User talk:Beyond My Ken: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[Jingle Bells]] == |
|||
__notoc__ |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
| align = center |
|||
| direction = horizontal |
|||
| image1 = Edelfelt Läsande kvinna.jpg |
|||
| width1 = 200 |
|||
| caption1 = <center>''It is '''[[WP:READER|The Reader]]''' that we should consider on '''[[User:Beyond_My_Ken/thoughts|each and every edit]]''' we make to Wikipedia.''</center> |
|||
| image2 = A no money handshake nocolor.png |
|||
| width2 = 153 |
|||
| caption2 = <center>'''No paid editing'''</center> |
|||
| image3 = MOS is.jpg |
|||
| width3 = 186 |
|||
| caption3 = <center>MOS is <u>not</u> mandatory<br>(see '''[[User:Ritchie333/MOS for Dummies]]''')</center> |
|||
| image4 = Let Shit Go.jpg |
|||
| width4 = 186 |
|||
| caption4 = <center>('''Life is too short!)'''</center> |
|||
| image5 = Camel (PSF)-transparent.png |
|||
| width5 = 158 |
|||
| caption5 = <center><big>'''{{nb5}}A HORSE'''</big><br>{{nb5}}(crowd-sourced)</center> |
|||
| image6 = Do The Right Thing graffiti Amsterdam crop.jpg |
|||
| width6 = 126 |
|||
| caption6 = <center>[[WP:IAR|Always do what's best for the encyclopedia]]</center> |
|||
}} |
|||
Greetings, BMK! Sorry to read above that your Christmas didn't go so well. Considering that, this might be an annoying question... but can you help guide the Jingle Bells article towards GA status? If that is not possible, I will have to just go ahead with the nomination and rely fully on the reviewer's help, which might be an inconvenience given our mutual unfamiliarity with the topic. You have 242 edits to the page, making any participation from you highly valuable.-- ''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 20:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="position: fixed; right:0; bottom:0; display:block; height:{{{1|150}}}px; width:{{{1|150}}}px;"><div style="position: relative; width: {{{1|150}}}px; height: {{{1|150}}}px; overflow: lolz"><div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; font-size: 300px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 300px; z-index: 3">[[WP:Ignore all rules|...]]</div> |
|||
:{{ping|MaranoFan}} Thanks for contacting me. Yes, I've contributed a fair amount to that article over the years, but I cannot hold myself out as any kind of expert on the subject. Considering that, and the fact that my level of participation on Wikipedia is very low right now -- almost random, in fact -- due to a variety of family crises, means that I'm going to have to turn down your invitation to participate in bringing the article to GA status. I do, however, wish you the best of luck with it, and I look forward to seeing the result of your efforts. Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; z-index: 2">[[File:Undertow seal.png|150px]]</div></div></div> |
|||
== yt-dlp == |
|||
{{tocright}} |
|||
Check out [https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp yt-dlp] [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 13:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Articles that need serious visual work == |
|||
*?? [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*[[Degenerate art]] |
|||
::I read your userpage and it mentioned youtube-dl. I would recommend using yt-dlp instead. [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 11:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*[[Lock Haven, Pennsylvania]] |
|||
::*Thanks. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*[[German mediatization]] |
|||
*[[Footlight Parade]] (not really shitty, but needs cleanup) |
|||
*[[Black Sea]] - a mess |
|||
== |
== Horseshoe Theory == |
||
*[[Flapper]] - review for writing, order |
|||
*[[A Matter of Life and Death]] |
|||
*[[Yiddish Theatre District]] |
|||
*[[This Is Not A Theatre Company]] |
|||
*[[Hollywood blacklist]] - re: ''The Front'' |
|||
*[[Seven Summits]] - badly organized |
|||
*[[The Leatherman]] - copyedit |
|||
*[[Singin' in the Rain]] - add from Comden & Green intro to script when it's unburied |
|||
*[[Irvington Historic District (Irvington, New York)]] - further research and expand into sep article, if possible |
|||
*[[Train graveyard]] - lots of material out there to expand this |
|||
Hi, I edited "Horseshoe theory" just before you. The odd spacing in ''" Voilà, comme les extrêmes se rencontrent ! "'' is actually the original 19th-century typesetting, which I imitated. Is there a Wikipedia rule that typesetting has to be normalized to 21st-century standards? |
|||
==Preventing unwanted emails== |
|||
BMK, |
|||
I'm not intending to revert it or anything, just curious. [[User:ScarletPlanet|ScarletPlanet]] ([[User talk:ScarletPlanet|talk]]) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I thought you might be interested in [[Wikipedia:Emailing_users#Prohibiting email from specified users]]. Your choice, of course, but it makes for an easier dispute resolution than going to arbcom, I believe. |
|||
:I wouldn't say that there is a rule, per se, but our primary concern should be communicating with our readers, and using contemporary formatting makes things easier for them. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The relevant policy is [[MOS:CONFORM]]. See also [[MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE]]. [[User:Cagliost|cagliost]] ([[User talk:Cagliost|talk]]) 21:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:Cite gotham]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[:Template:Cite gotham]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 February 29#Template:Cite gotham|'''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''']].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 09:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== CfD nomination at {{Section link|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Category:Indoor ice hockey venues}} == |
|||
Best, |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/79.43.23.144|79.43.23.144]] ([[User talk:79.43.23.144|talk]]) 16:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you, that facility has already been brought to my attention, and I've made use of it. Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 16:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Category:Indoor ice hockey venues}}''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notify--> Thank you. –[[User:Aidan721|Aidan721]] ([[User talk:Aidan721|talk]]) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 4== |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:John Fryer in disguise as 'Dr. H. Anonymous'.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:John Fryer in disguise as 'Dr. H. Anonymous'.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages. |
|||
:[[Trailer trash]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Trailer_trash check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Trailer_trash?client=notify fix with Dab solver]) |
|||
::added links pointing to [[White collar]] and [[Agnes Meyer]] |
|||
:[[White trash]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/White_trash check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/White_trash?client=notify fix with Dab solver]) |
|||
::added links pointing to [[White collar]] and [[Agnes Meyer]] |
|||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 == |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{done}} by other editors. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 18:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
== Re: [[WP:DWIP]] == |
|||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per [[H:DL]], causes errors for screen readers --> |
|||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; |
|||
I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=834424437 this] and got curious. [[WP:DWIP]] is currently in use 48 times. [[WP:POINT]] is in use 26409 times (550 times more frequently). I fail to see the point of DWIP anyway. It's not an appropriate acronym; that would be WP:DNDWTIAP, or WP:DDWIP maybe, but who would even use those? Obviously WP:POINT is the one with traction. Maybe we should delete WP:DWIP as confusing at first pass? I had to look it up, as did you. We can save others the effort. What do you think? --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 17:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:I would agree with that. POINT is so clearly evocative of the rule, while DWIP is completely meaningless. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 18:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, |
|||
:* Ok, I'm going to visit all the uses of DWIP and switch them to POINT, then put DWIP up for deletion. Sound good? --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 18:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="float: right; |
|||
::*Works for me! [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 18:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" |
|||
:::* Moving ahead. In support of that, I changed the current reference on AN/I and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&type=revision&diff=834430815&oldid=834429039 removed your comment] as it's doubly confusing now if left on there :) --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 18:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC) <small>(doubling -> doubly. I swear I cannot type today.)</small> |
|||
::::*No problem. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 18:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Obviously pointless? [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 17:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== We're watching the same movie == |
|||
*wave* [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 04:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Hey, how's the view from over there? [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well, woulda been better without the [[Gewehr 43]] in the way. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 06:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Majority supports it == |
|||
I count two people in favor, one (you) against. So majority supports this. Feel free to remove it when there is no majority support. Also, be mindful of [[WP:3RR]]. You have tried to remove another tag from that article, and you may be be approaching your revert limit there. I suggest you take a cup of [[WP:TEA]]. If there is no majority support for said tags, we will remove them in few days. (But for now majority seems to support both adding more refs and rewriting things into prose). --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 03:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Nope, not the way things work. I've started an RfC, Express your views there, not by tagging the section. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::You have violated [[WP:3RR]] at HD page. Please self-revert yourself, otherwise I'll have to take it to the relevant forum. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 04:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Count again, different content. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::An experienced editor like yourself should know that doesn't matter. It's a page rule, not content rule. I am filling in a report. Next time, please self-revert when someone asks you to do so, politely. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 08:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Have at it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 08:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== April 2018 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Holocaust denial]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 09:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
|||
{{tlx|unblock|reason=I don't usually request an unblock, just sit out the enforced vacation, but I think this time I will. I have no new information to provide, I simply would like a second admin to review the WP:EWN report to see if they agree with the block. I believe my explanation there was sufficient for a block not to have been placed, especially since I took steps in both disputes to resolve the conflicts. Also, MSGJ's remark that I didn't address my own behavior is not accurate, I was quite specific about what I had done and why. Thanks. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 09:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)}} |
|||
Do you deny that you violated [[WP:3RR]]? Or do you claim any of the exceptions to that bright line rule? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 09:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:We both know, I think, that it's not always considered a "bright line rule" I'm sure we've both seen many disputes at AN/I where editors are at a very high number of reverts, but don't get blocked because of extenuating circumstance '''''other''''' than policy-based exceptions. I explained my behavior, what lead up to it, and why I stopped when I did -- because I had taken action to resolve the disputes. That, it seems to me, is much more important to a consensus-based project than rote enforcement of a "bright line rule" without considering the circumstances surrounding it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 09:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Anyway it 5:30am here on the East Coast of the US, and I have to go to sleep - so if I don't respond to any further questions, it's not out of impoliteness, I'm just not awake. I'll respond after I get up. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 09:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::BMK, why humiliate yourself? Wear it with pride! [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 11:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I agree that 3RR was violated, it doesn't have to be the same revert on an article, any 3 reverts in 24 hours breaches the rule. However, 72 hours seems very unnecessary - {{yo|MSGJ}} would you consider reducing the length to 24 hours (particularly given that the reporter also agrees 72 hours is overly harsh ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=835877698])? Cheers, <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em">[[User:Fish and karate|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish</u>]]+[[User_talk:Fish and karate|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate</u>]]</u> 12:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I personally would have left it with a warning or full protected (despite BMK's block log), because by starting the RfC on the talk page, he was clearly trying to engage in the consensus building process. I'd suggest reducing this to time served. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 13:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|MSGJ}} Endorse unblock per TonyBallioni and Fish and karate. --[[User:Dlohcierekim|<b style="color:black">Dloh<span style="color:red">cier</span><span style="color:gold">ekim</span></b>]] ([[User talk:Dlohcierekim|talk]]) 15:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*MSGJ hasn't edited for six hours, so in consideration of the views posted above, I think we won't wait for him. I've unblocked. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 15:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC). |
|||
*Thank you {{u|Bishonen}}, and thanks as well to {{u|Fish and Karate}}, {{u|TonyBallioni}} and {{u|Dlohcierekim}}. Also, in regard to {{u|Piotrus}}' comment on the EWN report, I will indeed attempt to be more circumspect about the use of undo. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*I don't understand how admins, and MSGJ in particular, choose who to block at the 3RR board. I've seen MSGJ block editors for breaking the bright line, I've seen them block for 2 reverts over a couple days, and I've seen them ignore bright line violations for various reasons. For an editor as experience as you, a block certainly isn't needed. At least it's over now. [[User:Mr Ernie|Mr Ernie]] ([[User talk:Mr Ernie|talk]]) 19:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:*I think there is a structural problem with the definition of a "revert" when considered in regard to the purpose of [[WP:EW]] to stop edit wars. I have some thoughts on that, but I think I'll allow a little distance from this episode before I write them up, so I can approach the subject with more objectivity.{{parabr}}Anyway, thanks for the comment, it's appreciated. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 20:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 11== |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[The Kennel Murder Case (film)]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Warren Williams]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Kennel_Murder_Case_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Kennel_Murder_Case_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{done}} - Typo, it was [[Warren William]] [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Not sure where it went sideways == |
|||
