User talk:Ellinewilliams231: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
::No. Your unblock request is a complete mess and [[WP:SNOWBALL]] would apply. For example, you are not eligible for the [[WP:SO|standard offer]] as you edited just a few weeks ago. For example, you abused the help-me template earlier this month, demonstrating you still don't know how to follow simple directions. I'm not going to close your unblock request, but it doesn't convince me you've understood [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] or the other policies. Just saying you have read the policies isn't enough, especially when you continue to demonstrate a complete lack of [[WP:CIR]]. I'm done here. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
::No. Your unblock request is a complete mess and [[WP:SNOWBALL]] would apply. For example, you are not eligible for the [[WP:SO|standard offer]] as you edited just a few weeks ago. For example, you abused the help-me template earlier this month, demonstrating you still don't know how to follow simple directions. I'm not going to close your unblock request, but it doesn't convince me you've understood [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] or the other policies. Just saying you have read the policies isn't enough, especially when you continue to demonstrate a complete lack of [[WP:CIR]]. I'm done here. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
@[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] |
:@Your right, [[User:Yamla|Yamla]]. Thank you very much. I already respect it in good faith and I will not ever to do that again to make editing disruptions in the near future. I am able to read and write English well enough. Well @[[User:El C|El C]], I will make an improving their behavior. I promise to put everything i have learnt from [[WP:RS]] into practice and adhere to the guides while editing or contributing to Wikipedia.[[User:Ellinewilliams231|Ellinewilliams231]] ([[User talk:Ellinewilliams231#top|talk]]) 13:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
==Unblock Request for April 21== |
==Unblock Request for April 21== |
Revision as of 02:33, 20 May 2022
Archives: 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020; 2021; 2022
January 2022
Hello can you add the missing show The Jack and Triumph Show on the Universal Television section on List of Universal Television programs please? 185.69.144.44 (talk) 07:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello can you add Alex Murdaugh: Death. Deception. Power. on the Universal Television Alternative Studio section in the television specials section on List of Universal Television programs please? And also add a source to it. 185.69.144.44 (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello can you add the missing shows Harlem and As We See It on List of Universal Television programs please? 85.255.237.43 (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Can you also add the upcoming show Bel-Air on List of Universal Television programs please? And also Fremulon and 3 Arts Entertainment never produced American Auto so can you change it to the right production companies and also make to add redirect links. 85.255.237.63 (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Freestyle skiing at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's halfpipe, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not mark someone as Qualified when its not officially qualified. Please be careful how you are editing especially on mobile. Swaggalicious (talk) 05:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may be blocked from editing. Please, don't do your own calculations, just like what you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. I had so much cleaning up to do after your updates. Also, could please use edit summaries? Thanks. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2021 Barangay Ginebra San Miguel season, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Mediawiki-button-preview.png/760px-Mediawiki-button-preview.png)
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup qualification (Asia), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding your own wrong information into articles. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
It does not make sense to add the delay now, de Jong is unlikely to hold the first position, and then all the delaye will be recalculated with respect to the champion.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Rivera.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Basketball
Hey, we only list the country when the game is not played in the country of the home nation. Kante4 (talk) 16:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
PBA 3x3
Could you make sure that your edits are consistent with the FIBA 3x3 website? Because I always have to do cleaning up your edits. Thanks. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Okay. I will edit the updates in real time. thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may be blocked from editing. Don't add qualification letters if it is not yet sure. You have been repeatedly warned about this. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2021 PBA Governors' Cup Playoffs bracket. I'm very tired of cleaning up your wrong edits. You have warned already but there is no change. Make sure that there are sources supporting your edits, not just doing edits based on your own calculations. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Stop disrupting editing next time
Decline reason:
This account is not directly blocked. Yamla (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
You just won't stop
Could you stop adding your own standings at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference? There is a source provided – use that for the standings and scores. Don't make up your own info. If you won't stop, I will be restoring my report at WP:ANI. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)- You really need to change the ways you are editing Wikipedia and you communicate, otherwise you will soon be blocked for an indefinite duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ymblanter blocked me for one day because of disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty is responsible for editing some pages related to basketball. Do not make disruptive editing next time. Thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 13:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're listing why you're blocked. We already know that. You need to tell us why you should be unblocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amazon Prime Video into IMDb TV. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Do make vandalism like did it next time. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- You're making up stuff again. One more time and I'd report you again to WP:ANI. You have been blocked but you won't change your ways. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- No way. last time, I was block by User:Ymblanter. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 08:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- You're making up stuff again. One more time and I'd report you again to WP:ANI. You have been blocked but you won't change your ways. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Minoa (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Indefinite block
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 09:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Don't make changes to vandals next time. Don't make misinformation like did to 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus § Airspace closures. Thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unclear what you mean. PhilKnight (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note that I decided to revoke talk page access following this nonsense. It read (in full!):
Don't make changes to vandals next time
— what does that even mean? But they managed to also add this right before I pressed the button. Doesn't matter. May well be just too incompetent, even to fully understand what's happening right now. Language barrier likely a major factor, but this is the English Wikipedia, so a decent command of the English language is required, at least when one makes contested edits to a contested topic area. El_C 10:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk page access revoked
![Stop hand](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/45px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
RE: email
Sorry, Ellinewilliams231, I do not respond to emails from users whom I don't know well. But as the message above explains, in order to regain talk page access for the purpose of filing an appeal of this block, you'll need to contact WP:UTRS. Thanks. El_C 13:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
is pending. Restoring TPA to request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Restoring TPA after asking first. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. TPA is restored. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please follow the instructions I gave at UTRS. You are moving with frightening speed back toward incoherence. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- the appeal was expired. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 06:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So a while ago I ran across a page with inaccurate information, which I tried to fix, but there were too many inconsistencies to fix so I rolled the page back to what it was before I had begun and gave up, but later found I was blocked anyways? So to make this very clear, yes I am hoping this block can be removed becuase I was blocked anyways despite rolling back the change as if I had never made it. I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and admins. I much better understand that, if a draft article that feels limited in scope an appears to paint a overly-negative picture, it is best for it to either go unpublished in the article space, or at least first go through other hands for review and revision first. I will attend future ArbCom elections in the near future. I contribute to the project with good faith was being that I proceed to make positive edits where I can. I am not making legal threats. Again, I'm just trying to help. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 11:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As noted below and as accepted by Ellinewilliams231, this unblock request is insufficient. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Ellinewilliams231, that you're trying to help isn't in question. But your unblock request, though a great improvement, is unfortunately still subpar. And kinda out there. Like, what does ARBCOM elections have to do with anything? (No such elections in the near future, btw.) So, although you're communicating much more cogently now (in drastic contrast to your prior comments), this request still fails to recognize the reasons why I blocked you or why I revoked talk page access soon thereafter. How you'd avoid it next time.
