User talk:AKS.9955

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoroastrian Students' Association

This was an improper non-admin closure of an AFD discussion. There were only two opinions given: mine as nominator, and one other keep opinion based on the fact that "it's an old organization; there must be sources" but without any evidence that there were any sources. Given the split nature of the discussion, a relist was in order. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you for your contribution at WP:AFD. As an uninvolved administrator, I have reopened your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoroastrian Students' Association as in my view, there is insufficient discussion with which to decide on the consensus. I have relisted the page to generate a more thorough discussion. Do not be disheartened by this, take it as being a sign that the decision was not as obvious as you thought. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

• Hello WikiDan61 and Malcolmxl5, thanks for your messages. I noticed that the AfD has been reopened and hence I am not making any further edits on the article / related pages. Let me know if you need something from me as well. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

• Hello WikiDan61 & Malcolmxl5, can you give this AfD a look please? The discussion is still at the same place since it was re-opened and has fallen in Old AfD list again. Do we want to keep this open for any longer? Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 02:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

You could relist it again. Or let an admin deal with it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Help to Create a Life History

₩ho can you help me to Create a articles page about my Farmers Day 27th Jestha programme in Nepal to share a great news for Nepales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Dhawal (talk • contribs) 05:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

• Dev Dhawal, if I remember correctly then article on this subject was speedy deleted previously. The subject is not notable and no I wont help you with this. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

But why, Are you know about "Farmers Day" . If you and your family depending upon others sources then also you have to eat for or other material to be alive. We know that this material are prepared by Agro raw materials. Then why we didn't have any questions to develop Farmers and respect Farmers as Celebrating #FarmersDay2070. You can search about Farmers Day 27th Jestha in Google search. .....thanks sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Dhawal (talk • contribs) 08:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

• Dev Dhawal, the article failed WP:GNG. There are specific guidelines in Wikipedia. I recommend that you read them. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hrishikesh Pandey (Director)

This Entity is properly shared with proper description of the real living identity. Please share your consent on the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romir2014 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Activity centre

Could you please relist this? The two keep votes are the deprodder of the article and an editor who involved himself in several AfDs I started, so at the very least, there is no consensus built. MSJapan (talk) 03:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

• Hello MSJapan, I personally felt that consensus was built since no-one supported the AfD. However, I am still opening the AfD. Kindly relist the same to get more consensus. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 03:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Setting aside the fact the MSJapan seems to damn everyone who disagrees with him (even though Kvng and I have every right to participate in AfDs just as much as he has to start them), a third person has now voted Keep on the article, so it'll probably get kept in the next couple of days anyway. pbp 23:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

• Purplebackpack89,I am closing this as keep. No point waiting further as despite asking MSJapan, he did not even bother to relist the AfD and there is already a clear consensus for keep. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you, AKS. That's probably the right call pbp 04:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

As an involved editor, I can't relist my own AfDs. MSJapan (talk) 04:28, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

St. Theresa’s Boys High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church

Sunil Kumar Choudhary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Posthumous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

• Comment. Fixed. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of RLV-TD

Hello! Your submission of RLV-TD at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Please note that the nomination is on the verge of closing as unsuccessful. If you can address the issues raised both in the review and on the article's talk page, this is your final opportunity to do so. Best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, AKS.9955. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 02:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Omni Flames (talk) 02:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

• Hello Omni Flames, checked my inbox and no emails received. Can you please re-transmit the email on arunsingh16@gmail.com? Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done Not sure what happened there. Omni Flames (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Ambassadors to Venezuela

This is an improper closure under WP:NAC. experienced non-admins in good standing may consider closing a discussion on that page which is beyond doubt a clear keep. LibStar (talk) 12:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

this is now at deletion review. LibStar (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Given that this is not your first (or second, or even third) instance of an improper non-admin closure, perhaps you should consider refraining from this activity in the future. There is no rush to close AFDs, and except under extraordinary circumstances, they should only be closed by experienced admins. NAC should not be used as a means of just helping clean up the backlog unless the case is crystal clear. If there is any doubt whatsoever, NAC should not be used. A no-consensus closure is never a case of "no doubt whatsoever" and NAC should never be used for that. (As a contrast, the only time I ever use NAC is if the article under discussion has already been speedily deleted, and the deleting admin simply neglected to close the AFD themselves.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

agreed. And if AKS continues this, expect a WP:ANI on this. LibStar (talk) 12:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

• LibStar, explain to me why is that an improper closure? Just because you happen to be the nominator and you argued with everyone who voted keep? As far as your understanding of non-admins performing closures, read this. It clearly states that non-admins can perform AfD closure as "Keep, Redirect, Merge and no consensus". And dont post threats on my TalkPage about reporting me.

WikiDan61, yes there has been discussion on my non-admin closure (including a DRV) BUT the final outcome has been exactly the same as my initial action in all the cases. Be sure of what you are accusing me of. If you have an issue and want more discussion on the AfD, then request so and as courtesy to another experienced fellow editor I will re-open it with proper remarks (as I did in case of "Activity centre" and it came out with the same result). As far as no-consensus is concerned, I am sorry but I don't agree with your statement completely. Please read the link I posted above. Thanks for your time folks. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

List of Australian middleweight boxing champions AfD closure

I believe you're closing this discussion was not within the limits of Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. This did not look like a clear consensus had been reached or that it was not contentious. I believe it should have been left for an admin. I am going to list this at deletion review. Papaursa (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

• Certainly not. This was a clear keep. If the AfD closure does not gel well with what you have been debating in the AfD then its your bad luck. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 02:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)