Jump to content

Talk:2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tidy using AWB
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Indian English}}
{{Indian English}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject India|class=B|importance=Mid|bengal=yes|bengal-importance=Top|politics=yes|politics-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject India|class=B|importance=High|bengal=yes|bengal-importance=Top|politics=yes|politics-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Politics|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=B|ts=20191017202501|reviewer=Number 57|oldid=921775184}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=B|ts=20191017202501|reviewer=Number 57|oldid=921775184}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 08:41, 31 December 2021

Succession box for biography articles

Please use the Succession box for MLAs, MPs wherever applicable.

--Walrus Ji (talk) 10:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polls

Please do not add without using reliable sources. Twitter is not reliable. --Walrus Ji (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure the section on opinion polls was removed from the 2021_West_Bengal_Legislative_Assembly_election page. Each opinion poll had citations from reputable news sources. Moreover, I didn't create this section, I simply re-inserted this section from a previous edit, which had been removed without any reasonable explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdgmtl (talkcontribs) 20:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdgmtl: I had removed it as they were sourced to unreliable and questionable sources. Please do not add them back without discussing it here first. I have checked the links and I dont think they are reliable source. --Walrus Ji (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is what wikipedia says on "Reliable Source" from the link you cited. "News sources often contain both factual content and opinion content. News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact" How is an article from an established news outlet like ABP India not reliable? What you are doing amounts to vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdgmtl (talkcontribs) 21:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here are tw reliable sources, not twitter that can be used perfectly fine. I don't see any reason not to include the opinion poll with these sources referenced: https://www.thequint.com/news/politics/abp-cvoter-opinion-poll-west-bengal-assembly-elections-mamata-banerjee-bjp-tmc

https://news.abplive.com/news/india/west-bengal-election-2021-abp-news-c-voter-opinion-poll-results-who-will-win-wb-election-2021-tmc-bjp-congress-cpi-kaun-banega-mukhyamantri-1439913/amp Hindian1947 (talk) 00:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

www.thequint.com/amp/story/news/politics/abp-cvoter-opinion-poll-west-bengal-assembly-elections-mamata-banerjee-bjp-tmc Teerthaloke102 (talk) 11:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hindian1947, Teerthaloke102, Thanks for the links. Since thequint, a third party news site has cited this ABP-CVOTER Opinion poll. I think it would now be acceptable for me if ABP-CVOTER is included into the article. But I dont agree to including other polls. Let's see what others have to say. Walrus Ji (talk) 10:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add India Tv - Peoples' Pulse survey as on 24.03.2021 Subham1126 (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tv9 Bharatbarsh opinion poll data is incorrect. Please check and give correct info. Subham1126 (talk) 04:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add opinion poll of P-Marq (Politique Marquer) the only opinion poll to predict the Bihar election 2020 100% correctly. The same agency's opinion poll conducted in partnership with MediaOne was added for Kerala elections[1] https://twitter.com/pmarq_/status/1374954562621108225 http://pmarq.in/Default.aspx?catid=Mw== https://www.siasat.com/p-marq-survey-gives-edge-to-bjp-in-west-bengal-left-in-kerala-2115366/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnysterix (talkcontribs) 11:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Results

Many Users Want To Knew What Are The List Of The Constituencies Districts For Seeing Candidates,Past Results Etc...,

So I Recommend To Remove Hide Code For Results Dev Adhi (talk) 10:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Adhi, An article on the WP:MAINSPACE, should not have incomplete entries or empty sections.
If you want to add a table with list of constituencies, You can copy one from the List of constitency in West Bengal. It should not have empty rows about winners etc. if it was a WP:DRAFT then empty sections can be allowed. This is not a draft, so no empty tables. You can work on your sandbox at User:Dev Adhi/sandbox. Once you think it is ready, you can add it into the article. The table that is hidden right now should not be exposed as it has too many empty columns and it looks incomplete. Walrus Ji (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For Example In Us Elections They Have Kept Empty Tables With TBD

We Are Keeping TBD As Here Also.How Can It Be Called Empty Unless Results Are Declared

Results Column Should Be Used

Many Users Are Complainting About It In Twitter Or Some Social Media Accounts About Hide Out Of Results Column Dev Adhi (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Adhi, It does not matter what people say on twitter. There is no benefit in adding tables with empty columns.
I am open to you adding a table with only the list of constituencies Walrus Ji (talk) 11:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just added the list of constituency table in the article myself. Hope you are now happy. If you want to work on the table of results, you can do so on the talk page section below. Walrus Ji (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Should Be On Page Dev Adhi (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NO. Not until the table is completed. Please reach a WP:CONSENSUS by continuing the discussion
Dev Adhi, You said you wanted to include the table of constituencies. So I added it based on your request. Now I see that you have again restored the entire incomplete table, knowing that I had objected to the incomplete table. This is inappropriate behavior and editing against WP:CONSENSUS. Accordingly I have removed the entire table. We willl need to discuss this first. Please explain why you are adding incomplete tables here. This is not a WP:DRAFT version.
I have Moved the draft to your user space at User:Dev Adhi/sandbox. It was moved due to the incomplete tables. It is the latest version that you edited and Copy from 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. You can work on it and complete it. But do not copy the content unless it is complete. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New party in Bengal

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/elections/story/bengal-polls-abbas-siddiqui-floats-new-party-indian-secular-front-1761391-2021-01-21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teerthaloke102 (talkcontribs) 17:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alliances?

I feel I bring this up pretty much every assembly election:

  • Is there any indication that the 'Federal Front' is contesting the election? Does the FF really exist at present? Wouldn't it be better to just say "Trinamool and allies"?
  • Is the NDA contesting the election? Is there any reference that there is a NDA seat-sharing for the assembly election?

--Soman (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2021

182.66.26.234 (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — TGHL ↗ (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2021

Reformat and add below

Campaigning
Issues
Campaign controversies
Party campaigns
People’s Campaign

West Bengal is witnessing a brand new phenomenon – a political campaign led by people, which is reaching the farthest corners of the state. The campaign is known as “No Vote To BJP”. [2] [3] [4]

Party manifestos
Campaign finance

References

122.171.202.4 (talk) 14:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please refine your requested changes in your user sandbox. — TGHL ↗ (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TheGoodAndHolyLord:What to refine? Add empty sections and let others to expand. 122.171.202.4 (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@122.171.202.4:  Partly done: Added the "People's Campaign" subheading. If you would like to add to the other headings, reopen this request. — TGHL ↗ (talk) 15:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2021

Reformat and add below

Extended content

Campaigning

Issues

Campaign controversies

Party campaigns

People’s Campaign

West Bengal is witnessing a brand new phenomenon – a political campaign led by people, which is reaching the farthest corners of the state. The campaign is known as "No Vote To BJP". [1][2][3]

Party manifestos

Campaign finance

122.179.119.208 (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Too many blank sections. The one proposed sentence is not WP:NPOV.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 01:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Ghosh, Himadri (2021-02-28). "'No Vote To BJP': A People's Campaign in Bengal Reaches Remote Villages". The Wire. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  2. ^ "'No Vote to BJP' campaign launched in West Bengal". Muslim Mirror. 2021-01-07.http://muslimmirror.com/eng/no-vote-to-bjp-campaign-launched-in-west-bengal/
  3. ^ Roy, Biswajit (2021-01-05). "No Vote to BJP: Activists launch campaign in Kolkata before Assembly Polls". eNewsroom India.https://enewsroom.in/no-vote-to-bjp-campaign-kolkata-assembly-polls/

Trinamool Muslim candidates

There is a confusion amongst different news outlets about number of Muslim candidates from Trinamool. While The Hindu and Outlook says the number is 35,[1][2] Zee News and Siasat Daily says the number is 42.[3][4] Which one is correct? -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 15:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Singh, Shiv Sahay (2021-03-05). "Mamata to contest from Nandigram, announces TMC candidates for 291 seats". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
  2. ^ "In TMC's Candidate List, Muslims Are Down By A Third From 2016". outlookindia.com. Retrieved 2021-03-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ "West Bengal: 42 Muslims, 50 women candidates in Mamata's list of candidates". Zee News. 2021-03-05. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
  4. ^ "West Bengal polls: Mamata gives tickets to 42 Muslim candidates". The Siasat Daily. 2021-03-05. Retrieved 2021-03-05.

@Wbpollanalyst, Mrvl2009, Dev Adhi, and Agastya11: Pinging recent frequent editors for solution. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 15:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have to qualify candidates by religion? Especially, if there is uncertainty about the number, why not wait a bit until we have clarity among sources? --Soman (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voter Statistics data

Again, there are two different sources giving two separate sets of data.

Among the total electorates, 3,63,7,307 are male, 3,59,26,064 are female and 1,590 are third gender voters.

— The New Indian Express[1]

According to the revised list, there are 3,73,66,306 male voters while the number of women eligible to vote is 3,59,27,084. There are 1,590 members of the third gender on the list.