I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and admins
is very vague.
- Look, I don't need for you to grovel or anything, I don't want that. But there's too much WP:NOTTHEM in your request. Crucially, you need to firmly commit to curving the WP:BATTLEGROUND, and from this point on, to WP:COMMUNICATE comprehensively (i.e. readability) as a matter of course, even if it takes a lot more time to do. And, finally, to tie this all together, also communicate pertinently, responsively (i.e. relevantly). Thanks and good luck. El_C 13:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you El_C. Will accepting your request. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 03:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Yamla. Good to talk to you after 1 month. If so will you please take above one to the AN (or the appropriate one). Thanks!Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 04:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- No. Your unblock request is a complete mess and WP:SNOWBALL would apply. For example, you are not eligible for the standard offer as you edited just a few weeks ago. For example, you abused the help-me template earlier this month, demonstrating you still don't know how to follow simple directions. I'm not going to close your unblock request, but it doesn't convince me you've understood WP:BATTLEGROUND or the other policies. Just saying you have read the policies isn't enough, especially when you continue to demonstrate a complete lack of WP:CIR. I'm done here. --Yamla (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Your right, Yamla. Thank you very much. I already respect it in good faith and I will not ever to do that again to make editing disruptions in the near future. I am able to read and write English well enough. Well @El C, I will make an improving their behavior. I promise to put everything i have learnt from WP:RS into practice and adhere to the guides while editing or contributing to Wikipedia.Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Unblock Request for April 21
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading.
I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded.
Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciate Yamla's acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting the standard offer to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help! Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=To [[User:Deepfriedokra|Deepfriedokra]], [[User:El_C|El_C]], and others: I have closely reviewed the [[wp:GAB]] as well as [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]], [[WP:COMMUNICATION]] and [[WP:RS]] and would like to make a second Unblock appeal. As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading. I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded. Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciate [[User:Yamla|Yamla]]'s acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting the [[WP:OFFER|standard offer]] to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help! [[User:Ellinewilliams231|Ellinewilliams231]] ([[User talk:Ellinewilliams231#top|talk]]) 02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=To [[User:Deepfriedokra|Deepfriedokra]], [[User:El_C|El_C]], and others: I have closely reviewed the [[wp:GAB]] as well as [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]], [[WP:COMMUNICATION]] and [[WP:RS]] and would like to make a second Unblock appeal. As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading. I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded. Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciate [[User:Yamla|Yamla]]'s acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting the [[WP:OFFER|standard offer]] to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help! [[User:Ellinewilliams231|Ellinewilliams231]] ([[User talk:Ellinewilliams231#top|talk]]) 02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=To [[User:Deepfriedokra|Deepfriedokra]], [[User:El_C|El_C]], and others: I have closely reviewed the [[wp:GAB]] as well as [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]], [[WP:COMMUNICATION]] and [[WP:RS]] and would like to make a second Unblock appeal. As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading. I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded. Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciate [[User:Yamla|Yamla]]'s acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting the [[WP:OFFER|standard offer]] to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help! [[User:Ellinewilliams231|Ellinewilliams231]] ([[User talk:Ellinewilliams231#top|talk]]) 02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. No confidence at this time that the WP:BATTLEGROUND will be corrected, not to mention even acknowledged. The issues of WP:COMMUNICATION and WP:RS failures must be addressed if editing privileges are to be reinstated. Please take my appeal to the AN. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 03:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
is closed. It was unintelligible. Nevertheless, I have redirected user here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. My unblock request is posted above. Thank you @Deepfriedokra. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Help request
- Thanks for info
Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately.
The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code{{help me-inappropriate}}
on this page with{{help me}}
to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. - i'm waiting help for repeal restriction on my account
- please repeal suspension on my account
- sincerely
- Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)