User talk:Kimchi.sg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:54, 25 November 2006

User:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh/User page banner

Thanks.

Thanks a lot, you deleted an article for not having much info WHILE I was adding a bunch of new things. I really appreciate that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by J-Head (talk • contribs)

Resysopping??!

Yeah baby! Woohoo! Glen 07:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now let's see if any 'crats are online. :D Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 07:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Good to see you back around! You're a superstar at clearing backlogs; wish I could live up to your numbers -- Samir धर्म 04:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And from me too. Kavadi had me fooled on those RfAs. And congrats on the userpage. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. - crz crztalk 04:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's "that" referring to? My user page? :-) Kimchi.sg 04:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Lindsey Cyrus

Maybe you and I read the article differently. I saw four episodes, and unnamed roles that looked like she was an extra. Fan-1967 05:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I missed the mention of her father's show, and IMDB says she actually is a named character there. Fan-1967 05:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff moved from your userpage

Hi,

You have deleted our shool webpage and I am very unhappy about this. I would like to know why you felt this necessary considering we have the rights to all content from www.bisc.krakow.pl as it is our web page. And secondly could you please restore this ASAP.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreasHuntley (talk • contribs)

Specifying which article would be appreciated, thanks. MER-C 09:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it's British International School of Cracow. Kimchi.sg 09:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry about that. We as a school are still learning about your website. Can you please unprotect the page so that we can edit it in the future.

regards

Andy Huntley— Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreasHuntley (talk • contribs)

Request for undeletion of Context Sensitive Solutions

Hello,

I would like to request undeletion of the article on Context Sensitive Solutions. Here is the reasoning behind my request, which I also posted to the discussion page for the article:

"This article was deleted for a supposed copyright violation. However, the material in question is in the public domain. The lists that appear under the sections "Qualities of a CSS Project" and "CSS Principles" are generally agreed upon by transportation planners as defining the practice of Context Sensitive Solutions. They were originally produced at a conference sponsored by the state of Maryland Department of Transportation in 1998 and have since been reproduced online in several forums, including The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Carter and Burgess (a private firm), and dozens more that can be produced with a Google search of "Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design."

"In light of the consensus that has emerged around these principles (Federal legislation has referred to them as design criteria for the federal highway system, see SAFETEA-LU, Section 109.c.2.C), I believe it is justified and necessary to include them in this article. I have altered the citation format to make it clearer that the lists are not my words, and I re-directed the reference to point to the original document on the Maryland State Highway Administration website.

"Also, there is other material in this article besides those lists, which I believe should preclude full deletion."

Thanks for considering this request.

--Hobisfried 16:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your courteous reply. I appreciate your rigorous standards and welcome your suggestions. I realize that I have not met the burden of proof, and I would like your help understanding what conditions must be met to either prove that I have permission to use this material or prove that it is in the public domain. Since the source document is a PDF on the Maryland State Highway Administration website, would confirmation from a representative of that public agency be sufficient? I've already reviewed many pages pertaining to copyright protocol on Wikipedia, but I hope you'll be able to give an authoritative answer that will allow me to pursue a course of action free from doubt.

I understand that the most reasonable thing to do would be to find another way to convey the same ideas. However, the reason I'm resisting re-wording the disputed text is because my colleagues in the transportation planning field firmly believe this particular phrasing is intrinsic to the meaning of the term. Perhaps that stance is contrary to the very nature of Wikiedia, but I am trying to explore all available options to preserve the disputed wording before going another route.

I'm also curious as to why the entire article was deleted when the disputed text was only a portion of the whole. Is it possible to restore the remainder of the article?

Thanks again for your assistance.

--Hobisfried 04:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, thanks for your work expanding British International School of Cracow. Looks like you saved it from being deleted again – Gurch 21:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (once again)

Ah, that never occurred to me. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll be sure to check that in the future. —Chowbok ☠ 01:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Pijin

it is insulting that an article for a notable do it yourself band {I.E a none signed band that has been on three tours thus far including a european one,} such as the pijin can not be added to wikipedia. Yet I see many inifinitely more pointless articles littering the server that don't deserve to be here. The moderation of this site is bigoted and hypocritical in nature. I propose you allow this article to be recreated and I shall spend a little more time adding images and information so you can see that this act are actually notable and unlike your pre conconceptions not a piece of petty trivia.. Toxic Pijin have been around for three years they have a wide cult fanbase in both europe and England. They have produced four albums in this time period I am very insulted by the fact I create a user name, log in, start to create and article and it is deleted twice and before I can add my coding to it you decide to protect it so I cannot recreate it again and add my further editing. Also I find it very hypocritical to send me a message claiming I am not contributing when in all fairness I have tried to contribute but you have deleted it twice!