I'm not sure where the whole exchange at ANI went sideways, but I want to apologize for my part in it. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 17:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Niteshift36}} That's very decent of you, and I appreciate your graciousness. I accept your apology, and in return offer my own for anything intemperate I said in the course of that discussion. Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::*It's all good. I believe we're both here with the goal of improving the project. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 19:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::*Amen to that. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== KKK not "far-right"? Maybe so == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ku_Klux_Klan&curid=16780&diff=835961241&oldid=835960806]The issue raised on the Talking Page of KKK is an issue of definition of terms being used in regards to '[[Far-right politics|Far-right]]' vs. '[[Alt-right]]' in the USA. Many people see and embrace a very conservative form of politics and consider groups like the [[Tea Party movement]] to be 'far-right' but would shy away from calling them 'alt-right'. The problem is that in the USA, the term 'far-right' generally has more of a political overtone where as the 'alt-right' has more of a street protest connotation. Yes, the terms and even the movements are mixed up and overlap without clear lines, but the editor might have had a point to consider at the end of the day. [[User:C. W. Gilmore|C. W. Gilmore]] ([[User talk:C. W. Gilmore|talk]]) 20:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Maybe - if you think my deletion on NOTAFORUM grounds was inappropriate, please feel free to undo it - I'm just fed up with obvious right-wing trolls complaining about Nazis and Fascists being on the left and not being on the right, so perhaps I overreacted.{{parabr}}As for the Klan, they're obviously on the right, and at the extreme end of the spectrum, but I would hesitate to classify them as "alt-right" because of their long history - to me, they're just too old school to be alt-right. So what else do you call a terroristic organization that's anti-black, anti-immigrant, anti-semitic, anti-Catholic (at least historically), highly nationalistic, and so on? It would be an insult to those in the mainstream right to call them "conservative", so "far-right" seems pretty appropriate. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Identifying the KKK as alt-right seems kinda like identifying [[Louis XIV of France]] as a fascist dictator. We'd call him that now, but that doesn't make it retroactively correct. [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 23:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ken, I only bring it up because I have run into this on other articles with other 'conservative' editors taking offense. It seems this will continue, that was my only point, sigh. [[User:C. W. Gilmore|C. W. Gilmore]] ([[User talk:C. W. Gilmore|talk]]) 01:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'm certain you're right about that. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*The white-bread, white-sheet KKKers of the past would be aghast at being identified with the namby-pamby, tofu-eating, knit polo shirt{{ndash}}wearing alt-righters of today. There's just no respect for tradition. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 04:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::That's a very solid argument for identifying the KKK as alt-right. [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 12:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::We do have other terms available that are less political than '[[Far-right politics|Far-right]]' if you do not wish to use '[[Alt-right]]'; 'extremist', 'radical', just to name a few alternatives that are less upsetting to the political far-right conservatives in America. Merely a consideration that could reduce conflicts but maintain the integrity of the articles on these 'groups'. [[User:C. W. Gilmore|C. W. Gilmore]] ([[User talk:C. W. Gilmore|talk]]) 13:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'm really not undestanding your concerns, the "extreme right" or "radical right" '''''is''''' the far-right. In any case, we report what reliable sourcs call these groups, and we don;t whitewash it for fear of upsetting someone. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 15:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::But there are very fine people on both sides, of course. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 15:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::"Far-right" in the USA is considered much more political than any of those other terms by many; so they would classify groups like the 'Moral Majority' and 'Tea Party' within that wing of politics. Please glace through the '[[Far-right politics|Far-right]]' and '[[Alt-right]]' articles, I'm only trying to say the continued use of the term for hate-groups will continue to bring out "good people" to challenge the use of the term 'far-right'. They do not seem to take issue with any of the other terms, only with using 'far-right' in non-political ways. Please keep this in mind when dealing with these "good people", thanks - [[User:C. W. Gilmore|C. W. Gilmore]] ([[User talk:C. W. Gilmore|talk]]) 22:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I'm sorry, but I just don't see it. "Extreme right", "radical right", and "far-right" are to me equivalent terms. If someone wants to set up a hierarchy of extremeness, let them provide citations from neutral reliable sources to do so. Until then, frankly, I am not going to worry about it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I also disagree that "'Far-right' in the USA is considered much more political than any of those other terms by many". I want to see citations and identification of who these "many" are, 'cause I'm not buying it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}} I respect your point of view and was only trying to point out the way others see things so it might help reduce conflict on the articles for hate-groups. Best of luck. - [[User:C. W. Gilmore|C. W. Gilmore]] ([[User talk:C. W. Gilmore|talk]]) 23:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== April 2018 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] }}} Please do not reference nostalgic WWI songs at ANI. Consider that some users will then have it stuck in their heads for the entire rest of the day. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 21:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::OMG, I know what that's like -- I'm so, so, sorry. Try humming one of [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/06/spice-girls-wannabe-catchiest-song_n_6112266.html these songs] to drive it out. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Could be worse I guess, like the time I had to listen to the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6oto9nzYc4 101st Airborne song] on repeat for most of a 5 hours drive, because I was expected to be able to sing it for a ceremony...because generals like singing in large groups for some reason. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 21:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Five hours, huh? Do the generals not mind if the singers are stark raving mad? [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::It's preferred by some. I did the same thing with the [[NCO Creed]], and I'm still not sure if I'm tactically and technically proficient, or technically or tactically proficient. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 21:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Reference order (thanks!) == |
|||
Thank you very much for bringing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alt-lite&oldid=prev&diff=836146554 this] to my attention. I considered this a minor change for the longest time – clearly, I have not given it enough thought, and I'm glad to be reminded that I still have a lot to learn about this site. In the future, I will definitely seek consensus before making a similar change, and I suspect I'll have to revisit a good number of my old edits after this. As for this particular edit, I think I'll put off a discussion until I have the time to read through the previous discussions about reference order and reevaluate the sources in the article (although from what I've read so far, I'm not sure I will ever start a discussion, since I suspect I'll agree with your judgement in any case). Thanks again, and I hope you have a good rest of your week! Best, [[User:Me, Myself, and I are Here|Me, Myself & I (☮)]] ([[User talk:Me, Myself, and I are Here#top|talk]]) 04:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for your consideration of my comment, and for the very agreeable message. Best to you as well. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Holocaust denial]] == |
|||
I saw you made an intervening edit while I was cleaning up some broken refs - it was a minor edit, but I am working with a 1RR restriction (it may have been lifted but I would have to check) - anyway, if you don't have any objections ok I am going to keep editing the article...I'm not sure it counts as multiple reverts anyway as long as it could have been one continuous edit, but I don't feel like having an argument about that with a sanctioning admin [[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Helvetica; color:#503753; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]])</sup> 01:11, 15 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Seraphim System}} You know I'm not an admin, right?{{parabr}}My understanding is that edits made continuously, or in close proximity, are considered to be one edit. I wasn't aware that you were doing a bunch of edits, and I'm sure that you weren't aware of my edit as you were working, so I would think that reasonable admins would conclude that your edits, even though technically interrupted by mine, are, for the purpose of counting reverts, all one edit. {{parabr}}But, as I said, that's just my opinion, I'm not an admin, and I myself have gotten into trouble recently by improperly counting reverts, so if you have doubts in regard to your 1RR restriction, I'd check with the admin who placed the sanction on you. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Seraphim System}} Hasn't your 1RR restriction run out? If it's the one listed at [[WP:Editing restrictions]], it was placed on 26 January and was to run for 1-2 months. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::<small>''Shhhhhh!'' [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 02:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== [[Savoy Theater (New York)]] == |
|||
I can't believe we don't have an article on this - I must just be looking in the wrong place. The context to this is a [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] concert filmed there in 1981, where the ''[[New York Times]]'' said "the group's rare club appearance Saturday at the Savoy had the aura of a major rock event".<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/1981/11/30/arts/rock-genesis-at-the-savoy.html</ref> So, where's the article? I don't believe a major gig would have taken place at a venue we don't cover. I seem to recall you've done a lot of NY articles, so maybe you'll know (or know somebody else who does)? [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 20:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
:*Try [[Savoy Ballroom]]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::*I tried that, but that was demolished over 20 years' earlier, so it can't be there. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 22:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::*You're right. The ''Times'' article says it was a "club appearance", so I don't think it was a theatre. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::*OK, here's a short thing from ''Playbill'' [http://www.playbill.com/venue/savoy-nightclub-vault-0000000199]. It was a short-lived rock nightclub venue in the now-landmarked [[Hudson Theatre]] on West 44th Street. The club is mentioned in our article. I'll make a redirect. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::*[[Savoy (nightclub)]] now redirects to [[Hudson Theatre]]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Cheers! [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 22:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Holocaust denial == |
|||
Regarding this statement {{Tq|Personally, considering the opinions you expressed above}} - can you please specify what opinions you are talking about using quotes, or stop saying vague things like this? [[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Helvetica; color:#503753; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]])</sup> 23:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:The opinions in the section the remark took place in, regarding OR, BLP and official capacity, which were all incorrect or inaccurate. I'll revise the statement to make that clear, if you'd like. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::You seem to be a fairly experienced editor, but I think it would be better if you focus on the content on the edit and try to avoid making belittling comments about other experienced editors, even if you disagree with them. A certain level of precision and accuracy is especially important for a GA article...[[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Helvetica; color:#503753; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]])</sup> 00:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Oh, I "'''''seem to be''''' a fairly experienced editor", do i? Talk about damning with faint praise.{{parabr}}BTW, I'm not interested in GAs, I'm interested in good articles. The two are not necessarily the same thing, and the latter is much more important than the former. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Well take for example the dead links in the article - this is not a GA criteria. Articles with dead links and inconsistent citations may still meet the criteria, but is it good? My opinion is no. And there are a lot of long quotes - many of them are not necessary. They could be paraphrased in fewer words without removing any essential information (conciseness) — for example the Niewyk quote could be paraphrased as <blockquote>"According to Douglas Niewyk, denial may be distinguished from legitimate historical revisionism which seeks to improve "aspects of the story for which evidence is incongruous or absent". Niewyk gives several examples of such aspects including "Hitler's role in the event, Jewish responses to persecution, and reactions by onlookers both inside and outside Nazi-controlled Europe".</blockquote> Breaking up a long quote this way preserves all the essential information of the quote, but also improves readability. Unfortunately, the editing atmosphere on the article is so hostile that even minor good faith attempts to improve the prose quality of the article are turning into content disputes, assuming bad faith about editors motives for editing the article, personalizing disputes, etc. [[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Helvetica; color:#503753; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]])</sup> 01:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I'm not interested in discussing the article with you here, that's what the article talk page is for. You know, maybe with a little more experience I'd be comfortable doing that, but not now. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. Please see my comments there. I was hoping we could resolve this on the talk page, but you violated [[WP:3RR]]. - [[User:Psantora|Paul]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Psantora|T]]<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]</span></sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Psantora|C]]</sub></small> 17:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== ANI comment == |
|||
You wrote "That might be a valid argument for 'off-brand' publishers, but no one's going to evaluate the reliability of the Yale University Press or Random House by consulting our articles on those publishers, nor should they have to." |
|||
I take your point and certainly you and I are completely familiar with such publishers. But I write with the interests of English language readers worldwide, which includes young readers in South Africa, India, Jamaica, Japan and China. And so on. I concede that only a tiny percentage of readers will click those links, but anyone who does will learn a little bit about a major publishing house, which I consider a good thing. Not a big deal, but I am posting my thoughts here, since the issue is a distraction from the main point at ANI. Take care. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 02:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, I concede you have a point there. As I said a bit up in the discussion, linking them was my first impulse, but then I looked around and no one else was doing it, so I stopped. I guess it's really not that big a deal, and I was mostly annoyed at the context in which it was occured. Let me try to separate out the two things in my mind and have a think on it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Could you please stop? == |
|||
You continuing to champion a pest who stalks my edits is pretty goddamn annoying, and so I thought I'd come here and ask you to stop it. If you look at the section i created, it was to cut down on the rancor, editpwarrign and nonsense that Legacypac ''thrives'' on. And you give him a stage right in the middle of it. What the heck is wrong with you, man? - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 18:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Jack you continue to make baseless stalking accusations. In light of the advice you received here [[User_talk:Legacypac#Please_remember_AGF]] from [[User:Premeditated Chaos]] you really need to stop these posts. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 18:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Get lost, creep. There is no other way you would know I posted here unless you are following my edits. Ergo, you're being a creepy stalker. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 22:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Jack Sebastian: Your evaluation of my comments is, I think, biased by your position in the discussion. I have said nothing there that's surprising or unusual, and the point of it was simply to stop you from trying to prevent an editor from commenting on an AN/I report. I know nothing about your history with Legacypac, and, frankly, don't care, as it's irrelevant to the question of whether he should be allowed to participate. You seem to want to simply shut him down, but I suggest you stop making a big deal about it -- both here and there -- and allow things to proceed as they will. If your complaint has merit, I'm sure it will be upheld, regardless of what Legacypac has to say.{{parabr}}As for my participation -- again, if you simply dropped the matter, I would have nothing to comment about, as the underlying issue is of no interest to me. However, I will not stop commenting simply because it annoys you, '''''if''''' I have something pertinent to say. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Consider that Legacypac knew enough to follow my edits here. And to AN/I. And to every other article I work on. Aren't we supposed to discourage [[WP:HARASS|wiki-stalking]]? I am not asking you stop commenting; I am asking you to consider the larger issue here: that creepy guy keeps stalking my articles because he's got hurt feelings. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 22:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Have you considered the possibility that BMK's talkpage was on Legacypac's watchlist? Did you? It may (or may not) surprise you to know that I currently have 8,607 pages on my watchlist, including this one. Responding to an edit that I see on watchlist wouldn't make me a "creepy guy" right? And they're not "your" articles. Remember? [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Fair enough, but out of those 8,607 pages, do you go out of your way to post commentary slamming someone who you didn't like? I think that's unlikely. I hve a fairly large watchlist as well. There are people who are also on some of the pages who I'd prefer to throw down a well, so I don't interact with them. Wikipedia is supposed to be fun; why purposely turn it into a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]]? Legacypac has plenty of reason to be upset at me; he got himself punked at AN/I when he made up a litany of complaints about how I'm the Debbil Hisself (or whatever). That he has specifically shown up at pages where I am at and starts bitching about me, essentially seeking to poison the well. Surely you can see that, right? - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 23:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::I post whatever I like wherever I fancy, there are no rules in my mind. Wikipedia is not supposed to be fun, it's supposed to be an encyclopedia which we're all building for the greater good. I would just ignore (like I do, every single day) and move on to improving Wikipedia. I would also close your ANI thread as it's not really being helpful any longer. Deal with content and such issues at the article talk page, like the rest of us. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::"Wikipedia is not supposed to be fun" - wow, that's just sad, man. Building for the greater good, finding a collaborative middle ground is fun as fuck to me, almost as much as learning something new every time I am here. That you derive no pleasure from that is a pretty grim way to go through editing. |
