Jump to content

Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{POV}}
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[[Euroscepticism]]''', the opposition to policies of supranational EU institutions and/or opposition to Britain's membership of the European Union, has been a significant element in the politics of the [[United Kingdom]] (UK).
'''[[Euroscepticism]]''', the opposition to policies of supranational EU institutions and/or opposition to Britain's membership of the European Union, has been a significant element in the politics of the [[United Kingdom]] (UK).


Even when the European Unity movement as a political project after 1945 was supported by important British voices, they did not intend to involve Britain.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/astonish.html|title= Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich, I9 September 1946}}</ref> The ambivalent position of British politics and citizens has been described as "wishing to seem an important part of Europe without being a part of it".<ref name=dw>{{Cite book|title= Britain in the European Union Today|edition=3rd|last1= Watts |first1=Duncan|last2= Pilkington |first2=Colin|isbn=9780719071799|url= http://books.google.de/books?id=8XizwW0g2CkC |date= 2005|publisher= Manchester University Press}}</ref> The [[othering]] of European Unity as a Continental issue and [[somebody else's problem]] has been rather strong.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240">{{Cite book|title= From Common Market to European Union Building|last=Gehler|first=Michael| isbn=9783205777441|url= http://books.google.de/books?id=IbP_olB1gPgC|date= 2009|publisher= Böhlau|page=240|location=Vienna}}</ref> Pro-European British politicians and citizens have faced various defeats and humiliations with regard to Britain's steps in the direction of increased European integration.<ref name=plot/> Even parties like the [[Liberal Democrats]] with an outspoken pro-European platform stay either in a minority position respectively have members that share the British lack of enthusiasms 'of all things European.'.<ref>Britain in the European Union Today: Third Edition, Duncan Watts, Colin Pilkington, Manchester University Press, 29.11.2005, p.220</ref> After joining the EU, confrontational attitudes of British politicians, as in the [[UK rebate]] controversy, gained further popularity among the British public, while the advantages of the European Union were taken for granted.<ref name=dw/>
The European Unity movement as a political project after 1945 was supported and inspired by important British voices. E.g. [[Winston Churchill]] pledged in his 1946 Zurich speech for a 'a kind of United States of Europe' lead by France and Germany but did not intend to involve Britain.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/astonish.html|title= Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich, I9 September 1946}}</ref> The ambivalent position of British politics and citizens has been described as "wishing to seem an important part of Europe without being a part of it".<ref name=dw>{{Cite book|title= Britain in the European Union Today|edition=3rd|last1= Watts |first1=Duncan|last2= Pilkington |first2=Colin|isbn=9780719071799|url= http://books.google.de/books?id=8XizwW0g2CkC |date= 2005|publisher= Manchester University Press}}</ref> The [[othering]] of European Unity as a Continental issue and [[somebody else's problem]] has been rather strong.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240">{{Cite book|title= From Common Market to European Union Building|last=Gehler|first=Michael| isbn=9783205777441|url= http://books.google.de/books?id=IbP_olB1gPgC|date= 2009|publisher= Böhlau|page=240|location=Vienna}}</ref> Pro-European British politicians and citizens have faced various defeats and humiliations with regard to Britain's steps in the direction of increased European integration.<ref name=plot/> Even parties like the [[Liberal Democrats]] with an outspoken pro-European platform stay either in a minority position respectively have members that share the British lack of enthusiasms 'of all things European.'.<ref>Britain in the European Union Today: Third Edition, Duncan Watts, Colin Pilkington, Manchester University Press, 29.11.2005, p.220</ref> After joining the EU, confrontational attitudes of British politicians, as in the [[UK rebate]] controversy, gained further popularity among the British public, while the advantages of the European Union were taken for granted.<ref name=dw/>


==History==
==History==
Line 13: Line 13:


In the years before, only the British extreme right&nbsp;– in particular [[Fascist]] politician [[Oswald Mosley]]– were rather outspoken, based on the [[Union Movement]] and the [[Europe a Nation]] slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe.<ref>Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31.12.2003, p.75</ref><ref>DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53-65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, ISSN 1803-750X</ref> The British elites did not assume Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities at that time.<ref name=dra>Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973-2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013</ref> The reservation was based less on economic considerations, since European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of the inter-[[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] trade,<ref name=Geh /> but rather on political philosophy.<ref name=Geh /> In Britain, the concept of unlimited [[sovereignty]], based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was, and is, held in high esteem and presents a serious impediment to attempts at integration into a Continental legal framework.<ref name=Geh>From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009</ref>
In the years before, only the British extreme right&nbsp;– in particular [[Fascist]] politician [[Oswald Mosley]]– were rather outspoken, based on the [[Union Movement]] and the [[Europe a Nation]] slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe.<ref>Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31.12.2003, p.75</ref><ref>DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53-65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, ISSN 1803-750X</ref> The British elites did not assume Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities at that time.<ref name=dra>Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973-2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013</ref> The reservation was based less on economic considerations, since European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of the inter-[[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] trade,<ref name=Geh /> but rather on political philosophy.<ref name=Geh /> In Britain, the concept of unlimited [[sovereignty]], based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was, and is, held in high esteem and presents a serious impediment to attempts at integration into a Continental legal framework.<ref name=Geh>From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009</ref>
The [[democratic deficit in the European Union}}, including legitimacy problems of the [[European Commission]] and the [[European Parliament]] is besides the [[supremacy of EU law]] over national legislation among the basic points of British EU-sceptics. As well rising costs of membership,<ref name="CostsT">{{cite news| url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8417255/300-a-year-the-cost-to-each-taxpayer-of-funding-EU.html| title = £300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU| publisher = The Daily Telegraph| author = Winnett, R. & Waterfield, B.| date=31 March 2011| accessdate= 8 June 2011| location=London}}</ref> or an alleged negative impact of EU regulatory burdens on UK business are being mentioned.<ref name="DemCor">{{cite news| url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1228769/MAIL-COMMENT-EU-democracy-lose-relentless-expansion-continues.html| title = EU 'democracy' and why we always lose as its relentless expansion continues| publisher = Daily Mail| date=18 November 2009| accessdate= 2 August 2011| location=London}}</ref>
Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and [[civil servants]] of corruption. A media scoop of this sort was 2005 [[Nigel Farage]] MEP request of the [[European Commission]] to disclose the individual Commissioner holiday travel, after [[President of the European Commission]], [[José Barroso]] had spent a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire [[Spiro Latsis]].<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| work=The Independent| location=London| title=Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon| first=Stephen| last=Castle| date=26 May 2005| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| location=London| work= The Independent| first=Stephen| last=Castle| date=26 May 2005}}</ref> The [[European Court of Auditors]] reports about the financial planning are as well among the topics which are often scandalized in the British press.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/14/do1402.xml| work=The Daily Telegraph| location=London| title=Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU?| first=Daniel| last=Hannan| date=14 November 2007| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref> The [[Better Off Out]] campaign, run by [[Simon Richards]], is a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal and lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others.<ref>[http://www.betteroffout.net/the-case/10-reasons-wed-be-better-off-out/ Why we should leave: The top Ten reasons we would be BETTER OFF OUT ...]</ref>