— The Indian Express[2]

What should we do? -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 07:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Election Commission releases final electoral roll ahead of West Bengal Assembly elections 2021". Indian Express. 2021-01-15. Retrieved 2021-03-08.
  2. ^ "Bengal: EC releases electoral roll, over 20 lakh names added". The Indian Express. 2021-01-16. Retrieved 2021-03-08.

Note : In the TNIE article, the male elector list is definitely looking dubious. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 07:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marxist Forward Bloc

Samar Hazra is a member of the Marxist Forward Bloc, a party that generally contests on CPI(M) symbol. Should we keep him listed as CPI(M) candidate or mention MFB instead? Any other LF candidates from minor parties? --Soman (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it is CPIM symbol, that means officially she'll be part of CPIM Legislative party (given if she wins). Hence should be named CPIM candidate. However a sidenote can be written that she's a member of MFB. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 15:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Candidates

Hi Wbpollanalyst ,
Please do not add candidates twice. There's already a dedicated section for list of all candidates. Thank you. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 17:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2021

Total Seats for Paschim Bardhaman & Uttar Dinajpur are wrongly mentioned as 10 instead of 9 under District wise Results Dkbanik (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simple counting in the article indicates that this is true. Leaving this to another reviewer. ~ Aseleste (t, c, l) 05:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: closing this, as the article appears to be correct. Please give reliable sources and someone else may accept your edit request. —Belwine (talk) 07:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-Belwine,You need Reliable sources! Please check Election Commission website, Paschim Bardhaman & Uttar Dinajpur both has 9 Assembly seats each.Please get your facts right.Even your seat tally in candidate list does tally with my claim.Am saying this with full conviction. Dkbanik (talk) 11:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even seat count for Jalpaiguri is incorrect stated as 8, should be 7 in 'District Wise Results' sub-section under Results. If you count all seat it comes to 297 when WB assembly has total 294 seats! Dkbanik (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you not correcting the info, with actual facts! Dkbanik (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2021

193 Saptagram contituency BJP candidate name declares just now the name of candidate is "Sayan Garai' Bjp sayan wb (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2021

In the past 24 hours, the heading "Opinion Polls" and all its contents were removed by a user. I paste below the info that was deleted by that user. Please reinstate that information as all the deleted information on the polls was well referenced. Thanks.

Deleted information: Date published Polling agency Lead Ref. NDA UPA Others 15 March 2021 ABP News C-Voter 64-72 52-60 0-2 4-20 [18] 8 March 2021 Times Now C-Voter 67 57 2 10 [19] 27 February 2021 ABP News C-Voter 68-76 47-55 0-3 13-29 [20] 18 January 2021 ABP News C-Voter 73-81 41-49 0-4 24-40 [21] 24.11.39.60 (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 02:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on ISF or RSMP

What should we name Abbas's party? ISF candidates are contesting on Envelope symbol of Bihar based RSMP.[1] Indian Secular Front or Rashtriya Secular Majlis Party? -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 09:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here on request from bot. Leaving as Indian Secular Front(ISF) with the note mentioning the borrowing/using another party's name and symbol works imo. I am not sure of the weight of Abbas or the party, and whether or not it should also have a mention in prose somewhere in the article. WikiVirusC(talk) 00:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ ঘোষ, প্রদীপ্তকান্তি (16 March 2021). "ভোটে লড়ছে না 'আইএসএফ', প্রার্থী দেবে 'অন্য দল'". TV9Bangla (in Bengali). Retrieved 17 March 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2021

Sujan Chakraborty (Legislative Party leader), Biman Basu (President of Left Front) and Surjokanto Mishra (State Party Secretary) are the leaders of Communist Party of India (Marxist) in West Bengal. Please change the infobox. Mohammad Salim is in national politics not state. 103.217.235.136 (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Melmann 21:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2021 (2)

Sujan Chakraborty (Legislative Party leader), Biman Basu (President of Left Front) and Surjokanto Mishra (State Party Secretary) are the leaders of Communist Party of India (Marxist) in West Bengal. Please change the infobox. Mohammad Salim is in national politics not state.