|||
:::::::And I agree that the AN/I isn't necessary any more; the concealment of entry deletion during the formatting has been brought to light, and the table will have to be reset and repopulated the right way. That's best for the encyclopedia, since that sort of sinister nonsense shouldn't be allowed to happen. As at least three of the table creators were not inclined to even respond to requests to re-add the missing entries, AN/I was my only avenue. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 23:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::You misinterpret me. I didn't say I didn't enjoy it. I said it wasn't "supposed to be fun". Your over-interpretation is both unnecessary and wrong. I think my near-13 years here would testify to the fact that I enjoy it, I just don't ''expect'' to enjoy it. It's a knowledge-building exercise. Close your ANI thread, stop trampling around accusing people of bad faith, and perhaps you'll enjoy it more. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Sorry if I misinterpreted your comments; I don't know you, and was operating off what you stated here. As for withdrawing the AN/I complaint, it was offered in good faith about people who seem to have acted in bad faith - the number of deletions suggested that removing entries while re-formatting was indeed sone more than a half-dozen times. As far as I know, no one offered any explanation for the deletions, or edit summaries to back them up. At best, that's sloppy. At worst, it was intended to dispense with the extra work that might come from having to argue for their removal. So, the complaint has some validity. The only people who keep the complaint running are those who somehow think I'm the bad guy for expecting them to fix their mistake. |
|||
:::::::::Look, I am trying to get the article fixed, despite getting attacked by people who arent interested in doing actual work, but have spent bandwidth on painting me as the bad guy. Ask yourself how many of them actually contributed to the article. Go ahead and check; I'll wait. Then weigh how much work I've put into it. |
|||
:::::::::I came here to prevail upon Ken to see the larger picture of a wiki-stalker. He doesn't seem to care, so I'm not going to use up any more of his talk space. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 06:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::If you have evidence of Legacypac violating [[WP:HARASSMENT]], then present it at AN/I in a new report. If not, stop [[WP:Casting aspersions]]. That's the bottom line. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 13:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Unsurprisingly ANi and BMK's talk are both on my 26,000 page watchlist. Again [[User:Jack Sebastian]] has accused me of stalking him - with zero proof. [http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=Jack+Sebastian&users=Legacypac&users=&startdate=20180101&enddate=20180419&ns=&server=enwiki] That is a serious allegation. This is straight up harrassment and slander. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 05:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, I am unconvinced by your arguments, as were others when you offered them at AN/I before. |
|||
:So, slander, eh? Are you suggesting that you wish to pursue legal action? - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 06:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Both of you need to drop it now.—[[User:Cyberpower678|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">CYBERPOWER</span>''']] <span style="font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:Cyberpower678|<span style="color:olive">Chat</span>]])</span> 16:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Jack, there are 477 editors watching this talk page. BMK, I guess that's a tribute of some sort! Happy editing@ [[User:JaconaFrere|Jacona]] ([[User talk:JaconaFrere|talk]]) 18:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::They all love me for my money. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::For having more watchers on your page than mine, you will need to pay a daily fee of $10 until this condition is no longer true. Please wire a daily payment of $10, or reduce your number to less than 464. ;p—[[User:Cyberpower678|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">CYBERPOWER</span>''']] <span style="font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:Cyberpower678|<span style="color:\#FF8C00">Around</span>]])</span> 01:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Fuligo_septica_bl1.JPG#mw-jump-to-license|thumb|A goo deal indeed{{right|-[[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]]}}]] |
|||
::::::OK, if I've done the math right, paying 14 people ummmmm... $5 each to unwatch my page would cost the same as a week of paying you your fee. OK, step on up folks, who wants 5 bucks to get me off of your watchlist and out of your life? Seems like a goo deal to me. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Some bubble tea for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Bubble Tea.png|65px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Energizing chewy goodness for you to keep hope alive. [[User:Kethertomalkuth|Kethertomalkuth]] ([[User talk:Kethertomalkuth|talk]]) 00:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
[[File:NPP unreviewed article statistics as of April 2, 2024.svg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue January to March 2024]] |
|||
::{{ping|Kethertomalkuth}} Hey, just noticed that I never thanked you for this, so... Thanks! [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 16:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
'''Backlog update:''' The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to {{no ping|Schminnte}}, who led with over 2,300 points. |
|||
== Whitespace == |
|||
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive. |
|||
{{Moved discussion from|[[Special:Permalink/837163325#User:Beyond_My_Ken_reported_by_User:Psantora_(Result:_)|this edit warring noticeboard discussion]].}} |
|||
I have no comment about this user, other than that their revert of whitespace removal from the top of an article made no sense at all. [[User:TheDragonFire|TheDragonFire]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire|talk]]) 02:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, that's hardly relevant here, but I'll repeat the explanation I gave before: when one goes to edit the article, and the top of the text of the lede comes directly after the last line of the "pre-article" stuff (Engvar and date format notices, coordinates, infobox, images, etc.), it's frequently difficult to see where the "stuff" ends and the lede begins, so a blank line helps to make the change easier to see in order to edit. The single blank line '''''is not rendered on the page, so having it makes absolutely no difference to what the reader sees.''''' Thus, the advantage to the editor comes at absolutely no cost to the reader, so it's not really "whitespace" at all, since no one ever sees it on the rendered page. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 03:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I was simply responding to Paul's ping to clarify that I have minimal involvement with you. I understand your explanation with regard to your whitespace changes, but I have to disagree. I made [[Special:Diff/836869680|this edit]] exactly because there was a ''rendered'' gap at the top of the page (compare [[Special:Permalink/836573981|this]] and [[Special:Permalink/836869680|this]]). Please be assured that I have better things to do than argue over un-rendered whitespace. :P [[User:TheDragonFire|TheDragonFire]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire|talk]]) 07:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yes, it appears in the case of the top of [[Untermensch]] case you are correct. I suspect the difference is because there's no infobox or images. I'll revert. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 13:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Next backlog drive|May backlog drive planning discussion]]. |
|||
==New section== |
|||
Please stop [[WP:HOUND]]ing my edits. You have never edited [[World Jewish Congress lawsuit against Swiss banks]] and there is nothing controversial about moving it to the proper name of the case ''In re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation'' — I have also now stopped editing two articles to end this dispute but you are now stalking to me an article you have never even edited and reverting what should be a completely non-controversial move. Stop.[[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Helvetica; color:#503753; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]])</sup> 03:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:My god, you are... Let me make this as plain and clear as I can, so you will be able to follow it. ''[[The Holocaust Industry]]'' is on my watchlist. You made edits to that article, which I did not agree with and reverted. You then started a discussion on the talk page, During that discussion you mentioned [[In re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation]], and what bad condition it was in, so I went over there to take a look. When I did, I noticed that the title of the article did not match the bolded information in the first line of the lede, so I looked at the history to see if the article had been moved (the usual reason for such a mismatch), and saw that you had moved it from [[World Jewish Congress lawsuit against Swiss banks]] unilaterally, without discussion or consensus. Since I thought the new title was not as good as the old one, I reverted the move, and posted a comment on the talk page noting that a discussion was necessary for disputed moves -- but you just sent it back to where you had sent it before, still without discussion or consensus, a violation of the rules about moving articles.{{parabr}}So, you see, I am not "hounding" your edits. There is a significant amount of overlap in the subjects we appear to be interested in, so you're just going to have to get used to your editing being looked at by myself -- and other editors -- to see if they are appropriate. That is something you should have expected after your virulent derogation of Yad Vashem as a reliable source on [[Talk:Holocaust denial#Use of primary sources in this article]], and now your attempt to remove any criticism of the book ''[[The Holocaust Industry]]'' from the article about it. Frankly, your POV seems to be leaking our around the edges of your edits.{{parabr}}Now, as a final matter, please don't post on my talk page again. I find you exceedingly tiresome and a waste of my precious time. Anything further you post here will be deleted. If you post here again after this request, any further posts after that will be rolled back, unread.{{parabr}}I hope that's clear. Do not respond. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated! |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 22== |
|||
'''2023 Awards''' |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Alt-right]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Richard Spencer]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alt-right check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alt-right?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). |
|||
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|74px|left]] |
|||
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Hey man im josh}} led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]] and the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards#NPP Hall of Fame|Hall of Fame]]. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing! |
|||
'''WMF work on PageTriage:''' The [[:mw:Moderator Tools|WMF Moderator Tools team]] and volunteer software developers [[gerrit:c/mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage/+/966286|deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October]], and then [[gerrit:c/mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage/+/967661|gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November]]. This concludes most major work to [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/2023 Moderator Tools project#October 20, 2023: Final update!|wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October]]. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits. |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{done}} [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
'''Recruitment:''' A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited. |
|||
== Merge discussion? == |
|||
I see that you have put merge templates on [[Nazism and race]] and [[Racial policy of Nazi Germany]]. Do you plan to start a merge discussion? |
|||
'''Reviewing tip:''' Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated [https://nppbrowser.toolforge.org/ NPP Browser] tool. |
|||
I clicked on the ''discuss'' link but it merely led to the talk page, which did not seem to have a merge discussion.--<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 05:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, I've started one. You must have gotten there before I did so. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks.--<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 05:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
== Notifying == |
|||
'''Reminders:''' |
|||
* You can access live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Pages Patrol Discord]. |
|||
* Consider adding [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist. |
|||
* To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]]. |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Anythingyouwant]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]] may be of use. |
|||
</div> |
|||
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1216676254 --> |
|||
== New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive == |
|||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice -->[[User:Anythingyouwant| Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 23:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Fuck off. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" |
|||
== Catherine Wheel == |
|||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''[[Wikipedia:New Page Patrol|New Page Patrol]] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span> |
|||
|rowspan=3|[[File:NPP Barnstar.png|right|80px]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
* On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. |
|||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. |
|||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. |
|||
* Each review will earn 1 point. |
|||
* Interested in taking part? '''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2024/Participants|Sign up here]]'''. |
|||
|- |
|||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] |
|||
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 --> |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Small Back Room dvd.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Small Back Room dvd.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 02:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Your move of [[Catherine Wheel]] to [[Catherine Wheel (band)]] without leaving a redirect (summarized as "''Not primary target''") has left [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Catherine Wheel|almost 100 redlinks in article space]]. Can you please either revert that move (almost every link to that title seems to be looking for the band) or clean up the title's WhatLinksHere? - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] ([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]]) 09:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