[[File:HughGaitskell2.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Hugh Gaitskell]], a staunch opponent of European integration.]]
[[File:HughGaitskell2.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Hugh Gaitskell]], a staunch opponent of European integration.]]
The Labour Party party leader [[Hugh Gaitskell]] once declared that joining the European Communities would mean "the end of a thousand years of history".<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/6967366.stm| title = Your favourite Conference Clips| date= 3 October 2007| publisher = BBC| accessdate=17 September 2011}}</ref> Some Gaitskellites though (including the later founders of the [[Social Democratic Party (UK)|SDP]]) were favourable to British involvement. Labour later changed from its initial opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. Important groups of Conservatives also opposed [[Accession of the United Kingdom to the European Union|joining]] the [[Common Market]]. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the initially Conservative Party-based [[Anti-Common Market League]], whose president [[Victor Montagu]] declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject [themselves] to a lot of frogs and huns".<ref name="BritPol">{{cite book| author = Lieber, R. J.| title = British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups| year = 1970| publisher = University of California Press| isbn = 978-0-520-01675-0| page = 210}}</ref> Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership initially came from [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion.
The Labour Party party leader [[Hugh Gaitskell]] once declared that joining the European Communities would mean "the end of a thousand years of history".<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/6967366.stm| title = Your favourite Conference Clips| date= 3 October 2007| publisher = BBC| accessdate=17 September 2011}}</ref> Some Gaitskellites though (including the later founders of the [[Social Democratic Party (UK)|SDP]]) were favourable to British involvement. Labour later changed from its initial opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. Important groups of Conservatives also opposed [[Accession of the United Kingdom to the European Union|joining]] the [[Common Market]]. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the initially Conservative Party-based [[Anti-Common Market League]], whose president [[Victor Montagu]] declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject [themselves] to a lot of frogs and huns".<ref name="BritPol">{{cite book| author = Lieber, R. J.| title = British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups| year = 1970| publisher = University of California Press| isbn = 978-0-520-01675-0| page = 210}}</ref> Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership initially came from [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion. 2002 a minority of Labour MPs, and others such as [[Denis Healey|Lord Healey]], formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1919310.stm "Labour MPs launch anti-euro drive"], BBC News, 10 April 2002</ref> The TUC remains strongly pro-EU,<ref>Patrick Wintour [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/16/tuc-accuses-tories-labour-law "TUC accuses Tory Eurosceptics of trying to undermine labour law",] ''The Guardian'', 16 January 2013</ref> but some of Labour's opponents in the media claim [[Ed Balls]], the shadow chancellor, is privately a Eurosceptic.<ref name="Oborne"/><ref>Daniel Knowles [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielknowles/100115569/labours-new-euroscepticism-should-worry-the-coalition/ "Labour's new Euroscepticism should worry the Coalition"], telegraph.co.uk, 4 November 2011</ref>


===Impact of the Suez Crisis 1954===
===Impact of the Suez Crisis 1954===
After the events of the [[Suez Crisis]] 1954 the United Kingdom had to accept that it could no longer assume to be a preferred partner of the [[United States]] and underwent a massive loss of trust in the [[special relationship]] with the US.<ref>Pax Anglo-Americana, [[Ursula Lehmkuhl]], Oldenbourg 1999, p.236</ref> Britain, along with Denmark, Ireland and Norway then started to prepar for a trade union, as in the [[European Free Trade Association]] (EFTA). British politicians as Labours [[George Brown, Baron George-Brown|George Brown]] were 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule resp. neglection.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240"/>
After the events of the [[Suez Crisis]] 1954 the United Kingdom had to accept that it could no longer assume to be a preferred partner of the [[United States]] and underwent a massive loss of trust in the [[special relationship]] with the US.<ref>Pax Anglo-Americana, [[Ursula Lehmkuhl]], Oldenbourg 1999, p.236</ref> Britain, along with Denmark, Ireland and Norway then started to prepar for a trade union, as in the [[European Free Trade Association]] (EFTA). British politicians as Labours [[George Brown, Baron George-Brown|George Brown]] were 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule resp. neglection.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240"/>


Although at present a significant proportion of [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservatives]] are hostile to the European Union, it was the Conservative Party that took the United Kingdom into what then was the European Community. However, in the 1960s the UK faced a strong resistance from the Continent, especially from [[French president]], [[Charles de Gaulle]].<ref name="dra"/> Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humiliation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulle's veto in 1963 was a devastating blow for [[Harold Macmillan]],<ref name=plot>This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998</ref> who, according [[Hugo Young]], was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career as a result of European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination did not help much with the Europe's image in the UK, and vice versa. With [[Georges Pompidou]] replacing Charles de Gaulle, the veto was finally lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European government of [[Edward Heath]]. Heath had to deal with disagreements relating to the [[Common Agricultural Policy]] and the remaining relationship with the [[Commonwealth of Nations]]. 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but [[Norwegian European Communities membership referendum, 1972|Norway]].
In the 1960s the membership attempts of conservative UK governments faced strong resistance from the Continent, especially from [[French president]], [[Charles de Gaulle]].<ref name="dra"/> Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humiliation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulle's veto in 1963 was a devastating blow for [[Harold Macmillan]],<ref name=plot>This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998</ref> who, according [[Hugo Young]], was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career as a result of European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination did not help much with the Europe's image in the UK, and vice versa. With [[Georges Pompidou]] replacing Charles de Gaulle, the veto was finally lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European government of [[Edward Heath]]. Heath had to deal with disagreements relating to the [[Common Agricultural Policy]] and the remaining relationship with the [[Commonwealth of Nations]]. 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but [[Norwegian European Communities membership referendum, 1972|Norway]].