You can find many source with simple search. There is no source which will say Mohammad Salim is party head in West Bengal. It is just untrue, there is no source provided for it in the infobox. Please stop giving wrong information. Sources:

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/west-bengal-assembly-election-2021-big-crowd-at-left-congress-isf-kolkata-rally-seat-sharing-not-final-2380660

https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/bengal-assembly-polls-young-nominees-find-place-in-cpi-m-list-121031100743_1.html

https://www.thehindu.com/elections/west-bengal-assembly/west-bengal-assembly-elections-singur-to-nandigram-cpim-puts-faith-on-youth-leaders/article34039491.ece 103.217.235.136 (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Total Seats Incorrect in District Wise Result sub-section of Result section

Total Seats for Paschim Bardhaman & Uttar Dinajpur are wrongly mentioned as 10 instead of 9 under District wise Results Dkbanik (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Not done: closing this, as the article appears to be correct. Please give reliable sources and someone else may accept your edit request. —Belwine (talk) 07:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

-Belwine,You need Reliable sources! Please check Election Commission website, Paschim Bardhaman & Uttar Dinajpur both has 9 Assembly seats each.Please get your facts right.Even your seat tally in candidate list does tally with my claim.Am saying this with full conviction. Dkbanik (talk) 11:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Even seat count for Jalpaiguri is incorrect stated as 8, should be 7 in 'District Wise Results' sub-section under Results. If you count all seat it comes to 297 when WB assembly has total 294 seats! Dkbanik (talk) 12:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have myself corrected it. Thanks admin for changing the protection level of this page. Pls.ensure vandalism doesn’t ruin all the hard work Dkbanik (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leader details to be updated

On what basis Minakshi Mukherjee is being shown as leader of CPI(M). It needs to be updated.

Absolutely, only Md Salim name should be there. Subham1126 (talk) 10:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide reliable sources which support this assertion? Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2021

Add the opinion poll of P-Marq for West Bengal, this has not been added for West Bengal but it has been added for Kerala election 2021 West Bengal opinion poll 2021 TMC - 121-130 (Vote share : 42%-44%) BJP - 149-158 (Vote share : 41-43%) Left+ - 11-15 (Vote share : 12%-14%) https://twitter.com/pmarq_/status/1374954562621108225?s=20 https://www.siasat.com/p-marq-survey-gives-edge-to-bjp-in-west-bengal-left-in-kerala-2115366/ http://pmarq.in/Default.aspx?catid=Mw== Sunnysterix (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
SSSB (talk) 09:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2021

"Change Sabuj Roy to Sabuj Das". 103.21.127.79 (talk) 06:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done please provide a source. Ericfood (talk | contribs) 04:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong name of CPI(M) candidate at 92, Kalyani AC

Change Sabuj Roy to Sabuj Das[1] 103.21.127.79 (talk) 07:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, again, please provide a source. Ericfood (talk | contribs) 04:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thank you, I've changed Sabuj Roy to Sabuj Das. Sorry I just now realized you'd actually provided one. Ericfood (talk | contribs) 04:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Election Commission of India". affidavit.eci.gov.in. Retrieved 2 April 2021.

opinion poll

- 103.208.75.150 (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, sorry its unclear what you want done here.

EVMs and VVPATs found at a TMC candidate house

Request to update incidents subheading with this event-

4 Electronic Voting Machines and four voter-verifiable paper audit trail were found at a Trinamool Congress leader’s residence in Uluberia North constituency. [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tattva123 (talkcontribs)

checkY Done -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 18:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bahujan Samaj Party - BSP contesting West Bengal polls; should be included under Others section

Bahujan Samaj Party - BSP contesting West Bengal polls, should be included under Others section

[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkbanik (talkcontribs)

Please provide link for candidates contesting. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 08:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2021

Election Issue: SSC, TET not conducted for almost more than 7 years. No job created for educated people. 103.101.212.228 (talk) 03:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

☒N Not Done - Please provide reliable sources. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 07:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2021

Change the No. of seats in Phase V from 44 to 45 Starwood Folks (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 08:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Political Issue: Citizenship Act

Given the amount of size of the response and campaign surrounding it.[1] I think the section ought to be expanded. --Notbrev (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox two parties per line

As the page shows four major parties, it would be better to use 1, 2, 4, 5 in Infobox so that two parties would be shown per row, and that would look better and will not occupy a large part of the screen. More about the documentation: Template:Infobox election -- DaxServer (talk) 15:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For seat changes

In general, I think we do seat changes going off of how many seats the parties currently have, not based on their performance in the last election. So I'm going to be editing the article based on that. If y'all think that we should be using the last election numbers, explain why... I guess it's important to show that the BJP did a lot better from the last election, but seat changes are seat changes and they had 35 seats at the time of this election, so the number should reflect how many seats they gained. Jonaththejonath (talk) 21:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Someone just changed seat changes to the last election so can you fix that? C1MM (talk) 06:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Just fixed it.Jonaththejonath (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I checked the WikiProject Guidelines and they say to use the results from the last election. So I changed it back. I think it's really misleading in this specific case because of just how many defections there were but deferring to consensus. Jonaththejonath (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram Comment

Can somebody rename and add File:Svgfiles 2021-05-04-17-57-20-263306-1352875170146747404.svg to this article?