: Since you have apparently not worked to fix [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Catherine Wheel]] in the past week, I have undone your page move (by moving the page back, leaving a redirect at the "Catherine Wheel (band)" title). Like I said, almost every existing link (in article space) to "Catherine Wheel" intends the band to be the target, so the "primary target" is (''de facto'', if not ''de jure'') the band. Feel free to change that by fixing WhatLinksHere if you want to move the page again. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] ([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]]) 08:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:: If you had bothered to read this page, you would have seen that I was busy in real life and didn;t have the time to deal with your problem. Since a band that's been defunct since 2000 is still not the primary target for the phrase "Catherine Wheel", I have moved it back to [[Catherine Wheel (band)]], but this time with a re-direct. When I have sufficient time, I will fix the links to it to eliminate the need for the redirect, but for now it can stand. Please do not move it back. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Has nothing to do with "reading" anything. You left a bunch of redlinks in article space. (Hence, '''your''' problem.) Just try not to do that in the future. As far as I'm concerned, leaving the links going through the redirect is fine. If other folks want to retarget them all, that's fine, too. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] ([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]]) 06:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: Yeah, thanks, your advice is invaluable. You ever think about ptiching in and doing some of the fixes yourself? No, I'm sure you didn't, easier to bitch to the editor who fixed a problem. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 09:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: It wouldn't make much sense for me to fix almost 100 redlinks when I didn't agree that your change was necessary in the first place. Editors should take responsbility for any problems their own edits cause and should not rely on other users to clean up their messes (unless, of course, they want to ask for help with that). Face it: you screwed up. Don't try to pretend I did something wrong. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] ([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]]) 21:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::: (1) I am not asking you to do anything. (2) Since {{ping|Black Kite}}, an experienced long-time editor and admin with, as far as I know, no kink about the band, agrees that the band is not the primary target, I'd say your opinion is noted, but does not represent consensus, and the changing of the redirects will continue. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::: (1) "''You ever think about ptiching in and doing some of the fixes yourself?''" certainly sounds to me like you're implying I should have done something. (2) This comment is completely irrelevant; I already said if other users wanted to "fix" the redirects, that was fine by me. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] ([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]]) 19:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::: I agree that the band isn't the primary target, but now we have [[Catherine Wheel]] redirecting to [[Catherine Wheel (band)]], and [[Catherine wheel (disambiguation)]] redirecting to [[Catherine wheel]]. I ''think'' that the dab needs to be at [[Catherine wheel]] (which it is) and [[Catherine Wheel]] needs to redirect there as well ("r from capitalisation").<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Black Kite|contribs]]) 18:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign --> |
|||
:::: I agree with you, but I don't feel quite up to fixing all the existing links to the band, since I don't use any of semi-automated tools and would have to do it manually. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::: I'm off to bed now, but I'll have a look at fixing it automatically when I get a moment. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 23:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: Thanks. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: {{ping|Black Kite}} I've done a dozen or so, but there's still maybe 150 to do. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 09:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: About 50 done now, perhaps 125 to go. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: Nice one - I haven't had a chance to look at it yet - will try to do so tonight. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 13:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::: {{done}} [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 02:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == |
|||
==[[Naughty but Nice]] disambiguation page== |
|||
Upon visiting this dab page, I noticed the two entries under header "Film" — [[Naughty But Nice (1927 film)|''Naughty But Nice'' (1927 film)]] and [[Naughty But Nice (1939 film)|''Naughty But Nice'' (1939 film)]] — both with uppercase "B". |
|||
<section begin="announcement-content" /> |
|||
However, the main title headers of those articles depict one uppercase "B" — [[Naughty But Nice (1927 film)|''Naughty But Nice'' (1927 film)]] and one lowercase "b" — [[Naughty but Nice (1939 film)|''Naughty but Nice'' (1939 film)]]. In view of your 2014 comments on this subject both at [[Talk:Naughty But Nice (1927 film)]] and at [[Talk:Naughty but Nice (1939 film)]], I would like to consult with you regarding remedying this inconsistency since all the other dab page entries depict a lowercase "b" in "but". |
|||
:''[[m:Special:MyLanguage/Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Election/2024/Announcement – vote reminder|You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.]] [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&group=page-{{urlencode:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Election/2024/Announcement – vote reminder}}&language=&action=page&filter= {{int:please-translate}}]'' |
|||
Dear Wikimedian, |
|||
Do you still hold the same feeling regarding this topic as you did in 2014 and would you have any objections to the 1927 film's "But" being moved to "but"? [[User:Roman Spinner|Roman Spinner]] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roman Spinner|contribs)]]</small> 02:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi, I'll be very busy in RL for the next 4 days, with only intermittent editing, but if you can wait, I'll be glad to discuss this with you. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, of course — the matter can certainly be put aside until a convenient time. [[User:Roman Spinner|Roman Spinner]] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roman Spinner|contribs)]]</small> 04:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|Roman Spinner}} Thanks for waiting. Yes, I do still agree with the position I took in 2014, and the evidence I presented then is still valid, so I would indeed object to the 1927 film's title being changed to a small "b". Although that would be consistent with the Wikipedia MOS, it is not the title of the film as listed by those reliable and authoritative sources I provided. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Fair enough. In reading the discussion at [[Talk:Naughty but Nice (1939 film)#Requested move]], my attention was drawn to the line, "{{green|One last note, if the consensus is to move this title, than I think we should also look at moving the title of the 1927 film of the same name (although no relation). Onel5969 (talk) 04:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)}}". Since, in the intervening four years, no one nominated [[Naughty But Nice (1927 film)|''Naughty But Nice'' (1927 film)]] for a requested move, I will not do so either. One final consultation — should the [[Naughty but Nice]] dab page listing for [[Naughty But Nice (1939 film)|''Naughty But Nice'' (1939 film)]] be revised to reflect the article's post-July 2014 main title header or would you prefer that it remain as is, with "But" rather than "but"? [[User:Roman Spinner|Roman Spinner]] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roman Spinner|contribs)]]</small> 03:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::No, I think that the dab page should show the verbatim name of the article, which means the small "b". [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. |
|||
== It's all you == |
|||
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the [[m:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Election/2024|voting page on Meta-wiki]] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. |
|||
I'll be traveling for three weeks so you're going to have to do most of the heavy lifting on keeping track of our favorite non-Harvard alumnus surreal Japanese politician. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 03:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Have a safe trip, {{u|EEng}}. We will miss your sense of humor and the oddball but apt images that you scatter about. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 03:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Douglas_MacArthur_lands_Leyte1.jpg|thumb|I shall return!]] |
|||
::I'm going to Japan, not a hospice. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 03:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Japan's a big country -- where in Japan? [[User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris|Shock Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 03:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Hong Kong, Tokyo, Nagano, Kyoto. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 03:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I once saw Mount Fujiyama out the window of an airplane while flying home from Hong Kong. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 03:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Of all things, the best apple I've ever eaten was from a 7-11 in Tokyo. They weren't in a big pile like an American supermarket but individually wrapped in fancy little doily-type coverings. Japan's different from here, apparently. [[User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris|Shock Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 03:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::The Japanese are really into containers and packaging. [[Kōbako]] is an article that I saved at AfD by expanding and referenced it. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 04:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please [[m:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Charter|review the U4C Charter]]. |
|||
:{{ping|EEng}} Will do - have a good trip! Fortunately my RL crunch is just starting to taper off. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::P.S. Never been to Japan. Had two different shows that were supposed to go there, both cancelled. Closest I've been are Seoul and Singapore. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. |
|||
== Reverted edit on 'The Bank Dick' == |
|||
On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> |
|||
I edited 'The Bank Dick' because although it looks fine in a web browser the multi-column section on the cast does not work in the mobile app, at least in the one I have on Android 7.1. |
|||
[[m:User:RamzyM (WMF)|RamzyM (WMF)]] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
If you could re-edit it so that it works for all interfaces, what seems now to be called Accessibility, that would be an improvement to my edit. Your revert broke my 'fix'. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:BoringHusband|BoringHusband]] ([[User talk:BoringHusband#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/BoringHusband|contribs]]) 02:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign --> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> |
|||
:It's not our responsibility to format our pages for all interfaces, it is the responsibility of the people who program the interfaces to interpret our normal, legitimate code in such a way that it displays correctly on their systems - so complain to Google, not to me. And, no, it's not an "Accessibility" concern, since that refers to programs used by the blind or vision-impaired. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 07:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== On a sad day you've brought a smile to my face == |
|||
== A note re the Arbitration Enforcement remark, == |
|||
A childhood friend from the 80s died today, rather than sleeping I've distracted myself via wikipedia. While initialling perusing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_recognition I somehow ended up down the rabbit hole of James Watson's scientific racism, where a few editors have a habit of removing any criticism even when well sourced, doing the same for other like minded bigots. Bringing me to your glorious edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=next&oldid=995850740#Unhelpful_comment |
|||
I'm dropping this note here since replies like this are not appropriate there. |
|||
You wrote: |
|||
I laughed my head off, thank you for delivering joy right when I needed it most. Hope you are well. |
|||
'the cauldron of the "Middle East" in which the countries all around Israel have taken up a strong opposition to its existence.' |
|||
[[User:BeardedChimp|BeardedChimp]] ([[User talk:BeardedChimp|talk]]) 01:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Untrue. See the [[Arab Peace Initiative]] where 22 Arab member states have pressed three times for a treaty with Israel, for the normalization of relations between them and that state. This has been steadfastly rejected by Israel fore 15 years. Regards [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 08:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*Thanks, I appreciate it. I hope joy continues to come your way whenever you most need it. Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I would be more careful, if I were you. Pinging the user you're accusing: {{ping|User:Zero0000}}. --[[User:Mhhossein|<span style="font-family:Aharoni"><span style="color:#002E63">M</span><span style="color:#2E5894">h</span><span style="color:#318CE7">hossein</span></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Mhhossein|<span style="color:#056608">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::If you were me, you wouldn't be a POV editor. Stay off of my page. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 16:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for May 23 == |
|||
== [[Julius Streicher]] == |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[John C. Waugh]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[St. Johns College]] and [[American Heritage]]. |
|||
So what's the story with the inclusion of these "fake header" messages? We've been employing this convention for a long time on a great number of pages. Has there been some change or is there a template of which I am unaware? Thanks for any info you can provide. --[[User:Obenritter|Obenritter]] ([[User talk:Obenritter|talk]]) 22:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:What is it you want to know? [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Thank you... == |
|||
:Fixed. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 20:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Remind me about this? == |
|||
...for your support. :) ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 20:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:You're welcome. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:09, 8 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Hi BMK, long time. I see you commenting at various pages on my way-too-long watchlist, but one way or another, we haven't interacted for a while; I hope all is well with you. I remember something many moons ago where I came around to your way of seeing things regarding placement of maintenance templates, after starting out in opposition. I don't have much recollection anymore about the details, but the bottom line was that either I placed a maint. template on a page or someone else did, and then you removed it, saying (I think) that it didn't have consensus, or something similar. At first, I was bent out of shape, thinking anybody could place a template on their own say so, and someone else shouldn't remove it based on [[WP:WTRMT]]. Eventually, your reasoning won me over, and I've changed my view on this to more aligned with yours. Can you fill me in (again?) on your reasoning, and ideally, link me to some guidance? I find myself on the other side of the fence now, removing a MT placed by someone else, and it would be nice to recall what it is you said that persuaded me. Does this ring a bell at all? Thanks, and hope you are well. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Please clarify why my sources are biased == |
|||
:{{ping|Mathglot}} Sorry to take so long to respond to this. I '''''vaguely''''' recall the discussion you're referring to, but not enough to recall where and when it took place. There are a few older comments on my [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Beyond_My_Ken/Thoughts "Thoughts"] page which may trigger your memory. In particular, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Old_Earth_creationism#Placement_of_templates this discussion from 2008] may be useful.{{pb}}Incidentally, I haven't changed my views in the 16 years since then, although I'm less inclined to make an issue out of it, unfortunately because the Wikipedia community's inherent intransigence and lack of interest in change often doesn't lend itself to consideration of how the project would benefit from small evolutionary adjustments; it seems that people would rather stick to communal authoritarianism instead. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 02:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thanks! [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 05:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Precious anniversary == |
|||
I cite five references including Senate Resolution No. 614 in my edit. Which one do you think is biased? If so, please point it out and present evidence. [[User:Sleepy Beauty|Sleepy Beauty]] ([[User talk:Sleepy Beauty|talk]]) 07:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} |
|||
:You've got it backwards. When material is disputed, it is '''''your''''' responsibility to gather a consensus for the restoration of the material: see [[WP:ONUS]]. Therefore '''''you''''' have to show the [[WP:RS|reliability]] of your sources. This discussion will not continue here, please take it to the article's talk page. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 07:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you both for you reminder of the Wikipedia policies. I really appreciate that. [[User:Sleepy Beauty|Sleepy Beauty]] ([[User talk:Sleepy Beauty|talk]]) 01:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:File:300 & 302 Canal Street.jpg]] == |