===Admission and referendum===
===Admission and referendum===
Line 40: Line 44:
===Since 1997===
===Since 1997===
[[File:Nigel Farage MEP 1, Strasbourg - Diliff.jpg|thumb|[[United Kingdom Independence Party|UKIP]] leader [[Nigel Farage]] is arguably the United Kingdom's most famous Eurosceptic campaigner and wants the UK to leave the [[European Union]].]]
[[File:Nigel Farage MEP 1, Strasbourg - Diliff.jpg|thumb|[[United Kingdom Independence Party|UKIP]] leader [[Nigel Farage]] is arguably the United Kingdom's most famous Eurosceptic campaigner and wants the UK to leave the [[European Union]].]]
The financier Sir [[James Goldsmith]] had formed the [[Referendum Party]] as a single-issue party to fight the [[United Kingdom general election, 1997|1997 General Election]], calling for a [[referendum]] on aspects of the UK's relationship with the [[European Union]]. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]] after [[George Gardiner (politician)|George Gardiner]], the Conservative MP for [[Reigate (UK Parliament constituency)|Reigate]], changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party. The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The [[United Kingdom Independence Party]], advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by [[Alan Sked]], but initially had only very limited success.
The financier Sir [[James Goldsmith]] had formed the [[Referendum Party]] as a single-issue party to fight the [[United Kingdom general election, 1997|1997 General Election]], calling for a [[referendum]] on aspects of the UK's relationship with the [[European Union]]. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]] after [[George Gardiner (politician)|George Gardiner]], the Conservative MP for [[Reigate (UK Parliament constituency)|Reigate]], changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party. The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The [[United Kingdom Independence Party]], advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by [[Alan Sked]], but initially had only very limited success. Due to a change in the election principle, the [[European Parliament election, 1999]] allowed for the first UKIP parliamentary representation. Many commentators <ref>{{cite news| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/07/uk.toriesfuture/index.html| work=CNN| title=Tories facing identity crisis| date=8 June 2001| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref> believe over-interest in the issue to be an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the [[United Kingdom general election, 2001|General Election of 2001]]. They argue that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs.

Many commentators <ref>{{cite news| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/07/uk.toriesfuture/index.html| work=CNN| title=Tories facing identity crisis| date=8 June 2001| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref> believe over-interest in the issue to be an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the [[United Kingdom general election, 2001|General Election of 2001]]. They argue that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs.


After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, [[Iain Duncan Smith]], was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, [[William Hague]]. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative [[Member of the European Parliament|Members of the European Parliament]] (MEPs) from the federalist [[European People's Party]] group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic [[Union for a Europe of Nations]] (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of [[neo-fascist]] parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, [[Michael Howard]], emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the [[European Parliament]]. However Michael Howard's successor [[David Cameron]] pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this has now been implemented.
After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, [[Iain Duncan Smith]], was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, [[William Hague]]. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative [[Member of the European Parliament|Members of the European Parliament]] (MEPs) from the federalist [[European People's Party]] group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic [[Union for a Europe of Nations]] (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of [[neo-fascist]] parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, [[Michael Howard]], emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the [[European Parliament]]. However Michael Howard's successor [[David Cameron]] pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this has now been implemented.

In 2005, [[Nigel Farage]] MEP requested that the [[European Commission]] disclose where individual Commissioners had spent their holidays, which the Commission rejected on the basis that they had a right to privacy. Eurosceptics have also criticised the [[President of the European Commission]], [[José Barroso]], for spending a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire [[Spiro Latsis]] only a month before the Commission approved €10.3 million of Greek state aid for Latsis' shipping company.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| work=The Independent| location=London| title=Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon| first=Stephen| last=Castle| date=26 May 2005| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref> However, this decision had been made by the previous Commission body, before Barroso had been appointed.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| location=London| work= The Independent| first=Stephen| last=Castle| date=26 May 2005}}</ref>


UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the [[European Parliament election, 2004|2004 European Election]]. The party's results improved in the [[European Parliament election, 2009 (United Kingdom)|2009 UK European Election]], coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm| work=BBC News| title=European Election Results 2009, UK Results| date=19 April 2009| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref>
UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the [[European Parliament election, 2004|2004 European Election]]. The party's results improved in the [[European Parliament election, 2009 (United Kingdom)|2009 UK European Election]], coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm| work=BBC News| title=European Election Results 2009, UK Results| date=19 April 2009| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref>

==Criticism of the European Union==
{{POV|date=October 2014}}
Individual complaints about the EU made by Eurosceptics include rising costs of membership,<ref name="CostsT">{{cite news| url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8417255/300-a-year-the-cost-to-each-taxpayer-of-funding-EU.html| title = £300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU| publisher = The Daily Telegraph| author = Winnett, R. & Waterfield, B.| date=31 March 2011| accessdate= 8 June 2011| location=London}}</ref> a negative impact of the EU regulatory burden on UK business (including pointing out that this also affects those businesses engaged in purely domestic trade or exporting to non-EU markets) and claimed corrosive effects on democracy within all EU member states, including Britain.<ref name="DemCor">{{cite news| url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1228769/MAIL-COMMENT-EU-democracy-lose-relentless-expansion-continues.html| title = EU 'democracy' and why we always lose as its relentless expansion continues| publisher = Daily Mail| date=18 November 2009| accessdate= 2 August 2011| location=London}}</ref>

===Democratic deficit===
{{See also|Democratic deficit in the European Union}}
Many British Eurosceptics believe that the [[supremacy of EU law]] overly restricts national parliaments' freedom to legislate. They also object to provisions that EU legislation must be proposed by the [[European Commission]], which they claim lacks democratic legitimacy because it is elected by the [[European Parliament]]<ref>[[s:Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union/Title III: Provisions on the Institutions#Article 17|Treaty on European Union: Article 17:7]]</ref> and not directly by voters.
<!--The EU Council of Ministers (which also has a major legislative role) is traditionally viewed as representing the national interest against that of the supranational institutions, the Commission and the Parliament but, Eurosceptics{{Who|date=June 2011}} argue, the Council of Ministers, being a legislative body composed of ministers allows national governments to legislate in a way which bypasses the separation of powers that exist in many Continental countries' national legislatures and to cut out the domestic opposition completely.

By legislating at EU level, it is claimed{{By whom|date=June 2011}}, governments in power are able to enact legislation that remains binding on future governments, and for these reasons the EU Council of Ministers is alleged to have a marked tendency to support the expansion of the body of EU law, even in matters that might be thought to be of a purely domestic nature, thus resulting in a steady loss of the legislative powers of national parliaments and with it the power of national electorates to influence the law at the ballot box, with an increasing range of unpopular policies (e.g. the [[Common Agricultural Policy]]) not being discussed at all in election campaigns because the election result cannot affect them. Given the self-interest of the various EU institutions, Eurosceptics {{Who|date=June 2011}} argue, it is highly unlikely that they would all agree to any reform to remedy this institutional bias towards over-legislating at EU level. PLEASE PUT THESE PARAGRAPHS BACK WHEN ALL THE CLAIMS THEREIN HAVE BEEN REFERENCED.-->

===Claims of corruption===
Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and [[civil servants]] of corruption and failing to get the EU's accounts signed off by the [[European Court of Auditors]].<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/14/do1402.xml| work=The Daily Telegraph| location=London| title=Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU?| first=Daniel| last=Hannan| date=14 November 2007| accessdate=2 May 2010}}</ref>

Excerpts from the report and accounts on 2011<ref>http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/INAR11/INAR11_EN.PDF</ref> include:
*The 2011 accounts present fairly the financial position of the European Union and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year. Revenue and commitments were free from material error. In contrast, payments were affected by material error, with an estimated error rate of 3,9 % for the EU budget as a whole. The level of error remained similar to 2010 when it was 3,7 %.
*All individually assessed areas of EU spending were affected by material error with the exception of external relations, aid and enlargement and administrative expenditure. This shows that improvements are needed in the management of EU funds.
*Overall, the control systems examined were only partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments and are not realising their potential to prevent or detect and correct errors. Many instances of control failure were identified.

A minority of Labour MPs, and others such as [[Denis Healey|Lord Healey]], formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1919310.stm "Labour MPs launch anti-euro drive"], BBC News, 10 April 2002</ref> The TUC remains strongly pro-EU,<ref>Patrick Wintour [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/16/tuc-accuses-tories-labour-law "TUC accuses Tory Eurosceptics of trying to undermine labour law",] ''The Guardian'', 16 January 2013</ref> but some of Labour's opponents in the media claim [[Ed Balls]], the shadow chancellor, is privately a Eurosceptic.<ref name="Oborne"/><ref>Daniel Knowles [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielknowles/100115569/labours-new-euroscepticism-should-worry-the-coalition/ "Labour's new Euroscepticism should worry the Coalition"], telegraph.co.uk, 4 November 2011</ref> Opposition to the European Union is generally more marked in the Conservative Party, with all leaders from [[John Major]] (1990–97) onwards having to placate the Eurosceptics in the party.


==Eurosceptic political parties==
==Eurosceptic political parties==
The different voting systems allowed some UK political parties with low amount of direct elected MPs in London to gain representation in the European Parliament, including the [[United Kingdom Independence Party]]. Smaller parties and [[electoral alliance]]s have included the [[Referendum Party]], [[Alliance for Democracy (UK)]], [[We Demand a Referendum]], which was launched by [[Nikki Sinclaire]], a former UKIP [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]] in June 2012.<ref name="DM">{{cite web| author = Richards, S.| url = http://richardsblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/09/is-it-time-for-ukip-to-make-way-for-a-new-eurosceptic-party.html| title = Is it time for UKIP to make way for a new Eurosceptic party?| publisher = [[Daily Mail]]| date= September 20, 2012| accessdate= September 24, 2012| quote = You can tell when it's UKIP Conference time, because Nikki Sinclaire, the former UKIP MEP, can always be relied upon to pull a stunt to try to steal the limelight from her old party. This time, she's set up her own party, the "We Demand A Referendum Party".}}</ref>
{{see also|Category:Eurosceptic parties in the United Kingdom}}

The political party with representation in the European Parliament that seeks to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union is the [[United Kingdom Independence Party]]. Unrepresented parties and [[electoral alliance]]s have included the [[Referendum Party]], [[Alliance for Democracy (UK)]], [[We Demand a Referendum]], which was launched by [[Nikki Sinclaire]] [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]] in June 2012.<ref name="DM">{{cite web| author = Richards, S.| url = http://richardsblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/09/is-it-time-for-ukip-to-make-way-for-a-new-eurosceptic-party.html| title = Is it time for UKIP to make way for a new Eurosceptic party?| publisher = [[Daily Mail]]| date= September 20, 2012| accessdate= September 24, 2012| quote = You can tell when it's UKIP Conference time, because Nikki Sinclaire, the former UKIP MEP, can always be relied upon to pull a stunt to try to steal the limelight from her old party. This time, she's set up her own party, the "We Demand A Referendum Party".}}</ref>


Senior figures in both the Labour Party and Conservative Party have held strongly contrasting views on European integration ever since it became a contentious issue back in the 1970s. Neither party currently advocates the formal withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, although both have put forward proposals for the reform of European institutions. However, pro-European reformers, such as the Conservative former Foreign Secretary [[Malcolm Rifkind|Sir Malcolm Rifkind]], are resolutely opposed to any moves towards a [[European superstate]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/rifkind-looks-to-partnership-of-nations-as-solution-for-europe-1.416096|title=Rifkind looks to partnership of nations as solution for Europe|publisher=''[[The Herald (Glasgow)|The Herald]]'' (newspaper)|date=24 Jan 1997|accessdate=22 May 2014}}</ref>
Senior figures in both the Labour Party and Conservative Party have held strongly contrasting views on European integration ever since it became a contentious issue back in the 1970s. Neither party currently advocates the formal withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, although both have put forward proposals for the reform of European institutions. The conservative party faces strong rifts. Conservative governments took major political steps towards a stronger integration of Britain in Europe but had to placate anti-european sentiment in the political base and the conservative media as well. Pro-European reformers, as the Conservative former Foreign Secretary [[Malcolm Rifkind|Sir Malcolm Rifkind]] took to draw lines against a [[European superstate]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/rifkind-looks-to-partnership-of-nations-as-solution-for-europe-1.416096|title=Rifkind looks to partnership of nations as solution for Europe|publisher=''[[The Herald (Glasgow)|The Herald]]'' (newspaper)|date=24 Jan 1997|accessdate=22 May 2014}}</ref>


The [[Liberal Democrats]], the UK's third-largest parliamentary party, are strongly pro-EU but advocate institutional reform to advance European federalism, with a greater role for national parliaments in scrutinising EU legislation though with less power (through the raising of Qualified Majority Voting blocking thresholds as in the Lisbon Treaty) to block or amend it.
The [[Liberal Democrats]], the UK's third-largest parliamentary party, are strongly pro-EU but advocate institutional reform to advance European federalism, with a greater role for national parliaments in scrutinising EU legislation though with less power (through the raising of Qualified Majority Voting blocking thresholds as in the Lisbon Treaty) to block or amend it.
Line 83: Line 60:


The [[Green Party of England and Wales]] does not seek to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union, but supports another referendum on the country's membership and is also highly critical of some aspects of the EU.
The [[Green Party of England and Wales]] does not seek to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union, but supports another referendum on the country's membership and is also highly critical of some aspects of the EU.

==Media attitudes==
Among Britain's main national newspapers, those that take a broadly Eurosceptic line are the ''[[Daily Mail]]'', ''[[Daily Express]]'', ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', ''[[The Sun (United Kingdom)|The Sun]]'' and ''[[The Times]]'',<ref>{{cite book| last = Anderson| first = Peter J.|editor=Robert Harmsen, Menno Spiering| title = Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=q7y5W8svwh0C| accessdate=17 December 2009| series = European Studies| year = 2005| publisher = Rodopi| isbn =978-90-420-1946-1| page = 151| chapter = A Flag of Convenience? Discourse and Motivations of the London-based Eurosceptic Press }}</ref> as well as their respective Sunday sister publications. These newspapers tend to oppose further European integration and have called for ratification of the [[Lisbon Treaty]] to be subject to a referendum. In November 2010, the ''Daily Express'' became the first British newspaper to formally call for withdrawal from the EU.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/214358/Get-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusade|title=Get Britain out of Europe: Massive support for our crusade|publisher=Express.co.uk|date=29 November 2010|accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref>
''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' and ''[[The Times]]'' are widely seen as belonging to the "[[quality press]]".<ref name="QP">{{cite book| author = Scheller, P. R.| title = How valid is the distinction between the popular and the quality press in Britain?| publisher = Cardiff University (School of European Studies)| year = 2000| isbn = 978-3-640-86409-6| doi = 10.3239/9783638341035}}</ref> On the other hand, the ''[[Daily Express]]'', ''[[The Sun (United Kingdom)|The Sun]]'', and the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' are widely considered [[tabloid (newspaper format)|tabloids]]. The ''Daily Express'' withdrew from the [[Press Complaints Commission|PCC]]'s self-regulatory system in early 2011.<ref name="PCC">{{cite web| url = http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=Njg3NA==| title = PCC statement on Northern & Shell's withdrawal from press self-regulatory system| publisher = Press Complaints Commission| date= 11-01-2011| accessdate= 7 June 2011}}</ref>

The hard-left daily ''[[The Morning Star]]'' takes an international-Marxist Eurosceptic position.{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} Under the editorship of [[Mark Seddon]], ''[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]]'', the journal of the Labour Movement, tended to give space to Eurosceptic contributors, including controversially Marc Glendening of the [[Democracy Movement]].{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} This position was defended by other centre-left Eurosceptics who also spoke on platforms with the Democracy Movement.{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}}

The European Union has accused the British Press of circulating inaccurate stories which it calls "[[Euromyths]]".<ref name="BBC">{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6481969.stm| title = Guide to the best euromyths| publisher = BBC| date=23 March 2007| accessdate= 8 June 2011}}</ref> Although they usually have a grain of truth in them, they sometimes arise from misunderstandings or erroneously attribute the actions of a different European organisation, such as the [[Council of Europe]], to the EU.<ref name="BBC"/>

The [[Better Off Out]] campaign, run by [[Simon Richards]], is a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal and lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others.<ref>[http://www.betteroffout.net/the-case/10-reasons-wed-be-better-off-out/ Why we should leave: The top Ten reasons we would be BETTER OFF OUT ...]</ref>


==Opinion polling==
==Opinion polling==
Line 102: Line 68:


Whereas overall the majority of EU citizens (56%) believed that membership of the EU had benefited their country (with a significant minority (31%) believing that their country had not benefited),<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe" />{{rp|QA7a|date=November 2012}} in Britain only 34% believed that Britain had benefited from membership, on balance.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71" />{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}} Overall, about 48% of EU citizens tended to trust the European Parliament, and about 36% did not tend to trust it,<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|110–2|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp|QA 13.1|date=November 2012}} but in the UK trust was lowest, at 22%.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp| QA 14.1|date=November 2012}}
Whereas overall the majority of EU citizens (56%) believed that membership of the EU had benefited their country (with a significant minority (31%) believing that their country had not benefited),<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe" />{{rp|QA7a|date=November 2012}} in Britain only 34% believed that Britain had benefited from membership, on balance.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71" />{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}} Overall, about 48% of EU citizens tended to trust the European Parliament, and about 36% did not tend to trust it,<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|110–2|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp|QA 13.1|date=November 2012}} but in the UK trust was lowest, at 22%.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp| QA 14.1|date=November 2012}}