 Done- Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 07:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did we delete the left and Congress Party performances?

I think it's important to keep them because we need to show that they were wiped out/the BJP had big gains. That is very important for the narrative of this election (and both parties had sizable numbers before this election!). The account who deleted it mentioned something on the talk page, but I do not see that section. Jonaththejonath (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. The Sanyukta Morcha got about 9-10% of the votes (AIFB 0.53 CPI 0.2 CPI(M) 4.73 INC 2.93 RSP 0.21 ISF?), and thus by no means insignificant for the outcome of the election. --Soman (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If someone doesn't give me a good reason why we shouldn't keep the parties, I will add them back tonight. Jonaththejonath (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Result images

@Mrvl2009:. please use the svg images. If you create result images, please upload them as SVG version. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 07:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have brought back the SVG Map. But please rectify the color of TMC and change GJM to GJM (Tamang). Or else it will be mistaken as the unified GJM of 2016. Sorry for the mistakes. Thank you. Mrvl2009 (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please edit the image as I mentioned or else the image will remain misleading. And the GJM has to be edited. Thank you. Mrvl2009 (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2021

The votes secured by all the candidates are not updated and most of them are blank. Please refer to the Election commission Of India website to fill this up. Also add the third place finishes and the votes secured by these candidates too. A lot of other parties which took part in this election are not mentioned anywhere in this page. Please add them in the party wise result section along with their popular votes count. In the post poll violence section the Kolkata Police reports of fake news being spread should be written too. Thank you. 43.252.248.72 (talk) 10:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NOTA

How many people and how much percent of people voted for NOTA (None of the above candidates)? Please add data and graph for that.

13:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4060:2E98:BC21:7D9A:15A3:6F6B:8445 (talk)

Notably I saw there was NOTA button in this election.

Further read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/None_of_the_above

Post poll violence

Very little is mentioned in the page in the aftermath section about the post-poll violence that ensued and displaced many WB Hindus to neighbouring states. Expanding this or creating a new page about this would be a good idea as this is an important topic.

I concur with the above comment. Post poll violence is certainly an important topic and more information can be captured about it by expanding this page or creating a new page. There are several articles available on it online. https://theprint.in/politics/dragged-by-wire-head-smashed-hacked-gory-stories-of-post-poll-violence-in-mamatas-bengal/654407/. Details from the governer's visit can also be added to provided further information.:https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/what-i-saw-can-t-be-described-dhankhar-on-meeting-people-hiding-in-assam-post-polls-101621020781160.html

Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2021

180.188.247.94 (talk) 16:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turnout 82.32% there should be voter turnout, increase or decrease parameter, so i was trying to add that.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ben ❯❯❯ Talk 18:27, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting article

This article is currently the second largest on the wiki, with 546,365 bytes. After looking at the section sizes, the Nandigram controversy appears to be 181,888 bytes. Splitting the Nandigram controversy into a separate article would reduce the page size to 364,477 bytes. So I propose we split the Nandigram controversy section into a separate article. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 21:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blubabluba9990 - sounds good to me, feel free - it's been about a week without objection. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 21:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Blubabluba9990: Yes, splitting it would be great if a short summary about the same is provided for context. // Personally, being from West Bengal, I am surprised that we literally made the contents of the longest Wiki article. Lol. // ---CX Zoom(he/him) (chat with me|contributions) 17:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I would split it myself but I use a phone and I would need a powerful computer since my phone takes a few seconds to load the page itself.
@Blubabluba9990: I'd suggest that the section be split to the the page titled 2021 Nandigram controversy to avoid confusion with the 2007 Nandigram violence. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (chat with me|contributions) 15:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. As long as it gets split. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 17:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Page created at 2021 Nandigram controversy. I shifted some content and added some extra. Pls edit it as desirable.Asmitghosh3 (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Asmitghosh3:  Thank you very much! ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 17:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are we going to remove/condense the constituency wise results since an article was made from it? zsteve21 (talk) 19:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very generic term. Currently it speaks mostly about one election, and can be merged into the election article. Titodutta (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to an editor moving the page and changing the topic, I noticed the page and eventually moved it to 2021 Bengal post-poll violence, which appears to be supported by the sources. Original term is fairly generic and could become a disambiguation page if needed, but I've left it as a redirect. Since this page is so long, I instead merged 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election#Violence to the post-poll violence page. No prejudice against merging it back here, but it may be a notable topic on its own. —Ost (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]