|||
==Interaction Timeline V1.1== |
|||
Hello Beyond_My_Ken, |
|||
I’m following up with you because you previously showed an interest in the [[Wikipedia:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Interaction Timeline|Interaction Timeline]]. The Anti-Harassment Tools team has completed V1.1 and the tool is ready for use. The Interaction Timeline shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits. |
|||
Many, many years ago you uploaded [[:File:300 & 302 Canal Street.jpg|an image]] of some loft buildings on Canal Street, with some notes about their history and architecture. It came in handy for an article I was working on, so I thought I might return the favor with a fun fact about its later history. The building on the left was the subject of a very famous experimental film called ''[[Wavelength (1967 film)|Wavelength]]'', which uses as one of its main visual elements the building's tall, mullioned windows. [[User:hinnk|hinnk]] ([[User talk:hinnk|talk]]) 22:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
The purpose of the tool is to better understand the sequence of edits between two users in order to make a decision about the best way to resolve a user conduct dispute. Here are some [[Wikipedia:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Interaction Timeline#Examples to test|test cases]] that show the results and also some [[Wikipedia:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Interaction Timeline#Known limitations|known limitations]] of the tool. We would like to hear your experience using the tool in real cases. You can leave public feedback on [[Wikipedia talk:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Interaction Timeline#Real case feedback|talk page]] or contact us by [[Special:EmailUser/SPoore_(WMF)|email]] if the case needs discretion or you would prefer to comment privately. [[User:SPoore (WMF)|SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative]] ([[User talk:SPoore (WMF)|talk]]) 15:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*That's very interesting - I have an LP by Michael Snow in my collection, ''Music for Piano, Whistling, Mic & Tape Recorder'', which I haven't listened to in years.{{pb}}Do you have a source that verifies that 300 Canal is the building used for the film? I'd like to add that information to the photo's file, but I generally like to have a source to cite. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{ping|hinnk}} A belated ping to point you to my talk page. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*:[https://reverseshot.org/symposiums/entry/2022/wavelength An article by Jeff Reichert], from the online publication for [[Museum of the Moving Image]]. [[User:hinnk|hinnk]] ([[User talk:hinnk|talk]]) 04:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::*Thanks very much! [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::*Done, with a link to your article. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for August 3 == |
|||
== May 2018 == |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop continuing to remove [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance|maintenance templates]] from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive editing]]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]]<sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 06:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Get a consensus. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 06:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I see the only way to deal with your disruption is to make a report at a noticeboard.– [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]]<sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 06:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Go ahead, be my guest -- only don;t post on this page ever again.[[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 06:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Augustus Baldwin Longstreet]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Democratic Party]], [[Republican Party]] and [[Reconstruction]]. |
|||
== Doing research == |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
If you look at my edit history, I do a metric butt-ton of research, adding references right and left: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_Adams&diff=prev&oldid=840411199] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_Adams&diff=prev&oldid=840410719] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swami_Sri_Yukteswar_Giri&diff=prev&oldid=840244024] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaspard_Monge&diff=prev&oldid=840241194] (this one I had to go to the French article to copy the sources, except they turned out to be dead links, and I was able to find the original primary sources, in French no less) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gopal_Krishna_Gokhale&diff=prev&oldid=840114869] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zita_of_Bourbon-Parma&diff=prev&oldid=840097895] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Stepanovich_Popov&diff=prev&oldid=839694736] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Tyrrell&diff=prev&oldid=839661770] and so on and so on. I think I've earned the right to ask other people to do their part. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 07:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Done. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 14:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:That's fine, but when the source is '''''in the text''''', and you '''''tag it''''' instead of just copying the source into a ref (which, in fact, I was working on when you posted yours), and then want other people to do that for you instead of you doing it yourself, that is unreasonable. Tag-bombing is unreasonable. Tagging obvious facts of history that are not in serious dispute is unreasonable. Read [[WP:V]] again -- it doesn't require that all facts be supported by citations, it requires them to be '''''verifiable''''', and when you cite something that is of the nature of "the sky is blue" you are causing unnecessary work for other editors. You should only be tagging those things which you sincerely believe are wrong, or which you are in serious doubt about. If you think or know that a fact is correct, '''''don't tag it with "CN"'''''. That's not what [[WP:V]] calls for, and it's not helpful to the encyclopedia or the community.{{parabr}}In other words, your balance is '''''way off''''', and you need to re-center yourself on what you're doing. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 07:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Howcheng}} Please listen carefully, because I'm going to nip this in the bud right now. You just followed me to [[Nazi book burnings]], an article you've never edited before, and which I had just finished doing some work on. This is closing in on the textbook definition of [[WP:Harassment]]. If you follow me to any other articles, I will be bringing this to an admin for their evaluation. I hope that's abundantly clear to you, I will not tolerate your harrassing me. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 07:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Firstly, I am NOT asking for citations for "the sky is blue" types of facts. It may be "obvious" to you, but as someone who is unfamiliar with the topic, it's not so obvious, and that's why I want the citation there. Perhaps in [[Peter Stuyvesant]], if you had linked to [[Three Forms of Unity]] and [[Thirty-Nine Articles]] (two terms that I had never heard of before reading this article), then I might not have added a tag. There is no basis for me to "think or know a fact is correct" (again, beyond general knowledge) unless there's an inline citation to a reliable source. Do you know how many uncited "facts" I've discovered to be completely wrong? Going back to Stuyvesant, the sentence I tagged with {{tl|contradict-inline}} (which BTW is suitable for use when facts in one article contradict those in another article, otherwise it wouldn't have <code>article</code> and <code>section</code> parameters) which you then removed is one of those, according to the [[Johannes de Decker]] article. Believe me, I would love to copy the ref from somewhere else in the same article, but when there are so many of them, how am I supposed to know where to look? Or when the sources are offline? |
|||
==[[James Longstreet]]== |
|||
:::As for [[Nazi book burnings]], I didn't "follow" you there. I have absolutely no idea what articles you watch, nor do I even care to know. I was at that article because I was considering it for inclusion at [[WP:Selected anniversaries/May 10]]. Because of my involvement with OTD I touch a wide variety of articles, so as our paths have crossed before, they certainly will again in the future. Alert [[WP:AN/I]] if you must. In fact, I encourage you to so that you may be reminded by other people about [[WP:AGF]]. Every edit I make in article space is intended for the improvement of the encyclopedia. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 08:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I am sorry, but that explanation is completely unbelievable. My edits to [[Nazi book burnings]] were at 3:14 and 3:16, and yours was at 3:23, your very next edit after you posted here at 3:15. If you looked at my contribution list right after you posted here, the [[Nazi book burnings]] edit at 3:14 would have been at the very top of the list.{{parabr}}[[WP:AGF]] is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.{{parabr}}I repeat - do not follow me again. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 08:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Whether you choose to believe it or not, my sequence of events was: |
|||
:::::#During my article evaluations for OTD for May 10, go through the articles in the Events section of [[May 10]] |
|||
:::::#Touched several other articles that are all related to that date: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Edgar_Hoover&diff=prev&oldid=840242513 J. Edgar Hoover], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Astor_Place_Riot&diff=prev&oldid=840243259 Astor Place Riot], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siamese_revolution_of_1688&diff=prev&oldid=840244519 Siamese revolution of 1688], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rock_Around_the_Clock&diff=prev&oldid=840246140 Rock Around the Clock], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Felix_Manalo&diff=prev&oldid=840249594 Felix Manalo] |
|||
:::::#In the process of doing that, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nazi_book_burnings&diff=prev&oldid=840245888 I added a refimprove tag] to Nazi book burnings |
|||
:::::#Noticed later that you moved the tag to the bottom of the page, but decided I didn't feel like getting into an argument about it, especially since we also tussled about {{tl|fake heading}} |
|||
:::::#Decided late last night that since we were already in discussion, to enforce the MOS and went back to the article |
|||
:::::I never once looked at your contribution list so I had no idea you were also editing the article at the same time. The timing happened to be coincidental. Contrary to what you might think, I have no malice towards you. True, you frustrate me to no end because you'd rather argue than just add the damn citations. Seriously, it takes me a long time to do research on topics that I'm not familiar with, and if you already know where in the article text the citation is for the content that I've tagged, you could have saved us a whole lot of time and bad feelings by just doing it instead of reverting me. Seriously, I was trying to go to bed but instead got sucked into this. The article is not ''harmed'' by the additional citation(s), so why are you so against having them? Or maybe use a better edit summary: "citation for this sentence is at the end of the next paragraph" or whatever. Something that points me in the right direction so I can actually resolve the problem that I see. |
|||
:::::Look, I went through [[User:Beyond My Ken/thoughts|your thoughts]] and for the most part, you and I are actually on the same page (LOL at the Giano and Malleus Fatuorum observations). Like you, I am trying to the best editing I can do in the limited time I have available. When I feel like I can add missing citations to an article, I do it (I've been getting a lot of experience doing genealogies, for example), but if the task is "beyond my ken" (sorry, couldn't resist) or if I get stuck down a rabbit hole trying to chase sources or if I just don't have the time, I'm going to give up, but I can't just ignore the fact the article is in bad shape, so it gets tagged. You may be right that readers "would be totally disinterested in going any farther and looking at the article", but you might also be wrong and maybe people understand that to mean "take this article with a grain of salt". Regardless, responsible editors should dislike seeing that tag on the article that they've presumably spent a lot of time and effort on and do the needful (as my Indian colleagues say) to fix the problem that's been identified. To repeat, if I could fix it myself, I would, but at the same time, I can't be expected to do everything myself. We are all ostensibly on the same team here, right? So please, when someone in good faith leaves a tag on article, just work on resolving the issue instead of arguing about the process. Because otherwise, you just come off as someone who is uninterested in improving the quality of articles, when I know that's not true. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 17:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
I have reverted your recent changes to the James Longstreet article. I have identified the following problems: |
|||
== [[Alt-right]] == |
|||
Your addition that Helen Dortch Longstreet was a journalist appears to be unsupported by either of the sources attached to that sentence. |
|||
Just a heads up, looks like you broke 1RR on Alt-right. |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alt-right&diff=840478890&oldid=840465415 23:16, May 9, 2018] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alt-right&diff=840552762&oldid=840536609 11:46, May 10, 2018] |
|||
Just be careful. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 16:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Aargh! [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 16:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Hehe happens to the best of us. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 16:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Removing the separate section header and subheaders for the Bibliography was completely useless. The citations and the bibliography are two separate sections and should be presented as such. Your change makes it more difficult to edit the Bibliography, is in my view also less pleasant to read, and accomplishes nothing. |
|||
Continuing discussion on that edit, I was just looking to see if there was a paragraph I could drop as "don't need to know right now, as long as it's covered later", and that seemed to me to fit the bill. I'm definitely willing to consider it might have been too drastic, but since "get it down to 4 paras" had been raised somewhere or other, that seemed like the cleanest way to do it. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|<span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span>]] 17:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
3 |
|||
:Four grafs is just a guideline, and it shouldn't come at the expense of necessary information. I'll look it over again tonight after work, but my feeling is that possibly the first half of the paragraph could go, and the second half -- with the list of beliefs -- might be integrated elsewhere. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 18:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
The article originally said that the election of Grover Cleveland to the presidency in 1884 “ended” Longstreet’s political career. You changed “ended” to “interrupted,” implying that Longstreet would someday resume involvement in politics. This is false. Longstreet never held public office again. I also found the language “return of a Democratic administration” to be confusing, as Cleveland had never been president before. |
|||
Your version of the "Later life" section contains numerous excessively short one-sentence “paragraphs.” |
|||
== Dashes == |
|||
You made numerous edits which interrupted source to text integrity. Basically, you broke up paragraphs and added citations to new sources (mainly the Varon book) but did not adjust the page numbers in the original citations. As a general rule, it is usually not necessary to add sources if a sentence is already reliably sourced. But if you are going to do so, and you make edits in a way that moves the original citations elsewhere, then you need to make sure that those citations stay attached to the information that they are supposed to verify. |
|||
I randomly ran across you being unnecessarily threatening (a while back) to another editor, over something as trivial as dashes. That seemed out of character. But more to the point, what you said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pre-Code_Hollywood&type=revision&diff=831528419&oldid=831402869 here] is incorrect, in being overbroad and misunderstanding the nature of what the early disputes were about. |
|||
I will restore some copyedits that I made, and I welcome you to re-add citations to the Varon book. But do not break up paragraphs in ways that are unnecessary, especially when that disrupts the citations. I would appreciate if you would also take note of the other statements that I made. [[User:Display name 99|Display name 99]] ([[User talk:Display name 99|talk]]) 20:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
We are definitely supposed to normalize to EITHER spaced en dash OR unspaced em dash in the same article. (For this use of dashes, that is; there are uses of en dashes for which em dashes are never substituted, as in constructions like "Dunning–Kruger effect"). |
