paid too much attention to the original derivation :)

Thanks for the additions to alpha helix and beta sheet. I've made a few organizational changes (not much new content) if you want to take a look. Opabinia regalis 05:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I've replied on my talk page to keep things together. Opabinia regalis 01:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox tip

Hi WillowW,

Nice userboxes you've been putting up! :-) I have one tip on formatting. If you put the following codes together on one line like this,
"</includeonly><noinclude>"
it saves an extra space below the box when displayed. An example of what I mean is at Template:User dressmaker. Regards, Rfrisbietalk 19:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikiprojects invite

You might enjoy visiting the talk pages of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics and Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics. In particular, I'd encourage you to add your name to the "participants" list on both these projects. linas 19:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]