===General attitudes to the European Union===
<!-- TO BE REPLACED WITH A MORE RECENT EUROBAROMETER SURVEY WHEN POSSIBLE -->
A survey in {{As of|2009|alt=2009}} showed that attitudes toward the European Union vary greatly between countries. Overall, the majority of EU citizens supported their country's membership: over 50% thought their country's membership was "a good thing", and only 15% thought it was "a bad thing".;<ref name="Eurobarometer 71">{{cite web| url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb71_std_part1.pdf| title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 (fieldwork June–July 2009)| accessdate=26 November 2009|date=September 2009| format = PDF| publisher = [[European Commission]]}}</ref>{{rp|91–3|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe">{{cite web| url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb713_annexes.pdf| title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 Table of Results, Standard Eurobarometer 71: Public Opinion in the European Union (fieldwork June&nbsp;— July 2009)| accessdate=1 November 2009|date=September 2009| format = PDF| publisher = [[European Commission]]| pages = }}</ref>{{rp|QA6a|date=November 2012}} but while support was very high in Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and Ireland, with about 70%–80% thinking that membership was a good thing, scepticism was high in Latvia, the United Kingdom, and Hungary, with only 25%–32% viewing membership as a good thing.
In Britain, those who view the UK's membership of the EU negatively and those who view it as neither positive nor negative each constitute 32% of the population. Those who view EU membership positively make up 28%.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|91–3|date=November 2012}}

Within Europe overall, a positive to neutral opinion of the EU dominated, with about 46% of citizens having a positive opinion and only 16% having a negative opinion; about 36% had a neutral opinion.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|130–3|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp| QA 10|date=November 2012}} In Britain, only 22% had a positive opinion, 33% had a negative opinion, and 38% had a neutral opinion.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 13:24, 31 October 2014

The Inner Six alongside the Outer Seven (1961)
  Inner Six
  Outer Seven

Euroscepticism, the opposition to policies of supranational EU institutions and/or opposition to Britain's membership of the European Union, has been a significant element in the politics of the United Kingdom (UK).

The European Unity movement as a political project after 1945 was supported and inspired by important British voices. E.g. Winston Churchill pledged in his 1946 Zurich speech for a 'a kind of United States of Europe' lead by France and Germany but did not intend to involve Britain.[1] The ambivalent position of British politics and citizens has been described as "wishing to seem an important part of Europe without being a part of it".[2] The othering of European Unity as a Continental issue and somebody else's problem has been rather strong.[3] Pro-European British politicians and citizens have faced various defeats and humiliations with regard to Britain's steps in the direction of increased European integration.[4] Even parties like the Liberal Democrats with an outspoken pro-European platform stay either in a minority position respectively have members that share the British lack of enthusiasms 'of all things European.'.[5] After joining the EU, confrontational attitudes of British politicians, as in the UK rebate controversy, gained further popularity among the British public, while the advantages of the European Union were taken for granted.[2]

History

The ideological split between reverence for continental European refinery and classics and an emerging, especially antifrench, antigerman or general anti European sentiment is strong since various centuries. As in splendid isolation, self-definition and othering always includes projections of internal conflicts and differences. While having some overlap, Euroscepticism is somewhat different from Anti-Europeanism. Anti-Europeanism has always a strong influence in especially American culture and American exceptionalism, which sometimes sees Europe on the decline or as a rising rival power, or both.[6] Some aspects of British Euroscepticism have been mirrored and parroted by US anti-European authors[6] and the American discussion has influenced positions in Britain.

After 1945

The United Kingdom (dark green) in the European Union (light green).

Britain was urged to join and lead western Europe in the immediate aftermath of the War. The American Committee for a United Europe and the European Conference on Federation led by Winston Churchill were among the early endeveaours for European unity with British participation. However, British governments and political mainstream players, while advocating stronger integration of the Continent, did not intend to take part themselves. Britain never had a strong pro-European movement like the one founded in post-war Germany. The postwar years up to 1954 saw the UK occupied with the dissolution of its global Empire. It was not among the six founding member states of the European Communities in the early 1950s. The Six signed the Treaty of Paris, creating the European Coal and Steel Community, on 18 April 1951 but failed to create a European Defence Community.

In the years before, only the British extreme right – in particular Fascist politician Oswald Mosley– were rather outspoken, based on the Union Movement and the Europe a Nation slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe.[7][8] The British elites did not assume Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities at that time.[9] The reservation was based less on economic considerations, since European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of the inter-Commonwealth trade,[10] but rather on political philosophy.[10] In Britain, the concept of unlimited sovereignty, based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was, and is, held in high esteem and presents a serious impediment to attempts at integration into a Continental legal framework.[10] The [[democratic deficit in the European Union}}, including legitimacy problems of the European Commission and the European Parliament is besides the supremacy of EU law over national legislation among the basic points of British EU-sceptics. As well rising costs of membership,[11] or an alleged negative impact of EU regulatory burdens on UK business are being mentioned.[12]

Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and civil servants of corruption. A media scoop of this sort was 2005 Nigel Farage MEP request of the European Commission to disclose the individual Commissioner holiday travel, after President of the European Commission, José Barroso had spent a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire Spiro Latsis.[13][14] The European Court of Auditors reports about the financial planning are as well among the topics which are often scandalized in the British press.[15] The Better Off Out campaign, run by Simon Richards, is a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal and lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others.[16]

File:HughGaitskell2.jpg
Hugh Gaitskell, a staunch opponent of European integration.

