User talk:ELindas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:58, 28 June 2022

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, ELindas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Context (festival)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Context (festival), ELindas!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boris of Tver

Hello! Thanks for your work on the article. However, when you translate an article, even partially, you should put a Template:Translated page completed in the talk page of the translated article. Veverve (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you!—ELindas (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria of Borovsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fontanka Embankment moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fontanka Embankment, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fontanka Embankment has been accepted

Fontanka Embankment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Solovetsky Stone (Saint Petersburg)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Solovetsky Stone (Saint Petersburg) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Solovetsky Stone (Saint Petersburg)

The article Solovetsky Stone (Saint Petersburg) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Solovetsky Stone (Saint Petersburg) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I recently found the Typhoid Mary article, and was struck by how easy and engaging it was to read. I can see that you've done a lot of work on it, and I wanted to thank you. Perhaps it can be a candidate for a Good article! Cloud atlas (talk) 05:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus related business people article creation

Hi, ELindas I have started working on an article about businessmen from Belarus, after a brief research, I found that in the early years he has been connected with Viktor Prokopenya through Viaden Media. It's my first article so I'm looking for facilitation from more experienced authors who has relations to Belarusian businessman's articles to avoid doubt mistakes during creation. I'm going to create a new article at Special:Mypage/Nameofbusinessman so other editors can help me. So, what info should I provide you so you can check if you are interested to participate in it? User cruiser Ben (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I think you'd better make a draft (in User:User cruiser Ben/Draft), this way it would be easier for other editors to read it. When I'll have time I'll also go and take a look! ELindas (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I prepared a draft User:User cruiser Ben/Ivan Montik, selected the most relevant sources. Those in which I doubt, I left in external links until I finish the work on the article. I am waiting for your feedback and facilitation.User cruiser Ben (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hi again! I’ve looked through your draft! In my opinion, the reviewers might say that the section ‘Provably fair system in gaming‘ can be simply moved into the article about SoftSwiss, and that the section ‘Press and media freedom’ merely adds some facts to his biography, not really adding weight to notability. The main issue is with the sources. All that I see in References and External links, they are either Montik’s interviews, or briefly mention him. According to the Wiki rules, interviews of a person cannot be used as main sources of information. The reviewers will almost for sure recommend you to find independent articles, something fully dedicated to Montik and his business, not from the man himself. Unfortunately, only the fact that his company is notable is not enough.
    - Thanks for your facilitation. Can you please show examples of fully dedicated-to-person articles, for example, Prokopenya? It will help me to understand chances to finish the article in this life xD User cruiser Ben (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      - Hi again! Sorry, took me some time xD You see, articles' volume and structure depend on the personality and its biography. It can't be long if a person hasn't lots of media coverage. As an example of an article I can recommend you Sequoia Capital, Don Valentine, or Douglas Leone. They are compact, but thorough and well-structured. Speaking about sources, you can refer to 1 & 2. If there are only interviews, one from a reliable respected publication might serve as well (like this).

Some baklava for you!

Hi thanks for creating Church of the Immaculate Conception of Saint Virgin Mary (Babruysk). It’s a requirement of Wikipedia that when material is reused from one wiki to another, proper attribution is given for copyright reasons. If you’re translating material from another wiki you should state thus in your first edit summary. I can add a translation template to the article talk page if you can let me know what material you reused or translated. Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 08:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for the information, will know! I've added the template {translated page to the article's Talk. However, in fact it has maybe two phrases from the text from ru-wiki, all I've written is from the source articles about the church.--ELindas (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Chanel article

Hello! I see you have made some recent edits to the Chanel page. Would you be able to help me make some factual changes due to a COI?

I have put the request in the Talk section. Their HQ has moved from France to London and this is showing incorrectly in the infobox. Let me know if that is possible to correct? Thanks in advance. Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I've added two more relevant sources and corrected the infobox.--ELindas (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much ELindas for correcting Chanel's HQ location and adding the two extra sources. Are you also able to help make two more factual corrections in the infobox? Leena Nair should be called Global CEO, and the industry should be changed to Luxury Goods which would align this article with that of Dior. Hoping this is an easy change and many thanks in advance. Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done! ELindas (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! Can you help explain one more thing if there a reason why we can't change the industry to Luxury goods? I know it is referenced as Packaged goods on Forbes and that is being listed as a source, however Forbes only have limited categories to list industries and this is the closest they have but still inaccurate for Chanel. Is this possible to change or do we need to find a different source? Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 10:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've put 'luxury goods' in the infobox on March 30. Someone has just reverted my edit and left no comment, why, so I can't really tell you... Maybe the user RenatUK, to whom to talked here, can help? —ELindas (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Belarusian constitutional referendum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TJ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vadim Fedotov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vadim Fedotov, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadim Fedotov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Church of St. Charles Borromeo, Pinsk

Hello, ELindas,

Thank you for creating Church of St. Charles Borromeo, Pinsk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The ISBN for Gabrus T.V. is incorrect. Please supply correct ISBN

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ELindas

Thank you for creating Kira Kovalenko.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ELindas

Thank you for creating Alexander Auzan.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Chanel article

Hello ELindas - I see you recently updated some out of date information on the Chanel article. I have a conflict of interest with Chanel and I can see there are more out of date stats in the infobox following Chanel's latest financial results. Do you have time to help make some changes again please? I have added a change request to the Talk page. Many thanks in advance.

@@ Line 155: / Line 155: @@
 <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
+== Edits on Chanel article ==
+Hello [[User:ELindas| ELindas]] - I see you recently updated some out of date information on the [[Chanel|Chanel]] article. I have a conflict of interest with Chanel and I can see there are more out of date stats in the infobox following Chanel's latest financial results. Do you have time to help make some changes again please? I have added a change request to the Talk page. Many thanks in advance.