Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

(add request · view requests)

User:Dandilero

• Dandilero (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I first applied for this rank on March 29 and on April 3 my request was denied^link because the pages I had created weren't yet reviewed and I was encouraged to apply again in three months. I know it has only been almost two months, but I'm participating in a translation contest for the Wikiproject Women in Red and I think having this rank would be very useful since I'm creating quite a few pages. Regards and sorry for the inconvenience. Dandilero (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 22:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

XTools is currently down. We shall come back to this request when it's up and running again. But I shall say that the messages on your talk page make this look promising. Schwede66 01:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I have reviewed many of your recent articles, and I don't mind continuing to do so. Some of them seemed to have a somewhat borderline notability. I think you'll benefit from the extra pair of eyes reviewing your creations. MarioGom (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Maybe some of the articles are a bit short, but that's because I'm participating in this contest in order to increase the number of articles about women on Wikipedia. Anyway, I think that all the articles I have created meet the conditions of notability. Dandilero (talk) 11:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done I suggest you look up dashes, MOS:DATEFORMAT, and MOS:DATETIES but beyond that, your articles are fine. And I don't know where this notion of "notability" comes from but it isn't by far the only requirement for obtaining autopatrolled. Essentially, your articles need to be "clean". And yours are, apart from the stylistic issues outlined. Schwede66 04:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

User:KittenKlub

• KittenKlub (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

KittenKlub is an experienced and productive editor - 495+ articles created - on Dutch and Belgian subjects. All those I've seen have been good clean articles, and newly written rather than translations. Ingratis (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Wallflowernepal

• Wallflowernepal (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

They've created 100 plus articles in English Wikipedia out of which only 4 was deleted. (I am not connected to this user). Fade258 (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Fade258 is CU-blocked. No comment on Wallflowernepal, who appears to have nothing to do with this other then a similar content area. (Non-administrator comment) casualdejekyll 19:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

 Not done without prejudice to reapplication if someone other than a CU-blocked editor wants to nominate them. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Dallez

• Dallez (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have successfully made over 100 edits in the community making me more experienced to be granted the permission to make more edits Dallez (talk) 08:43, 5 June 2022 (UTC)