The Labour Party party leader Hugh Gaitskell once declared that joining the European Communities would mean "the end of a thousand years of history".[17] Some Gaitskellites though (including the later founders of the SDP) were favourable to British involvement. Labour later changed from its initial opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. Important groups of Conservatives also opposed joining the Common Market. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the initially Conservative Party-based Anti-Common Market League, whose president Victor Montagu declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject [themselves] to a lot of frogs and huns".[18] Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership initially came from Labour politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion. 2002 a minority of Labour MPs, and others such as Lord Healey, formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency.[19] The TUC remains strongly pro-EU,[20] but some of Labour's opponents in the media claim Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, is privately a Eurosceptic.[21][22]

Impact of the Suez Crisis 1954

After the events of the Suez Crisis 1954 the United Kingdom had to accept that it could no longer assume to be a preferred partner of the United States and underwent a massive loss of trust in the special relationship with the US.[23] Britain, along with Denmark, Ireland and Norway then started to prepar for a trade union, as in the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). British politicians as Labours George Brown were 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule resp. neglection.[3]

In the 1960s the membership attempts of conservative UK governments faced strong resistance from the Continent, especially from French president, Charles de Gaulle.[9] Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humiliation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulle's veto in 1963 was a devastating blow for Harold Macmillan,[4] who, according Hugo Young, was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career as a result of European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination did not help much with the Europe's image in the UK, and vice versa. With Georges Pompidou replacing Charles de Gaulle, the veto was finally lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European government of Edward Heath. Heath had to deal with disagreements relating to the Common Agricultural Policy and the remaining relationship with the Commonwealth of Nations. 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but Norway.

Admission and referendum

Despite the decision to join the European Community, internal Labour divisions over EEC membership prompted the Labour Party to propose a referendum be held on the permanence of the UK in the Communities. Originally proposed in 1972 by Tony Benn[24] (known as Anthony Wedgwood Benn at the time), Labour's referendum proposal led the anti-EEC Conservative politician Enoch Powell to advocate a Labour vote (initially only inferred) in the February 1974 election,[25] which was thought to have influenced the result, a return to government of the Labour Party. The eventual referendum in 1975 asked the voters:

"Parliament has decided to consult the electorate on the question whether the UK should remain in the European Economic Community: Do you want the UK to remain in the EEC?"

British membership of the EEC was endorsed by 67% of those voting, with a turnout of 64.5%.

From 1975 to 1997

Margaret Thatcher with her famous handbag, spouse and some foreign guests at Chequers 1984

The debate between Eurosceptics and EU supporters is ongoing within, rather than between, British political parties, whose membership is of varied standpoints. The two main political parties in Britain, the Conservative Party (in government) and the Labour Party (in opposition) both have within them a broad spectrum of views concerning the European Union.

In the 1970s and early 1980s the Labour Party was the more Eurosceptic of the two parties, with more anti-European Communities MPs than the Conservatives. In 1975, Labour held a special conference on British membership and the party voted 2 to 1 for Britain to leave the European Communities.[26] In 1979, the Labour manifesto[27] declared that a Labour government would "oppose any move towards turning the Community into a federation" and, in 1983,[28] it still favoured British withdrawal from the EEC.

Under the leadership of Neil Kinnock after 1983, however, the then oppositional party dropped its former resistance to the European Communities and instead favoured greater British integration into European Economic and Monetary Union. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher however gained much popularity with the so-called UK rebate in 1984. Britain then managed to reduce its contributions to the Union to a certain extent, as it was then the EU's second poorest member and, without much agriculture, benefited little from farm subsidies.[29]

A speech by Jacques Delors, then President of the European Commission, at the TUC conference in 1988 helped to weaken the eurosceptic inclination in the Labour Party.[21] In the context of Margaret Thatcher's Conservative premiership, when policies to reduce the power of the trade unions were pursued, Delors' advocacy of a "social Europe" became attractive to many.[30] However the UK rebate have been held up as well by following Prime ministers.[29] In late October 1990, just before her premiership ended, Mrs Thatcher reacted strongly against Delors' plans for a single currency in the House of Commons;[31] her stance contributed to her downfall a few weeks later.[32]

Since 1997

UKIP leader Nigel Farage is arguably the United Kingdom's most famous Eurosceptic campaigner and wants the UK to leave the European Union.

The financier Sir James Goldsmith had formed the Referendum Party as a single-issue party to fight the 1997 General Election, calling for a referendum on aspects of the UK's relationship with the European Union. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the House of Commons after George Gardiner, the Conservative MP for Reigate, changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party. The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The United Kingdom Independence Party, advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by Alan Sked, but initially had only very limited success. Due to a change in the election principle, the European Parliament election, 1999 allowed for the first UKIP parliamentary representation. Many commentators [33] believe over-interest in the issue to be an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the General Election of 2001. They argue that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs.

After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, Iain Duncan Smith, was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, William Hague. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) from the federalist European People's Party group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic Union for a Europe of Nations (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of neo-fascist parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, Michael Howard, emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the European Parliament. However Michael Howard's successor David Cameron pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this has now been implemented.

UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the 2004 European Election. The party's results improved in the 2009 UK European Election, coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party.[34]

Eurosceptic political parties

The different voting systems allowed some UK political parties with low amount of direct elected MPs in London to gain representation in the European Parliament, including the United Kingdom Independence Party. Smaller parties and electoral alliances have included the Referendum Party, Alliance for Democracy (UK), We Demand a Referendum, which was launched by Nikki Sinclaire, a former UKIP MEP in June 2012.[35]

Senior figures in both the Labour Party and Conservative Party have held strongly contrasting views on European integration ever since it became a contentious issue back in the 1970s. Neither party currently advocates the formal withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, although both have put forward proposals for the reform of European institutions. The conservative party faces strong rifts. Conservative governments took major political steps towards a stronger integration of Britain in Europe but had to placate anti-european sentiment in the political base and the conservative media as well. Pro-European reformers, as the Conservative former Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind took to draw lines against a European superstate.[36]

The Liberal Democrats, the UK's third-largest parliamentary party, are strongly pro-EU but advocate institutional reform to advance European federalism, with a greater role for national parliaments in scrutinising EU legislation though with less power (through the raising of Qualified Majority Voting blocking thresholds as in the Lisbon Treaty) to block or amend it.