|||
:I will be restoring my edits, as the information is sourced to the Varon book, which you should read before making any additional reversions. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The Bibliography is still totally editable in the "References: section. This style is frequently used on Wikipedia, and is not forbidden by the MOS. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Please do presume to lecture me on how to edit Wikipedia. I've been editing for 19 years and over 60,000 edits and am well aware of how to edit. Your objections to format and style are noted and rejected as irrelevant. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::One can be a public figure without holding public office. Longstreet continued to try to achieve office almost continually after he stepped down as Marshall, so his political cafreer was not "ended". That is why the article already said that he went into "semi-retirement", not "retirement". [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Please be cognizant of the dangers of [[WP:OWNERSHIP]] of articles. I mention this because I see indications of ownership-type behavior in your message above. You also do not want to risk being partially blocked from another page as you are from [[Andrew Jackson]]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Any further discussions should take place on the article's talk page and not here and should focus entirely on the subject at hand and not on your attempt to school me on how to edit Wikipedia. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Because I clearly told you not to post here on this subject again, but to go to the article's talk page instead, I have deleted your comments without reading them. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Display name 99|Display name 99]] ([[User talk:Display name 99|talk]]) 17:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
What's discouraged per MOS:RETAIN, etc., is taking an article that uses spaced en dashes consistently and converting it to use unspaced em dashes, or vice versa, just to assert a preference. What's encouraged is fixing inconsistent usage in the same article (on any MoS matters). |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:Images from advertising campaigns]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Images from advertising campaigns]] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a [[:Category:Disambiguation categories|disambiguation category]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia soft redirected categories|category redirect]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia featured topics categories|featured topics category]], under discussion at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under [[WP:CSD#C1|section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. |
|||
It's also perfectly fine to convert unnecessary HTML character entity codes to Unicode dash characters, though that kind of edit is trivial enough that people may complain if you make it without also doing something more substantive like at least fixing a grammar error or a typo, because it triggered their watchlist over something that doesn't make any visual difference in the article, something that isn't really broken. |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Category:Images from advertising campaigns|visiting the page]] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
But the edit you reverted rather hostilely was perfectly legitimate; the HTML→Unicode cleanup trivia was also accompanied by a dash consistency edit that's encouraged not discouraged. Please reserve your dash complaints for people going around converting all spaced en dashes to unspaced em dashes or vice versa for no reason.<br /><span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 11:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive == |
|||
== Lionel took you to Ani... == |
|||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; color: #000; padding:10px 15px 0" |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attack:_Beyond_My_Ken Since he can't be assed to do it himself... --[[User:Tarage|Tarage]] ([[User talk:Tarage|talk]]) 05:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|New pages patrol]] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/September 2024|September 2024 Backlog Drive]]</span> |
|||
:Thanks. I think I'll stay out of it until someone asks me to respond. In this case the harassment doesn't take the form of following me to articles he's never edited before, it's comes in taking up a knee-jerk antagonistic attitude toward me and my edits. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|rowspan=3|[[File:NPP Barnstar.png|right|80px]] |
|||
* BMK, I have some similar ammo of my own and will join you if/when you're ready. {{nw}} --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 16:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
*:I was going to get some popcorn, and then realized I was fresh out from all the previous Dramah TV ANI episodes lately. :p—[[User:Cyberpower678|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">CYBERPOWER</span>''']] <span style="font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:Cyberpower678|<span style="color:olive">Chat</span>]])</span> 17:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
| |
|||
* On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. |
|||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. |
|||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. |
|||
* Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. |
|||
* Interested in taking part? '''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/September 2024/Participants|Sign up here]]'''. |
|||
|- |
|||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] |
|||
|} |
|||
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1242377836 --> |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 6 == |
|||
== ''German war effort'' arbitration case opened == |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Federal State of Austria]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Pfalz]]. |
|||
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort]]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Evidence]]. '''Please add your evidence by May 30, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Workshop]]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration]]. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·'''  [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·'''  [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 23:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:L235@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German_war_effort/Non-party_mailing_list&oldid=841617130 --> |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 07:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Keeping Wikipedia Wikipedia == |
|||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
Just wanted to say thank you for your participation in important discussions and for keeping Wikipedia the solid source of factual information that it is. Your efforts are important and greatly appreciated.[[User:Cypherquest|Cypherquest]] ([[User talk:Cypherquest|talk]]) 19:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
== [[St. John's Park]] ref names == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi BMK. Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._John%27s_Park&diff=842013061&oldid=826355826 this edit], what I intended to do was rephrase the awkward wording {{tq|consists of a teardrop-shaped roadway which provides five exits from [[Interstate 78 in New York|Interstate 78]] which sort traffic down a number of city streets.}} I didn't change any ref names, intentionally or otherwise, but the Visual Editor ''did'' put them in quotation marks. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:37, 19 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Then, that's changing ref names. Quotations are no tnecessary unless there is a space in the ref name. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 20:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree that they aren't necessary, and it really doesn't matter that much to me. The grammar changes you also reverted were what I was more worried about. I'm just giving you a heads up that putting quotations is what Visual Editor does. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 22:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== International Art Museum of America == |
|||
I'm not able to post on WP:ANI (it is currently protected), but have made some comments on the talk page for the [[International Art Museum of America]] article. To be brief, the disputed content is blatant [[Wikipedia:Coatrack articles]] material in my opinion, and disputes about its sourcing are therefore irrelevant. I think that pointing this out might prove more productive than further discussion of sourcing for material which clearly doesn't belong there in the first place regardless of sources. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:403A:2FB7:2915:8DBB|2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:403A:2FB7:2915:8DBB]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:403A:2FB7:2915:8DBB|talk]]) 06:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Game == |
|||
??? |
|||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842485126 |
|||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842500762 |
|||
This opens up for gaming the system. In a thread or procedure that is <u>not about me</u>, such as the current one, FCAYS, or any of his friends, can just starting mentioning me and suddenly the iBan means nothing. That's ridiculous. |
|||
That's how he violated the iBan. |
|||
I'm on my phone, so can't do much. This must be stopped. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 22:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
If I recall correctly this IBAN (which is way too highly structured and subjective) says that the thread must be directly about BR. So for example at my recent weekend visit to AE, I thought there was a violation where BR was mentioned, even though there was no essential reason for him to be mentioned at all. In my opinion the only way IBAN or TBAN restrictions are workable is when they are very broad, bright-line rules. In this case, I thought it was the wrong remedy from the start, because the problem was not specific to BR. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 22:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, sorry BullRangifer, but the description of the IBan that NeilN gave on AE didn't seem to fit the circumstance. As I said, I had assumed it was a normal one-way IBan, which is why I reported the violation, but that appears not to be the case. I agree with you that the way it's structured gives Factchecker too much leeway for gaming, and also with SPECIFICO that a normal IBan would be preferable. I'll say as much on the thread there. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 22:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842515218 Right now], he's going way off-topic to attack me with spurious accusations. '''That's a huge violation.''' He's relitigatiing the kind of behavior that has gotten him in trouble before, but now he's trying to drag me down with him. It's impossible for me to debunk so many falsehoods, so the fact he can use multiple quotes (out of context) makes it look like he has a case. Sigh. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 23:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::: My essay was started nearly a month before FCAYS came to the dossier article, and before I had any interactions with him. It was inspired by my interactions with two other editors who used very extreme sources. I only <u>moved</u> it at the time he claims I <u>created </u> it, so it obviously wad not about him. I have the diffs at home. He is demonstrating a huge amount of bad faith. It's a whole conspiracy theory, claiming that I am to blame for his lack of self-control. He blames the victim for his constant attacks and harassment. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> |
|||
Holy shit!! Now I feel sick. At the end of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842515218 this diatribe], he tries to invent some weird attack on himself by me, just because I'm a medical professional who is studying the anatomy of where my possible colon cancer is located! I had just gotten a colonoscopy and I have a 1x3 cm mass in my cecum. Now I have to get surgery to remove it and get a better biopsy result. I'm scared. Jesus fucking Christ. FCAYS is pure evil. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 00:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry to hear that. Timely book on RE: Facts and Fears of a different kind. [https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/566796/facts-and-fears-by-james-r-clapper-with-trey-brown/9780525558644/] [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 01:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for May 23== |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Carey Wilson (writer)]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Atomic Energy Commission]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Carey_Wilson_%28writer%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Carey_Wilson_%28writer%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{done}} [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== User:Coffeeandcrumbs == |
|||
Just want your advice here. So... per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs this users] removal of "''[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]] awarded the song the distinction of "Best New Track".''" from [[This is America (Childish Gambino song)]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=This_Is_America_(Childish_Gambino_song)&oldid=842064979 edit summary:"''a Pitchfork contributor is not notable''."]), I used Twinkle [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs#May_2018 to add a warning to this user's talk page]. As you can see the user's response was 100% inappropriate and not [[WP:CIVIL]]. Is this a case for ANI, or how can this be solved? [[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⯃</span>]] 00:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:No, I don't think it rises to the level of an ANI issue. Their response to you was certainly inappropriate, but you might have left them a personal message instead of a templated one -- sometimes that goes down easier. Also, what I do sometimes (not all the time) is to check the article's history to see if the editor has contributed a lot to it, and might feel a stewardship stake in it, as seems to be that case with this editor. If I see that, I try to make my message as "soft" as possible to avoid stirring up any resentment. But that's hindsight, what you did was prettybe reasonable, and they really shouldn't have told you to "fuck off". I would wait to see if anything develops. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Beyond My Ken}}, looks like the user is 100% unapologetic and has no intention to change their behavior. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs&diff=843253604&oldid=843133559&diffmode=source They commented again] and then 4 minutes later removed the section [[User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs/Archive_1|to one of their archives]] before I could even respond. [[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⯃</span>]] 03:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::That's unfortunate, but perhaps understandable. It's certainly not anything that they're going to sanctioned for. I'd advise just to stay away from that editor as best you can. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 05:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Reactionary 'undoing' of legitimate editing/review/revision of /Nazi_symbolism == |
|||
Dear Mr. Beyond My Ken, |
|||
Please actually look over the edits made to [[Wikipedia]] entries that you seem to think you are master and commander of. |
|||
Especially when your benevolence corrupts the [[Wiki]] [[markup]] and causes the page to malfunction. |
|||
Perhaps you should curb your vigilantism before you assume that anyone that makes corrections to [[WWII]] articles is some crypto-fascist thug or sympathizer etc., and allow the system to work as intended. |
|||
Thank you for your time, consideration, and what I can only assume must be [[good intentions]]. I'm not in that big a rush to get to Hell. |
|||
All the best, |
|||
Anonymous Coward that undid your undo of certain improvements using IP address 31.184.197.6 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.184.197.6|31.184.197.6]] ([[User talk:31.184.197.6#top|talk]]) 19:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Thank you so much for your best wishes. It's so refreshing to be called a "reactionary" after spending all of my adult life being labelled as a "goddamn pinko liberal" or a "Commie faggot junkie".{{parabr}}Perhaps you might consider that this is '''''English''''' Wikipedia, and links on-site are preferable to links off-site to other language Wikipedias. We also use the English terms for things in preference to non-English terms, per [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018 == |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! {{Notabilityguide}} |
|||
'''ACTRIAL''': |
|||
*[[WP:ACREQ]] has been implemented. The flow at [[Special:NewPagesFeed|the feed]] has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google. |
|||
'''Deletion tags''' |
|||
*Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification. |
|||
'''Backlog drive''': |
|||
*A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at [[WT:NPR]] for more details. '''NOTE''': It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing. |
|||
'''Editathons''' |
|||
*There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the '[[User:Evad37/MoveToDraft|move to draft]]' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace. |
|||
'''Paid editing - new policy''' |
|||
*Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to [[WP:COIN]] if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts. |
|||
'''Subject-specific notability guidelines''' |
|||
*The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant [[WP:BEFORE|BEFORE]] nominating an article for deletion. |
