User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions
→Stanley Holloway: new section |
|||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
The amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at [[WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Amendment request (October 2016)]]. The motion to open a case did not pass. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:navy">Mini</span>''''']][[User_talk:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:#8B4513">apolis</span>''''']] 19:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
The amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at [[WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Amendment request (October 2016)]]. The motion to open a case did not pass. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:navy">Mini</span>''''']][[User_talk:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:#8B4513">apolis</span>''''']] 19:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Stanley Holloway == |
|||
I've put a box on "your article". It's improved it no end. See what you think. Are will you tell me to f... off? No, you can't. I think your treatment of {{u|Caden}} and {{u|LaughingVulcan}} is shocking, by the way. Your friends will no doubt delete this. Give Corbett a nudge and tell him to stiop being uncivil of the MooorsMurders article. Or is your Burke and Hare murders article in direct competition with each other now? [[Special:Contributions/164.38.132.22|164.38.132.22]] ([[User talk:164.38.132.22|talk]]) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:20, 9 October 2016
...open here
|
|---|
|
Articles Lists |
You're red now...
...per your request at RFPP. If you decide to return, it can always be undeleted. Good luck with wherever you go from here, and perhaps we'll see you back sometime. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Pff, the world's gone to hell in a hand basket. That said, you do need to choose your battles more carefully. There is no doubt that you have been targeted on several fronts, with either baiting or grind down the key tactic. But....I hope you reconsider, I always respected your input and view on article work, and share (with many others) your more general concerns. You play a large role at FAC that we can ill afford to loose, and are a voice of reason....if you dont mind me saying...up to a point of red mist :) Anyway take a breather man, climb some trees, and maybe reconsider. Ceoil (talk) 22:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, your new red signature looks so much cooler, dude. Really stealthy, in fact.... Climb trees? hmm, why not try some Giant Redwoods?? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Well yes. Cassianto was always a gentleman to me and my collabs; reviewers of his ability and attention to detail dont grow on trees. Cass's retirement is a real blow, but at least we still have.....fly by night neebs, meta data, and peace and love on AN/I. Well done to those involved, for instilling and leading with such perfect people management skills; our core mission of CIV reigns pure! Ceoil (talk) 03:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, your new red signature looks so much cooler, dude. Really stealthy, in fact.... Climb trees? hmm, why not try some Giant Redwoods?? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Infoboxes ARCA
The amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Amendment request (October 2016). The motion to open a case did not pass. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 19:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Stanley Holloway
I've put a box on "your article". It's improved it no end. See what you think. Are will you tell me to f... off? No, you can't. I think your treatment of Caden and LaughingVulcan is shocking, by the way. Your friends will no doubt delete this. Give Corbett a nudge and tell him to stiop being uncivil of the MooorsMurders article. Or is your Burke and Hare murders article in direct competition with each other now? 164.38.132.22 (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)