The Scottish National Party (SNP) has tended to be pro-EU since the 1980s. The SNP's heartlands tend to be in fishing and farming areas of Scotland. However these regions tended in the Scottish independence referendum for remaining in the Union with Britain (and the EU), against the SNP proposition. Scottish farmers received £583 million in subsidy payments from the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) alone in 2013.[37]

The Green Party of England and Wales does not seek to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union, but supports another referendum on the country's membership and is also highly critical of some aspects of the EU.

Opinion polling

The assessment of attitudes to the European Union and European Parliamentary Election voting intentions is undertaken on a regular basis by a variety of opinion polling organisations, including ComRes, ICM, Populus and Survation.

Support for withdrawal

A YouGov poll in 2010 found that 47% of voters in the United Kingdom would vote to leave the European Union, while 33% would vote to stay in (with 14% undecided and 5% unwilling to vote).[38] Support and opposition for withdrawal from the Union are not evenly distributed among the different age groups: opposition to EU membership is most prevalent among those 60 and older (57%) and decreases to 31% among those aged 18–24 (with 35% of 18-24 year olds stating that they would vote for Britain to remain in the EU). Those most likely to vote for continued EU membership were those aged 25–39, at 38%, though the same percentage of 25-39 year olds would vote to leave it.[38] Finally, the results of the poll showed some regional variation: support for withdrawal from the EU is lowest in London and Scotland (at 40% and 44% respectively) but reaches 49% across the rest of mainland Britain.[38]

Whereas overall the majority of EU citizens (56%) believed that membership of the EU had benefited their country (with a significant minority (31%) believing that their country had not benefited),[39]: 95–6 [40]: QA7a  in Britain only 34% believed that Britain had benefited from membership, on balance.[39]: 95–6  Overall, about 48% of EU citizens tended to trust the European Parliament, and about 36% did not tend to trust it,[39]: 110–2 [40]: QA 13.1  but in the UK trust was lowest, at 22%.[40]: QA 14.1 

See also

References

  1. ^ "Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich, I9 September 1946".
  2. ^ a b Watts, Duncan; Pilkington, Colin (2005). Britain in the European Union Today (3rd ed.). Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719071799.
  3. ^ a b Gehler, Michael (2009). From Common Market to European Union Building. Vienna: Böhlau. p. 240. ISBN 9783205777441.
  4. ^ a b This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998
  5. ^ Britain in the European Union Today: Third Edition, Duncan Watts, Colin Pilkington, Manchester University Press, 29.11.2005, p.220
  6. ^ a b Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States, Patrick Chamorel No 25, EUI-RSCAS Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS) 2004
  7. ^ Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31.12.2003, p.75
  8. ^ DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53-65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, ISSN 1803-750X
  9. ^ a b Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973-2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013
  10. ^ a b c From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009
  11. ^ Winnett, R. & Waterfield, B. (31 March 2011). "£300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU". London: The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2011.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ "EU 'democracy' and why we always lose as its relentless expansion continues". London: Daily Mail. 18 November 2009. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  13. ^ Castle, Stephen (26 May 2005). "Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon". The Independent. London. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  14. ^ Castle, Stephen (26 May 2005). The Independent. London http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  15. ^ Hannan, Daniel (14 November 2007). "Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU?". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  16. ^ Why we should leave: The top Ten reasons we would be BETTER OFF OUT ...
  17. ^ "Your favourite Conference Clips". BBC. 3 October 2007. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
  18. ^ Lieber, R. J. (1970). British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups. University of California Press. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-520-01675-0.
  19. ^ "Labour MPs launch anti-euro drive", BBC News, 10 April 2002
  20. ^ Patrick Wintour "TUC accuses Tory Eurosceptics of trying to undermine labour law", The Guardian, 16 January 2013
  21. ^ a b Peter Oborne "It’s taken decades, but Labour has seen the light on Europe", telegraph.co.uk, 21 April 2011
  22. ^ Daniel Knowles "Labour's new Euroscepticism should worry the Coalition", telegraph.co.uk, 4 November 2011
  23. ^ Pax Anglo-Americana, Ursula Lehmkuhl, Oldenbourg 1999, p.236
  24. ^ Peter Oborne "David Cameron may have finished off the Tories – but he had no choice", Daily Telegraph, 23 January 2013
  25. ^ Simon Heffer Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998, p.707-10
  26. ^ "1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC". BBC News. 26 April 1975. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  27. ^ "Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world". Psr.keele.ac.uk. 5 May 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  28. ^ "Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world". Psr.keele.ac.uk. 5 May 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  29. ^ a b Reuters (16 December 2005). "Reuters footage". ITN Source archive. Retrieved 26 January 2013. Blair is under pressure to yield on the rebate won by his predecessor Margaret Thatcher in 1984 to reflect the fact that Britain, then the EU's second poorest member, benefited little from farm subsidies. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  30. ^ Katwala, Sunder (12 September 2007). "Bring Back Social Europe". London: guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 4 September 2008.
  31. ^ "30 October 1990: 'No! No! No!'", BBC Democracy Live, 31 October 2009
  32. ^ Charles C. W. Cooke "How Thatcher Came to Be Euroskeptic", National Review, 23 July 2012
  33. ^ "Tories facing identity crisis". CNN. 8 June 2001. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  34. ^ "European Election Results 2009, UK Results". BBC News. 19 April 2009. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  35. ^ Richards, S. (September 20, 2012). "Is it time for UKIP to make way for a new Eurosceptic party?". Daily Mail. Retrieved September 24, 2012. You can tell when it's UKIP Conference time, because Nikki Sinclaire, the former UKIP MEP, can always be relied upon to pull a stunt to try to steal the limelight from her old party. This time, she's set up her own party, the "We Demand A Referendum Party".
  36. ^ "Rifkind looks to partnership of nations as solution for Europe". The Herald (newspaper). 24 Jan 1997. Retrieved 22 May 2014. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  37. ^ Bicker, Laura (29 April 2014). "Scottish independence: Farmers give their views on referendum debate". BBC. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
  38. ^ a b c "YouGov Survey Results" (PDF). YouGov. 8 September 2010. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
  39. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Eurobarometer 71 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  40. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Eurobarometer 71 annexe was invoked but never defined (see the help page).