|||
*Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for [[WP:ORG|organisations and companies]]. |
|||
'''Not English''' |
|||
*A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with [[WP:NPPNE]]. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential. |
|||
'''News''' |
|||
*Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review. |
|||
*The next issue of [[Wikipedia:The Signpost|''The Signpost'']] has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters. |
|||
<hr/> |
|||
<small>Go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. </small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=842255780 --> |
|||
== For my own reasons... == |
|||
Not taking a position on anything, but for my own benefit, will you help me get this straight in my head? So, an editor can be filed against at AE (which for some reason I thought was sorta the 2nd highest court) and also be filed against at AN/I while AE is in session, despite there having been a 1st AN/I case that directed the problem to AE? Is that not like [[WP:forumshopping]]? I'm not understanding the reason for having 2 cases going on at the same time (not to mention the fact he's blocked but with TP access). The problem is behavior, and the purpose of both noticeboards (or any admin action) is to stop disruption, correct? Is there concern that the AE case won't hand down an acceptable resolution to stop the disruptive behavior and AN/I will? <sup>[[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme</span>]][[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 00:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:At one point, investigations into whether there was collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign were being carried out by the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Special Counsel. Or, think of those instances such as O. J. Simpson where civil trials followed after criminal trials for precisely the same set of facts. Or think of situations where Federal charges and state charges are filed simultaneously for the same behavior, but as violations of different laws. Or, how about, let's say, a landlord indicted for rent gouging who also gets a speeding ticket and one for jaywalking.{{parabr}}In this instance, Fackchecker's '''''general''''' behavior lies behind both complaints, but the '''''specific''''' issues are violations of '''''different''''' policies. The AE complaint concerns violating discretionary sanctions on American politics, which include enhanced civility requirements, while Guy Macon's complaint on ANI is of a run-of-the-mill violation of [[WP:HARASSMENT]]. If Fackchecker were to edit war once they came off their block, that could be brought to [[WP:EWN]], and of they were to begin harassing another editor, that could be brought to ANI. If they violate the IBan regarding BullRangifer, they can be blocked again for that -- and all of this even if the AE complaint is still open. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Ahhhh...I see. Thank you. <sup>[[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme</span>]][[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 05:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==DYK for 23rd Street (Manhattan)== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
|||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
|||
|imagesize=40px |
|||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 May 2018|27 May 2018]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[23rd Street (Manhattan)]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that New York City's '''[[23rd Street (Manhattan)|23rd Street]]''' once contained the city's largest residential complex and the world's largest hotel?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/23rd Street (Manhattan)]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-05-17&end=2018-06-06&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=23rd_Street_(Manhattan) 23rd Street (Manhattan)])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
|||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]] ([[User talk:Alex Shih|talk]]) 01:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Request for consensus on capitalization of "independent" == |
|||
Hi, you may be able to provide insight on the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government#Stylistic question about capitalization of "independent" in an infobox]]. It's clear that "independent" should not be capitalized in a sentence (except if it's the first word), as is the usage in [[Independent politician]], because it is a common noun and not a proper noun, like Republican. Should it be capitalized in an infobox or when it's abreviated in parentheses, i.e. Bernie Sanders (i) vs Bernie Sanders (I)? I look forward to your thoughts at the talk page, above. Sincerely, [[User:HopsonRoad|HopsonRoad]] ([[User talk:HopsonRoad|talk]]) 22:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for May 31== |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Fort Tryon Park]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Tweet]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fort_Tryon_Park check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fort_Tryon_Park?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}} by another editor. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 20:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Clarification on kwwl.com link on [[Turning Point USA]] == |
|||
You said "If a polity blocks a site". No political entity has blocked the site. The owner of the site themselves decided to make the website inaccessible to European users. |
|||
The site owners fear they'll be liable for a fine under the [[GDPR]] (which went into force last month). Several American websites have done this: "On the effective date, some international websites began to block EU users entirely (including Instapaper, Unroll.me, and Tronc-owned newspapers, such as the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times)" ([[General Data Protection Regulation#Impact]]). I expect there'll be a lot of European users complaining about sources being unavailable until American businesses <del>stop acting like children</del> <ins>figure out the legal situation (which they've had two years to prepare for)</ins>. --[[User:ChiveFungi|ChiveFungi]] ([[User talk:ChiveFungi|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the information. Please see [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. Reliable sources are not required to be available to '''''everyone''''' at any particular time, hence we allow rare books, available only in academic or research libraries, which many people do not have access to, to be used as sources, and websites that require subscriptions, as well as foreign language sources which the majority of editors cannot read (although English sources are preferred). Sources do not have to be online, and they do not have to be available to every editor. This is because the purpose of sourcing is to '''''verify''''' the information, and as long as '''''someone''''' can verify that the source supports the information, that information is acceptable to use in an article.{{parabr}}That websites have voluntarily cut themselves off from Europe is unfortunate, but is a foreseeable consequence in the changes made by the European Union -- thus it is actually the '''''polity''''' which caused the problem, and not the website, which is merely reacting to protect itself. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|ChiveFungi}} Please see previous edit. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 21:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Incorrect edit == |
|||
Please follow the sequence of edits on [[Turning Point USA]]. Your argument for reverting the latest edit seems to be a missunderstanding. [[User:CFCF|<span style="color:#014225;font-family: sans-serif;">Carl Fredrik</span>]]<span style="font-size: .90em;">[[User talk:CFCF|<sup> talk</sup>]]</span> 13:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== MoS:poss == |
|||
Just to draw your attention to the manual of style in respect of possessives: the correct format for singular possessive is always " 's ", including words that end in s. Kind regards. [[User:MapReader|MapReader]] ([[User talk:MapReader|talk]]) 06:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Just to draw '''''your''''' attention to the fact that the Manual of Style is a '''''guideline''''' and is '''''not''''' mandatory. See the top of this mage. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 19:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Whilst not mandatory in the sense that content added to articles has to reflect in in every regard, edits that align an article to the MoS are ''improvements'' to the encyclopaedia, reflecting existing consensus on the most appropriate style. Therefore they shouldn't be reverted, and it is hard to believe that something as simple as the correct possessive form is worth an argument. [[User:MapReader|MapReader]] ([[User talk:MapReader|talk]]) 20:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::I'm not interested in having a discussion here about the MoS or your theories about it. Simply stop edit warring to enforce it, and everything will be fine. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 20:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Advice == |
|||
I appreciate the advice but as someone who has suffered admin abuse and an unjust block forever staining my log, I have little sympathy for those who abuse their power in a clearly unwarranted and ignorant ways. It is entirely too difficult to remove a bit from an admin once they've gotten it. I've seen three cases, none of them resulted in removal. Quite frankly, it's the same way I feel about police violence. If I were an admin and I saw another admin acting that way, I would be ripping them a new one because they make my job that much harder. Granted it doesn't have the real life consequences, but it's still important. Did I go too far? Possibly. But I really was laughing out of disbelief after learning that, in addition to the bad block, in addition to editing against consensus, he also violated his very clear topic ban. It's that level of incompetence that plagues the admin corps, and if he doesn't lose his bit, then there's no hope for any of us. --[[User:Tarage|Tarage]] ([[User talk:Tarage|talk]]) 06:34, 9 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Slow down when reverting == |
|||
Your revert has now created duplicate material in the 2nd and 3rd sentence of the 2nd paragraph of the [[Breitbart News]] article. -- [[User:Somedifferentstuff|Somedifferentstuff]] ([[User talk:Somedifferentstuff|talk]]) 22:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:That could be a form of subtle irony, I suppose. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 23:35, 10 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, in the continuum of Wikipedia problems, I would think that accidentally causing a duplicate reference ranks somewhere significantly below attempting to skew an article to bring it in line with one's personal political POV. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 02:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::You didn't just "create a duplicate reference", the 2nd and 3rd sentences now both speak about [[Steve Bannon]] in a way that doesn't make sense. The edit you reverted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breitbart_News&type=revision&diff=845306436&oldid=844661512] did not change the political POV of the article, '''it reinstated duplicate material''', which is why I tilted this section, '''''"Slow down when reverting."''''' Maybe you'll take the time to fix it. -- [[User:Somedifferentstuff|Somedifferentstuff]] ([[User talk:Somedifferentstuff|talk]]) 11:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Nah, I don't think so. Better to restore it to what it was before you edited it. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Nonfree images== |
|||
You may only use nonfree images when they are irreplaceable, regardless of rationale. In this case, the article says clearly in text that the book is responsible for the myth. Future restoration of the nonfree image on [[Rommel myth]] is disallowed; please ensure never to do that again. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 00:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:NFCC says no such thing, but since you're armed and I'm not, I'm obviously not going to restore, since you've obliquely threatened to block me. Way to use your bit to get your way, instead of using the proper community discussion process. You've fallen considerably in my estimation. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, you did, and you can see I'm not blocking you. That's never my preferred solution to anything, especially with established editors. That being said, inappropriate nonfree images aren't really negotiable, they're copyvios. There's no ''need'' for the book cover in that article, the role of the book can be easily covered by text. That renders it replaceable. Replaceability by text fails #1. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 00:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::The mere fact that you '''''threatened''''' to block me, when you should have followed the instructions at [[WP:NFC#Handling inappropriate use of non-free content]] to open a discussion at [[WP:FFD]] is a blot on your record. As for the image, there is '''''never''''' any absolute "need" for '''''any''''' image on '''''any''''' article, so that argument is specious on its face. "Need" is an opinion, and on Wikipedia, differences of opinion are settled by discussion at appropriate venues, not by pulling rank or displaying one's armament. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:40, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::I neither threatened to block you, nor did I do so. And I'll make very clear that when I ''do'' tell someone I'll block them, I mean it and I'll do it. If I had meant "I'll block you", I would've said exactly that, and I would've done exactly that. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 00:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::And by the way, I don't see the purpose of your FFD recommendation. That image ''would'' be appropriate for the article about the book. I'm not seeking to delete it, just remove it from a single inappropriate use. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 01:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::The use is '''''not''''' inappropriate, in my opinion, and differences of opinion are settled by discussion, not by fiats such "Future restoration of the nonfree image on [[Rommel myth]] is disallowed," which was most definitely an oblique a threat to block -- how elee were you planning on "disallowing" something? Please stop trying to explain away your inexcusable behavior. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 01:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Well, it's not allowed by the nonfree image policy. Specifically [[WP:NFCC#1|number 1]], nonfree images may not be used when replaceable, including by text. It's not that ''I'm'' disallowing it, it's that policy disallows it. It would be like me saying "Not remaining neutral in articles is disallowed". That's not somehow my personal rule, it's site policy. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 02:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::That's '''''your''''' particular interpretation of NFCC #1, one that is not shared by many -- perhaps most -- Wikipedians who are not hardliners on this subject, and, on Wikipedia, disputes over interpretation of policy are settled by discussion, and not by flashing one's badge and threats. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 03:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}}Erm, not really. We don't even have images of the Harry Potter book covers on [[J.K. Rowling]] or the Lord of the Rings covers on [[J.R.R. Tolkein]], and both of those would have far stronger cases for it. But since they're not articles about the books, they don't have images of the covers. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 04:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:The bottom line is that you abused your authority by threatening to block me instead of opening a discussion as is recommended by [[WP:NFC#Handling inappropriate use of non-free content]]. It's a single incident, so it's not going to get you desysopped -- nor should it, considering your generally good work as an admin -- but it '''''should''''' make you reconsider your hamfisted approach to NFC issues, which the community has consistently held are subject to consensus interpretation and are '''''not''''' the kind of black letter law you want them to be.{{parabr}}Since we are not going to agree, and you are unwilling to open a formal discussion about the use of the image in the article, I see no point in continuing here, so this conversation is over in this venue, unless you plan on sanctioning me in some way and need to communicate that to me. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 04:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== NPP Backlog Elimination Drive == |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! |
|||
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently '''2900''' unreviewed articles, and '''4000''' unreviewed redirects. |
|||
<big>'''Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!'''</big> |
|||
*As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June. |
|||
*Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: [[File:NPPbarnstar SE.png|30px|Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar]]. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: [[File:RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png|30px|100 review coin]], [[File:Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png|30px|250 review coin]], [[File:Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png|30px|500 review coin]], [[File:US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg|30px|1000 review certificate]]. |
|||
*Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we <u>focus on quality reviewing</u>. |
|||
<hr/> |
|||
