User talk:Benyamin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:47, 20 August 2019

National Organization for Development of Exceptional Talents

You helped edit this article, do you have time to add source references? The text look fascinating but there is no way I can verify it, and don't have the language myself. --ClemRutter (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Benyamin-ln! Thank you for your contributions. I am VQuakr and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! VQuakr (talk) 19:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

I hope you like it ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chyah: Hi Mrs. Sonia! Thanks for your gift.

I think, I know you at WikiFa. Nice to see you at here :) Benyamin-ln (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yea, a dead user of wikifa. but now i prefer to be called as a FaWikiquotion . --ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suddenly I saw your talk page a month ago, and feel sad about something...

Good luck! Benyamin-ln (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Love the work you, GTVM92 and Pahlevun put into the Iranian local elections, 2017, love the designs of the tables and charts as well as y'all keeping each other in check really makes for a wonderful page. Thanks for all your hard work! Diedrichb (talk) 05:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diedrichb: You're welcome. Thanks my friend Benyamin-ln (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Benyamin-ln. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, can you please add your sources to Government of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2009–13)? It is at risk of being moved to draftspace at the moment. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Hello, I will do it soon. Benyamin-ln (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Boleyn (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Gilan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talysh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Your splendid contributions on Iran-related articles do not go unnoticed. Keep up the good work! - LouisAragon (talk) 13:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon: Thank you very much. It is my pleasure.

I already wanted to ask you for help on early future, but I want to tell that now :))) I created this article. I think Talysh Khanate may be Reanimation of Sipahbad. «Mihranids of Astara» was the ruling dynasty of Sipahbad. Decline of Ispahbads occurred at 15th century, but Mihranids continued governing of Astara until 18th century. Bayandur Khan who was appointed on 1539, was loyal to Safavid Dynasty. He and his son «Ḥamza Khan» took part in suppressing of local governors of Gilan on 1568 and 1580. Russian academician Melʹgunov mentioned Bayandur Khan from descendant of Paduspanids. Hamza Khan's era was not similiar to his father, because he lead a rebellion against heads of Qizilbash on 1592. Hamza's first son «Bayandur II» succeeded him for 18 years. Hamza's second son «Saru Khan» was prominent rather than the first. Saru Khan who governed Astara from 1610s until 1650s, becamed commander-in-chief of Gilan's corps by order of Shah Safi on April 1629 to suppress the Gharib Shah's uprising. (someone have made him confused with Saru Taqi, but historian Fumani did not mentioned Saru Taqi anywhere). He was commander of Iranian forces that helped Nadir Muhammad Khan to retake the Bukhara's throne on November 1645. Saru Khan was also among leaders of siege of Herat and conquered Zamindawar; also he was who signed the Treaty of Zuhab along with Kemankeş Kara Mustafa Pasha on 27 May [O.S. 17 May] 1639... So this dynasty was very influential on history of whole region even after collapse of Sipahbad. I don't know this dynasty and Mihranids had same roots or not, because i can't find anything else in Persian sources about Ispahbads principality and this dynasty. Maybe somethings can be found in non-Persian sources. I ask you to help me if you want... Benyamin-ln (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm not that well versed anymore in Medieval Iranian/West Asian history (with some exceptions). The Ispahbads of Gilan flourished in the Medieval era proper. I think you'd be better off asking HistoryofIran and Kansas Bear. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon: I was inactive for a long time. I'm glad to return here with a message from you. Thanks. Benyamin-ln (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran and Kansas Bear: Hello. May you help me? Benyamin-ln (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, at this moment I am quite busy. Any research would happen on the weekend and currently my girlfriend has been taking up a lot of that time. I would post a request on HistoryofIran's talk page, he is outstanding(easily better than me) in this area. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use talk to discuss new changes per WP:BRD and all Wikipedia policies. Reverting unexplained content removal.

Per your edit warring and unexplained content removal-- please use talk to discuss new changes per WP:BRD and all Wikipedia policies. Thank you. tahc ^chat 12:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tahc: You are violating the three-revert rule. Did you hear me?! Please listen and seriously aviod from Harassment! I will not tolerate next time! This is my last warning! You should revert your last edit. Benyamin-ln (talk) 19:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They why do you keep reverting to your last edit?

Why will you not discuss your destructive and controversial edit(s)?

Why are you ignoring your own violations of Wikipedia policy?

Are you claiming harassment because I am willing to discuss your controversial edit? Maybe you could start by reading WP:Harassment and WP:Listen for yourself. tahc ^chat 20:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you won't hear me. Please leave my talk page. Benyamin-ln (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hear you? You will not even post on the talk page, and you post just a one-word explanation-- "redundant"-- in an edit summary. You are claiming that I will not listen because I cannot guess what you think "redundant" means in this situation. tahc ^chat 01:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biography note to be removed

Hello Benyamin-In,

You wrote me a note regarding an ‘Early Life’ biographical note for Admiral Kamal Habibollahi which we each keep changing. I knew this wonderful man INTIMATELY well, as I am his Son. My father was orphaned at the age of 6 and had NO memories of his own father who passed when he was an infant. The Wikipedia page should be about the Admiral. Where his father was buried is irrelevant. While my father fought for and believed in individual freedoms and liberties for all, including freedom of religion, including a respect for Islam included, he himself ONLY believed in God and a goodness in humanity, and NEVER practiced Islam in any way, shape or form. Again-no disrespect, but this was the man he was. He had a passionate love for Iranian culture, history, and tradition but individually never had an affinity for Islam. Whether his ancestors were Muslims, Zoroastrians, or whatever that is irrelevant. Noting that his father who he never consciously met might have been a Muslim buried in a Mosque ground is irrelevant and UNFAIRLY labels him as something he wasn’t. In fact he spent a lot of his time preaching and educating against RADICAL Islam, not only as a threat to the western world but also as a threat to the over 1 billion+ Good Muslims who have mostly been the victims of extreme ideology. I don’t know who you are or why you feel it is important to ruin my fathers biography with a silly side-note about his father who he never met, but I respectfully ask that you please leave it from here, thank you. Nojazer (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Benyamin-ln. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci!

Thank you very much for adding this infobox!![1] It was exactly what the page needed! - LouisAragon (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon: I began Persian translation of the subject. :) Benyamin-ln (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! - LouisAragon (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian politics general sanctions notice

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 :{{ping|LouisAragon}} I began [[:fa:بصره در اشغال ایران صفوی (۱۷۰۱–۱۶۹۷)|Persian translation]] of the subject. :) [[User:Benyamin-ln|Benyamin-ln]] ([[User talk:Benyamin-ln#top|talk]]) 19:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 ::Much appreciated! - [[User:LouisAragon|LouisAragon]] ([[User talk:LouisAragon|talk]]) 17:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
+==Iranian politics general sanctions notice==
+{{Ivm|2='''''Please read this notification carefully:''' it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia.  It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
+A [[Special:PermaLink/911594635#Proposal:_General_sanctions_on_post-1978_Iranian_politics|community discussion]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Post-1978 Iranian politics |here]].
+[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas.  This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Post-1978 Iranian politics#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  }}