Talk:Yahoo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:40, 23 January 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yahoo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 90 days

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Internet C‑class Top‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Internet culture C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Websites: Computing C‑class Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies C‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: San Francisco Bay Area C‑class High‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Stanford University C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Stanford University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Stanford UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Stanford UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Stanford UniversityStanford University articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2013, when it received 13,470,174 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Yahoo received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Yahoo! was mentioned on the Signpost on 3 July 2013

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

RM, Yahoo! → Yahoo, not moved, 30 October 2006 (discussion)
RM, Yahoo! → Yahoo, not moved, 13 April 2008 (discussion)
RM, Yahoo! → Yahoo, not moved, 15 August 2013 (discussion)
RM, Yahoo! → Yahoo, no consensus to move, 4 March 2015 (discussion)
RM, Yahoo! → Yahoo, not moved, 9 May 2017 (discussion)

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Is yahoo a web services provider ?

I think they are a news media company that edits stories to spin a narrative. Not allowing free speech and picking and choosing what you read makes them a tabloid news company with no ability for its readers to challenge their narrative PAPERS PLEASE

Merge Yahoo Australia, Maktoob and YahooXtra

These are international variants of Yahoo that are mainly just discontinued joint ventures and acquisitions. All they really need is a few sentences on the main Yahoo page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyanbox782 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree that the other articles are unnecessary and should be merged.
Support Indeed articles should be merged as they are international versions. DownTownRich (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose both, as both have independent histories and were collaborative ventures with respective national companies. Both pages are independently referenced, so notability isn't a concern. The Yahoo! Australia is extensively linked in article space and serves as a useful standalone for readers. So, the current structure is fine. talk:Klbrain (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree about the few sentences on the main page part, but like Klbrain said, they have independent histories, and so they deserve their own article, although a mention on the main Yahoo page could be a solid idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:81:C300:4470:710C:2147:A9DE:5E20 (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per talk:Klbrain. Emphrase (talk) 06:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2021

This edit request to Yahoo! has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Verizon Media - Apollo Global Management have successfully stuck a deal, and the parent company has now changed from Verizon to Apollo Jkbbumblebee (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Run n Fly (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

The Criticism section of this article is fully 2/3 of its current content, which seems to run well afoul of WP:UNDUE. It needs to be trimmed way down to the most notable examples instead of the laundry list of minor grievances currently there. ♟♙ (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give people about a week to respond and thereafter I'll just start boldly editing most of the stuff out. ♟♙ (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with trimming it down. — kashmīrī ^TALK 19:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updates in relation to spinoff

There’s a bunch of stuff in the info box (subsidiary, parent company, etc) that is outdated post the now completed semi-acquisition by Apollo. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2021/09/02/apollo-verizon-yahoo-name/1841630594905/

I have never gotten the hang of info boxes or I’d just fix, but wanted to ping others. CastAStone /^/(talk) 15:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 * '''Support''' I agree that the other articles are unnecessary and should be merged.
 * '''Support''' Indeed articles should be merged as they are international versions. [[User:DownTownRich|DownTownRich]] ([[User talk:DownTownRich|talk]]) 21:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
-:'''Oppose''' both, as both have independent histories and were collaborative ventures with respective national companies. Both pages are independently referenced, so notability isn't a concern. The [[Yahoo! Australia]] is extensively linked in article space and serves as a useful standalone for readers. So, the current structure is fine. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 14:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
+:'''Oppose''' both, as both have independent histories and were collaborative ventures with respective national companies. Both pages are independently referenced, so notability isn't a concern. The [[Yahoo! Australia]] is extensively linked in article space and serves as a useful standalone for readers. So, the current structure is fine. [[User:Klbrain|talk:Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 14:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * '''Oppose''' I agree about the few sentences on the main page part, but like Klbrain said, they have independent histories, and so they deserve their own article, although a mention on the main Yahoo page could be a solid idea.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:81:C300:4470:710C:2147:A9DE:5E20|2601:81:C300:4470:710C:2147:A9DE:5E20]] ([[User talk:2601:81:C300:4470:710C:2147:A9DE:5E20#top|talk]]) 17:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+* '''Oppose''' per talk:Klbrain. [[User:Emphrase|Emphrase]] ([[User talk:Emphrase|talk]]) 06:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 == Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2021 ==