User talk:Nashwalker: Difference between revisions
→January 2020: it's feb now but this is related |
|||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
Hiya. I'm leaving this here instead of making a new section because it's related to the message Doniago left you last month. While I was working through a backlog of plot summaries in film articles I've been meaning to fix up, I came across [[John Q]]. When I checked into the article history, as I always do, I realized that much of the plot bloat there came directly from your efforts over several years and that you've been reverted and warned about this multiple times since at least 2014. It's obvious you have a passion for films and that, like me, you enjoy working on the plot sections. I wanted to direct you, again, to [[WP:FILMPLOT|the plot section]] of the [[MOS:FILM|film project's style guidelines]] so you can get a better idea of when that kind of length is needed in an article and what the goal of the plot summary is within the larger scope of WIkipedia at large. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 02:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC) |
Hiya. I'm leaving this here instead of making a new section because it's related to the message Doniago left you last month. While I was working through a backlog of plot summaries in film articles I've been meaning to fix up, I came across [[John Q]]. When I checked into the article history, as I always do, I realized that much of the plot bloat there came directly from your efforts over several years and that you've been reverted and warned about this multiple times since at least 2014. It's obvious you have a passion for films and that, like me, you enjoy working on the plot sections. I wanted to direct you, again, to [[WP:FILMPLOT|the plot section]] of the [[MOS:FILM|film project's style guidelines]] so you can get a better idea of when that kind of length is needed in an article and what the goal of the plot summary is within the larger scope of WIkipedia at large. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 02:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
*Nashwalker, the time for you to respond to other editors' concerns came a long time ago: you cannot simply ignore this. I see editors signaled problems with your plot additions years ago, and they have a point. The long and short of it is that if you a. continue to edit in the same vein, bloating plot summaries, and b. refuse to learn from and communicate with other editors, you will end up being blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:13, 21 February 2020
September 2013
Hello, I'm Minna Sora no Shita. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Sofia the First episodes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! (removed copyvio tag without permission) --みんな空の下 (トーク) 05:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with List of Sofia the First episodes. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:List of Sofia the First episodes/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nash Bridges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Perry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in K.C. Undercover, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I encourage you to look at the MOS:BOLD guideline, as I reverted edits concerning your adding boldface to character names in the above article, as well as for I Didn't Do It (TV series). Guideline is clear on the appropriate uses for boldface. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Your addition to List of ChalkZone episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Episode summaries must be written from scratch in our own words. They may not be copied or even closely paraphrased from other sources. The community takes copyright violations seriously. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rush Hour (U.S. TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of State Security. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unforgettable (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Unforgettable Season 3.png
Thanks for uploading File:Unforgettable Season 3.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Twister (1996 film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 00:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 15:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Rugrats Movie plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NinjaRobotPirate (talk • contribs) 06:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Holes (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to talk page
You are invited to the talk page on WP:FILM to discuss the issues with the format of 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
January 2020
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Five Heartbeats. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hiya. I'm leaving this here instead of making a new section because it's related to the message Doniago left you last month. While I was working through a backlog of plot summaries in film articles I've been meaning to fix up, I came across John Q. When I checked into the article history, as I always do, I realized that much of the plot bloat there came directly from your efforts over several years and that you've been reverted and warned about this multiple times since at least 2014. It's obvious you have a passion for films and that, like me, you enjoy working on the plot sections. I wanted to direct you, again, to the plot section of the film project's style guidelines so you can get a better idea of when that kind of length is needed in an article and what the goal of the plot summary is within the larger scope of WIkipedia at large. Millahnna (talk) 02:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Nashwalker, the time for you to respond to other editors' concerns came a long time ago: you cannot simply ignore this. I see editors signaled problems with your plot additions years ago, and they have a point. The long and short of it is that if you a. continue to edit in the same vein, bloating plot summaries, and b. refuse to learn from and communicate with other editors, you will end up being blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)