I apologise for swearing at you I was merely making a point not everyone has the time you do on your hands and I would appreciate it if you would consider that

thanks

Craigus— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

Ok I shall get back to you when it is ready thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

re: toxic pijin I notice that I can claim the completed article as notable under point 3 . Criteria for musicians and ensembles - Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in notable and verifiable sources. "There are, at present, no precise definitions of a "small", "medium" or "large" country in this context. However, a very limited definition of "small" will generally be used, excluding only a few of the world's smallest countries."

I therefore propose I produce links to reviews of their european tour last year and a scan of their media coverage. I have several reviews of their recent england "Oberon gisepe wemblequest" tour. I would also like to add that no other band in the world throws bread, brocoli, dog food at their audience and no other band has the balls to throw tabasco sauce in their eyes and express their pain through feedback and anger.. I am also sure no other band has songs about the number 27, tea breaks, ikea and preaching teachers who tell you to "get in the cupboard with jesus and think about what you've done". I admit I have a hard task ahead to convice you but they are worthy of inclusion due to the fact by their very nature the toxic pijin go out of their way to offend everyone. Excuse my spelling errors this keyboard is in poor condition. I shall get in touch— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

Amityville Horror theme music

I re-uploaded [1] as for some reason it was coming up as an orphaned file. The link from the article The Amityville Horror is now working.--Ianmacm 21:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Deletion project...

Thanks! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 14:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recently tagged Image:DisneyAfternoonGang.jpg with {{no rationale}}. However, the tag is only applicable to images which were uploaded after 2006-05-04. This image was uploaded 2005-07-28. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 03:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What a surprise...

...to see your name in the deletion log. Glad you never gave up trying for the bit. :-) Kimchi.sg 06:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. (By the way, your username change is going to be quite confusing). -- tariqabjotu 06:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Publimedia International

You deleted Publimedia International as {{csd-g11}}, which it was. However, I think the company is a notable Romanian publishing company, and it would be helpful if you could restore the article and turn it into something NPOV, if necessary by turning it into a stub. I wasn't the original author, but I was trying to expand another article written by the same author and saw your note on the user's talk page about the deletion of Publimedia International. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't start the article for scratch, since I don't know much about Romanian magazines. Could you restore that article, together with ProTV Magazin, Ce se intampla, doctore?, and DESCOPERA to my user space so that I can work on them there? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subiaco Marist Cricket Club

Jeffrey,

Thank you for the feedback (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subiaco_Marist_Cricket_Club, Nov 15). It is fair that the reader shouldn't have to take the author's word for it when the words "renowned" and "notable" are used. As such, these assertions have now been backed up by references to the 24 state championships claimed by the club and the 11 SMCC players who have represented their countries at the highest level. In terms of achievement and contribution to the sport of cricket, these criteria are more reliable than the number of Google entries.

Regards,

Richard Somerville— Preceding unsigned comment added by Somerof69 (talk • contribs)

Coffee Lounge MfD

Why was the Coffee Lounge deleted after only one day of votes? There's supposed to be about five days worth. Al e thiophile¹2₃ 18:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not protesting the deletion of the Coffee Lounge per se. I am protesting the unfairness of the MfD. It should not have been closed so quickly. I will request undeletion and a full, fair MfD. I will then go along with the result of that. Al e thiophile¹2₃ 02:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Several issues

Are you coming for the meetup on 24 November? Please do reconfirm your attendance at the meetup, as you told me that you are not going months ago. Regarding the AFD on Woodlands Civic Centre, please do consider merging the article into Woodlands, Singapore as this place is quite a huge building in a regional centre. Houses Woodlands Regional Library and other government facilities as well as shops. So do reconsider changing to merge it to salvage the article. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 03:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to help doing some assesment for Singapore-related articles? There's a page on how to do it, check the notice board and its subpages for more details. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 04:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have confronted my friends already. It will NOT happen in the next six weeks, and see how it goes. Those are in my personal userpage, and I will sort it out with them if that happens again. I don't want to go any further as my blood is boiling now because of some things that happened today. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 10:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libellous statements

