Talk:Natural History (Pliny): Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Natural History (Pliny)/Archive 1) (bot |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
== The fantastical animals described in Natural History. == |
|||
By modern standards would this bestiary of fantastical animals and other creatures would fall under Greek Folklore? Since Greek Mythology does not seem appropriate for various reasons due to the nature of this book. |
|||
Or should the creatures described in his works be considered a parody-like take on actual tribes and animals of the time? [[Special:Contributions/74.124.162.10|74.124.162.10]] ([[User talk:74.124.162.10|talk]]) 05:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:04, 6 July 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Natural History (Pliny) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Natural History (Pliny) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 28, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Natural History (Pliny) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Undiscussed move: propose revert
93 has moved "Natural History (Pliny)" to "Natural History (encyclopedia)", without giving any explanation. The new title is longer, less easy for editors to guess, does not name the author, and has no precedent in common usage, so it might be thought not much of an improvement.
A better title, more suited to the modern world, might be "Pliny's Natural History" or "Pliny the Elder's Natural History", both of which are used as names of editions (Philemon Holland's and Trevor Murphy's, respectively, for example), but the use of a genitive in a title is not much liked on Wikipedia, I therefore propose we revert the title to "Natural History (Pliny)". Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Natural History (Pliny). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170101063545/http://www.masseiana.org/pliny.htm to http://www.masseiana.org/pliny.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Natural History (Pliny). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328192743/http://www.pdmhs.com/PDFs/ScannedBulletinArticles/Bulletin%2015-4%265%20-%20Pliny%27s%20Arrugia%20-%20Water%20Power%20in%20Roman%20Gold-Mining.pdf to http://www.pdmhs.com/PDFs/ScannedBulletinArticles/Bulletin%2015-4%265%20-%20Pliny%27s%20Arrugia%20-%20Water%20Power%20in%20Roman%20Gold-Mining.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The fantastical animals described in Natural History.
By modern standards would this bestiary of fantastical animals and other creatures would fall under Greek Folklore? Since Greek Mythology does not seem appropriate for various reasons due to the nature of this book.
Or should the creatures described in his works be considered a parody-like take on actual tribes and animals of the time? 74.124.162.10 (talk) 05:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- GA-Class history of science articles
- Mid-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- GA-Class Latin articles
- Mid-importance Latin articles
- GA-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- GA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Unassessed Book articles
- Reference works task force articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles