User talk:Atsme: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:19, 1 October 2014

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

February 2014

Keesings Query

Hello, Atsme. You have new messages at WP:Keesings.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Alligator gar

The article Alligator gar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alligator gar for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, your chain moray eel image is now in The Signpost. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth, thank you for the update, and congratulations on your accomplishments!! Atsme☯^Consult 03:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gabor B. Racz

Thought of complimenting you for this article. A good one mainly in terms of prose quality. Best --PeterCRames (talk) 19:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What a nice compliment. Thank you, PeterCRames. Atsme☯^Consult 03:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alligator gar

On 20 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alligator gar, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that alligator gars (pictured) are "living fossils" that can breathe in both air and water? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alligator gar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 05:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Atsme. You have new messages at Matty.007's talk page.
Message added 06:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mat ty.007 06:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review Gabor B. Racz

May I review this article for you? If you don't mind. It would be my first. In case you want it to be reviewed by experienced reviewers, I assure you it's okay with me. --PeterCRames (talk) 13:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PeterCRames Please do. We all have to start somewhere, and I think the Racz article is a great place for you to begin. Atsme☯^Consult 03:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Great works!! You have improved a lot....Keep up....

The herald 15:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Herald - how sweet - thank you!! And thank you for being so patient and giving of your time. I'm pretty excited about a couple new projects I'm working on offline, and also trying to improve a very inaccurate "start" article that relies heavily on self-published sources, and original research. Atsme☯^Consult 16:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:JSTOR access

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.[reply]

Your GA nomination of American paddlefish

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article American paddlefish you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 01:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:FunkMonk. Atsme☯^Consult 03:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of American paddlefish

The article American paddlefish you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:American paddlefish for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 00:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration for Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation

Greetings. I am responding to your request for collaboration to the Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation article on Wikipedia. Thank you for the work you and others have put into trying to make the article contents adhere to Wikipedia writing policies. I am willing to share my thoughts and perspectives on any issues that come up on the article's Talk Page, unfortunately I do not have much time for much beyond that. Feel free to reach out to me anytime in the future. Thank you. Djrun (talk) 15:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Djrun Thank you for your response. I would very much appreciate your input regarding the sandbox article I included in my initial text to you. Thank you again. Atsme☯^Consult 21:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ARBCOM

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#IPT and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Serialjoepsycho (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bowfin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bowfin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Chiswick Chap. Thank you for the generous contribution of your time and expertise. I will be paying attention in the event additional editing is required of me. Atsme☯^Consult 14:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bowfin

The article Bowfin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bowfin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

An topic you recently edited or contributed to Talk discussion on is the subject of discussion, if you would like to participate: [1]. This is a blanket notice given to all editors. DocumentError (talk) 03:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 {{Did you know nominations/Bowfin}}
+== Hello ==
+An topic you recently edited or contributed to Talk discussion on is the subject of discussion, if you would like to participate: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iranian-led_intervention_in_Iraq#Iran.2C_Hezbollah_Reaction_to_American-led_intervention_in_Iraq]. This is a blanket notice given to all editors. [[User:DocumentError|DocumentError]] ([[User talk:DocumentError|talk]]) 03:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)