There was a personal attack on the Arcadia 2001 discussion page. These statements are libellous and quite simply are lies. I notice you reverted the cleanup, why do this!? 211.31.127.128 18:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not spam

Sending a note to all users who participated in an earlier AfD does not seem to fall afoul of WP:SPAM. I have therefore restored the messages. JoshuaZ 06:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JoshuaZ. My intention was definitely not to spam anyone, but W.marsh's initial concern was that those who had voted Keep in the first round didn't know about the second, and the agreement we had apparently reached involved notifying them (thus my comment to Awyong and the two others). When the nomination went up a third time on procedural grounds, I thought it was only fair to re-notify the Delete votes as well. Believe me, I understand very well that it's bad form to go out soliciting for votes, and totally unacceptable to do it on random User_talk pages, but that wasn't what I was doing in this case (nor would I ever). --Arvedui 09:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I meant to say thank you to you, AJMS, for taking the time in setting up and listing the third nomination after my mistaken re-opening of the second one (a miscommunication between myself and W.marsh). Thanks! --Arvedui

untitled/unknown

Hi Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh....uh... why did you delete this page? --(this unsigned comment was made by 68.121.111.129 on 09:23, 20 November 2006 )

Vangelis & In the Heavyskies

Hiya, I have just noticed that you speedily deleted Vangelis (Buffyverse) & User:Mets501 speedily deleted In the Heavyskies (WP:AfD/Vangelis & WP:AfD/In the Heavyskies). I can see that at present they are not very notable since they are unlikely to see the light of day until at least 2007, and even then it will remain to be seen if they are covered by some notable sources. Would it be possible for the article to be put onto my user space:

User:Paxomen/In the Heavyskies, User:Paxomen/Vangelis (Buffyverse)

I put a lot of work into the articles, researching them on the web and writing them, and would be interested in using my work, on a Buffy wiki (e.g. http://buffy.wikia.com/wiki/Buffyverse_Wiki).

I would have saved the content myself for use elsewhere, but I was never informed about the deletions. Please could you help out.

Thanks -- Paxomen 17:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers tagged by sockpuppet vandal

Please be more careful when deleting images tagged with {{no source}}. A number of album cover images were tagged "no source" by a sockpuppet vandal User:Aujin66, but for the most part the source of an album cover is obviously the album from which it came. See the discussion here. If you could restore these images it would be much appreciated. The following is a list of just some of the images... the majority of images deleted on 19 November were probably similar, and between 200 and 250 were tagged by the sockpuppet on 11 November.

DHowell 23:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for restoring these images. DHowell 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Thanks for the note about the template, though it took me awhile to figure out what you meant, as I wasn't involved in its creation at all, merely providing an unwitting source for it. --Calton | Talk 00:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WiktionaryZ on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of WiktionaryZ. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Andres 01:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Movementarian's RfA

Thank you for taking the time to comment on my RfA. I appreciate your input and although I would like to be successful this attempt, you have a very valid point. Movementarian (Talk) 14:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

張圭陽

Hello. I notice you speedily kept 張圭陽. I just speedily deleted it, on the basis that WP:PNT aren't going to do anything with it, because Cheung kwai yeung (itself likely to be deleted) was already an English version of it. If my reading of the article is wrong or you disagree with this, please feel free to restore. Morwen - Talk 17:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of IRED page

Dear Salleh, I was not sure why my page( Iqbal international institute for research, education and dialgoue was deleted and protected by you. Can you please give me some information reagrding that. I will appreciate an early reply.Thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paada (talk • contribs)

Notable issue ???

thanks for your speedy reply, what i gathered from your reply is that the article was deleted because it does not show how the group is notable. well this page is about a think tank opertaing from paksitan and having President of paksitan as its Patron in Chief. and the institute is headed by world famous femenist theologian Dr.Riffat Hassan. I am yet in a process of adding the things and you have deleted it. i think first there should be some history of Institute and the purpose why this institute has been eastablished and after that we can add who is running it. An early reply will be highly appreciated again— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paada (talk • contribs)

Some Links

please visit some links about the institute http://www.presidentofpakistan.gov.pk/PRPressReleaseDetail.aspx?nPRPressReleaseId=903&nYear=2005&nMonth=2 http://pakobserver.net/200607/11/national.asp

and there might be many, and if you just googl Dr.Riffat Hassan you will find thousands of pages. Please let me know if you need any further information. So that i can contribute to this. An early reply will be highly appreciated yet again— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paada (talk • contribs)