<small>Go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — '''''<small>[[User:Insertcleverphrasehere|Insertcleverphrasehere]] <sup>([[User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere|or here]])</sup></small>''''' 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</div> |
</div> |
||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Insertcleverphrasehere@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=845733689 --> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> |
|||
== How can the Interaction Timeline be useful in reporting to noticeboards? == |
|||
Hi Beyond My Ken, |
|||
The Anti-Harassment Tools team built the [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline/ Interaction Timeline] to make it easier to understand how two people interact and converse across multiple pages on a wiki. The tool shows a chronological list of edits made by two users, only on pages where they have both made edits within the provided time range. Our goals are to assist users to make well informed decisions in incidents of user misconduct and to keep on-wiki discussions civil and focused on evidence. |
|||
We're looking to add a feature to the Interaction Timeline that makes it easy to post statistics and information to an on-wiki discussion about user misconduct. We're discussing possible wikitext output on [[Wikipedia talk:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Interaction Timeline#How_can_the_Interaction_Timeline_be_useful_in_reporting_to_noticeboards?|the project talk page, and we invite you to participate!]] Thank you, For the Anti-Harassment Tools team, [[User:SPoore (WMF)|SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative]] ([[User talk:SPoore (WMF)|talk]]) 22:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —[[User:Dervorguilla|Dervorguilla]] ([[User talk:Dervorguilla|talk]]) 07:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
Does Wiki have a policy about "Further reading" sections? If you look around, you can see that many articles have "Further reading" sections. For example, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Kerouac#Further_reading here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Ginsberg#Further_reading here], and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California#Further_reading here]. Sometimes there is also a "Sources" section with book titles, as for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas%E2%80%93Nebraska_Act#Sources here]. Without putting a book title under a heading of some kind, it gets lost in the article. No one can find it. Would you object to putting Mike Welding's Alt-Right book under the heading "Sources"? [[User:Chisme|Chisme]] ([[User talk:Chisme|talk]]) 16:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thee is no policy, there is only a guideline, which is not mandatory. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Where can I find the guideline? Also, why do you object to making the heading "Further reading" appear in the "Contents" listing near the top of the Alt-Right article? Someone wanting to know more about a topic should be able to click "Further reading" at the top of the article to see a list of books on the topic, IMHO. [[User:Chisme|Chisme]] ([[User talk:Chisme|talk]]) 17:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::<s>I didn't "neglect" that,</s> it was a deliberate choice, to prevent the TOC from being cluttered up with unnecessary sections. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Neglect? If I told you I don't think the "Contents" section is cluttered, would you mind if I put "Further reading" in? It's just one line in "Contents" after all. I don't want to edit-war about this, but I do want readers to be able to find the book title. It's the first (and probably not the last) book about the Alt-Right. Also, where are the "Further reading" guidelines you mentioned? [[User:Chisme|Chisme]] ([[User talk:Chisme|talk]]) 17:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::There is a further reading section, it is within the References section, where it belongs. We don't need a heirarchical section for a single book which was not used in the preparation of the article. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::"Further reading" isn't really "section" if you can't get to it from a link in "Contents," IMHO. By "not used in the preparation of the article," you mean that the book isn't referenced in the article, therefore it doesn't deserve listing in a "Further reading" section? I don't understand you. If the book were referenced in the article, you wouldn't object to its appearance in a "Further reading" linked to "Contents"? Again, where are the "Further reading" guidelines? [[User:Chisme|Chisme]] ([[User talk:Chisme|talk]]) 17:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::There's no need for the reader to get to the section. Why are you attempting to promote this book? If you have it, and it has relevant material, enhace the article with that material and it will be listed in the notes. Otherwise, given your advocacy, I'm tempted to remove it entirely per [[WP:WEIGHT]]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:33, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::I've been very respectful to you. Show me the same. Where are the guidelines? I'd like to bring a broader discussion of this to Wikipedia and I need to see what guidelines are already there. [[User:Chisme|Chisme]] ([[User talk:Chisme|talk]]) 17:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::You have '''''not''''' been respectful, you've been as demanding as a petulant child. I was about to post the link, but was prevented from doing so by an edit conflict. Given your attitude, find the damn section yourself, and don't post to this page again. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 17:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 19 November 2024
Greetings, BMK! Sorry to read above that your Christmas didn't go so well. Considering that, this might be an annoying question... but can you help guide the Jingle Bells article towards GA status? If that is not possible, I will have to just go ahead with the nomination and rely fully on the reviewer's help, which might be an inconvenience given our mutual unfamiliarity with the topic. You have 242 edits to the page, making any participation from you highly valuable.-- NØ 20:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: Thanks for contacting me. Yes, I've contributed a fair amount to that article over the years, but I cannot hold myself out as any kind of expert on the subject. Considering that, and the fact that my level of participation on Wikipedia is very low right now -- almost random, in fact -- due to a variety of family crises, means that I'm going to have to turn down your invitation to participate in bringing the article to GA status. I do, however, wish you the best of luck with it, and I look forward to seeing the result of your efforts. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
yt-dlp
[edit]Check out yt-dlp Polygnotus (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I read your userpage and it mentioned youtube-dl. I would recommend using yt-dlp instead. Polygnotus (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I read your userpage and it mentioned youtube-dl. I would recommend using yt-dlp instead. Polygnotus (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Horseshoe Theory
[edit]Hi, I edited "Horseshoe theory" just before you. The odd spacing in " Voilà, comme les extrêmes se rencontrent ! " is actually the original 19th-century typesetting, which I imitated. Is there a Wikipedia rule that typesetting has to be normalized to 21st-century standards?
I'm not intending to revert it or anything, just curious. ScarletPlanet (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say that there is a rule, per se, but our primary concern should be communicating with our readers, and using contemporary formatting makes things easier for them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- The relevant policy is MOS:CONFORM. See also MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE. cagliost (talk) 21:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite gotham
[edit]Template:Cite gotham has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beland (talk) 09:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:John Fryer in disguise as 'Dr. H. Anonymous'.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:John Fryer in disguise as 'Dr. H. Anonymous'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
[edit]Hello Beyond My Ken,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Small Back Room dvd.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Small Back Room dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
On a sad day you've brought a smile to my face
[edit]A childhood friend from the 80s died today, rather than sleeping I've distracted myself via wikipedia. While initialling perusing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_recognition I somehow ended up down the rabbit hole of James Watson's scientific racism, where a few editors have a habit of removing any criticism even when well sourced, doing the same for other like minded bigots. Bringing me to your glorious edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=next&oldid=995850740#Unhelpful_comment
I laughed my head off, thank you for delivering joy right when I needed it most. Hope you are well.
BeardedChimp (talk) 01:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it. I hope joy continues to come your way whenever you most need it. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John C. Waugh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St. Johns College and American Heritage.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Remind me about this?
[edit]Hi BMK, long time. I see you commenting at various pages on my way-too-long watchlist, but one way or another, we haven't interacted for a while; I hope all is well with you. I remember something many moons ago where I came around to your way of seeing things regarding placement of maintenance templates, after starting out in opposition. I don't have much recollection anymore about the details, but the bottom line was that either I placed a maint. template on a page or someone else did, and then you removed it, saying (I think) that it didn't have consensus, or something similar. At first, I was bent out of shape, thinking anybody could place a template on their own say so, and someone else shouldn't remove it based on WP:WTRMT. Eventually, your reasoning won me over, and I've changed my view on this to more aligned with yours. Can you fill me in (again?) on your reasoning, and ideally, link me to some guidance? I find myself on the other side of the fence now, removing a MT placed by someone else, and it would be nice to recall what it is you said that persuaded me. Does this ring a bell at all? Thanks, and hope you are well. Mathglot (talk) 07:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: Sorry to take so long to respond to this. I vaguely recall the discussion you're referring to, but not enough to recall where and when it took place. There are a few older comments on my "Thoughts" page which may trigger your memory. In particular, this discussion from 2008 may be useful.Incidentally, I haven't changed my views in the 16 years since then, although I'm less inclined to make an issue out of it, unfortunately because the Wikipedia community's inherent intransigence and lack of interest in change often doesn't lend itself to consideration of how the project would benefit from small evolutionary adjustments; it seems that people would rather stick to communal authoritarianism instead. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 05:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Many, many years ago you uploaded an image of some loft buildings on Canal Street, with some notes about their history and architecture. It came in handy for an article I was working on, so I thought I might return the favor with a fun fact about its later history. The building on the left was the subject of a very famous experimental film called Wavelength, which uses as one of its main visual elements the building's tall, mullioned windows. hinnk (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's very interesting - I have an LP by Michael Snow in my collection, Music for Piano, Whistling, Mic & Tape Recorder, which I haven't listened to in years.Do you have a source that verifies that 300 Canal is the building used for the film? I'd like to add that information to the photo's file, but I generally like to have a source to cite. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hinnk: A belated ping to point you to my talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- An article by Jeff Reichert, from the online publication for Museum of the Moving Image. hinnk (talk) 04:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done, with a link to your article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hinnk: A belated ping to point you to my talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Augustus Baldwin Longstreet, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic Party, Republican Party and Reconstruction.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
I have reverted your recent changes to the James Longstreet article. I have identified the following problems:
Your addition that Helen Dortch Longstreet was a journalist appears to be unsupported by either of the sources attached to that sentence.
Removing the separate section header and subheaders for the Bibliography was completely useless. The citations and the bibliography are two separate sections and should be presented as such. Your change makes it more difficult to edit the Bibliography, is in my view also less pleasant to read, and accomplishes nothing. 3 The article originally said that the election of Grover Cleveland to the presidency in 1884 “ended” Longstreet’s political career. You changed “ended” to “interrupted,” implying that Longstreet would someday resume involvement in politics. This is false. Longstreet never held public office again. I also found the language “return of a Democratic administration” to be confusing, as Cleveland had never been president before.
Your version of the "Later life" section contains numerous excessively short one-sentence “paragraphs.”
You made numerous edits which interrupted source to text integrity. Basically, you broke up paragraphs and added citations to new sources (mainly the Varon book) but did not adjust the page numbers in the original citations. As a general rule, it is usually not necessary to add sources if a sentence is already reliably sourced. But if you are going to do so, and you make edits in a way that moves the original citations elsewhere, then you need to make sure that those citations stay attached to the information that they are supposed to verify.
I will restore some copyedits that I made, and I welcome you to re-add citations to the Varon book. But do not break up paragraphs in ways that are unnecessary, especially when that disrupts the citations. I would appreciate if you would also take note of the other statements that I made. Display name 99 (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will be restoring my edits, as the information is sourced to the Varon book, which you should read before making any additional reversions. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Bibliography is still totally editable in the "References: section. This style is frequently used on Wikipedia, and is not forbidden by the MOS. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please do presume to lecture me on how to edit Wikipedia. I've been editing for 19 years and over 60,000 edits and am well aware of how to edit. Your objections to format and style are noted and rejected as irrelevant. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- One can be a public figure without holding public office. Longstreet continued to try to achieve office almost continually after he stepped down as Marshall, so his political cafreer was not "ended". That is why the article already said that he went into "semi-retirement", not "retirement". Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please be cognizant of the dangers of WP:OWNERSHIP of articles. I mention this because I see indications of ownership-type behavior in your message above. You also do not want to risk being partially blocked from another page as you are from Andrew Jackson. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Any further discussions should take place on the article's talk page and not here and should focus entirely on the subject at hand and not on your attempt to school me on how to edit Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please be cognizant of the dangers of WP:OWNERSHIP of articles. I mention this because I see indications of ownership-type behavior in your message above. You also do not want to risk being partially blocked from another page as you are from Andrew Jackson. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- One can be a public figure without holding public office. Longstreet continued to try to achieve office almost continually after he stepped down as Marshall, so his political cafreer was not "ended". That is why the article already said that he went into "semi-retirement", not "retirement". Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please do presume to lecture me on how to edit Wikipedia. I've been editing for 19 years and over 60,000 edits and am well aware of how to edit. Your objections to format and style are noted and rejected as irrelevant. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Bibliography is still totally editable in the "References: section. This style is frequently used on Wikipedia, and is not forbidden by the MOS. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Because I clearly told you not to post here on this subject again, but to go to the article's talk page instead, I have deleted your comments without reading them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images from advertising campaigns
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Images from advertising campaigns indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal State of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pfalz.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)