Riffat Hassan to head newly eastablished Institute

Please visit following links to find Dr.Riffat Hassan's link with the Iqbal international Institute for Research, Education and Dialogue. Dr. riffat hassan is a women so it would be appropriate to mention her as HER instead of HIM.

www.powerofculture.nl/uk/current/2006/may/riffat_hassan.html www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_18-9-2005_pg7_45 www.newsline.com.pk/NewsDec2004/religion1dec.htm www.businessrecorder.com/index.php?id=494931&currPageNo=1&query=&search=&term=&supDate= www.gcu.edu.pk/Media2006.htm

Well about the brief deatil of Institute will you please let me know how much and what kind of detail you need.

I think we should communicate till we reach on a mutual understanding . As this is my first contribution to wikipedia ,I will appreciate if you people can guide me so that I can make some contribution to this community— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paada (talk • contribs)

Siqnatures

Sorry i forgot to sign my last query/explanation Paada 12:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)paada[reply]

Please advise me

I posted User:Xyz_or_die on the vandalism page and you deleted him stating that his last edit wasn't vandalism. So please advise me on what action to take. His last six edits have been identical edits to an article to stick an unfounded opinion in. The first time, it's an honest mistake, but he's done it at least 10 or 12 times now after repeated warnings on his talk page which he doesn't respond to and ignores every attempt to explain what 'opinion' and what 'documented fact' is. There is no evidence he will stop making the same edit over and over again. If he can't be banned for vandalizing, what action can be taken? Thank you TheHYPO 13:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: I do perceve it at vandalism. I do not, in good faith perceve it as vandalism in the first instance. I do perceve it as vandalism if they ignore repeated explainations on THEIR talk page (not the article's) that the content is not appropriate and simply make the same edit 6 times in a row (and several times before that). It's not a content dispute because there is no dispute - the person has made no communications, and if they did there would be no argument. An opinion "this song is similar to that song" has no basis on wikipedia - particularly without any citation. Nor is the fact that the same writer (who has written dozens and dozens of hit songs) happened to write these two, even arguably worth mentioning. The vandalism isn't the comment in itself. It's ignoring any discussion and repeatedly forcing it upon the articles. If I went into The Simpsons and kept writing "This is a really really great show, and the same guys created Futurama." in the lead, and ignored any request to stop adding that, I'd expect to get banned. TheHYPO 16:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A message from SupaStarGirl

I am sorry about my "vandalism" of the Afd page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States). However, I never intended to become a vandal, and just wanted to play a joke once.

I never intended to hurt anybody:

It was an obvious joke, and I only did it once.
The joke was done with intention that the entry was not serious, and that the article would not be deleted. Only true vandals would really want to delete the article on the United States.
The sentence "Non-notable place. Too few people." was not meant to be serious either. In fact, I'm from the USA!
AfD is part of Wikipedia, but not part of the Wikipedia encyclopedia. It won't give people any misinformation.
The most important reason: On Special:Contributions/SupaStarGirl, the joke is surrounded by real AfD votes and vandal reversions. I would never convert to vandalism.

I am truly sorry. Thank you. SupaStarGirl 14:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and P.S., your userpage looks exactly like your talk page. Some users do not have a userpage, and make their userpages redirects to their talk pages. At first I thought you were one of them! SupaStarGirl 14:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Block

Hello Jeffrey, my name is Robert Wecker. I'm a great grandson of Bruno Piglhein - mothersside. Josef Block was not involved in the paintig of the Jerusalem Panorama. Bruno Piglhein engaged nearly before opening the panorama, a student of him for helping Jos. Krieger in landscape paintig. The other assistent from the beginning was Karl Frosch, the perspective painter. Anyway I'm glad that you mention Bruno Piglhein as the professor of Joseph Block. Sincerely Robert Wecker-Piglhein— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.38.49 (talk • contribs)

Books

Hanseen Abdelnaby (AFD discussion)

You have, now. ☺ Uncle G 20:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'm currently undergoing an Editor review, and am trying to get a large amount of replies. I am sending messages to those who left me a message on my talk page as a way of getting the word out. I encourage you to add your two cents to the review! Thanks for your time, and Happy Thanksgiving! FireSpike Editor Review! 21:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use pics

Theoretically, we can use a whole pile of fair use pics of Ian Thorpe to describe historical races right? As they are "replaceable" as we can't go back in time? A few people are insisting on multiple pictures for the FAC.....Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like stuff from the BBC? and ABC? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as though in many articles on actors like Shahrukh Khan you can describe the subject in the actual event - like {some pic - SRK portrays the title character in Devdas}, so I think you could put a pic of {Thorpe competes in some event at a past olympics}. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought Quadell was pretty strict but it seems he has added a fair use picture to Grant Hackett which shows Hackett winning in Sydney 2000. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decleated

please consider my comments.

Respectfully,

Gbop 04:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Bad Dream

Thanks for clearing the page up a little bit, but it's a waste of time. This article has been deleted several times after a unanimous AFD[2], and is just being recreated by the User:Fluence, who is destructively precious about his low quality contributions. I've asked another sysop to help out with this, but he doesn't seem to be active right now. As you've turned your attention to the page, perhaps you could deal with the matter and with Fluence? He's been blocked for this sort of behaviour before, and certainly isn't hiding his intentions with comments like "suffer now Mekon, Mr. Scare, Richyard. Added back article. Reverted vandalism" (calling official deletions of his content "vandalism" is part of his overall pattern, and something that should be addressed, I feel) and "I told you stubborn: A Bad Dream. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!" (on my talk page). The Mekon 05:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ivy Goh Nair

Thanks for the advice on my talk page about removing the article Ivy Goh Nair from this Singapore talk page. I am learning something new everyday. I have left a note directing users to my talk page where the full discussion can be fully followed if anyone is still interested in this topic which is already over for some time.Ivygohnair 13:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd - 2nd nomination procedure?

Hi - I see you deleted The Fortunate Sons which I had attempted to do a second nomination for. I had nominated a previous incarnation of this article, although for a different, non-notable unsigned band. For future reference, can you tell me, or at least point me to, the procedure for nominating an article for a second time? Thanks. Camillus (talk) 14:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Bayesian Poisoning article is my own work!

Re: Bayesian Poisoning.

I wrote the article the you are referring to both the Wikipedia version and the original. I am the copyright holder of the original text and can decide what I do with it. I cannot change the version on the Virus Bulletin site to release if under the FDL because they are licensing that writing from me for their site, but I can put it on Wikipedia if I want to since it's my writing in the first place.

John.

Your edits to "A Bad Dream".

I'm not arguing about what I've said to The Mekon since all he has said to me in the past. I mean, let's not get involved in that. However, I MUST TELL YOU. The article about the single you've just deleted HAS BEEN CONFIRMED to be released as you can see here:[3] and here [4]. So if you can't believe me please visit these pages to see why I keep on reverting the article. So I'm just requesting the unprotection of the page to finally create the article. Please don't let the Wikipedia fail now.--Fluence 16:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Hope it works.

A Bad Dream on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of A Bad Dream. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.--Fluence 17:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your support and well, I didn't take "silly" as an offense so don't worry if you thought that ;). I hope this can be solved soon. I also thank you for showing me another thing about Wikipedia on the deletion review. I'll avoid making also crystal-ball articles in the future!--Fluence 01:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Really appreciate it: thanks. --HappyCamper 22:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting that page, and I'll remember to use that template next time. I first tried the Requests for deletion page, until I found out it's inactive. So MFD was the next thing that came into mind. My, my. There's alot of templates out there that I need to learn... --AAA! ^(AAAA) 06:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Why did you lock Do briefs stink?? from being re-created?? It's better if its just left redlinked. --NorwegianLiner 13:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I'm also User:SiobhanHansa as well. --Siobhan Hansa 13:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:52, 25 November 2006 edit NorwegianLiner (talk \| contribs) 2 edits A question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:54, 25 November 2006 edit undo NorwegianLiner (talk \| contribs) 2 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 343:		Line 343:

	Why did you lock [[Do briefs stink??]] from being re-created?? It's better if its just left redlinked. --[[User:NorwegianLiner\|NorwegianLiner]] 13:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)		Why did you lock [[Do briefs stink??]] from being re-created?? It's better if its just left redlinked. --[[User:NorwegianLiner\|NorwegianLiner]] 13:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

			::Note, I'm also [[User:SiobhanHansa]] as well. --[[User:NorwegianLiner\|Siobhan Hansa]] 13:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)